Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 4 de 4
Filtrar
Mais filtros

Base de dados
País/Região como assunto
Tipo de documento
País de afiliação
Intervalo de ano de publicação
1.
J Food Prot ; 76(1): 144-9, 2013 Jan.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-23317871

RESUMO

The U.S. Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act prohibits the distribution of food that is adulterated, and the regulatory mission of the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) is to enforce this Act. FDA field laboratories have identified the 22 most common pests that contribute to the spread of foodborne disease (the "Dirty 22"). The current method of detecting filth and extraneous material (tails, legs, carcasses, etc.) is visual inspection using microscopy. Because microscopy can be time-consuming and may yield inaccurate and/or nonspecific results due to lack of expertise, an alternative method of detecting these adulterants is needed. In this study, we sequenced DNA from the 5' region of the cytochrome oxidase I gene of these 22 common pests that contribute to the spread of foodborne pathogens. Here, we describe the generation of DNA barcodes for all 22 species. To date, this is the first attempt to develop a sequence-based regulatory database and systematic primer strategy to identify these FDA-targeted species. DNA barcoding can be a powerful tool that can aid the FDA in promoting the protection and safety of the U.S. food supply.


Assuntos
DNA/análise , Contaminação de Alimentos/análise , Contaminação de Alimentos/legislação & jurisprudência , Indústria de Processamento de Alimentos/normas , Saúde Pública , Animais , Qualidade de Produtos para o Consumidor , Contaminação de Alimentos/prevenção & controle , Microbiologia de Alimentos , Humanos , Especificidade da Espécie , Estados Unidos , United States Food and Drug Administration
2.
J Food Prot ; 75(6): 1107-12, 2012 Jun.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-22691479

RESUMO

The U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) has previously validated a real-time PCR-based assay that is currently being used by the FDA and several state laboratories as the official screening method. Due to several shortcomings to the assay, a multiplex real-time PCR assay (MRTA) to detect three ruminant species (bovine, caprine, and ovine) was developed using a lyophilized bead design. The assay contained two primer or probe sets: a "ruminant" set to detect bovine-, caprine-, and ovine-derived materials and a second set to serve as an internal PCR control, formatted using a lyophilized bead design. Performance of the assay was evaluated against stringent acceptance criteria developed by the FDA's Center for Veterinary Medicine's Office of Research. The MRTA for the detection of ruminant DNA passed the stringent acceptance criteria for specificity, sensitivity, and selectivity. The assay met sensitivity and reproducibility requirements by detecting 30 of 30 complete feed samples fortified with meals at 0.1 % (wt/wt) rendered material from each of the three ruminant species. The MRTA demonstrated 100 % selectivity (0.0 % false positives) for negative controls throughout the assessment period. The assay showed ruggedness in both sample selection and reagent preparation. Second and third analyst trials confirmed the quality of the written standard operating procedure with consistency of results. An external laboratory participating in a peer-verification trial demonstrated 100 % specificity in identifying bovine meat and bone meal, while exhibiting a 0.03 % rate of false positives. The assay demonstrated equal levels of sensitivity and reproducibility compared with the FDA's current validated real-time PCR assay. The assay detected three prohibited species in less than 1.5 h of total assay time, a significant improvement over the current real-time assay. These results demonstrated this assay's suitability for routine regulatory use both as a primary screening tool and as a confirmatory test.


Assuntos
Ração Animal/análise , DNA/análise , Contaminação de Alimentos/análise , Reação em Cadeia da Polimerase Multiplex/métodos , Animais , Bovinos , Primers do DNA , Encefalopatia Espongiforme Bovina/prevenção & controle , Encefalopatia Espongiforme Bovina/transmissão , Cabras , Laboratórios/normas , Reprodutibilidade dos Testes , Sensibilidade e Especificidade , Ovinos , Especificidade da Espécie , Fatores de Tempo , Estados Unidos , United States Food and Drug Administration
3.
Vet Immunol Immunopathol ; 148(3-4): 236-42, 2012 Aug 15.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-22648045

RESUMO

Non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAID) are a family of chemicals that function to reduce pain, fever, and inflammation, and they are commonly used in people and animals for this purpose. Currently there are no NSAIDs approved for the management of inflammation in swine due to a lack of validated animal models and suitable biomarkers to assess efficacy. A previous in vitro study examining biomarkers of inflammation identified fourteen genes that were significantly altered in response to Escherichia coli lipopolysaccharide (LPS)-induced inflammation. In the present study, five of those fourteen genes were tested in vivo to determine if the same effects observed in vitro were also observed in vivo. Plasma levels of prostaglandin E(2) (PGE(2)), an essential mediator of fever and inflammation, were also determined. Two groups of swine were stimulated with LPS with the second group also treated with flunixin meglumine. Blood was collected at 0, 1, 3, 6, 8, 24, and 48 h post LPS-stimulation. The RNA was extracted from the blood and quantitative real-time-PCR (qRT-PCR) was utilized to determine the expression patterns of CD1, CD4, serum amyloid A2 (SAA2), Caspase 1, and monocyte chemoattractant protein 1 (MCP-1). The LPS-stimulated animals demonstrated a statistically significant alteration in expression of SAA2 and CD1 at 3h post-stimulation. Flunixin meglumine treated animals' demonstrated reduced expression of CD1 in comparison to the LPS-stimulated swine at 24 and 48 h post LPS-stimulation. Flunixin meglumine treated animals exhibited reduced expression of SAA2 at 48 h post-stimulation compared to LPS-stimulated swine. Swine treated with LPS demonstrated statistically significant increases in plasma PGE(2) at 1h post-stimulation. Swine treated with flunixin meglumine had no increase in plasma PGE(2) levels at any time. These results demonstrate that PGE(2) production, along with two out of five genes (SAA2 and CD1) have the potential to serve as early biomarkers of inflammation as well as indicators of NSAID efficacy.


Assuntos
Anti-Inflamatórios não Esteroides/farmacologia , Clonixina/análogos & derivados , Inflamação/veterinária , Doenças dos Suínos/sangue , Animais , Antígenos CD1/sangue , Biomarcadores/sangue , Antígenos CD4/sangue , Caspase 1/sangue , Quimiocina CCL2/sangue , Clonixina/farmacologia , Dinoprostona/sangue , Ensaio de Imunoadsorção Enzimática/veterinária , Inflamação/sangue , Inflamação/tratamento farmacológico , Lipopolissacarídeos/farmacologia , Masculino , Reação em Cadeia da Polimerase em Tempo Real/veterinária , Proteína Amiloide A Sérica/análise , Suínos , Doenças dos Suínos/tratamento farmacológico , Doenças dos Suínos/imunologia , Tromboxano B2/sangue
4.
Vet Immunol Immunopathol ; 139(1): 67-72, 2011 Jan.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-20828834

RESUMO

Currently there are no non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) approved for the control of inflammation in swine due to a lack of validated animal models and suitable biomarkers to assess drug efficacy. This study investigates the differential expression of genes altered in response to Escherichia coli lipopolysaccharide (LPS) induced inflammation which may serve as indicators of NSAID efficacy. Unstimulated whole blood from swine was mixed with tissue culture media, stimulated with LPS, and RNA extracted at the following time points 0h, 1h, 3h, 24h and 48h. Total RNA was extracted and analyzed using a commercial swine DNA microarray. The DNA microarray was utilized as a screen to determine potential biomarkers, focusing on the genes that exhibited the greatest degree of differential expression. A master list of 57 genes was formed based on the differential expression as a result of the stimulation. Following analysis, 12 genes whose expressions were significantly altered (8 up- and 4 down-regulated) were chosen for verification via quantitative RT-PCR (qRT-PCR). The qRT-PCR analysis confirmed the differential expression of 11 of the 12 genes chosen via the microarray analyses. Specifically, traditional genes such as SAA, G-CSF, and IL-10 were up-regulated, while CD4 was down-regulated; all of the genes were altered by 24h or 48h post-stimulation. We demonstrate here that expression of these 11 genes is altered as a direct result of LPS stimulation and consequently inflammation.


Assuntos
Biomarcadores/sangue , Inflamação/veterinária , Doenças dos Suínos/sangue , Animais , Inflamação/sangue , Inflamação/genética , Inflamação/imunologia , Leucócitos/imunologia , Análise de Sequência com Séries de Oligonucleotídeos/veterinária , Reação em Cadeia da Polimerase Via Transcriptase Reversa/veterinária , Suínos/sangue , Suínos/genética , Suínos/imunologia , Doenças dos Suínos/genética
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA