The modulation of task relevance on emotion-induced blindness depends on whether targets and distractors belong to the same category.

Previous research on emotion-induced blindness (EIB) argues emotional distractors capture attention in a bottom-up manner due to their physical and emotional salience. However, recent research has shown it is controversial whether EIB will be modulated by top-down factors. The present study further investigated whether the magnitude of EIB would be modulated by top-down factors, specifically the emotional relevance between tasks and distractors. Participants were divided into two groups having the same targets except for different task instructions. The orientation judgment group was asked to judge the orientation of the target (an emotionally irrelevant task), and the emotion judgment group was required to judge the emotional valence of the target (an emotionally relevant task). It was found the emotional relevance between tasks and distractors has no modulation on the magnitudes of EIB in two groups when targets and distractors are from different categories (Experiment 1), but a modulation when they are from the same category (Experiment 2). Consequently, we contend top-down task relevance modulates the EIB effect and distractors' priority is regulated by the emotional relevance between tasks and distractors. The current study holds attentional capture by stimulus-driven is unconditional in EIB, while attentional capture by goal-driven requires certain conditions.

Behavioral state and stimulus strength regulate the role of somatostatin interneurons in stabilizing network activity.

Inhibition stabilization enables cortical circuits to encode sensory signals across diverse contexts. Somatostatin-expressing (SST) interneurons are well-suited for this role through their strong recurrent connectivity with excitatory pyramidal cells. We developed a cortical circuit model predicting that SST cells become increasingly important for stabilization as sensory input strengthens. We tested this prediction in mouse primary visual cortex by manipulating excitatory input to SST cells, a key parameter for inhibition stabilization, with a novel cell-type specific pharmacological method to selectively block glutamatergic receptors on SST cells. Consistent with our model predictions, we find antagonizing glutamatergic receptors drives a paradoxical facilitation of SST cells with increasing stimulus contrast. In addition, we find even stronger engagement of SST-dependent stabilization when the mice are aroused. Thus, we reveal that the role of SST cells in cortical processing gradually switches as a function of both input strength and behavioral state.