The effect of itraconazole on the pharmacokinetics of lorlatinib: results of a phase I, open-label, crossover study in healthy participants.

Background The third-generation tyrosine kinase inhibitor lorlatinib is approved for the treatment of ALK-positive metastatic NSCLC. CYP3A plays a major role in lorlatinib metabolism; therefore, a drug-drug interaction study was warranted to evaluate the impact of the strong CYP3A inhibitor, itraconazole, on lorlatinib plasma exposure. Methods This phase 1, open-label, 2-period, crossover study estimated the effects of itraconazole on the plasma pharmacokinetics and safety of lorlatinib in healthy participants (NCT02838264). Single-dose lorlatinib 50 mg (n = 2), 75 mg (n = 2) and 100 mg (n = 12) was administered in Period 1. In Period 2, itraconazole oral solution 200 mg/day was administered on Days 1-11, and single-dose lorlatinib on Day 5. Blood samples were collected up to 168 h after lorlatinib dosing. Results During daily dosing with itraconazole (Period 2), the ratios of the adjusted geometric means for area under the plasma concentration-time profile extrapolated to infinity (AUCinf) and maximum plasma concentration (Cmax) of single-dose lorlatinib 100 mg were 141.79% (90% confidence interval, 128.71%, 156.21%) and 124.39% (110.20%, 140.41%), respectively, compared with Period 1 (lorlatinib alone). Lorlatinib was well tolerated alone and with itraconazole. No serious adverse events or withdrawals were reported. Conclusions Co-administration of itraconazole and lorlatinib increased the plasma exposure of lorlatinib relative to lorlatinib alone in healthy participants. Therefore, concomitant use of lorlatinib with strong CYP3A inhibitors should be avoided. If this combination is unavoidable, the starting dose of lorlatinib should be reduced from 100 mg to 75 mg.

Axitinib plasma pharmacokinetics and ethnic differences.

Axitinib, a potent and selective tyrosine kinase inhibitor of vascular endothelial growth factor receptors 1, 2, and 3, showed improved progression-free survival over sorafenib in patients previously treated for advanced renal cell carcinoma in the AXIS trial. Although a few studies had established the efficacy and safety of axitinib in Asian patients, additional evaluation was necessary to obtain regulatory approval in several Asian countries, especially in light of ethnic differences that are known to exist in genetic polymorphisms for metabolizing enzymes such as cytochrome P450 (CYP) 3A5, CYP2C19 and uridine diphosphate glucuronosyltransferase (UGT) 1A1, which are involved in axitinib metabolism. Axitinib plasma pharmacokinetics following single or multiple administration of oral axitinib in Asian (Japanese or Chinese) healthy subjects as well as Asian patients with advanced solid tumors was compared with that obtained in Caucasians. Upon review, the data demonstrated that axitinib can be characterized as not sensitive to ethnic factors based on its pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic properties. Axitinib exhibited similar pharmacokinetics in Asian and non-Asian subjects. A pooled population pharmacokinetic analysis indicated lack of a clinically meaningful effect of ethnicity on axitinib disposition. Therefore, dose adjustment for axitinib on the basis of ethnicity is not currently warranted.

Treatment of advanced thyroid cancer with axitinib: Phase 2 study with pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic and quality-of-life assessments.

BACKGROUND: In a previous phase 2 trial, axitinib was active and well tolerated in patients with advanced thyroid cancer. In this second phase 2 trial, the efficacy and safety of axitinib were evaluated further in this population, and pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic relationships and patient-reported outcomes were assessed. METHODS: Patients (N = 52) with metastatic or unresectable, locally advanced medullary or differentiated thyroid cancer that was refractory or not amenable to iodine-131 received a starting dose of axitinib 5 mg twice daily. The primary endpoint was the objective response rate (ORR). Secondary endpoints included progression-free survival (PFS), overall survival (OS), safety, pharmacokinetic parameters, and patient-reported outcomes assessed with the MD Anderson Symptom Inventory questionnaire. RESULTS: The overall ORR was 35% (18 partial responses), and 18 patients had stable disease for ≥16 weeks. The median PFS was 16.1 months, and the median OS was 27.2 months. All-causality, grade ≥3 adverse events (>5%) were fatigue, dyspnea, diarrhea, decreased weight, pain in extremity, hypertension, decreased appetite, palmar-plantar erythrodysesthesia, hypocalcemia, and myalgia. Patients who had greater axitinib exposure had a longer median PFS. Quality of life was maintained during treatment with axitinib, and no significant deterioration in symptoms or interference in daily life caused by symptoms, assessed on MD Anderson Symptom Inventory subscales, were observed. CONCLUSIONS: Axitinib has activity and a manageable safety profile while maintaining quality of life, and it represents an additional treatment option for patients with advanced thyroid cancer.

Population pharmacokinetic analysis of axitinib in healthy volunteers.

AIMS: Axitinib is a potent and selective second generation inhibitor of vascular endothelial growth factor receptors 1, 2 and 3 approved for second line treatment of advanced renal cell carcinoma. The objectives of this analysis were to assess plasma pharmacokinetics and identify covariates that may explain variability in axitinib disposition following single dose administration in healthy volunteers. METHODS: Plasma concentration-time data from 337 healthy volunteers in 10 phase I studies were analyzed, using non-linear mixed effects modelling (nonmem) to estimate population pharmacokinetic parameters and evaluate relationships between parameters and food, formulation, demographic factors, measures of renal and hepatic function and metabolic genotypes (UGT1A1*28 and CYP2C19). RESULTS: A two compartment structural model with first order absorption and lag time best described axitinib pharmacokinetics. Population estimates for systemic clearance (CL), central volume of distribution (Vc ), absorption rate constant (ka ) and absolute bioavailability (F) were 17.0 l h(-1) , 45.3 l, 0.523 h(-1) and 46.5%, respectively. With axitinib Form IV, ka and F increased in the fasted state by 207% and 33.8%, respectively. For Form XLI (marketed formulation), F was 15% lower compared with Form IV. CL was not significantly influenced by any of the covariates studied. Body weight significantly affected Vc , but the effect was within the estimated interindividual variability for Vc . CONCLUSIONS: The analysis established a model that adequately characterizes axitinib pharmacokinetics in healthy volunteers. Vc was found to increase with body weight. However, no change in plasma exposures is expected with change in body weight; hence no dose adjustment is warranted.

Axitinib with or without dose titration for first-line metastatic renal-cell carcinoma: a randomised double-blind phase 2 trial.

BACKGROUND: Population pharmacokinetic data suggest axitinib plasma exposure correlates with efficacy in metastatic renal-cell carcinoma. Axitinib dose titration might optimise exposure and improve outcomes. We prospectively assessed the efficacy and safety of axitinib dose titration in previously untreated patients with metastatic renal-cell carcinoma. METHODS: In this randomised, double-blind, multicentre, phase 2 study, patients were enrolled from 49 hospitals and outpatient clinics in the Czech Republic, Germany, Japan, Russia, Spain, and USA. Patients with treatment-naive metastatic renal-cell carcinoma received axitinib 5 mg twice daily during a 4 week lead-in period. Those patients with blood pressure 150/90 mm Hg or lower, no grade 3 or 4 treatment-related toxic effects, no dose reductions, and no more than two antihypertensive drugs for 2 consecutive weeks were stratified by Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status (0 vs 1), and then randomly assigned (1:1) to either masked titration with axitinib to total twice daily doses of 7 mg, and then 10 mg, if tolerated, or placebo titration. Patients who did not meet these criteria continued without titration. The primary objective was comparison of the proportion of patients achieving an objective response between randomised groups. Safety analyses were based on all patients who received at least one dose of axitinib. FINDINGS: Between Sept 2, 2009, and Feb 28, 2011, we enrolled 213 patients, of whom 112 were randomly assigned to either the axitinib titration group (56 patients) or the placebo titration group (56 patients). 91 were not eligible for titration, and ten withdrew during the lead-in period. 30 patients (54%, 95% CI 40-67) in the axitinib titration group had an objective response, as did 19 patients (34%, 22-48]) in the placebo titration group (one-sided p=0·019). 54 (59%, 95% CI 49-70) of non-randomised patients achieved an objective response. Common grade 3 or worse, all-causality adverse events in treated patients were hypertension (ten [18%] of 56 in the axitinib titration group vs five [9%] of 56 in the placebo titration group vs 45 [49%] of 91 in the non-randomised group), diarrhoea (seven [13%] vs two [4%] vs eight [9%]), and decreased weight (four [7%] vs three [5%] vs six [7%]). One or more all-causality serious adverse events were reported in 15 (27%) patients in the axitinib titration group, 13 (23%) patients in the placebo titration group, and 35 (38%) non-randomised patients. The most common serious adverse events in all 213 patients were disease progression and dehydration (eight each [4%]), and diarrhoea, vomiting, pneumonia, and decreased appetite (four each [2%]). INTERPRETATION: The greater proportion of patients in the axitinib titration group achieving an objective response supports the concept of individual axitinib dose titration in selected patients with metastatic renal-cell carcinoma. Axitinib shows clinical activity with a manageable safety profile in treatment-naive patients with this disease.

Evaluation of the Effect of Lorlatinib on CYP2B6, CYP2C9, UGT, and P-Glycoprotein Substrates in Patients with Advanced Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer.

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE: Lorlatinib is a tyrosine kinase inhibitor approved for the treatment of advanced anaplastic lymphoma kinase-positive non-small cell lung cancer. This study assessed the effect of steady-state lorlatinib on the metabolic enzymes cytochrome P450 (CYP) 2B6, CYP2C9, and uridine 5'-diphospho-glucuronosyltransferase (UGT) and the P-glycoprotein (P-gp) transporter. METHODS: Thirty-two patients received a single oral dose of a probe drug on Day - 2 to determine the pharmacokinetics of the probe drug alone. Starting on Day 1, patients received 100 mg oral lorlatinib daily. On Day 15, a single oral dose of the probe drug was administered concurrently with lorlatinib. Pharmacokinetic parameters for these probe substrates were assessed. RESULTS: Plasma exposures of all probe substrates were reduced by lorlatinib compared with the probe alone. The greatest reduction in area under the plasma concentration-time curve from time zero to infinity (AUC∞) and maximum (peak) plasma drug concentration (Cmax) (67% and 63% decrease, respectively) was observed with the P-gp probe substrate fexofenadine. Lorlatinib coadministration also decreased the AUC∞ and Cmax of bupropion (CYP2B6 probe substrate) by 25% and 27%, tolbutamide (CYP2C9 probe substrate) by 43% and 15%, and acetaminophen (UGT probe substrate) by 45% and 28%, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: Lorlatinib is a net moderate inducer of P-gp and a weak inducer of CYP2B6, CYP2C9, and UGT after steady state is achieved with daily dosing. Medications that are P-gp substrates with a narrow therapeutic window should be avoided in patients taking lorlatinib; no dose modifications are needed with substrates of CYP2B6, CYP2C9, or UGT. CLINICALTRIALS: gov: NCT01970865.

Dose Optimization in Oncology Drug Development: An International Consortium for Innovation and Quality in Pharmaceutical Development White Paper.

The landscape of oncology drug development has witnessed remarkable advancements over the last few decades, significantly improving clinical outcomes and quality of life for patients with cancer. Project Optimus, introduced by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration, stands as a groundbreaking endeavor to reform dose selection of oncology drugs, presenting both opportunities and challenges for the field. To address complex dose optimization challenges, an Oncology Dose Optimization IQ Working Group was created to characterize current practices, provide recommendations for improvement, develop a clinical toolkit, and engage Health Authorities. Historically, dose selection for cytotoxic chemotherapeutics has focused on the maximum tolerated dose, a paradigm that is less relevant for targeted therapies and new treatment modalities. A survey conducted by this group gathered insights from member companies regarding industry practices in oncology dose optimization. Given oncology drug development is a complex effort with multidimensional optimization and high failure rates due to lack of clinically relevant efficacy, this Working Group advocates for a case-by-case approach to inform the timing, specific quantitative targets, and strategies for dose optimization, depending on factors such as disease characteristics, patient population, mechanism of action, including associated resistance mechanisms, and therapeutic index. This white paper highlights the evolving nature of oncology dose optimization, the impact of Project Optimus, and the need for a tailored and evidence-based approach to optimize oncology drug dosing regimens effectively.

Phase I study of axitinib (AG-013736) in combination with gemcitabine in patients with advanced pancreatic cancer.

PURPOSE: Axitinib (AG-013736), an oral, potent, and selective inhibitor of vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) receptors 1, 2, and 3, is under investigation for treatment of various solid tumors. The safety and pharmacokinetics of axitinib in combination with gemcitabine in patients with advanced pancreatic cancer was evaluated in the phase I portion of this trial. The randomized phase II portion was reported separately. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Patients with advanced pancreatic cancer who had received no prior chemotherapy were eligible for this study. Pharmacokinetic profiles of the drugs were obtained on cycle (C) 1 day (D) 1 (gemcitabine alone 1,000 mg/m(2)), C1D14 (steady state, axitinib alone 5 mg twice daily [BID]), and C1D15 (gemcitabine plus steady-state axitinib). Adverse events were monitored weekly at the clinic. RESULTS: Eight patients participated in the phase IB portion of the trial. Patients received gemcitabine on D1, D8, and D15 and continuous axitinib in a 28 day-cycle beginning C1D3. There was no dose-limiting toxicity. Common treatment-related adverse events included fatigue, diarrhea, dysphonia, and hypertension. Myelosuppression was similar to gemcitabine monotherapy. No apparent major pharmacokinetic interactions between gemcitabine and axitinib were observed. Of six patients evaluable for efficacy, three had confirmed partial responses. CONCLUSIONS: Axitinib (5 mg BID) and gemcitabine (1,000 mg/m(2)) were well tolerated when administered together, without any pharmacokinetic interactions, and showed encouraging antitumor activity.

Effect of ketoconazole on the pharmacokinetics of axitinib in healthy volunteers.

OBJECTIVE: Axitinib (AG-013736), an oral, potent, and selective inhibitor of vascular endothelial growth factor receptors 1, 2, and 3, is metabolized primarily by cytochrome P450 (CYP) 3A with minor contributions from CYP1A2, CYP2C19, and glucuronidation. Co-administration with CYP inhibitors may increase systemic exposure to axitinib and alter its safety profile. This study evaluated changes in axitinib plasma pharmacokinetic parameters and assessed safety and tolerability in healthy subjects, following axitinib co-administration with the potent CYP3A inhibitor ketoconazole. METHODS: In this randomized, single-blind, two-way crossover study, 32 healthy volunteers received placebo, followed by a single 5-mg oral dose of axitinib, administered either alone or on the fourth day of dosing with oral ketoconazole (400 mg/day for 7 days). RESULTS: Axitinib exposure was significantly increased in the presence of ketoconazole, with a geometric mean ratio for area under the plasma concentration-time curve from time zero to infinity of 2.06 (90% confidence interval [CI]: 1.84-2.30) and a geometric mean ratio for maximum plasma concentration (C(max)) of 1.50 (90% CI: 1.33-1.70). For axitinib alone or with ketoconazole, C(max) occurred 1.5 and 2.0 h after dosing, respectively. Adverse events were predominantly mild; the most commonly reported treatment-related adverse events were headache and nausea. CONCLUSIONS: Axitinib plasma exposures and peak concentrations were increased following concurrent administration of axitinib and ketoconazole in healthy volunteers. Axitinib alone and in combination with ketoconazole was well tolerated. These findings provide an upper exposure for expected axitinib plasma concentrations in the presence of potent metabolic inhibition.

A literature review of liver function test elevations in rifampin drug-drug interaction studies.

Although rifampin drug-drug interaction (DDI) studies are routinely conducted, there have been instances of liver function test (LFT) elevations, warranting further evaluation. A literature review was conducted to identify studies in which combination with rifampin resulted in hepatic events and evaluate any similarities. Over 600 abstracts and manuscripts describing rifampin DDI studies were first evaluated, of which 30 clinical studies reported LFT elevations. Out of these, 11 studies included ritonavir in combination with other drug(s) in the rifampin DDI study. The number of subjects that were discontinued from treatment on these studies ranged from 0 to 71 (0-100% of subjects in each study). The number of subjects hospitalized for adverse events in these studies ranged from 0 to 41 (0-83.67% of subjects in each study). LFT elevations in greater than 50% of subjects were noted during the concomitant administration of rifampin with ritonavir-boosted protease inhibitors and with lorlatinib; with labeled contraindication due to observed hepatotoxicity related safety findings only for saquinavir/ritonavir and lorlatinib. In the lorlatinib and ritonavir DDI studies, considerable LFT elevations were observed rapidly, typically within 24-72 h following co-administration. A possible sequence effect has been speculated, where rifampin induction prior to administration of the combination may be associated with increased severity of the LFT elevations. The potential role of rifampin in the metabolic activation of certain drugs into metabolites with hepatic effects needs to be taken into consideration when conducting rifampin DDI studies, particularly those for which the metabolic profiles are not fully elucidated.

Evaluation of Lorlatinib Cerebrospinal Fluid Concentrations in Relation to Target Concentrations for Anaplastic Lymphoma Kinase (ALK) Inhibition.

Lorlatinib is a third-generation, brain-penetrant anaplastic lymphoma kinase (ALK) and c-ros oncogene 1 (ROS1) tyrosine kinase inhibitor (TKI) with robust intracranial activity in patients with ALK- or ROS1-positive non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). Data from the ongoing open-label, single-arm, multicenter, phase-1/2 study of lorlatinib in patients with metastatic ALK- or ROS1-positive NSCLC were used to further investigate the potential brain penetration of lorlatinib. Patients received escalating lorlatinib doses (10-200 mg once daily or 35-100 mg twice daily) or the approved dosing (100 mg daily). Plasma was collected from all patients, and cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) was collected at baseline and during the study from 5 patients with suspected or confirmed leptomeningeal carcinomatosis or carcinomatous meningitis. For those 5 patients, lorlatinib concentrations ranged from 2.64 to 125 ng/mL in the CSF and from 12.7 to 457 ng/mL in the plasma; free plasma concentrations ranged from 4.318 to 155.385 ng/mL. The CSF/free plasma ratio was 0.77 (R2  = 0.96 and P < .001). Using a post-hoc population pharmacokinetic model, the average steady-state unbound plasma concentration of lorlatinib was derived and the CSF concentration was estimated for all patients. Known minimum efficacy concentrations (Ceff ) for wild-type and mutated (L1196M and G1202R) ALK were used to derive central nervous system (CNS) Ceff . Estimated CNS concentrations exceeded the derived CNS Ceff values in all patients for wild-type ALK and the ALK L1196M mutation, and in 35.8% of patients for the ALK G1202R mutation. Projected lorlatinib CNS concentrations were consistent with the high intracranial response rates reported in clinical trials and provide further evidence of the potent CNS penetration of lorlatinib.

Evaluation of the absolute oral bioavailability of the anaplastic lymphoma kinase/c-ROS oncogene 1 kinase inhibitor lorlatinib in healthy participants.

PURPOSE: Lorlatinib is a third-generation tyrosine kinase inhibitor currently approved for the treatment of anaplastic lymphoma kinase (ALK)-positive metastatic non-small cell lung cancer. This open-label, phase 1, randomized two-sequence, two-treatment, two-period, crossover study investigated the absolute oral bioavailability of lorlatinib in healthy participants. METHODS: Eligible participants were randomized to receive two treatments in one of two sequences: lorlatinib 100 mg single oral dose followed by lorlatinib 50 mg intravenous (IV) dose, or lorlatinib IV dose followed by lorlatinib oral dose, each with at least a 10-day washout between successive lorlatinib doses. Blood samples for pharmacokinetics were collected for up to 144 hours (h) after dosing. Validated liquid chromatographic-tandem mass spectrometry was used to determine plasma concentrations of lorlatinib and its benzoic acid metabolite PF-06895751. RESULTS: In total, 11 participants were enrolled (mean age 37.6 years, all male). The adjusted geometric mean (90% confidence interval) for the absolute oral bioavailability was 80.78% (75.73-86.16%). Using non-compartmental analysis, the estimated arithmetic mean elimination plasma half-life of lorlatinib was 25.5 and 27.0 h after the oral and IV doses, respectively. No deaths, serious adverse events (AEs), or severe AEs were reported, and most treatment-emergent AEs were mild in severity, with two events of transaminase increase of moderate severity. All treatment-emergent AEs were resolved by the end of the study. CONCLUSION: Both oral and IV lorlatinib were well-tolerated in healthy participants and oral lorlatinib is highly bioavailable after oral administration.

A Phase I Study to Evaluate the Pharmacokinetics and Safety of Lorlatinib in Adults with Mild, Moderate, and Severe Renal Impairment.

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: Lorlatinib is approved (100 mg once daily [QD]) for the treatment of patients with anaplastic lymphoma kinase- (ALK) positive metastatic non-small cell lung cancer. This study evaluated the impact of varying degrees of renal impairment on the safety and pharmacokinetics of lorlatinib. METHODS: Participants were assigned to mild, moderate, and severe renal impairment groups and to a matching normal renal function group based on absolute estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR, based on the Modification of Diet in Renal Disease equation and adjusted for body surface area [BSA]) and were evaluated for pharmacokinetics and safety. RESULTS: A total of 29 participants (5 with severe renal impairment; 8 each with moderate and mild impairment and normal renal function) were enrolled and received a single dose of lorlatinib 100 mg. One of the participants with severe renal impairment had end-stage renal disease with a baseline absolute eGFR of 10.3 mL/min. No serious adverse events (AEs) were reported. Eighteen AEs, all mild or moderate in severity, were reported by 12 participants (5, 2, 4, and 1 in the normal, mild, moderate, and severe groups, respectively). Area under the plasma concentration-time profile from time zero extrapolated to infinity (AUCinf) for lorlatinib was increased by 4%, 19%, and 41% in the mild, moderate, and severe renal impairment groups, respectively, compared with the normal renal function cohort. CONCLUSION: Lorlatinib 100 mg was well tolerated. As participants with mild and moderate renal impairment did not experience clinically meaningful increases in lorlatinib exposure, no lorlatinib dose adjustment is recommended in these populations. Patients with severe renal impairment are recommended to reduce the starting dose of lorlatinib from 100 mg QD to 75 mg QD. GOV IDENTIFIER: NCT03542305 (available May 31, 2018 on clinicaltrials.gov).

Influence of mild and moderate hepatic impairment on axitinib pharmacokinetics.

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the effects of hepatic impairment on the pharmacokinetics and safety of a single, oral axitinib dose in subjects with mild or moderate hepatic impairment. METHODS: In this phase I, open-label, parallel-group study, a total of 24 subjects with either normal hepatic function (n = 8) or with mild (n = 8) or moderate (n = 8) hepatic impairment were administered a single, oral dose of axitinib (5 mg). Blood samples were collected at intervals up to 144 h following dosing, and plasma pharmacokinetics and safety were assessed. Changes in axitinib plasma exposures in subjects with mild or moderate hepatic impairment were predicted using computer simulations and used to guide initial dosing in the clinical study. RESULTS: Axitinib exposure was similar in subjects with normal hepatic function and those with mild hepatic impairment, but approximately twofold higher in subjects with moderate hepatic impairment. Axitinib exposure weakly correlated with measures of hepatic function but was not affected by smoking status. Axitinib protein binding was similar in the three treatment groups. No significant treatment-related adverse events were reported. CONCLUSIONS: Compared with subjects with normal hepatic function, moderate hepatic impairment increased axitinib exposure, suggesting that the oral clearance of axitinib is altered in these subjects. In addition, these data indicate a possible need for a dose reduction in subjects who develop moderate or worse hepatic impairment during axitinib treatment. A single 5-mg dose of axitinib was well tolerated in subjects with mild or moderate hepatic impairment.

Population pharmacokinetic model with time-varying clearance for lorlatinib using pooled data from patients with non-small cell lung cancer and healthy participants.

Lorlatinib, a selective inhibitor of anaplastic lymphoma kinase (ALK) and c-ROS oncogene 1 (ROS1) tyrosine kinase, is indicated for the treatment of ALK-positive metastatic non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) following progression on crizotinib and at least one other ALK inhibitor, or alectinib/ceritinib as the first ALK inhibitor therapy for metastatic disease. The population pharmacokinetics (PopPK) of lorlatinib was conducted by nonlinear mixed effects modeling of data from 330 patients with ALK-positive or ROS1-positive NSCLC and 95 healthy participants from six phase I studies in healthy volunteers; demographic, metabolizer phenotype, and patient prognostic factors were evaluated as covariates. Lorlatinib plasma PK was well-characterized by a two-compartment model with sequential zero-order and first-order absorption and a time-varying induction of clearance. Single dose clearance was estimated to be 9.04 L/h. Assuming that the metabolic auto-induction of lorlatinib reaches saturation in ~ 5 half-lives, clearance was estimated to approach a maximum of 14.5 L/h at steady-state after a period of ~ 7.25 days. The volume of distribution of the central compartment was estimated to be 121 L and the first-order absorption rate constant was estimated to be 3.1 h-1 . Baseline albumin and lorlatinib total daily dose were significant covariates on lorlatinib clearance. Use of proton pump inhibitors was found to be a significant covariate on the lorlatinib absorption rate constant. These factors were assessed to have no clinically meaningful impact on lorlatinib plasma exposure, and no dose adjustments are considered necessary based on the examined covariates.

The Effect of Modafinil on the Safety and Pharmacokinetics of Lorlatinib: A Phase I Study in Healthy Participants.

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE: Lorlatinib is a third-generation tyrosine kinase inhibitor approved for the second-line treatment of patients with advanced anaplastic lymphoma kinase-positive non-small cell lung cancer. Lorlatinib is metabolized by cytochrome P450 (CYP) 3A and contraindicated with strong CYP3A inducers because of significant transaminase elevation. This phase I, open-label, two-period study evaluated the impact of a moderate CYP3A inducer, modafinil, on the safety and pharmacokinetics of lorlatinib. METHODS: Healthy participants received single-dose oral lorlatinib (50 mg [n = 2], 75 mg [n = 2], or 100 mg [n = 2 + 10 in an expanded cohort]) in Period 1 followed by modafinil 400 mg/day (days 1-19) and single-dose lorlatinib (day 15, same dose as previous) both orally in Period 2. Blood samples were collected for 120 h after each dose of lorlatinib. RESULTS: Of 16 participants, ten completed the study; six participants, all in the expanded 100-mg cohort, discontinued because of adverse events during the modafinil lead-in dosing period. Single doses of lorlatinib 50-100 mg were well tolerated when administered alone and in the presence of steady-state modafinil. Of the ten participants who completed the study, all had transaminase values within normal limits during the combination of lorlatinib with modafinil. The ratios of the adjusted geometric means (90% confidence interval) for lorlatinib area under the plasma concentration-time profile extrapolated to infinity and maximum plasma concentration were 76.69% (70.15-83.83%) and 77.78% (65.92-91.77), respectively, when lorlatinib 100 mg was co-administered with steady-state modafinil compared with lorlatinib administration alone. CONCLUSION: Lorlatinib 100 mg may be safely co-administered with moderate CYP3A inducers. CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov NCT03961997; registered 23 May, 2019.

Phase 1 Study Evaluating the Effects of the Proton Pump Inhibitor Rabeprazole and Food on the Pharmacokinetics of Lorlatinib in Healthy Participants.

Lorlatinib is approved worldwide as treatment for anaplastic lymphoma kinase-positive and c-ros oncogene 1-positive non-small cell lung cancer. The objectives of this phase 1, open-label crossover study (NCT02569554) in healthy adult participants were to determine (1) the effects of the proton pump inhibitor (PPI) rabeprazole on lorlatinib pharmacokinetics (PK), (2) the effects of a high-fat meal on lorlatinib PK, and (3) the relative bioavailability of an oral solution to tablet formulation of lorlatinib under fasted conditions. Participants were followed on-study for ≥50 days after the first dose of lorlatinib. Participants received treatments over 4 periods, with a washout of ≥10 days between consecutive lorlatinib doses. Twenty-seven participants were enrolled and received lorlatinib, and all were assessed for PK and safety. Results showed no effect of multiple doses of rabeprazole on the total plasma exposure of a single oral dose of lorlatinib 100-mg tablets. The results also indicated that a high-fat meal had no effect on lorlatinib PK after a single 100-mg oral dose. In addition, the relative bioavailability of lorlatinib oral solution compared with lorlatinib tablets was complete (approximately 108%). The safety profile of lorlatinib was consistent with that reported in previous studies, and most treatment-related adverse events were mild to moderate. These data indicate that lorlatinib can be administered with drugs that modify gastric acid, including PPIs, without restriction. These results also confirm that lorlatinib can be administered regardless of food intake.

Pharmacokinetics of Lorlatinib After Single and Multiple Dosing in Patients with Anaplastic Lymphoma Kinase (ALK)-Positive Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer: Results from a Global Phase I/II Study.

BACKGROUND: Lorlatinib demonstrated efficacy (including intracranial activity) in patients with anaplastic lymphoma kinase (ALK)-positive non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) in a phase I/II study (NCT01970865). BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE: This analysis describes the pharmacokinetics (PK) of lorlatinib following single and multiple dosing. METHODS: This ongoing, multicenter, open-label, single-arm, phase I/II trial enrolled patients with ALK-positive or c-ros oncogene 1 (ROS1)-positive advanced NSCLC. In phase I, patients received escalating doses of lorlatinib (10-200 mg orally once daily) and twice-daily doses of 35, 75, and 100 mg in continuous 21-day cycles. In phase II, lorlatinib was administered at a starting dose of 100 mg once daily in continuous 21-day cycles. Parameters investigated included the potential for lorlatinib to inhibit/induce cytochrome P450 (CYP) 3A; the absorption/metabolism of lorlatinib and its major metabolite PF-06895751; and differences in these parameters between Asian and non-Asian patients. RESULTS: Data were available for 54 patients from phase I and 275 patients from phase II. Lorlatinib plasma exposure increased dose proportionally after single doses of 10-200 mg, and slightly less than dose proportionally after multiple doses. Lorlatinib clearance increased following multiple dosing compared with single dosing, indicating autoinduction. The area under the concentration-time curve from time zero to time τ (the dosing interval; AUCτ) of PF-06895751 was approximately 80% higher than that of lorlatinib after multiple dosing. Lorlatinib exhibited brain penetration. Furthermore, no overt differences in single- and multiple-dose PK parameters between the Asian and non-Asian patients were observed. CONCLUSIONS: Lorlatinib is highly brain penetrant and exhibits autoinduction after multiple dosing. There appears to be no inherent differences in lorlatinib PK between healthy subjects and cancer patients, or between Asian and non-Asian patients. ClinicalTrials.gov NCT01970865.

Liver Toxicity Observed With Lorlatinib When Combined With Strong CYP3A Inducers: Evaluation of Cynomolgus Monkey as a Nonclinical Model for Assessing the Mechanism of Combinational Toxicity.

Lorlatinib is a potent small-molecule anaplastic lymphoma kinase inhibitor approved for the treatment of patients with nonsmall cell lung cancer. In a drug-drug interaction study in healthy human participants, liver enzyme elevations were observed when a single 100 mg dose of lorlatinib was administered after multiple doses of rifampin, a strong cytochrome P450 (CYP) 3A inducer and a pregnane X receptor (PXR) agonist. A series of in vitro and in vivo studies were conducted to evaluate potential mechanisms for the observed clinical toxicity. To investigate the involvement of CYP3A and/or PXR in the observed liver toxicity, studies were conducted in cynomolgus monkeys administered lorlatinib alone or with coadministration of multiple doses of known CYP3A inducers that are predominantly PXR agonists (rifampin, St. John's wort) or predominantly constitutive androstane receptor agonists (carbamazepine, phenytoin) and a net CYP3A inhibitory PXR agonist (ritonavir). Results from the investigative studies identified cynomolgus monkeys as a pharmacologically relevant nonclinical model, which recapitulated the elevated liver function test results observed in humans. Furthermore, liver toxicity was only observed in this model when lorlatinib was coadministered with strong CYP3A inducers, and the effects were not restricted to, or exclusively dependent upon, a PXR activation mechanism. These results generated mechanistic insights on the liver enzyme elevations observed in the clinical drug-drug interaction study and provided guidance on appropriate product safety label for lorlatinib.

Correction to: The Effect of Rifampin on the Pharmacokinetics and Safety of Lorlatinib: Results of a Phase One, Open-Label, Crossover Study in Healthy Participants.

In the original article, the reference 4 has been published and cited incorrectly.