Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 2 de 2
Filtrar
Mais filtros

Base de dados
Ano de publicação
Tipo de documento
País de afiliação
Intervalo de ano de publicação
1.
Ann Oncol ; 24(4): 1073-8, 2013 Apr.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-23136235

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Health-related quality-of-life (HRQOL) assessments in research and clinical oncology settings are increasingly important. HRQOL instruments need to be rapid and still maintain the ability to capture the most relevant patient issues in a valid and reliable manner. The current study develops and validates the FACT-G7, a rapid version of the Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy-General (FACT-G). PATIENTS AND METHODS: Oncology patients with advanced cancer (N = 533) from 11 diseases sites ranked the symptoms and concerns they viewed as 'the very most important' when undergoing cancer treatment, completed the FACT-G, and additional HRQOL measures. Oncology patients' scores were referenced across a general US population sample (N = 2000). RESULTS: We selected the highest priority cancer-related symptoms and concerns endorsed by patients for inclusion in the FACT-G7. Fatigue and ability to enjoy life were ranked the most highly. The results provide preliminary support for the FACT-G7's internal consistency reliability (α = 0.74) and validity as evidenced by moderate-to-strong relationships with expected criteria. The references for the general population are summarized. CONCLUSIONS: The FACT-G7 can be used to assess top-rated symptoms and concerns for a broad spectrum of advanced cancers in clinical practice and research.


Assuntos
Fadiga/epidemiologia , Oncologia , Neoplasias/epidemiologia , Qualidade de Vida , Adulto , Idoso , Idoso de 80 Anos ou mais , Fadiga/patologia , Feminino , Humanos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Estadiamento de Neoplasias , Neoplasias/tratamento farmacológico , Neoplasias/patologia , Inquéritos e Questionários
2.
Int J Behav Med ; 6(3): 241-54, 1999.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-16250678

RESUMO

This study investigated the utility of 3 pretransplant psychological variables (affective functioning, compliance, social support stability) in predicting subsequent bone marrow transplantation (BMT) health outcomes. The pre-BMT psychological evaluations of 92 BMT recipients were coded along the specified psychological dimensions and used to predict post-BMT survival status and health-related quality of life. Data analyses showed that, in addition to medical risk status (low) and quality of the marrow graft (histocompatible), higher levels of pre-BMT affective functioning and social support stability significantly predicted survival status (i.e., alive) and higher levels of quality of life. These findings have important implications for the role of psychological assessment prior to BMT and the need for interventions designed to enhance psychological functioning and subsequent health outcomes following BMT.

SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA