Outcomes in hepatocellular carcinoma patients undergoing sorafenib treatment: toxicities, cellular oxidative stress, treatment adherence, and quality of life.

The study of toxicities induced by sorafenib, as well as the identification of possible mechanisms and biomarkers of these toxicities, is important to improve the treatment and quality of life of hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) patients. This study focused on toxicities, cellular oxidative stress, adherence, and quality of life of 11 patients with HCC treated with sorafenib. Dermatotoxicity, myelotoxicity, gastro toxicity, nephrotoxicity, pain, and fatigue were investigated. For oxidative stress analysis, the peripheral blood mononuclear cells were isolated and mitochondrial superoxide anion production was measured using MitoSOX Red test. Medication adherence was evaluated based on Morisky-Green and MedTake tests. Quality of life assessment was performed using EORTC QLQ C-30 and QLQ HCC18 questionnaires. The results showed that hand-foot syndrome (45.5%), thrombocytopenia (45.5%), diarrhea (54.5%), pain (54.5%), and fatigue (36.4%) were the most prevalent toxicities. A non-statistically significant change in the levels of superoxide anion was observed after the sorafenib treatment (Wilcoxon test, P = 0.4131). Moreover, 81.8% of patients had high adherence, 100% knew the correct indication of sorafenib, 81.8% knew the correct intake and drug regimen, and 36.4% knew the correct dose of antineoplastic. There was a significant worsening in the emotional and pain domains of quality of life after the sorafenib (Wilcoxon test, P = 0.0313 and P = 0.0313, respectively). A production of superoxide anion was not correlated with toxicities (Spearman's correlation and Mann-Whitney U tests, P > 0.05). This study suggests that oxidative stress might not be the mechanism of sorafenib toxicities.

A scoping review of pharmacists' clinical activities and impact on the care of patients with multiple myeloma.

BACKGROUND: Treating multiple myeloma is complex, and providing supportive care through an interdisciplinary approach is essential. AIM: To report and synthesize pharmacists' clinical activities and impact on the care of patients with multiple myeloma. METHOD: This was a scoping review that followed the PRISMA-ScR reporting recommendations. A search was conducted in PubMed, Embase, Web of Science, Scopus, and LILACS from the inception of the database until January 10th, 2024. Papers that reported pharmacists' clinical activities in the care of patients with multiple myeloma were included. Descriptive Elements of Pharmacist Intervention Characterization Tool (DEPICT) version 2 was used to characterize the pharmacists' clinical activities. The results are presented as a narrative and tabular synthesis. RESULTS: A total of 2885 records were identified, 10 of which met the inclusion criteria. Pharmacists' clinical activities related to 'direct patient care' (n = 8) and 'medication counseling, education, and training' (n = 7) were the most cited. Most were provided for patients (n = 8), by one-on-one contact (n = 9), and through face-to-face communication method (n = 8), with patient counseling being the main action taken by pharmacists (n = 7). Materials that supported pharmacists' actions were cited in five studies. Integrating pharmacists into interdisciplinary teams led to improved process, clinical, humanistic, and economic outcomes. CONCLUSION: This scoping review emphasizes pharmacists' clinical activities in improving the care of patients with multiple myeloma. There is a need to develop studies with patient-reported outcomes and comprehensive reporting of pharmacists' clinical activities to ensure reproducibility and effective implementation in clinical practice.