Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 20 de 32
Filtrar
Mais filtros

Base de dados
Tipo de documento
País de afiliação
Intervalo de ano de publicação
1.
Allergy ; 77(10): 3070-3083, 2022 10.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35611454

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Immediate drug hypersensitivity reactions (IDHRs) to clavulanic acid (CLV) have increased in the last decades due to a higher consumption alongside amoxicillin (AX). Due to its chemical instability, diagnostic procedures to evaluate IDHRs to CLV are difficult, and current in vitro assays do not have an optimal sensitivity. The inclusion of the specific metabolites after CLV degradation, which are efficiently recognised by the immune system, could help to improve sensitivity of in vitro tests. METHODS: Recognition by dendritic cells (DCs) of CLV and the synthetic analogues of two of its hypothesised antigenic determinants (ADs) was evaluated by flow cytometry in 27 allergic patients (AP) and healthy controls (HC). Their ability to trigger the proliferation of T cells was also analysed by flow cytometry. RESULTS: The inclusion of synthetic analogues of CLV ADs, significantly increased the expression of maturation markers on DCs from AP compared to HC. A different recognition pattern could be observed with each AD, and, therefore, the inclusion of both ADs achieves an improved sensitivity. The addition of synthetic ADs analogues increased the proliferative response of CD4+ Th2 compared to the addition of native CLV. The combination of results from both ADs increased the sensitivity of proliferative assays from 19% to 65% with a specificity higher than 90%. CONCLUSIONS: Synthetic ADs from CLV are efficiently recognised by DCs with ability to activate CD4+ Th2 cells from AP. The combination of analogues from both ADs, significantly increased the sensitivity of DC maturation and T-cell proliferation compared to native CLV.


Assuntos
Hipersensibilidade a Drogas , Hipersensibilidade Imediata , Amoxicilina , Proliferação de Células , Ácido Clavulânico/efeitos adversos , Células Dendríticas , Epitopos/metabolismo , Humanos
2.
Int J Mol Sci ; 23(9)2022 Apr 29.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35563370

RESUMO

Plant-food allergy is an increasing problem, with nonspecific lipid transfer proteins (nsLTPs) triggering mild/severe reactions. Pru p 3 is the major sensitizer in LTP food allergy (FA). However, in vivo and in vitro diagnosis is hampered by the need for differentiating between asymptomatic sensitization and allergy with clinical relevance. The basophil activation test (BAT) is an ex vivo method able to identify specific IgE related to the allergic response. Thus, we aimed to establish the value of BAT in a precise diagnosis of LTP-allergic patients. Ninety-two individuals with peach allergy sensitized to LTP, Pru p 3, were finally included, and 40.2% of them had symptoms to peanut (n = 37). In addition, 16 healthy subjects were recruited. BAT was performed with Pru p 3 and Ara h 9 (peanut LTP) at seven ten-fold concentrations, and was evaluated by flow cytometry, measuring the percentage of CD63 (%CD63+) and CD203c (%CD203chigh) cells, basophil allergen threshold sensitivity (CD-Sens), and area under the dose−response curve (AUC). Significant changes in BAT parameters (%CD63+ and %CD203chigh) were found between the controls and patients. However, comparisons for %CD63+, %CD203chigh, AUC, and CD-Sens showed similar levels among patients with different symptoms. An optimal cut-off was established from ROC curves, showing a significant positive percentage of BAT in patients compared to controls and great values of sensitivity (>87.5%) and specificity (>85%). In addition, BAT showed differences in LTP-allergic patients tolerant to peanut using its corresponding LTP, Ara h 9. BAT can be used as a potential diagnostic tool for identifying LTP allergy and for differentiating peanut tolerance, although neither reactivity nor sensitivity can distinguish the severity of the clinical symptoms.


Assuntos
Teste de Degranulação de Basófilos , Hipersensibilidade Alimentar , Alérgenos/metabolismo , Arachis , Teste de Degranulação de Basófilos/métodos , Basófilos , Hipersensibilidade Alimentar/diagnóstico , Hipersensibilidade Alimentar/metabolismo , Humanos , Imunoglobulina E/metabolismo
3.
Int J Mol Sci ; 23(13)2022 Jun 23.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35805992

RESUMO

Diagnosis of type I hypersensitivity reactions (IgE-mediated reactions) to penicillins is based on clinical history, skin tests (STs), and drug provocation tests (DPTs). Among in vitro complementary tests, the fluoro-enzyme immunoassay (FEIA) ImmunoCAP® (Thermo-Fisher, Waltham, MA, USA) is the most widely used commercial method for detecting drug-specific IgE (sIgE). In this study, we aimed to analyze the utility of ImmunoCAP® for detecting sIgE to penicillin G (PG) and amoxicillin (AX) in patients with confirmed penicillin allergy. The study includes 139 and 250 patients evaluated in Spain and Italy, respectively. All had experienced type I hypersensitivity reactions to penicillins confirmed by positive STs. Additionally, selective or cross-reactive reactions were confirmed by DPTs in a subgroup of patients for further analysis. Positive ImmunoCAP® results were 39.6% for PG and/or AX in Spanish subjects and 52.4% in Italian subjects. When only PG or AX sIgE where analyzed, the percentages were 15.1% and 30.4%, respectively, in Spanish patients; and 38.9% and 46% in Italian ones. The analysis of positive STs showed a statistically significant higher percentage of positive STs to PG determinants in Italian patients. False-positive results to PG (16%) were detected in selective AX patients with confirmed PG tolerance. Low and variable sensitivity values observed in a well-defined population with confirmed allergy diagnosis, as well as false-positive results to PG, suggest that ImmunoCAP® is a diagnostic tool with relevant limitations in the evaluation of subjects with type I hypersensitivity reactions to penicillins.


Assuntos
Hipersensibilidade a Drogas , Hipersensibilidade Imediata , Amoxicilina , Hipersensibilidade a Drogas/diagnóstico , Humanos , Hipersensibilidade Imediata/diagnóstico , Técnicas Imunoenzimáticas , Imunoglobulina E/análise , Penicilina G , Penicilinas/efeitos adversos , Testes Cutâneos
4.
Allergy ; 75(3): 561-575, 2020 03.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31469167

RESUMO

Nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs), the medications most commonly used for treating pain and inflammation, are the main triggers of drug hypersensitivity reactions. The latest classification of NSAIDs hypersensitivity by the European Academy of Allergy and Clinical Immunology (EAACI) differentiates between cross-hypersensitivity reactions (CRs), associated with COX-1 inhibition, and selective reactions, associated with immunological mechanisms. Three phenotypes fill into the first group: NSAIDs-exacerbated respiratory disease, NSAIDs-exacerbated cutaneous disease and NSAIDs-induced urticaria/angioedema. Two phenotypes fill into the second one: single-NSAID-induced urticaria/angioedema/anaphylaxis and single-NSAID-induced delayed reactions. Diagnosis of NSAIDs hypersensitivity is hampered by different factors, including the lack of validated in vitro biomarkers and the uselessness of skin tests. The advances achieved over recent years recommend a re-evaluation of the EAACI classification, as it does not consider other phenotypes such as blended reactions (coexistence of cutaneous and respiratory symptoms) or food-dependent NSAID-induced anaphylaxis. In addition, it does not regard the natural evolution of phenotypes and their potential interconversion, the development of tolerance over time or the role of atopy. Here, we address these topics. A state of the art on the underlying mechanisms and on the approaches for biomarkers discovery is also provided, including genetic studies and available information on transcriptomics and metabolomics.


Assuntos
Angioedema , Hipersensibilidade a Drogas , Preparações Farmacêuticas , Urticária , Angioedema/induzido quimicamente , Angioedema/diagnóstico , Anti-Inflamatórios não Esteroides/efeitos adversos , Hipersensibilidade a Drogas/diagnóstico , Hipersensibilidade a Drogas/etiologia , Humanos , Testes Cutâneos , Urticária/induzido quimicamente , Urticária/diagnóstico
5.
Allergy ; 75(7): 1689-1698, 2020 07.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31995231

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Allergic rhinitis (AR) and local allergic rhinitis (LAR) are defined by nasal reactivity to aeroallergens with and without positive skin prick test (SPT), respectively. In this study, we aimed to investigate whether both types of allergen-specific reactivity can coexist in the same individual. METHODS: Forty-eight patients with perennial rhinitis symptoms and positive SPT with seasonal allergens only (discrepant group) were subjected to consecutive nasal allergen challenges (NAC) with seasonal (NAC-S) and perennial allergens (NAC-P). A nasal lavage was collected before and after the NACs to measure eosinophil cationic protein (ECP). A basophil activation test (BAT) with seasonal and/or perennial allergens was performed in ten patients from the discrepant group and in six seasonal allergic rhinitis (SAR), eight perennial local allergic rhinitis (LAR), six nonallergic rhinitis (NAR), and six healthy control (HC) individuals. RESULTS: All patients in the discrepant group tested positive in the NAC-S, and 41 of them (85.4%), also in the NAC-P (group A). Conversely, seven patients tested negative in the NAC-P (group B). ECP in the nasal lavage increased after the NAC-P in the group A (P = .004), but not in the group B. The BAT with seasonal allergens was positive in 100% of SAR and group A cases, whereas the BAT with perennial allergens was positive in 37.5% and 60% of LAR and group A cases, respectively. All NAR and HC subjects tested negative for the BAT. CONCLUSION: This study shows that nasal reactivity to aeroallergens with and without positive SPT can coexist in the same patient. We propose the term dual allergic rhinitis for this rhinitis phenotype.


Assuntos
Rinite Alérgica Sazonal , Rinite Alérgica , Alérgenos , Humanos , Imunoglobulina E , Testes de Provocação Nasal , Rinite Alérgica/diagnóstico , Rinite Alérgica Sazonal/complicações , Rinite Alérgica Sazonal/diagnóstico
6.
Allergy ; 74(8): 1502-1510, 2019 08.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30887534

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Over 30% of local allergic rhinitis (LAR) patients self-report bronchial symptoms suggestive of asthma, but the relationship between the allergen exposure and the bronchial symptoms has not been studied. OBJECTIVE: To investigate whether a bronchial counterpart of LAR exists. METHODS: Patients were classified by clinical history, skin prick test/serum specific IgE (sIgE), and nasal allergen provocation test (NAPT) into the LAR, allergic rhinitis (AR), and nonallergic rhinitis (NAR) phenotypes. Twenty-eight LAR, 18 AR, and 19 NAR patients self-reporting bronchial symptoms suggestive of asthma and 8 healthy controls (HC) were subjected to a methacholine test (MT) before (Visit 1) and 24 hours after (Visit 3) a bronchial provocation test with Dermatophagoides pteronyssinus (BPT-DP) (Visit 2). Induced sputum and peripheral blood obtained after each MT were analyzed for immune cell populations, tryptase, ECP, and sIgE. RESULTS: A positive MT was found in 50% of LAR, 83.3% of AR, 57.89% of NAR, and 0% of HC individuals (P = 0.022 AR vs LAR) at V1. BPT-DP was positive in 8 LAR and 15 AR patients (28% vs 83.3%, P < 0.001), with no positive responses in NAR and HC. All BPT-DP+ patients experienced a significant decrease of PC20 at V3 vs V1 (P = 0.016 LAR, P ≤ 0.001 AR). BPT-DP+ patients also showed a significant increase of eosinophils, monocytes, and ECP in induced sputum at V3 compared with V1. CONCLUSION: The results suggest the existence of a new asthma phenotype (local allergic asthma) defined by absence of systemic atopy and positivity to BPT with allergen.


Assuntos
Alérgenos/imunologia , Antígenos de Dermatophagoides/imunologia , Asma/imunologia , Pyroglyphidae/imunologia , Rinite Alérgica/imunologia , Adulto , Animais , Asma/complicações , Asma/diagnóstico , Hiper-Reatividade Brônquica/diagnóstico , Hiper-Reatividade Brônquica/imunologia , Testes de Provocação Brônquica , Eosinófilos/imunologia , Eosinófilos/metabolismo , Feminino , Humanos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Rinite Alérgica/complicações , Rinite Alérgica/diagnóstico , Testes Cutâneos , Adulto Jovem
7.
Allergy ; 74(6): 1125-1134, 2019 06.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30667530

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: The nasal allergen challenge (NAC) is a useful tool for the diagnosis of allergic rhinitis (AR) and local allergic rhinitis (LAR) and might serve to design and monitor allergen immunotherapy. Nevertheless, data about its safety and reproducibility are scarce. OBJECTIVE: To investigate the safety and reproducibility of NAC in pediatric and adult rhinitis patients with/without asthmatic symptoms, and in healthy controls. METHODS: A retrospective evaluation of the NACs conducted in our Unit for 2005-2017 and monitored by acoustic rhinometry and nasal-ocular symptoms was performed to analyze the safety of two methods for allergen application (metered spray & micropipette) and NAC protocols (NAC with single or multiple allergens/session [NAC-S & NAC-M]). The adverse events (AEs), spirometry values, and rescue medication required for AE were recorded. The reproducibility was examined by a prospective analysis of three repeated NAC-S performed at 1-2-month interval in AR, LAR and nonallergic rhinitis patients, and in healthy controls. RESULTS: A total of 11 499 NACs were performed in 518 children and 5830 adults. Only four local AE occurred, and 99.97% of NACs were well tolerated. The reproducibility and positive and negative predictive values of three consecutive NAC-S performed in 710 subjects were 97.32%, 100%, and 92.91%, respectively. There were no false-positive results in the 710 analyzed subjects. Safety and reproducibility were comparable between the methods of allergen application and the rhinitis phenotypes. CONCLUSION: The NAC is a safe and highly reproducible diagnostic test ready to be used in the clinical practice in both children and adults with or without asthma.


Assuntos
Alérgenos/imunologia , Testes de Provocação Nasal/efeitos adversos , Testes de Provocação Nasal/métodos , Rinite Alérgica/diagnóstico , Adolescente , Adulto , Idoso , Idoso de 80 Anos ou mais , Alérgenos/administração & dosagem , Asma/diagnóstico , Espasmo Brônquico/etiologia , Criança , Pré-Escolar , Feminino , Humanos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Estudos Prospectivos , Reprodutibilidade dos Testes , Estudos Retrospectivos , Rinometria Acústica , Adulto Jovem
8.
Allergy ; 74(6): 1135-1144, 2019 06.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30667070

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: The role of arachidonic acid metabolites in NSAID-induced hypersensitivity has been studied in depth for NSAID-exacerbated respiratory disease (NERD) and NSAID-exacerbated cutaneous disease (NECD). However, no information is available for NSAID-induced urticarial/angioedema (NIUA), despite it being the most frequent clinical entity induced by NSAID hypersensitivity. We evaluated changes in leukotriene and prostaglandin metabolites for NIUA patients, using patients with NECD and single-NSAID-induced urticaria/angioedema or anaphylaxis (SNIUAA) for comparison. METHODS: Urine samples were taken from patients with confirmed NSAID-induced urticaria and healthy controls, at baseline and at various time intervals after ASA administration. Eicosanoid measurement was performed using high-performance liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry and gas chromatography-mass spectrometry. RESULTS: No differences were found between groups at baseline. Following ASA administration, LTE4 and 9α,11ß-PGF2 levels were increased in both NIUA and NECD patients compared to baseline, rising initially, before decreasing toward initial levels. In addition, the levels of these metabolites were higher in NIUA and NECD when compared with the SNIUAA and control groups after ASA administration. No changes were found with respect to baseline values for SNIUAA and control groups. CONCLUSIONS: We present for the first time data regarding the role of COX-1 inhibition in NIUA. Patients with this entity show a similar pattern eicosanoid levels following ASA challenge to those with NECD. Further studies will help ascertain the cell populations involved and the underlying molecular mechanisms.


Assuntos
Angioedema/induzido quimicamente , Angioedema/urina , Anti-Inflamatórios não Esteroides/efeitos adversos , Aspirina/efeitos adversos , Inibidores de Ciclo-Oxigenase/efeitos adversos , Hipersensibilidade a Drogas/urina , Eicosanoides/urina , Fenótipo , Administração Oral , Adolescente , Adulto , Anafilaxia/induzido quimicamente , Anafilaxia/urina , Anti-Inflamatórios não Esteroides/administração & dosagem , Aspirina/administração & dosagem , Ciclo-Oxigenase 1/metabolismo , Inibidores de Ciclo-Oxigenase/administração & dosagem , Dinoprosta/urina , Feminino , Humanos , Leucotrieno E4/urina , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Adulto Jovem
11.
Curr Allergy Asthma Rep ; 17(8): 56, 2017 Aug.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28752367

RESUMO

PURPOSE OF REVIEW: Quinolones are a group of synthetic antibiotics widely use as first-line treatment for many infections. There has been an increase in the incidence of hypersensitivity reactions to quinolones in recent years, likely due to increased prescription. The purpose of this review is to summarize the clinical pictures, the methods used for diagnosing and the management of allergic reactions to quinolones. RECENT FINDINGS: Allergic reactions to quinolones can be immediate or delayed, being anaphylaxis and maculopapular exanthema respectively the most frequent clinical entities. A precise diagnosis is particularly difficult since clinical history is often unreliable, skin tests can induce false-positive results, and commercial in vitro test are not well validated. Therefore, drug provocation testing is considered the gold standard to establish diagnosis, which is not a risk-free procedure. Cross-reactivity between quinolones is difficult to predict due to the small number of patients included in the few published studies. Moreover, hypersensitivity to quinolones has also been associated with beta-lactam and neuromuscular blocking agent allergies, although further studies are needed to understand the underlying mechanisms. Avoidance of the culprit quinolone is indicated in patients with a diagnosis of hypersensitivity to these drugs. When quinolone treatment is the only therapeutic option available, desensitization is necessary. This review summarizes the complex diagnostic approach and management of allergic reactions to quinolones.


Assuntos
Antibacterianos/efeitos adversos , Hipersensibilidade a Drogas/etiologia , Quinolonas/efeitos adversos , Antibacterianos/química , Antibacterianos/imunologia , Reações Cruzadas , Hipersensibilidade a Drogas/diagnóstico , Hipersensibilidade a Drogas/epidemiologia , Hipersensibilidade a Drogas/terapia , Humanos , Estrutura Molecular , Quinolonas/química , Quinolonas/imunologia
12.
Pharmacogenet Genomics ; 26(6): 280-7, 2016 06.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-26959713

RESUMO

OBJECTIVE: Cross-intolerance to NSAIDs is a class of drug hypersensitivity reaction, of which NSAIDs-induced urticaria and/or angioedema (NIUA) are the most frequent clinical entities. They are considered to involve dysregulation of the arachidonic acid pathway; however, this mechanism has not been confirmed for NIUA. In this work, we assessed copy number variations (CNVs) in eight of the main genes involved in the arachidonic acid pathway and their possible genetic association with NIUA. MATERIALS AND METHODS: CNVs in ALOX5, LTC4S, PTGS1, PTGS2, PTGER1, PTGER2, PTGER3, and PTGER4 were analyzed using TaqMan copy number assays. Genotyping was carried out by real-time quantitative PCR. Individual genotypes were assigned using the CopyCaller Software. Statistical analysis was carried out using GraphPad prism 5, PLINK, EPIDAT, and R version 3.1.2. RESULTS AND CONCLUSION: A total of 151 cases and 139 controls were analyzed during the discovery phase and 148 cases and 140 controls were used for replication. CNVs in open reading frames were found for ALOX5, PTGER1, PTGER3, and PTGER4. Statistically significant differences in the CNV frequency between NIUA and controls were found for ALOX5 (Pc=0.017) and PTGER1 (Pc=1.22E-04). This study represents the first analysis showing an association between CNVs in exonic regions of ALOX5 and PTGER1 and NIUA. This suggests a role of CNVs in this pathology that should be explored further.


Assuntos
Angioedema/genética , Anti-Inflamatórios não Esteroides/efeitos adversos , Araquidonato 5-Lipoxigenase/genética , Variações do Número de Cópias de DNA/genética , Receptores de Prostaglandina E Subtipo EP1/genética , Urticária/genética , Adulto , Angioedema/induzido quimicamente , Angioedema/patologia , Estudos de Casos e Controles , Feminino , Humanos , Masculino , Polimorfismo de Nucleotídeo Único/genética , Urticária/induzido quimicamente , Urticária/patologia
14.
Int Arch Allergy Immunol ; 169(4): 223-30, 2016.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-27224978

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Pyrazolones are the most common causes of selective nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drug (NSAID) hypersensitivity. We studied a large group of patients with immediate and delayed selective responses to metamizole. METHODS: Patients with suspicion of hypersensitivity to metamizole were evaluated. We verified acetylsalicylic acid tolerance and classified patients as immediate or delayed responders if they showed symptoms less or more than 24 h after metamizole administration. Skin tests were performed and if negative, a basophil activation test (BAT) was performed on immediate responders. If it was negative, we performed a drug provocation test (DPT) with metamizole. RESULTS: A total of 137 patients were included: 132 reacted within 24 h (single NSAID-induced urticaria/angioedema/anaphylaxis; SNIUAA) and 5 after 24 h (single NSAID-induced delayed hypersensitivity reaction; SNIDHR). Most SNIUAA patients developed anaphylaxis (60.60%); for SNIDHR, maculopapular exanthema was the most frequent entity (60%). Skin testing was positive in 62.04% of all cases and BAT in 28% of the SNIUAA patients with negative skin tests. In 5.1% of the cases, DPT with metamizole was needed to establish the diagnosis. In 22.62% of the cases, diagnosis was established by consistent and unequivocal history of repeated allergic episodes in spite of a negative skin test and BAT. CONCLUSIONS: SNIUAA to metamizole is the most frequent type of selective NSAID hypersensitivity, with anaphylaxis being the most common clinical entity. It may occur within 1 h after drug intake. SNIDHR occurs in a very low percentage of cases. The low sensitivity of diagnostic tests may be due to incomplete characterization of the chemical structures of metamizole and its metabolites.


Assuntos
Dipirona/efeitos adversos , Hipersensibilidade a Drogas/diagnóstico , Hipersensibilidade a Drogas/imunologia , Hipersensibilidade Tardia/diagnóstico , Hipersensibilidade Tardia/imunologia , Hipersensibilidade Imediata/diagnóstico , Hipersensibilidade Imediata/imunologia , Adolescente , Adulto , Idoso , Idoso de 80 Anos ou mais , Algoritmos , Anafilaxia/diagnóstico , Anafilaxia/imunologia , Tomada de Decisão Clínica , Gerenciamento Clínico , Feminino , Humanos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Fenótipo , Testes Cutâneos , Fatores de Tempo , Adulto Jovem
15.
Int Arch Allergy Immunol ; 169(4): 249-55, 2016.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-27240835

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) are the most frequent agents involved in hypersensitivity drug reactions, with NSAID-induced urticaria and/or angioedema (NIUA) being the most common entity. Mast cells are key players in NIUA and are activated by thymic stromal lymphopoietin (TSLP). This cytokine functions through recognition by its receptor, composed of IL7Rα (interleukin-7 receptor alpha) and TSLPR (TSLP receptor). These genes have been previously associated with other inflammatory diseases. METHODS: We assessed the genetic association between single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) in TSLP, IL7R and TSLPR and NIUA in Spanish individuals, using genotyped and imputed data. A total of 369 unrelated NIUA patients and 580 NSAID-tolerant control subjects were included, and 6 SNPs in TSLP, 6 in IL7R and 3 in TSLPR were genotyped. Further variants were imputed using Mach and the 1,000 Genomes Project (Phase 3) data. Association testing and statistical analyses were performed with Mach2dat and R. RESULTS: A total of 139 SNPs were tested for association following quality control. Two SNPs in TSLP (rs1816678 and rs764917) showed a nominal association (p = 0.033 and 0.024, respectively) with NIUA, although these results were not statistically significant after correcting for multiple comparisons. CONCLUSIONS: Although TSLP, IL7R and TSLPR are important genes involved in the development of the inflammatory response, we found no significant genetic association with NIUA in our population for common SNPs in these genes.


Assuntos
Angioedema/diagnóstico , Anti-Inflamatórios não Esteroides/efeitos adversos , Citocinas/genética , Hipersensibilidade a Drogas/diagnóstico , Hipersensibilidade a Drogas/etiologia , Variação Genética , Urticária/diagnóstico , Adulto , Alelos , Estudos de Casos e Controles , Feminino , Predisposição Genética para Doença , Genótipo , Humanos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Razão de Chances , Polimorfismo de Nucleotídeo Único , Adulto Jovem , Linfopoietina do Estroma do Timo
18.
Front Immunol ; 15: 1385101, 2024.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38725998

RESUMO

Background: Immunopathology in food allergy is characterized by an uncontrolled type 2 immune response and specific-IgE production. Recent studies have determined that group 2 innate lymphoid cells (ILC2) participate in the food allergy pathogenic mechanism and their severity. Our objective was to investigate the role of ILC2 in peach-allergic patients due to non-specific lipid transfer protein (Pru p 3) sensitization. Methods: The immune response in peripheral blood mononuclear cells was characterized in lipid transfer protein-allergic patients and healthy controls. We have analyzed the Pru p 3 uptake on ILC2, the expression of costimulatory molecules, and their involvement on the T-cell proliferative response and cytokine production under different experimental conditions: cytokines involved in group 2 innate lymphoid cell activation (IL-33 and IL-25), Pru p 3 as main food allergen, and the combination of both components (IL-33/IL-25+Pru p 3) using cell sorting, EliSpot, flow cytometry, and confocal microscopy. Results: Our results show that Pru p 3 allergen is taken up by group 2 innate lymphoid cells, regulating their costimulatory molecule expression (CD83 and HLA-DR) depending on the presence of Pru p 3 and its combination with IL-33/IL-25. The Pru p 3-stimulated ILC2 induced specific GATA3+Th2 proliferation and cytokine (IL-4, IL-5, and IL-13) production in lipid transfer protein-allergic patients in a cell contact-dependent manner with no changes in Tbet+Th1- and FOXP3+Treg cell differentiation. Conclusions: The results indicate that in lipid transfer protein-allergic patients, the responsible allergen, Pru p 3, interacts with group 2 innate lymphoid cells, promoting a Th2 cell response. Our results might be of interest in vivo, as they show a role of group 2 innate lymphoid cells as antigen-presenting cells, contributing to the development of food allergy. Consequently, group 2 innate lymphoid cells may be considered as potential therapeutic targets.


Assuntos
Antígenos de Plantas , Proteínas de Transporte , Hipersensibilidade Alimentar , Imunidade Inata , Humanos , Hipersensibilidade Alimentar/imunologia , Feminino , Antígenos de Plantas/imunologia , Proteínas de Transporte/imunologia , Masculino , Adulto , Citocinas/metabolismo , Linfócitos/imunologia , Linfócitos/metabolismo , Proteínas de Plantas/imunologia , Ativação Linfocitária/imunologia , Adulto Jovem , Pessoa de Meia-Idade
19.
J Allergy Clin Immunol Pract ; 11(12): 3715-3723, 2023 12.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37586474

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Ibuprofen and other arylpropionic acid derivatives (APs) are among the most consumed nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs worldwide at all age ranges; however, little is known about drug hypersensitivity reactions (DHRs) they induce. OBJECTIVE: To characterize in detail patients reporting DHRs to APs. METHODS: We prospectively evaluated patients with symptoms suggestive of AP-DHRs and analyzed their clinical characteristics, reported reactions, and diagnostic approaches. RESULTS: Six hundred sixty-two patients confirmed as hypersensitive to APs were included: 489 with cross-reactive reactions (CRs) (73.86%) and 173 with selective reactions (SRs) (26.13%). The percentage of subjects reporting reactions to ibuprofen and dexketoprofen was higher in CRs (P = .005 and P = .01, respectively), whereas naproxen and ketoprofen were more frequently involved in SRs (P = .0002 and P = .00001, respectively). The most frequent symptoms induced by ibuprofen, dexketoprofen, and naproxen were isolated angioedema and urticaria, combined or not with angioedema in both CRs and SRs. The result of nasal provocation test with lysine acetylsalicylate was positive in 156 cases (77.14% in patients showing exclusively respiratory symptoms, and in 68.18% of those with both cutaneous and respiratory involvement). To confirm diagnosis, drug provocation test with acetylsalicylic acid was required in 246 CR patients (50.3%), whereas in 28 SR patients (16.18%) drug provocation test with the culprit AP was required. CONCLUSIONS: Skin is the organ most commonly involved in AP-DHRs, with ibuprofen and dexketoprofen inducing most frequently CRs, and naproxen and ketoprofen SRs. More studies are necessary to clarify the underlying mechanism in DHRs induced by APs.


Assuntos
Angioedema , Hipersensibilidade a Drogas , Cetoprofeno , Humanos , Ibuprofeno/efeitos adversos , Cetoprofeno/efeitos adversos , Naproxeno/efeitos adversos , Anti-Inflamatórios não Esteroides/efeitos adversos , Hipersensibilidade a Drogas/diagnóstico , Angioedema/diagnóstico
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA