RESUMO
We present a rare case of irinotecan-induced transient dysarthria in a 60-year-old female undergoing FOLFIRI (folinic acid (leucovorin), fluorouracil (5-FU), and irinotecan) chemotherapy for metastatic colorectal cancer. In eight out of the 12 cycles, an isolated, self-limiting "lingual dysarthria" with tongue stiffness consistently occurred during infusion and resolved promptly upon completion. Cranial imaging done during the initial episode and after the completion of the chemotherapy regimen were unremarkable. This temporal correlation suggests a drug-induced effect, proposed to be related to cholinergic hyperactivity associated with the drug's reversible inhibition of acetylcholinesterase. The hypoglossal nucleus, responsible for the motor function of the tongue, is selectively affected due to dense innervation by muscarinic cholinergic receptors (in comparison to other brainstem nuclei). This aligned with acute cholinergic syndrome common to irinotecan, and dysarthria might just be a rare manifestation of this common phenomenon. Its reversibility and atropine responsiveness support the cholinergic hypothesis. Clinicians should be mindful of this rare adverse event to avoid premature cessation of effective chemotherapy. Patient education on potential side effects and a comprehensive dysarthria work-up are crucial.
RESUMO
BACKGROUND: Few studies have been performed on palliative care in Parkinson's disease (PD). This study was undertaken to understand treatment preferences of PD patients toward end-of-life care. METHODS: A questionnaire modified from the Willingness to Accept Life-Sustaining Treatment instrument was administered to participants. Four different scenarios based on the burden of care and outcome of the treatment were presented in detail to obtain decisions for end-of-life care. The responses in each scenario were compared between PD patients and controls. Further analyses were performed to identify factors that influenced treatment preferences among PD patients. RESULTS: In total, 136 PD patients and 60 controls were recruited. Parkinson's disease patients and controls were demographically similar, except that PD patients had more previous hospital admissions (P = 0.0195). Parkinson's disease patients were more likely to opt for high-burden care with poor outcome than controls (odds ratio [OR] = 2.11, P = 0.04).In the subgroup analysis for PD patients, the factors that influenced treatment preference toward end-of-life care were belief in religion (OR: 7.43, 95% confidence interval:1.97-28.07), higher Unified Parkinson's Disease Rating Scale (UPDRS) motor score (2.51, 1.14-5.50) in scenario B; belief in religion (6.93, 2.23-21.43), married patients (6.93, 2.23-21.43) in scenario C; and Chinese patients (0.29, 0.10-0.79), better PD knowledge (0.37, 0.17-0.80), and higher UPDRS motor scores (3.05, 1.35-6.9) in scenario D. CONCLUSION: Parkinson's disease patients were more likely to agree to high-burden care with a poor outcome compared to controls. Among PD patients, race, marital status, religious status, knowledge about PD, and severity of motor impairment significantly influenced their end-of-life treatment preferences.