Neutrophilic airway inflammation is a main feature of induced sputum in nonatopic asthmatic children.

BACKGROUND: Asthma phenotypes are well described among children. However, there are few studies comparing airway inflammation in different clinical presentations of pediatric asthma. We tested the hypothesis that nonatopic asthma is associated with a predominant noneosinophilic inflammation in the airways, as assessed by induced sputum. The objective of this study was to evaluate the cytological characteristics of induced sputum (IS) in atopic (AA), nonatopic asthmatics (NAA) and nonatopic nonasthmatic children (NANA). METHODS: Of 90 selected children, 77 met eligibility criteria for performing IS and were classified as: AA, n = 28, NAA, n = 29 and NANA, n = 19. Subjects answered to a set of ISAAC-based questions and were skin-tested for common aeroallergens. A defined series of exclusion criteria was applied. RESULTS: Induced sputum was obtained from 54 (70.1%) subjects (21 AA, 20 NAA and 13 NANA). Demographic data and mean FEV(1) were similar in the three groups. The proportion of eosinophils [median, inter quartile range (IQR)] was significantly higher in the sputum of AA [(6.0.)12)] compared with NAAs [0 (2)] and NANAs [0 (1)], P < 0.001. The proportion of children with sputum eosinophilia (eos > 3%) was also significantly higher in AA (71.4%) when compared with NAA (28.6%); none of the NANA had sputum eosinophilia. Nonatopic asthmatic children had significantly higher proportions and absolute number of neutrophils than AA and controls. CONCLUSIONS: The results suggest that nonatopic children present IS with a cell pattern that is predominantly neutrophilic while eosinophilia is the hallmark of airway inflammation in the majority of atopic wheezing children not treated with inhaled steroids.

Stable COPD: predicting benefit from high-dose inhaled corticosteroid treatment.

The role of inhaled corticosteroids in the management of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) remains controversial. The purpose of this study was to evaluate whether sputum eosinophilia (defined as eosinophils > or = 3%) predicts clinical benefit from inhaled corticosteroid treatment in patients with smoking-related clinically stable moderate-to-severe COPD. Forty consecutive patients with effort dyspnoea (mean age 67 yrs; 52 pack-yr smoking history; post-bronchodilator forced expiratory volume in one second (FEV1) <60% predicted, consistent with moderate-to-severe smoking-related chronic airflow limitation) were enrolled. Subjects were treated with inhaled placebo followed by inhaled budesonide (Pulmicort Turbuhaler 1,600 microg.day(-1)), each given for 4 weeks. While the treatment was single-blind (subject level), sputum cell counts before and after treatment interventions were double-blind, thus removing bias. Outcome variables included spirometry, quality-of-life assessment and 6-min walk test. Sputum eosinophilia was present in 38% of subjects. In these, budesonide treatment normalised the eosinophil counts and, in comparison to placebo treatment, resulted in clinically significant improvement in the dyspnoea domain of the disease-specific chronic respiratory questionnaire (0.8 versus 0.3) and a small but statistically significant improvement in post-bronchodilator spirometry (FEV1 100 mL versus 0 mL; p<0.05). In conclusion, sputum eosinophilia predicts short-term clinical benefit from high-dose inhaled corticosteroid treatment in patients with stable moderate-to-severe chronic obstructive pulmonary disease.

Steroid naive eosinophilic asthma: anti-inflammatory effects of fluticasone and montelukast.

BACKGROUND: Inhaled corticosteroids and leukotriene receptor antagonists reduce airway eosinophilia and have been used as first line anti-inflammatory therapy for mild persistent asthma. METHODS: A multicentre, randomised, placebo controlled, parallel group study was performed to compare the anti-inflammatory effects of fluticasone propionate and montelukast as measured by sputum eosinophils in 50 adults with symptomatic steroid naive asthma and sputum eosinophilia of > or =3.5%. RESULTS: Eighteen patients received low dose fluticasone (250 mug/day), 19 received montelukast (10 mg/day), and 13 were given placebo for 8 weeks. Fluticasone treatment resulted in a greater reduction in sputum eosinophils (geometric mean (SD) 11.9 (2.3)% to 1.7 (5.1)%) than montelukast (10.7 (2.3)% to 6.9 (3.8)%; p = 0.04) or placebo (15.4 (2.4)% to 7.8 (4.2)%; p = 0.002), and improvement in FEV(1) (mean (SD) 2.6 (0.9) l to 3.0 (0.9) l) than montelukast (2.8 (0.7) l to 2.8 (0.9) l; p = 0.02) or placebo (2.4 (0.8) l to 2.4 (0.9) l; p = 0.01). Treatment with fluticasone suppressed sputum eosinophilia within a week while montelukast only attenuated it. The effect of montelukast was maximal at 1 week and was maintained over 4 weeks. The effect of fluticasone was maintained over 8 weeks while that of montelukast was not. CONCLUSIONS: Montelukast is not as effective as low dose fluticasone in reducing or maintaining an anti-inflammatory effect in steroid naive eosinophilic asthma.

Failure of montelukast to reduce sputum eosinophilia in high-dose corticosteroid-dependent asthma.

Sputum eosinophilia is a sensitive predictor of benefit from corticosteroid treatment. Montelukast is a cysteinyl leukotriene antagonist, which also reduces sputum and blood eosinophils. The present study examined the possibility that montelukast has an added eosinophil-lowering effect in subjects with asthma who are corticosteroid responsive but relatively corticosteroid resistant. A total of 14 clinically stable adults with asthma requiring minimum treatment with a high-dose inhaled steroid or prednisone, with baseline sputum eosinophilia (> or =5%), were randomised to receive 4 weeks of 10 mg montelukast or placebo daily in a double-blind crossover trial. The primary outcome was the effect of treatment on the percentage of sputum eosinophils. Secondary outcomes were changes in the blood eosinophil count, symptoms, forced expiratory volume in one second, peak expiratory flow and the need for salbutamol. The median (interquartile range, i.e. 75th-25th centile) for sputum eosinophils at baseline was 15.7% (22). The effect of adding montelukast was not significantly different from that of placebo, sputum eosinophils being 9.3% (18.9) after montelukast and 11.3% (22.8) after placebo. No difference was detected on secondary outcomes. No crossover interactions were observed. In conclusion, the addition of montelukast to existing high-dose corticosteroid therapy in subjects with asthma with elevated sputum eosinophils does not provide additional attenuation of airway eosinophilia.