Very late stent thrombosis associated with COVID-19 infection: a case report and review of the literature.

Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19), caused by SARS-CoV-2 has varied manifestation with multisystem involvement. Acute coronary syndrome in COVID-19 as a result of stent thrombosis is an uncommon entity and is often due to hypercoagulable state. A 40-year-old male was referred to us with acute onset chest pain. He also reported fever, sore throat and dry cough for six days which mandated testing for COVID-19 which turned out to be positive. He had a prior history of coronary artery disease with a drug eluting stent implanted two years back. An electrocardiogram was suggestive of acute anterior wall myocardial infarction while echocardiogram revealed hypokinesia of left anterior descending (LAD) artery territory. Coronary angiogram revealed non-occlusive thrombus in proximal LAD stent. A Thrombolysis in Myocardial Infarction (TIMI) III flow was restored following balloon angioplasty with a non-compliant balloon and use of glycoprotein (GP) IIb-IIIa receptor antagonist. A diagnosis of very late stent thrombosis subsequent to COVID-19 was made.

Association of Lung Ultrasound Scores With Different Modes of Respiratory Support and Clinical Outcomes: An Observational Study in a Tertiary Care Neonatal Unit.

BACKGROUND: Lung ultrasound (LUS) is an evolving point-of-care tool in the neonatal intensive care unit. LUS score has been evaluated in adults as well as in neonates to characterize and diagnose various respiratory conditions. Recently, the LUS score has been evaluated for predicting clinical respiratory outcomes in neonates. OBJECTIVE: To assess the association between LUS score and various modes of respiratory support and clinical outcomes among neonates presenting with respiratory distress. METHODS: In this prospective, cross-sectional, observational study done in a tertiary care neonatal unit, the LUS score was calculated within three hours of receiving respiratory support. Subsequently, the LUS score was assigned with each escalation and de-escalation of respiratory support. Maximum LUS scores for each clinical outcome were also recorded. Inter-rater agreement was determined with the intraclass correlation coefficient. RESULT: A total of 162 LUS scans were performed in 65 babies with a mean gestation of 32.4 ± 3.7 weeks and median (IQR) birth weight of 1480 (1130-2000) grams. The LUS scores (median (IQR)) of babies on continuous positive airway pressure (CPAP), noninvasive positive pressure ventilation (NIPPV), and mechanical ventilation (MV) were 4 (3-6.5), 9 (8-11), and 12 (11-13.5), respectively (p-value < 0.001). The difference in maximum median LUS scores between different clinical outcomes was statistically significant, with a p-value < 0.001. LUS score had an excellent inter-rater agreement (intraclass correlation coefficient = 0.998; p-value < 0.001). CONCLUSION: There is an association between LUS score and different modes of respiratory support with scores increasing as the level of support increased. LUS score was also found to be related with clinical outcomes like death, extubation failure, and recovery, which could help in predicting the prognosis.

Barriers and enablers of breastfeeding in mother-newborn dyads in institutional settings during the COVID-19 pandemic: A qualitative study across seven government hospitals of Delhi, India.

Introduction: The COVID-19 pandemic disrupted newborn care and breastfeeding practices across most healthcare facilities. We undertook this study to explore the barriers and enablers for newborn care and breastfeeding practices in hospitals in Delhi, India for recently delivered mother (RDM)-newborn dyads during the first wave of the COVID-19 pandemic (2020) and inductively design a "pathway of impaction" for informing mitigatory initiatives during the current and future pandemics, at least in the initial months. Materials and methods: We used an exploratory descriptive design (qualitative research method) and collected information from seven leading public health facilities in Delhi, India. We conducted separate interviews with the head and senior faculty from the Departments of Pediatrics/Neonatology (n = 12) and Obstetrics (n = 7), resident doctors (n = 14), nurses (labor room/maternity ward; n = 13), and RDMs (n = 45) across three profiles: (a) COVID-19-negative RDM with healthy newborn (n = 18), (b) COVID-19-positive RDM with healthy newborn (n = 19), and (c) COVID-19 positive RDM with sick newborn needing intensive care (n = 8) along with their care-giving family members (n = 39). We analyzed the data using grounded theory as the method and phenomenology as the philosophy of our research. Results: Anxiety among clients and providers, evolving evidence and advisories, separation of the COVID-positive RDM from her newborn at birth, providers' tendency to minimize contact duration and frequency with COVID-positive mothers, compromised counseling on breastfeeding, logistic difficulties in expression and transportation of COVID-positive mother's milk to her baby in the nursery, COVID restrictions, staff shortage and unavailable family support in wards and nursery, and inadequate infrastructure were identified as major barriers. Keeping the RDM-newborn together, harmonization of standard operating procedures between professional associations and within and between departments, strategic mobilization of resources, optimization of human resources, strengthening client-provider interaction, risk triaging, leveraging technology, and leadership-in-crisis-situations were notable enablers. Conclusion: The separation of the RDM and newborn led to a cascade of disruptions to newborn care and breastfeeding practices in the study institutions. Separating the newborn from the mother should be avoided during public health emergencies unless there is robust evidence favoring the same; routine institutional practices should be family centered.