Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 4 de 4
Filtrar
1.
Thorax ; 78(9): 890-894, 2023 09.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36351688

RESUMO

The National Optimal Lung Cancer Pathway recommends rapid progression from abnormal chest X-rays (CXRs) to CT. The impact of the more rapid reporting on the whole pathway is unknown. The aim of this study was to determine the impact of immediate reporting of CXRs requested by primary care by radiographers on the time to diagnosis of lung cancer. METHOD: People referred for CXR from primary care to a single acute district general hospital in London attended sessions that were prerandomised to either immediate radiographer (IR) reporting or standard radiographer (SR) reporting within 24 hours. CXRs were subsequently reported by radiologists blind to the radiographer reports to test the reliability of the radiographer report. Radiographer and local radiologist discordant cases were reviewed by thoracic radiologists, blinded to reporter. RESULTS: 8682 CXRs were performed between 21 June 2017 and 4 August 2018, 4096 (47.2%) for IR and 4586 (52.8%) for SR. Lung cancer was diagnosed in 49, with 27 (55.1%) for IR. The median time from CXR to diagnosis of lung cancer for IR was 32 days (IQR 19, 70) compared with 63 days (IQR 29, 78) for SR (p=0.03).8258 CXRs (95.1%) were reported by both radiographers and local radiologists. In the 1361 (16.5%) with discordance, the reviewing thoracic radiologists were equally likely to agree with local radiologist and radiographer reports. CONCLUSIONS: Immediate reporting of CXRs from primary care reduces time to diagnosis of lung cancer by half, likely due to rapid progress to CT. Radiographer reports are comparable to local radiologist reports for accuracy. TRIAL REGISTRATION: International Standard Randomised Controlled Trial Number ISRCTN21818068. Registered on 20 June 2017.


Assuntos
Medicina Geral , Neoplasias Pulmonares , Humanos , Raios X , Reprodutibilidade dos Testes , Radiografia , Neoplasias Pulmonares/diagnóstico por imagem
2.
Acad Radiol ; 25(12): 1556-1563, 2018 12.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29724674

RESUMO

RATIONALE AND OBJECTIVES: Chest X-rays (CXR) are one of the most frequently requested imaging examinations and are fundamental to many patient pathways. The aim of this study was to investigate the diagnostic accuracy of CXR interpretation by reporting radiographers (technologists). METHODS: A cohort of consultant radiologists (n = 10) and reporting radiographers (technologists; n = 11) interpreted a bank (n = 106) of adult CXRs that contained a range of pathologies. Jack-knife alternate free-response receiver operating characteristic (JAFROC) methodology was used to determine the performance of the observers (JAFROC v4.2). A noninferiority approach was used, with a predefined margin of clinical insignificance of 10% of average consultant radiologist diagnostic accuracy. RESULTS: The diagnostic accuracy of the reporting radiographers (figure of merit = 0.828, 95% confidence interval 0.808-0.847) was noninferior to the consultant radiologists (figure of merit = 0.788, 95% confidence interval 0.766-0.811), P < .0001. CONCLUSIONS: With appropriate postgraduate education, reporting radiographers are able to interpret CXRs at a level comparable to consultant radiologists.


Assuntos
Pessoal Técnico de Saúde/normas , Cardiopatias/diagnóstico por imagem , Pneumopatias/diagnóstico por imagem , Radiologistas/normas , Erros de Diagnóstico , Humanos , Variações Dependentes do Observador , Estudos Prospectivos , Curva ROC , Radiografia Torácica
3.
J Med Radiat Sci ; 65(3): 200-208, 2018 Sep.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29806102

RESUMO

INTRODUCTION: Diagnostic capacity and time to diagnosis are frequently identified as a barrier to improving cancer patient outcomes. Maximising the contribution of the medical imaging workforce, including reporting radiographers, is one way to improve service delivery. METHODS: An efficient and effective centralised model of workplace training support was designed for a cohort of trainee chest X-ray (CXR) reporting radiographers. A comprehensive schedule of tutorials was planned and aligned with the curriculum of a post-graduate certificate in CXR reporting. Trainees were supported via a hub and spoke model (centralised training model), with the majority of education provided by a core group of experienced CXR reporting radiographers. Trainee and departmental feedback on the model was obtained using an online survey. RESULTS: Fourteen trainees were recruited from eight National Health Service Trusts across London. Significant efficiencies of scale were possible with centralised support (48 h) compared to traditional workplace support (348 h). Trainee and manager feedback overall was positive. Trainees and managers both reported good trainee support, translation of learning to practice and increased confidence. Logistics, including trainee travel and release, were identified as areas for improvement. CONCLUSION: Centralised workplace training support is an effective and efficient method to create sustainable diagnostic capacity and support improvements in the lung cancer pathway.


Assuntos
Capacitação em Serviço/métodos , Neoplasias Pulmonares/diagnóstico por imagem , Radiografia Torácica/normas , Radiologistas/educação , Adulto , Inglaterra , Feminino , Humanos , Capacitação em Serviço/normas , Masculino , Radiologistas/normas , Materiais de Ensino
4.
Trials ; 18(1): 521, 2017 Nov 06.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29110698

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Diagnostic capacity and suboptimal logistics are consistently identified as barriers to timely diagnosis of cancer, especially lung cancer. Immediate chest X-ray (CXR) reporting for patients referred from general practice is advocated in the National Optimal Lung Cancer Pathway to improve time to diagnosis of lung cancer and to reduce inappropriate urgent respiratory medicine referral for suspected cancer (2WW) referrals. The aim of radioX is to examine the impact of immediate reporting by radiographers of CXRs requested by general practice (GP) on lung cancer patient pathways. METHODS: A two-way comparative study that will compare the time to diagnosis of lung cancer for patients. Internal comparison will be made between those who receive an immediate radiographer report of a GP CXR compared to standard radiographer GP CXR reporting over a 12-month period. External comparison will be made with a similar, neighbouring hospital trust that does not have radiographer CXR reporting. Primary outcome is the effect on the speed of the lung cancer pathway (diagnosis of cancer or discharge). Secondary outcomes include the effect of the pathway on efficiency including the number of repeat CXRs performed in a timely fashion for suspected infection and the effect of immediate reporting of GP CXRs on patient satisfaction. DISCUSSION: The radioX trial will examine the hypothesis that immediate reporting of CXRs referred from GP reduces the time to diagnosis of lung cancer or discharge from the lung cancer pathway. TRIAL REGISTRATION: International Standard Randomised Controlled Trial Number ISRCTN21818068 . Registered on 20 June 2017.


Assuntos
Procedimentos Clínicos , Detecção Precoce de Câncer/métodos , Medicina Geral , Neoplasias Pulmonares/diagnóstico por imagem , Radiografia Torácica , Radiologistas , Protocolos Clínicos , Inglaterra , Humanos , Comunicação Interdisciplinar , Neoplasias Pulmonares/terapia , Equipe de Assistência ao Paciente , Satisfação do Paciente , Valor Preditivo dos Testes , Prognóstico , Encaminhamento e Consulta , Projetos de Pesquisa , Tempo para o Tratamento , Fluxo de Trabalho
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA