Erlotinib: another candidate for the therapeutic drug monitoring of targeted therapy of cancer? A pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic systematic review of literature.

Erlotinib is currently marketed at fixed standard dosage against pancreatic cancer and non-small-cell lung carcinoma. However, erlotinib pharmacokinetics (PK) is characterized by significant variability that may affect efficacy and tolerability. The aim of this review is to assess evidence that would justify therapeutic drug monitoring (TDM) and provide key information for the interpretation of erlotinib plasma concentrations. Literature was systematically reviewed to evaluate the standard criteria defining the potential clinical usefulness of TDM. Assessment was focused on the existence of unpredictable and wide PK variability and of consistent PK-pharmacodynamic relationships. PK parameters actually show marked variability (apparent clearance estimated to 4.85 ± 4.71 L/h, elimination half-life to 21.86 ± 28.35 hours, and apparent volume of distribution to 208 ± 133 L). Many covariates influence these parameters (CYP3A4 inducers or inhibitors, food, age, liver impairment), but most sources of variability still have to be identified. Some studies have demonstrated a relationship between exposure to erlotinib and clinical outcomes or skin toxicity. Erlotinib activity and target concentrations furthermore depend on tumor characteristics (eg, mutations on epidermal growth factor receptor and on K-ras). These results are in favor of TDM in addition to treatment adjustment for tumor biomarkers, but prospective clinical trials validating its clinical benefits are lacking. This review provides all the relevant information available to assist clinical interpretation of erlotinib plasma measurements. PK percentile curves and consideration to covariates yield information on whether a concentration measured is expected, whereas half maximal inhibitory concentration values determined in vitro provide preliminary insights on target concentration values to reach. Eventually, dosage adaptation might be considered in patients with intolerable toxicity because of excessive plasma levels or conversely nonresponse imputable to insufficient exposure.

Interest to consider re-challenging by cetuximab and platinum containing regimen in recurrent Head and Neck Cancer.

BACKGROUND: The EXTREME protocol is the standard of care for recurrent or metastatic head and neck squamous-cell carcinoma (R/M HNSCC) in first line. Beyond the first-line except immunotherapy, poor efficacy was reported by second-line chemotherapy. Re-challenge strategies based on a repetition of the first line with platinum and cetuximab regimens might have been an option to consider. METHODS: We performed a retrospective study in order to assess the efficacy of the cetuximab plus platinum doublet-based chemotherapy regimen in patients with R/M HNSCC progressing after at least 3 months of cetuximab maintenance (EXTREME protocol). We complete a retrospective review of all medical records from R/M HNSCC patients treated after 16 weeks with the EXTREME regimen and treated with a re-challenge strategy between January 2010 and December 2014 in our institution (Centre Paul Strauss, Strasbourg, France). RESULTS: 33 patients were identified. The re-challenged strategy provided an ORR in 33.3% of cases and a DCR of 69.6% of cases. The median OS and PFS observed from the second line were 11.2 months and 6.5 months for the subset re-challenged by EXTREME or PCC regimens respectively. The response rate between patients with a platin free interval within 3 and 6 months and greater than 6 months were equal. Drugs dose intensity were better with the PCC protocol than the EXTREME regimen used as a rechallenge. CONCLUSIONS: This study suggest re-challenging strategy by these regimens could be considered beyond the first line as an option when the platin free interval is greater than 3 months.

[Pharmacist involvement in supporting care in patients receiving oral anticancer therapies: A situation report in French cancer centers]. / Implication du pharmacien dans l'accompagnement des patients sous anticancéreux oraux : état des lieux dans les centres de lutte contre le cancer (CLCC).

INTRODUCTION: The increasing prescription of oral anticancer therapies has significantly changed inpatient care to outpatient care. This transformation requires an excellent coordination between different professionals to ensure healthcare channel security. METHOD: We performed a prospective study in 18 French cancer centers from March to April 2016. The aim of this study was to identify resources deployed to support patients receiving oral anticancer therapies and to assess pharmacist's involvement. RESULTS: More than half of the centers have developed patient education program and/or practice pharmaceutical consultations. In total, 54.5% have deployed an oral anticancer drugs program and the pharmacist is involved in multidisciplinary teams. In total, 44.4% of the centers have developed hospital-to-community coordination actions but all of them highlight the time-consuming character of those programs. DISCUSSION: Administrative burdens are seriously hindering patient education program's development. Multidisciplinary consultations can offer an attractive alternative because of easy implementation modalities. Finally, hospital-to-community coordination actions seem hard to implement and require harmonization of communication practices, and need more technical and financial means.