[Updates in emergency medicine]. / Médecine d'urgence.

In 2021, emergency medicine has been impacted by the Covid19 pandemic. The repercussions were both on clinical and scientific aspects specific to our discipline. For this special issue, we have chosen not to insist on the pandemic but to return to some fundamentals of our discipline: cardiovascular emergencies remain the leading cause of death in the world and the aspects of risk stratification of pathologies such as acute coronary syndromes or neurovascular attack remain a daily issue within the framework of the strategies of management and investigation in emergency medicine. In addition, the consideration of alternative treatments in the context of pathologies, ranging from cannabis consumption to cardiac arrest and atrial fibrillation, also remains a daily challenge.

En 2021, la médecine d'urgence a été impactée par la pandémie Covid19. Les répercussions ont autant été cliniques que sur la recherche scientifique spécifique à notre discipline. Pour ce numéro spécial, nous avons fait le choix de ne pas insister sur la pandémie, mais de revenir à certains fondamentaux de notre discipline : l'urgence cardiovasculaire reste la première cause de mortalité dans le monde. Les aspects de stratification du risque pour ces pathologies, telles que les syndromes coronariens aigus ou les AVC, sont toujours un enjeu quotidien dans le cadre des stratégies de prise en charge et d'investigation en urgence. Par ailleurs, la prise en compte d'alternatives thérapeutiques dans des pathologies très variées, allant de la consommation de cannabis à l'arrêt cardiaque en passant par la fibrillation auriculaire, reste également un enjeu au quotidien.

Factors Influencing Physician Decision Making to Attempt Advanced Resuscitation in Asystolic Out-of-Hospital Cardiac Arrest.

The objective of this study was to identify the key elements used by prehospital emergency physicians (EP) to decide whether or not to attempt advanced life support (ALS) in asystolic out-of-hospital cardiac arrest (OHCA). From 1 January 2009 to 1 January 2017, all adult victims of asystolic OHCA in Geneva, Switzerland, were retrospectively included. Patients with signs of "obvious death" or with a Do-Not-Attempt-Resuscitation order were excluded. Patients were categorized as having received ALS if this was mentioned in the medical record, or, failing that, if at least one dose of adrenaline had been administered during cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR). Prognostic factors known at the time of EP's decision were included in a multivariable logistic regression model. Included were 784 patients. Factors favourably influencing the decision to provide ALS were witnessed OHCA (OR = 2.14, 95% CI: 1.43-3.20) and bystander CPR (OR = 4.10, 95% CI: 2.28-7.39). Traumatic aetiology (OR = 0.04, 95% CI: 0.02-0.08), age > 80 years (OR = 0.14, 95% CI: 0.09-0.24) and a Charlson comorbidity index greater than 5 (OR = 0.12, 95% CI: 0.06-0.27) were the factors most strongly associated with the decision not to attempt ALS. Factors influencing the EP's decision to attempt ALS in asystolic OHCA are the relatively young age of the patients, few comorbidities, presumed medical aetiology, witnessed OHCA and bystander CPR.