Inter-Cell and Inter-Chromosome Variability of 5-Hydroxymethylcytosine Patterns in Noncultured Human Embryonic and Extraembryonic Cells.

5-hydroxymethylcytosine (5hmC) is an oxidative derivative of 5-methylcytosine (5mC). Recent studies have revealed a sharp difference in the levels of 5hmC in 2 opposite DNA strands of a given chromosome and a chromosome-wide cell-to-cell variability in mammalian cells. This asymmetric 5hmC distribution was found in cultured cells, which may not fully mimic in vivo epigenetic processes. We have checked whether inter-chromosome and inter-cell variability of 5hmC patterns is typical for noncultured human cells. Using indirect immunofluorescence, we analyzed the localization of 5hmC and its co-distribution with 5mC on direct preparations of mitotically active cells from human embryonic lung and chorionic cytotrophoblast samples. We demonstrated 3 types of chromosomes according to the 5hmC accumulation pattern: hydroxymethylated (5hmC in both sister chromatids), hemihydroxymethylated (5hmC in only 1 sister chromatid), and nonhydroxymethylated ones. Each accumulation type was not specific to any particular chromosome, resulting in different 5hmC patterns between homologous chromosomes, among chromosomes within each metaphase plate, among metaphases in one tissue, and between the tissues. The 5mC distribution was stable: chromosomes were methylated in R-bands and, especially in embryonic lung cells, in the heterochromatic regions 1q12, 9q12, and 16q11.2. Our results provide the first evidence of inter-cell and inter-chromosome variability of 5hmC patterns in human noncultured embryonic and extraembryonic cells.

Whole­exome sequencing in Russian children with non­type 1 diabetes mellitus reveals a wide spectrum of genetic variants in MODY­related and unrelated genes.

The present study reports on the frequency and the spectrum of genetic variants causative of monogenic diabetes in Russian children with non­type 1 diabetes mellitus. The present study included 60 unrelated Russian children with non­type 1 diabetes mellitus diagnosed before the age of 18 years. Genetic variants were screened using whole­exome sequencing (WES) in a panel of 35 genes causative of maturity onset diabetes of the young (MODY) and transient or permanent neonatal diabetes. Verification of the WES results was performed using PCR­direct sequencing. A total of 38 genetic variants were identified in 33 out of 60 patients (55%). The majority of patients (27/33, 81.8%) had variants in MODY­related genes: GCK (n=19), HNF1A (n=2), PAX4 (n=1), ABCC8 (n=1), KCNJ11 (n=1), GCK+HNF1A (n=1), GCK+BLK (n=1) and GCK+BLK+WFS1 (n=1). A total of 6 patients (6/33, 18.2%) had variants in MODY­unrelated genes: GATA6 (n=1), WFS1 (n=3), EIF2AK3 (n=1) and SLC19A2 (n=1). A total of 15 out of 38 variants were novel, including GCK, HNF1A, BLK, WFS1, EIF2AK3 and SLC19A2. To summarize, the present study demonstrates a high frequency and a wide spectrum of genetic variants causative of monogenic diabetes in Russian children with non­type 1 diabetes mellitus. The spectrum includes previously known and novel variants in MODY­related and unrelated genes, with multiple variants in a number of patients. The prevalence of GCK variants indicates that diagnostics of monogenic diabetes in Russian children may begin with testing for MODY2. However, the remaining variants are present at low frequencies in 9 different genes, altogether amounting to ~50% of the cases and highlighting the efficiency of using WES in non­GCK­MODY cases.

Reproductive History of a Woman With 8p and 18p Genetic Imbalance and Minor Phenotypic Abnormalities.

We report on the phenotype and the reproductive history of an adult female patient with an unbalanced karyotype: 8p23 and 18p11.3 terminal deletions and 8p22 duplication. The indication for karyotyping of the 28-year-old patient was a structural rearrangement in her miscarriage specimen: 45,ХХ,der(8;18)t(8;18)(p23;p11.3). Unexpectedly, the patient had the same karyotype with only one normal chromosome 8, one normal chromosome 18, and a derivative chromosome, which was a product of chromosomes 8 and 18 fusion with loss of their short arm terminal regions. Fluorescence in situ hybridization revealed that derivative chromosome was a pseudodicentric with an active centromere of chromosome 8. Array comparative genomic hybridization confirmed 8p and 18p terminal deletions and additionally revealed 8p22 duplication with a total of 43 OMIM annotated genes being affected by the rearrangement. The patient had minor facial and cranial dysmorphia and no pronounced physical or mental abnormalities. She was socially normal, had higher education and had been married since the age of 26 years. Considering genetic counseling, the patient had decided to conceive the next pregnancy through in vitro fertilization (IVF) with preimplantation genetic testing for structural chromosomal aberrations (PGT-SR). She underwent four IVF/PGT-SR cycles with a total of 25 oocytes obtained and a total of 10 embryos analyzed. Only one embryo was balanced regarding chromosomes 8 and 18, while the others were unbalanced and demonstrated different combinations of the normal chromosomes 8 and 18 and the derivative chromosome. The balanced embryo was transferred, but the pregnancy was not registered. After four unsuccessful IVF/PGT-SR cycles, the patient conceived naturally. Non-invasive prenatal testing showed additional chromosome 18. The prenatal cytogenetic analysis of chorionic villi revealed an abnormal karyotype: 46,ХХ,der(8;18)t(8;18)(p23;p11.3)mat,+18. The pregnancy was terminated for medical reasons. The patient has a strong intention to conceive a karyotypically normal fetus. However, genetic counseling regarding this issue is highly challenging. Taking into account a very low chance of balanced gametes, emotional stress caused by numerous unsuccessful attempts to conceive a balanced embryo and increasing age of the patient, an IVF cycle with a donor oocyte should probably be considered.