Optimal Homeostasis Model Assessment of Insulin Resistance (HOMA-IR) Cut-Offs: A Cross-Sectional Study in the Czech Population.

Background and Objectives: The key pathogenetic mechanism of glucose metabolism disorders, insulin resistance (IR), can be assessed using the Homeostasis Model Assessment of IR (HOMA-IR). However, its application in clinical practice is limited due to the absence of cut-offs. In this study, we aimed to define the cut-offs for the Czech population. Methods: After undergoing anthropometric and biochemical studies, the sample of 3539 individuals was divided into either nondiabetics, including both subjects with normal glucose tolerance (NGT, n = 1947) and prediabetics (n = 1459), or diabetics (n = 133). The optimal HOMA-IR cut-offs between subgroups were determined to maximize the sum of the sensitivity and specificity for diagnosing type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) or prediabetes. The predictive accuracy was illustrated using receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves. Logistic regression was performed to assess the association between a target variable (presence/absence of T2DM) depending on the HOMA-IR score as well as on the age and sex. Results: The HOMA-IR cut-off between nondiabetics and diabetics for both sexes together was 3.63, with a sensitivity of 0.56 and a specificity of 0.86. The area under the ROC curve was 0.73 for T2DM diagnosing in both sexes. The HOMA-IR cut-off between the NGT subjects and prediabetics was 1.82, with a sensitivity of 0.60 and a specificity of 0.66. Logistic regression showed that increased HOMA-IR is a risk factor for the presence of T2DM (odds ratio (OR) 1.2, 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.14-1.28, p < 0.0001). The predictive ability of HOMA-IR in diagnosing T2DM is statistically significantly lower in females (OR 0.66, 95% CI 0.44-0.98). The results are valid for middle-aged European adults. Conclusions: The results suggest the existence of HOMA-IR cut-offs signaling established IR. Introduction of the instrument into common clinical practice, together with the known cut-offs, may contribute to preventing T2DM.

The importance of advanced parental age in the origin of neurofibromatosis type 1.

Von Recklinghausen neurofibromatosis (NF1) is an autosomal dominant disorder with a prevalence about 1/3,000 (1/2,000-1/5,000 in various population-based studies). About 30-50% of cases are sporadic, resulting from a new mutation. NF1 is fully penetrant by mid-childhood, stigmata, and medical problems (neurological, dermatological, endocrine, ophthalmological, oncological) are highly variable. Advanced paternal age (APA) has been known to increase the risk of new germline mutations that contribute to the presence of a variety of genetic diseases in the human population. The trend in developed countries has been toward higher parental age due to various reasons. In a cross-sectional study, in two university hospital centers, data on parental age of 103 children (41 female) born between 1976 and 2005 with sporadic NF1 were analyzed. Parental age at birth was compared with the Czech general population matched to birth year. The mean NF1 sporadic case paternal age at birth was 32.0 years (95% CI 30.7-33.3 years) compared with 28.8 years (95% CI 28.6-29.1 years) in the general population (P < 0.001). The mean maternal age at birth was 27.4 years (95% CI 26.3-28.5 years) compared with 25.8 years (95% CI 25.5-26.0 years) in the general population (P < 0.05). The case-control difference in the father's age was higher than it was for the mother's age. Sporadic NF1 cases accounted for 35.6% of our entire NF1 cohort. We confirmed an association of advanced parental and particularly paternal age with the occurrence of sporadic NF1.

Problems and progress in public health education.

Further development of public health education is critical to improve population health globally. A debate on the relevance and direction of some 400 schools of public health and many other related institutions around the world is therefore timely. Some argue that most public health schools set up in low-income countries blindly follow their counterparts in high-income countries, reproducing classroom-based teaching, churning out epidemiologists with limited understanding of how to work within a health system to address local needs or how to align multiple partners towards population and equity health objectives. Others argue that schools in high-income countries focus on the science, whereas those in low-income countries plagued with resource constraints focus exclusively on the art. This round table discussion asks deans and directors of schools of public health from around the world to identify innovations in public health training, research and practice that will render schools relevant to health and development challenges.