Renal transplantation in systemic amyloidosis-importance of amyloid fibril type and precursor protein abundance.

Renal transplantation remains contentious in patients with systemic amyloidosis due to the risk of graft loss from recurrent amyloid and progressive disease. Outcomes were sought among all patients attending the UK National Amyloidosis Centre who received a renal transplant (RTx) between January 1978 and May 2011. A total of 111 RTx were performed in 104 patients. Eighty-nine percent of patients with end-stage renal disease (ESRD) due to hereditary lysozyme and apolipoprotein A-I amyloidosis received a RTx. Outcomes following RTx were generally excellent in these diseases, reflecting their slow natural history; median graft survival was 13.1 years. Only 20% of patients with ESRD due to AA, AL and fibrinogen amyloidosis received a RTx. Median graft survival was 10.3, 5.8 and 7.3 years in these diseases respectively, and outcomes were influenced by fibril precursor protein supply. Patient survival in AL amyloidosis was 8.9 years among those who had achieved at least a partial clonal response compared to 5.2 years among those who had no response (p = 0.02). Post-RTx chemotherapy was administered successfully to four AL patients. RTx outcome is influenced by amyloid type. Suppression of the fibril precursor protein is desirable in the amyloidoses that have a rapid natural history.

Hereditary lysozyme amyloidosis -- phenotypic heterogeneity and the role of solid organ transplantation.

OBJECTIVES: Lysozyme amyloidosis (ALys) is a form of hereditary systemic non-neuropathic amyloidosis, which is inherited in an autosomal dominant fashion. Lysozyme, which is the amyloidogenic precursor protein in ALys, is a ubiquitous bacteriolytic enzyme synthesized by hepatocytes, polymorphs and macrophages. The aim of this study is to describe the phenotype and outcome of patients with ALys including the role of solid organ transplantation. DESIGN: Retrospective evaluation of patients with ALys. SETTING: UK National Amyloidosis Centre. PATIENTS: All 16 patients with ALys followed at the centre. RESULTS: A family history of amyloidosis was present in every affected individual. Although the phenotype was broadly similar amongst those from the same kindred, there were marked phenotypic differences between kindreds who possessed the same amyloidogenic mutation. Symptomatic gastrointestinal (GI) amyloid was prevalent, and macroscopically visible amyloidotic lesions were present in nine of 10 patients who underwent GI endoscopy. All symptomatic ALys individuals had hepatic amyloid. Four patients received orthotopic liver transplants (OLT), three for spontaneous hepatic rupture and one case, who had extensive hepatic amyloid and a strong family history of hepatic rupture, pre-emptively. All of the liver grafts were functioning at censor 1.7, 5.8, 9.0 and 11.0 years after OLT. Five patients had progressive amyloidotic renal dysfunction culminating in end-stage renal failure, three of whom underwent renal transplantation (RTx). There was no evidence of renal allograft dysfunction at censor 6.6, 1.8 and 0.8 years after RTx. CONCLUSIONS: Lysozyme amyloidosis is a disease of the GI tract, liver and kidneys, which has a slow natural history. There was a clear family history in all cases within this cohort, demonstrating a high clinical penetrance in the presence of an amyloidogenic lysozyme mutation. There is currently no amyloid-specific therapy for the condition which is managed symptomatically. OLT and RTx appear to be successful treatments for patients with liver rupture or end-stage renal disease, respectively, with excellent outcomes in terms of medium-term graft function and patient survival.

Solid organ transplantation in AL amyloidosis.

Vital organ failure remains common in AL amyloidosis. Solid organ transplantation is contentious because of the multisystem nature of this disease and risk of recurrence in the graft. We report outcome among all AL patients evaluated at the UK National Amyloidosis Centre who received solid organ transplants between 1984 and 2009. Renal, cardiac and liver transplants were performed in 22, 14 and 9 patients respectively, representing <2% of all AL patients assessed during the period. One and 5-year patient survival was 95% and 67% among kidney recipients, 86% and 45% among heart recipients and 33% and 22% among liver recipients. No renal graft failed due to recurrent amyloid during median (range) follow up of 4.8 (0.2-13.3) years. Median patient survival was 9.7 years among 8/14 cardiac transplant recipients who underwent subsequent stem cell transplantation (SCT) and 3.4 years in six patients who did not undergo SCT (p = 0.01). Amyloid was widespread in all liver transplant recipients. Solid organ transplantation has rarely been performed in AL amyloidosis, but these findings demonstrate feasibility and support a role in selected patients.

A matched comparison of cyclophosphamide, bortezomib and dexamethasone (CVD) versus risk-adapted cyclophosphamide, thalidomide and dexamethasone (CTD) in AL amyloidosis.

Despite improvements in therapy amyloid light-chain (AL) amyloidosis, there are few studies comparing different regimens. Here we present a matched comparison with 69 patients in each cohort examining upfront therapy with cyclophosphamide, bortezomib and dexamethasone (CVD) vs cyclophosphamide, thalidomide and dexamethasone (CTD). On an intention-to-treat basis, the overall response rates were 71.0% vs 79.7% in the CVD and CTD arms, respectively, (P=0.32). A higher complete response (CR) rate was observed in the CVD arm (40.5%) vs CTD (24.6%), P=0.046. One-year overall survival (OS) was 65.2% and 66.7% for CVD and CTD, respectively (P=0.87). The median progression-free survival (PFS) was 28.0 and 14.0 m for CVD and CTD, respectively (P=0.039). In a landmark analysis assessing outcomes performed at 6 months, the CR rate with CVD was 59.6% vs 34.0% for CTD (P=0.03). The 1-year OS was 96% with CVD and 92% with CTD (P=0.40). The median PFS with CVD was not reached and was 19.2 m with CTD, P=0.028). In summary, both regimens are unable to overcome the high rate of early deaths in AL amyloidosis. However, CVD correlates with improved depth of response and superior PFS supporting its use in the frontline setting. Further optimisation and better supportive-care strategies are required to increase the proportion of patients fully benefiting from therapy.