RESUMO
OBJECTIVES: Widespread use of telemedicine for contraceptive care, including long-acting reversible contraception (LARC), was adopted in the United States in response to the COVID-19 pandemic. Given the rapid implementation of these services, little is known about the use of telemedicine for adolescent and young adult (AYA) contraceptive care. This study examined the routine use of telemedicine for LARC post-insertion care by comparing visit attendance between AYAs receiving LARC before and after the COVID-19 pandemic onset. METHODS: This analysis included LARC insertions 3/1/19-11/30/19 (pre-pandemic onset cohort) and 4/1/20-12/31/20 (post-pandemic onset cohort) from three Adolescent Medicine subspecialty clinics in the United States. De-identified data were collected via review of the electronic health record. Descriptive statistics, χ2 tests, and t-tests described and compared groups. Adjusted logistic regression models examined factors associated with attending a post-insertion visit and attending this visit via telemedicine. RESULTS: This analysis included 525 LARC insertions (279 pre- and 246 post-pandemic onset). The proportion of AYAs attending a post-insertion visit increased after the COVID-19 pandemic onset (pre 30â¯% vs. post 46â¯%; p≤0.001). Adjusted models revealed that the post-pandemic onset cohort was nearly twice as likely to attend a post-insertion visit as the pre-pandemic onset cohort (OR=1.90; 95â¯% CI=1.68-2.15). Of those attending this visit in the post-pandemic onset cohort (n=112), 42â¯% utilized telemedicine. CONCLUSIONS: AYAs were more likely to attend post-insertion visits after the COVID-19 pandemic onset than before. Telemedicine may have influenced this change in visit attendance.
Assuntos
COVID-19 , Contracepção Reversível de Longo Prazo , Estados Unidos/epidemiologia , Adulto Jovem , Adolescente , Humanos , Pandemias , AnticoncepcionaisRESUMO
STUDY OBJECTIVE: Telemedicine for long-acting reversible contraception (LARC) care is understudied given the rapid implementation of these services in response to the COVID-19 pandemic. We compared outcomes over 1 year of adolescents and young adults (AYAs) attending a LARC post-insertion visit via telemedicine vs in person. DESIGN: Longitudinal cohort study. SETTING: Four academic adolescent medicine clinics in the United States. PARTICIPANTS: AYAs (ages 13-26 years) who received LARC between 4/1/20 and 3/1/21 and attended a post-insertion visit within 12 weeks. INTERVENTIONS: none. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Outcomes over 1 year were compared between AYAs who completed this visit via telemedicine vs in person. We analyzed the data using descriptive statistics, bivariate analyses, and regression models. RESULTS: Of 194 AYAs (ages 13.9-25.7 years) attending a post-insertion visit, 40.2% utilized telemedicine. Menstrual management (odds ratio (OR) = 1.02; confidence interval (CI): 0.40-2.60), acne management (P = .28), number of visits attended (relative risk (RR) = 1.08; CI: 0.99-1.19), and LARC removal (P = .95) were similar between groups. AYAs attending via telemedicine were less likely than those attending in person to have STI testing (P = .001). Intrauterine device expulsion or malposition and arm symptoms with implant in situ were rare outcomes in both groups. CONCLUSION: Roughly 40% of AYAs attended a post-insertion visit via telemedicine during the first year of the COVID-19 pandemic and had similar 1-year outcomes as those attending in person. The decreased likelihood of STI testing for those using telemedicine highlights the need to provide alternative options, when indicated, such as asynchronous or home testing. Our results support the use of telemedicine for AYA LARC post-insertion care and identify potential gaps in telemedicine care which can help improve clinic protocols.
Assuntos
COVID-19 , Contracepção Reversível de Longo Prazo , Telemedicina , Humanos , Adolescente , Telemedicina/estatística & dados numéricos , Feminino , Adulto Jovem , Contracepção Reversível de Longo Prazo/estatística & dados numéricos , Adulto , Estudos Longitudinais , COVID-19/epidemiologia , COVID-19/prevenção & controle , Estados Unidos , SARS-CoV-2RESUMO
Adolescent medicine (AM) subspecialists provide primary, subspecialty, and consultative care to adolescents and young adults (AYAs). Given insufficient numbers of AM subspecialists to care for all AYAs, the workforce supports AYAs health care capacity through education, research, advocacy, and the development of policies and programs sensitive to their unique needs. A modeling project funded by the American Board of Pediatrics Foundation was developed to forecast the pediatric subspecialty workforce in the United States from 2020 to 2040 on the basis of current trends in each subspecialty. The model predicts workforce supply at baseline and across alternative scenarios, and reports results in headcount and headcount adjusted for percentage of time spent in clinical care, termed "clinical workforce equivalent." For the AM subspecialty, several scenarios were considered that modified the number of fellows and/or clinical time. The baseline model predicted low growth nationally (27% and 13% increase in total AM subspecialists and AM subspecialists per 100 000 children, respectively) and declines in AM workforce relative to population growth in census divisions with existing geographic workforce disparities. In the alternative scenarios, fellow number and clinical time changes did not significantly change predictions relative to the baseline model, but a 12.5% decrease in fellows predicted a 40% reduction in the workforce from baseline with a widening of geographic workforce disparities. On the basis of the expansive clinical and nonclinical roles of AM subspecialists and these forecasted workforce challenges, significant educational, practice, and policy changes will be necessary to bolster the supply of well-trained clinicians addressing the dynamic health care needs of AYAs.
Assuntos
Medicina do Adolescente , Adolescente , Adulto Jovem , Humanos , Criança , Saúde da Criança , Escolaridade , Encaminhamento e Consulta , Recursos HumanosRESUMO
STUDY OBJECTIVE: To describe adolescent and young adult (AYA) long-acting reversible contraception (LARC) follow-up care via telemedicine in the year following the COVID-19 pandemic onset DESIGN: Longitudinal cohort study SETTING: Three academic adolescent medicine clinics in the United States PARTICIPANTS: AYAs using LARC INTERVENTIONS: None MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: The main outcome measures were patient characteristics, visit information (frequency, timing, and modality), patient-reported symptoms, and outcomes for those presenting for LARC follow-up care between April 1, 2020, and March 31, 2021. Descriptive statistics were used to describe the sample. χ2 tests and t tests were used to compare groups. Adjusted logistic regression models using general estimating equations were applied to assess factors associated with telemedicine visits and to examine visit outcomes. RESULTS: Of the 319 AYAs (ages 13.6-25.7 years), 40.1% attended at least one LARC telemedicine visit. Patients attending any telemedicine encounter vs only in-person visits had similar demographic and clinical characteristics. Of the 426 follow-up visits, 270 (63.4%) were conducted in person and 156 (36.6%) were performed via telemedicine. Most visits (62.7%) occurred within 12 months of device insertion. Reports of bothersome uterine bleeding beyond patient expectations (OR = 1.26; 95% CI, 0.80-1.96), any symptom (OR = 1.40; 95% CI, 0.94-2.10), or 2 or more symptoms (OR = 1.22; 95% CI, 0.67-2.22) at follow-up was not associated, positively or negatively, with mode of follow-up. Management of bleeding (OR = 1.27; 95% CI, 0.56-2.89), management of acne (P = .46), and need for rapid follow-up (P = .33) were similar between follow-up modalities. CONCLUSIONS: Patient demographic/clinical characteristics and visit outcomes were similar between telemedicine and in-person LARC follow-up. Telemedicine could play an important role in AYA LARC care.
Assuntos
COVID-19 , Contracepção Reversível de Longo Prazo , Telemedicina , Feminino , Humanos , Adulto Jovem , Adolescente , Estados Unidos/epidemiologia , Adulto , Pandemias , Assistência ao Convalescente , COVID-19/epidemiologia , AnticoncepçãoRESUMO
OBJECTIVE: Adolescent and young adult (AYA) women with pediatric-onset chronic diseases, such as cystic fibrosis (CF), face disease-specific sexual and reproductive health (SRH) concerns. Using concept mapping (CM), this study aimed to identify the SRH topics and outcomes valued by AYA women with CF and their parents. METHODS: Women with CF who were 13 to 30years of age and parents of 13- to 30-year-old daughters with CF participated in an online CM study. Participants individually brainstormed, rated, and sorted SRH topics important for AYA women with CF. Using multidimensional scaling, hierarchical cluster analyses, and t tests to assess rating differences, multidisciplinary stakeholders interpreted results during in-person meetings. RESULTS: Twenty-four participants (13 AYAs and 11 parents) generated 109 statements around SRH in CF; 88% completed rating and sorting. Sixteen stakeholders named 6 main clusters of concepts: fertility and pregnancy, deciding to have children, birth control, navigating life, sex, and gynecologic concerns. Participants rated birth control as highest in importance for adolescent women (meanâ¯=â¯3.9 ± 0.1 on a 5-point scale) and fertility and pregnancy as highest for young adult women (meanâ¯=â¯4.2 ± 0.04). Parents provided higher importance ratings for all clusters than patient participants. Stakeholders identified patient-centered outcomes for each cluster and focused on how to improve SRH knowledge, decision making, and patient-provider communication in the subspecialty setting. CONCLUSIONS: Eliciting patient-centered outcomes using CM can inform improvements in the care of AYAs with pediatric-onset chronic diseases. The SRH topics and patient-centered outcomes identified in this study should inform enhancements to comprehensive clinical care delivery for these populations.
Assuntos
Fibrose Cística , Pais , Saúde Reprodutiva , Saúde Sexual , Mulheres , Adolescente , Adulto , Anticoncepção , Visualização de Dados , Tomada de Decisões , Feminino , Fertilidade , Humanos , Avaliação de Resultados da Assistência ao Paciente , Pesquisa Qualitativa , Comportamento Sexual , Adulto JovemRESUMO
PURPOSE OF REVIEW: New research is constantly being published regarding hormonal contraceptives and bone health, migraine headaches, thrombosis risk, hypertension, weight gain, and obesity, as well as emergency contraception. At times, these studies can be clarifying, but they can also raise new controversies and questions. It is important for providers to be aware of the emerging issues regarding contraceptive care for adolescent patients. RECENT FINDINGS: Research suggests that Depo-Provera (depot medroxyprogesterone acetate; Pfizer, New York City, New York, USA) and, perhaps, low-dose oral contraceptive pills can have adverse effects on adolescent bone health, although the data demonstrating reversibility of bone loss after discontinuation of these contraceptives are reassuring. Additionally, estrogen-containing contraceptives pose risks for patients, including the onset of or exacerbation of migraine headaches, venous thromboembolism, and hypertension. Depo-Provera has been implicated in weight gain, especially in girls who are already overweight. Obesity may decrease the efficacy of some hormonal contraceptives. Finally, the mechanism of action of emergency contraception is still unknown, although studies continue to suggest that it has primarily preovulatory, not postovulatory, effects. SUMMARY: Adolescent health providers need to be aware of the new research and controversies in contraceptive care in order to counsel and care for patients effectively.
Assuntos
Anticoncepção/efeitos adversos , Anticoncepção/métodos , Anticoncepcionais Femininos/efeitos adversos , Adolescente , Anticoncepcionais Femininos/farmacologia , Feminino , Humanos , Hipertensão/induzido quimicamente , Acetato de Medroxiprogesterona/efeitos adversos , Transtornos de Enxaqueca/induzido quimicamente , Obesidade/induzido quimicamente , Osteoporose/induzido quimicamente , Tromboembolia Venosa/induzido quimicamente , Aumento de Peso/efeitos dos fármacosRESUMO
PURPOSE: The most safe and effective dose of vitamin D supplementation for healthy adolescents is currently unknown. The aim of this study was to compare the efficacy of 200 IU versus 1,000 IU of daily vitamin D3 for supplementation in healthy adolescents with baseline vitamin D sufficiency. METHODS: We conducted a double-blind, randomized clinical trial. Fifty-six subjects, ages 11-19 years, with baseline vitamin D sufficiency received 1,000 IU or 200 IU of daily vitamin D3 for 11 weeks. Compliance was assessed using MEMS6 Trackcaps and pill counts. RESULTS: Fifty-three subjects completed the clinical trial. Subjects in the two treatment arms were similar in terms of age, race, gender, body mass index, and dietary calcium and vitamin D intake. Serum 25(OH)D level in the 200 IU treatment arm was 28.1 ± 6.2 ng/mL at baseline (mean ± SD) and 28.9 ± 7.0 ng/mL at follow-up. In the 1,000 IU treatment arm, 25(OH)D levels were 29.0 ± 7.3 and 30.1 ± 6.6 at baseline and follow-up, respectively. Mean change in 25(OH)D level did not differ significantly between treatment arms (p = .87), nor did mean change in parathyroid hormone, calcium, phosphate, bone turnover markers, fasting glucose, or fasting insulin. CONCLUSIONS: In healthy adolescents with baseline vitamin D sufficiency, supplementation with vitamin D3 doses of 200 and 1,000 IU for 11 weeks did not increase serum 25(OH)D levels, with no significant difference observed between treatment arms.
Assuntos
Deficiência de Vitamina D/tratamento farmacológico , Vitamina D/uso terapêutico , Adolescente , Boston , Criança , Suplementos Nutricionais , Método Duplo-Cego , Feminino , Humanos , Masculino , Adesão à Medicação , Resultado do Tratamento , Adulto JovemRESUMO
It is essential to develop contraceptive counseling skills given the potential complications associated with an unplanned pregnancy, especially for adolescents. Multiple factors must be considered when reviewing contraceptive options with an adolescent: maturity, finances, access to care and prescriptions, confidentiality, medical risks and benefits, and contraindications to use of certain hormonal agents. Many adolescents will be concerned about the possibility of weight gain or the development of acne associated with the use of certain contraceptive agents. They are usually unaware of the risks of thrombosis, stroke, or adverse bone health effects. Providers must be able to speak to these issues using an evidence-based approach.
Assuntos
Comportamento do Adolescente/fisiologia , Anticoncepção/estatística & dados numéricos , Serviços de Planejamento Familiar/métodos , Adolescente , Anticoncepção/efeitos adversos , Anticoncepcionais Orais Hormonais/administração & dosagem , Anticoncepcionais Orais Hormonais/efeitos adversos , Contraindicações , Aconselhamento/métodos , Serviços de Planejamento Familiar/ética , Feminino , Acessibilidade aos Serviços de Saúde , Humanos , Gravidez , Gravidez na Adolescência/prevenção & controle , Gravidez na Adolescência/estatística & dados numéricos , Educação Sexual/métodosRESUMO
STUDY OBJECTIVE: To evaluate bone mineral density (BMD) in adolescents and young adults treated with depot medroxyprogesterone acetate (DMPA). DESIGN, SETTING, PARTICIPANTS: Eighty-three healthy subjects, 13-20 years old, who received at least 3 DMPA injections in an urban adolescent clinic and underwent dual energy x-ray absorptiometry (DXA) were evaluated by chart review. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Anthropometric data, DMPA use, BMD of the spine and hip, fracture history, and vitamin D status were collected. RESULTS: Subjects were a median age of 16.4 years old (range 13-20 years) when DMPA was initiated. The median number of DMPA injections was 5 (range 3-18) before the first DXA. At the spine and hip, respectively, BMD was normal (Z-score > -1.0 SD) for most subjects (79%, 86%). Subjects who received > 5 injections were more likely to have low spinal BMD (Z-score ≤ -2.0 SD) at first DXA (P = .018). In 15 subjects with repeat DXA measurements, after an additional median 6 injections, spinal BMD Z-score decreased by -0.33 ± 0.10 (mean ± SD, P = .004), as did absolute BMD at the hip (-0.019 ± 0.007 g/cm(2), P = .014). History of fracture was not associated with initial or subsequent BMD measurements. Most (12/13, 92.3%) subjects with vitamin D measurements were deficient (25-hydroxy vitamin D < 20 ng/mL). CONCLUSIONS: Most subjects on DMPA had normal BMD at first DXA. Low spinal BMD was associated with longer DMPA use, and some BMD measurements declined with prolonged use. Fracture history is not an absolute contraindication to DMPA use in this population. Studies are needed to determine possible benefits of vitamin D supplementation in DMPA users.
Assuntos
Densidade Óssea/efeitos dos fármacos , Anticoncepcionais Femininos/administração & dosagem , Fraturas Ósseas/epidemiologia , Acetato de Medroxiprogesterona/administração & dosagem , Vitamina D/uso terapêutico , Absorciometria de Fóton , Adolescente , Boston/epidemiologia , Feminino , Humanos , Estudos Retrospectivos , Fatores de Risco , Estatísticas não Paramétricas , Adulto JovemRESUMO
STUDY OBJECTIVE: To assess whether a policy and educational intervention in an urban, pediatric emergency department (ED) increases advance provision of emergency contraception (EC) to patients. DESIGN/SETTING/PARTICIPANTS: A pre- and post-intervention, retrospective chart review was conducted in an urban, pediatric ED assessing provider care of sexually active female adolescents and young adults. INTERVENTION/MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: A policy was instituted recommending that ED providers prescribe EC and provide an educational handout to all sexually active female adolescents and young adults. ED providers were educated about EC and this policy. Charts, subsequently reviewed, included sexually active female patients, age 13-21 years, presenting to the ED status post sexual assault, seeking EC, or with an abdominal, gynecologic, or urologic complaint. Student's t-tests, Pearson's chi-square and Fisher's Exact tests compared pre- and post-intervention provider and patient characteristics and outcomes. RESULTS: The mean age of the patient sample was 18.8 years (SD=1.7), 83% were Black or Hispanic, 43% were previously pregnant, 25% reported not using birth control. Last unprotected sexual intercourse was not documented for 87% of patients presenting with medical complaints. There was no difference in the advance prescribing of EC or the provision of the educational handout to patients pre- (3.3%) or post- (5.6%) intervention (P = 0.73). CONCLUSIONS: Despite a policy and an educational intervention for providers, little change occurred in advance EC prescribing in an urban, pediatric ED. Additionally, many providers were not documenting last unprotected sexual intercourse, potentially missing an opportunity to treat patients with EC at the time of their visit.