Method-specific serum cortisol responses to the adrenocorticotrophin test: comparison of gas chromatography-mass spectrometry and five automated immunoassays.

OBJECTIVE: The serum cortisol response to the adrenocorticotrophin (ACTH) test is known to vary significantly by assay, but lower reference limits (LRL) for this response have not been established by the reference gas chromatography-mass spectrometry (GC-MS) method or modern immunoassays. We aimed to compare the normal cortisol response to ACTH stimulation using GC-MS with five widely used immunoassays. DESIGN, PATIENTS AND MEASUREMENTS: An ACTH test (250 µg iv ACTH1-24 ) was undertaken in 165 healthy volunteers (age, 20-66 years; 105 women, 24 of whom were taking an oestrogen-containing oral contraceptive pill [OCP]). Serum cortisol was measured using GC-MS, Advia Centaur (Siemens), Architect (Abbott), Modular Analytics E170 (Roche), Immulite 2000 (Siemens) and Access (Beckman) automated immunoassays. The estimated LRL for the 30 min cortisol response to ACTH was derived from the 2·5th percentile of log-transformed concentrations. RESULTS: The GC-MS-measured cortisol response was normally distributed in males but not females, with no significant gender difference in baseline or post-ACTH cortisol concentration. Immunoassays were positively biased relative to GC-MS, except in samples from women on the OCP, who showed a consistent negative bias. The LRL for cortisol was method-specific [GC-MS: 420 nm; Architect: 430 nm; Centaur: 446 nm; Access 459 nm; Immulite (2000) 474 nm] and, for the E170, also gender-specific (female: 524 nm; male 574 nm). A separate LRL is necessary for women on the OCP. CONCLUSIONS: Normal cortisol responses to the ACTH test are influenced significantly by assay and oestrogen treatment. We recommend the use of separate reference limits in premenopausal women on the OCP and warn users that cortisol measurements in this subgroup are subject to assay interference.

Measurement of urinary free cortisol by tandem mass spectrometry and comparison with results obtained by gas chromatography-mass spectrometry and two commercial immunoassays.

BACKGROUND: Determination of urinary free cortisol (UFC) is an important adjunct for the assessment of adrenal function. In this study, we have analysed cortisol concentrations in urine samples by gas chromatography-mass spectrometry (GC-MS), liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry (LC-MS/MS) and two immunoassays. The results were compared with GC-MS. The interference of cortisol ring-A metabolites in immunoassays was also assessed. METHODS: The GC-MS technique involved solvent extraction, LH-20 clean-up and derivatization. Only solid-phase extraction procedure was used for LC-MS/MS. The samples were analysed in positive electro-spray ionization mode, monitoring the transitions for cortisol and deuterated-cortisol at m/z 363.3 > 121.2 and m/z 365.3 > 122.2, respectively. Immunoassays were performed according to the manufacturer's instructions. RESULTS: When compared with GC-MS results both immunoassays (Coat-A-Count; approximately 1.9-fold, Centaur; approximately 1.6-fold) overestimated UFC concentrations. Cortisol ring-A dihydro- and tetrahydrometabolites contribute significantly to this overestimation. There was no interference by these metabolites in either GC-MS or LC-MS/MS methods. The sensitivity of the LC-MS/MS procedure was 2 nmol/L and the intra- and inter-assay variations were <5% in each quality-control sample. The comparison of the UFC results achieved by assaying the study samples with GC-MS and LC-MS/MS indicated that the agreement between the two methods was excellent (LC-MS/MS = 1.0036GC-MS - 0.0841; r2 = 0.9937). CONCLUSIONS: The interference of cortisol ring-A metabolites in immunoassays contribute to overestimation of UFC concentrations. The LC-MS/MS procedure had the sensitivity, specificity, linearity, precision and accuracy for the determination of UFC concentrations. The method is suitable for routine use provided that method-dependant reference values are established.

Causes of discordance between thyroglobulin antibody assays.

BACKGROUND: Anti-thyroglobulin (Anti-Tg) assays show poor concordance. METHODS: We have investigated concordance and the causes of discordance between Abbott, Roche and Immulite Anti-Tg assays in 606 patients followed up for differentiated thyroid cancer (DTC). The reference range (RR) or lower reporting limit (LRL) was used to classify samples as negative or positive. RESULTS: Anti-Tg prevalence ranged between 6% and 55% depending on the method and cut-off. Concordance was 45% using LRL and 75% using RR. Specimens between the RR and LRL using the Immulite and Roche assays were identified that were positive by the Abbott assay and showed poor recovery of Tg in the Tg assay. This suggests misclassification using the RR. Anti-Tg International Reference Preparation (IRP) concentrations measured by the Roche and Abbott methods agreed well but patient samples did not. This is likely to be due to the heterogeneity of Anti-Tg. The Immulite assay appeared less sensitive than the Abbott and Roche based on investigations using the IRP and the low prevalence of Anti-Tg in the DTC patients (6-8%). Interference by Tg (>1000 µg/L) in the Roche assay was also identified as a cause of assay discordance. CONCLUSIONS: Anti-Tg is used as a tumour marker for DTC and to predict interference in Tg assays themselves and hence inform clinicians of reported Tg concentrations. We have identified several causes of Anti-Tg assay discordance. This includes variation in assay sensitivity and interference from Tg, the heterogeneity of Anti-Tg and the use of different cut-offs to classify samples as antibody-positive or -negative.