Association of a Gamified Journal Club on Internal Medicine Residents' Engagement and Critical Appraisal Skills.

Background: Prior literature demonstrates internal medicine residents have suboptimal competence in critical appraisal. Journal clubs are a common intervention to address this skill, but engagement and critical appraisal skill improvement are variable. Objective: We evaluated journal club engagement and critical appraisal skills after implementation of a gamified format. Methods: This was a single-arm study, conducted from July 1, 2020 to June 30, 2021, involving internal medicine residents at 2 US programs. Residents participated in a 12-month gamified journal club that sorted residents into 2 teams. Residents attended an orientation followed by 6 to 10 monthly, hour-long competitions. In each competition, a subset of the resident teams competed to answer a clinical prompt by critically appraising an original article of their choice. A chief medical resident or faculty member moderated each session and chose the winning team, which received a nominal prize of candy. The primary outcome was engagement, measured by a 7-question survey developed de novo by the authors with Likert scale responses at baseline and 12 months. The secondary outcome was critical appraisal skills assessed by the Berlin Questionnaire. Results: Sixty-one of 72 eligible residents (84.7%) completed both engagement surveys. Residents reported statistically significant improvements in most dimensions of engagement, including a higher likelihood of reading articles before sessions (posttest minus pretest score -1.08; 95% CI -1.34 to -0.82; P<.001) and valuing time spent (posttest minus pretest score -0.33; 95% CI -0.55 to -0.11; P=.004). Critical appraisal skills marginally improved at 12 months (posttest minus pretest score -0.84; 95% CI -1.54 to -0.14; P=.02). Conclusions: Our study demonstrates a gamified journal club was associated with improvements in engagement and minimal change in critical appraisal skills.

Mycobacterium tuberculosis concealed by enterococcal sacroiliitis.

A 77-year-old African American female with rheumatoid arthritis presented with fever and unsteady gait. She was started on broad-spectrum antimicrobials due to CT evidence for sacroiliitis and psoas abscess and underwent partial excision of her sacroiliac bone and drainage of the abscess. One of four blood cultures grew Enterococcus faecalis and the patient was sent home with intravenous ampicillin for 6 weeks. Two days after antimicrobial completion, the patient presented with night sweats and weakness. Chest x-ray revealed new right upper lobe pulmonary infiltrates, and the AFB culture sent during her prior admission returned positive for TB. RIPE therapy with moxifloxacin was initiated. Although she responded well to treatment, she retained functional immobility. We report a case of musculoskeletal TB initially misdiagnosed as enterococcus sacroiliitis, resulting in a delayed initiation of anti-tuberculous therapy. A high index of suspicion and rapid detection with TB-PCR testing should be considered to avoid delayed diagnosis.

An Ethical Conflict Between Parents and Clinician in a Child with a Language Delay.

CASE: A developmental-behavioral pediatrician evaluated a 2-year-old child for developmental delays. He determined that the child had mild expressive language delays; the child had an intelligible vocabulary of 20 words and at least 20 other words that he said unclearly. He said a few contracted 2-word phrases, such as "gimme" and "its ok." He was shy and generally clung to his parents who spoke softly and very little. His development in all other domains was normal. Hearing evaluation and the neurological examination were normal.The pediatrician provided suggestions to the parents in order to stimulate language and scheduled a follow-up appointment in 3 months. The parents asked him to refer the child for early intervention and write a letter to the US Immigration and Naturalization Service. They asked that the letter state that the child had a disabling condition and returning the child and his family to their country of origin would cause permanent harm to the child. The parents then gave the pediatrician a draft of a letter that had been prepared by an immigration lawyer.The physician explained to the parents that the child had a mild expressive language delay and that he would like to see the child again in 3 months before deciding on early intervention. He advised them to obtain a copy of his medical note from the medical records department. The parents insisted that he write the letter and got upset and called him "heartless" when the physician refused to write the letter.

An ethical conflict between parents and clinician in a child with a language delay.

CASE: A developmental-behavioral pediatrician evaluated a 2-year-old child for developmental delays. He determined that the child had mild expressive language delays; the child had an intelligible vocabulary of 20 words and at least 20 other words that he said unclearly. He said a few contracted 2-word phrases, such as "gimme" and "its ok." He was shy and generally clung to his parents who spoke softly and very little. His development in all other domains was normal. Hearing evaluation and the neurological examination were normal. The pediatrician provided suggestions to the parents in order to stimulate language and scheduled a follow-up appointment in 3 months. The parents asked him to refer the child for early intervention and write a letter to the US Immigration and Naturalization Service. They asked that the letter state that the child had a disabling condition and returning the child and his family to their country of origin would cause permanent harm to the child. The parents then gave the pediatrician a draft of a letter that had been prepared by an immigration lawyer.The physician explained to the parents that the child had a mild expressive language delay and that he would like to see the child again in 3 months before deciding on early intervention. He advised them to obtain a copy of his medical note from the medical records department. The parents insisted that he write the letter and got upset and called him "heartless" when the physician refused to write the letter.