Determination of four homogeneous subgroups of patients with antiphospholipid syndrome: a cluster analysis based on 509 cases.

OBJECTIVE: APS is a heterogeneous disease with different phenotypes. Using an unsupervised hierarchical cluster analysis, we aimed to determine distinct homogeneous phenotypes among APS patients. METHODS: We performed an observational, retrospective study of APS patients enrolled in the French multicentre 'APS and SLE' registry who met the Sydney classification criteria. The clustering process involved an unsupervised multiple correspondence analysis followed by a hierarchical ascendant clustering analysis; it used 27 variables selected to cover a broad range of APS clinical and laboratory manifestations. RESULTS: These analyses included 509 patients, mainly women (77.8%). Mean (s.d.) age at APS diagnosis was 36.2 (14.6) years, and mean follow-up since diagnosis 10.3 (8.5) years. This hierarchical classification cluster analysis yielded four homogeneous groups of patients: cluster 1, mostly with venous thromboembolism without any associated autoimmune disease; cluster 2, older, lowest proportion of women, history of arterial events, and/or with migraines, arterial hypertension, diabetes mellitus, or dyslipidaemia; cluster 3, younger, highest proportion of women, associated SLE or other autoimmune diseases, and a history of venous thromboembolism or pregnancy morbidity; and cluster 4, mainly with a history of catastrophic antiphospholipid syndrome, aPL-associated nephropathy, and pregnancy morbidity, with frequent triple positivity and more deaths (16.7%). CONCLUSIONS: Our study applied an unsupervised clustering method to distinguish four homogeneous APS patient subgroups that were predominantly venous; arterial; associated with SLE or another autoimmune disease; and arterial microthrombotic. Heterogeneous pathophysiological mechanisms may explain these findings.

Risk of irAEs in patients with autoimmune diseases treated by immune checkpoint inhibitors for stage III or IV melanoma: results from a matched case-control study.

OBJECTIVE: To quantify the risk of immune-related adverse events (irAEs) in patients with pre-existing autoimmune disease (pAID) treated by immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) for stage III or IV melanoma. METHODS: Case-control study performed on a French multicentric prospective cohort of patients with melanoma, matched for irAE risk factors and oncological staging. Risk of irAE was assessed by logistic regression. RESULTS: 110 patients with pAID were included and matched with 330 controls, from March 2013 to October 2020. Over a median follow-up period of 7.2 months for cases and 6.9 months for controls, the ORs of developing all-grade and grade ≥3 irAEs among cases compared with controls were 1.91 (95% CI (1.56 to 2.27)) and 1.44 (95% CI (1.08 to 1.82)), respectively. Patients with pAID had an increased risk of multiple irAEs (OR 1.46, 95% CI (1.15 to 2.67)) and a shorter time to irAE onset. In contrast, there were no difference in irAE-related mortality nor in the rate of treatment discontinuation, and a landmark analysis revealed a better survival at 24 months among cases (p=0.02). Thirty per cent of cases experienced a pAID flare during follow-up, and baseline immunosuppression did not prevent irAE occurrence. Last, we report associations between the pAID clinical subsets and organ-specific irAEs. CONCLUSION: In our study, patients with pAID were at greater risk of all-grade, severe and multiple irAEs, yet had a better 24-month survival than controls. Thus, patients with pAID should be eligible for ICI therapy but benefit from a close monitoring for irAE occurrence, especially during the first months of therapy.

Convalescent Plasma Therapy in Immunocompromised Patients Infected With the BA.1 or BA.2 Omicron SARS-CoV-2.

The emergence of SARS-CoV-2 Omicron variant has led to a complete reconfiguration of the therapeutic landscape, with all monoclonal antibodies having lost any neutralization activity. We report here a case series of 75 immunocompromised patients infected by the Omicron variant who benefited from COVID-19 convalescent plasma (CCP). At Day 28, the overall survival was 76% (95% CI 67-86) with no significant difference in the clinical outcome between patients with hematological malignancies, solid organ transplantation or autoimmune diseases. No safety concern was reported during the course of the study. These results showed that CCP is well tolerated and represents a treatment option for immunocompromised patients who remain highly impacted by the COVID19 epidemic.

[Pathogenèse de l'infection par le SARS-CoV-2]. / Infection with SARS-CoV-2 : a viral or inflammatory disease ?

PATHOGENESIS OF SARS-COV-2 INFECTION COVID-19 follows a rather stereotyped and reproducible course. While the first events are mediated by direct viral toxicity, resolution of the infection relies on a finely tuned immune response. In patients with severe forms, defects of the initial immune response have been reported, including insufficient type 1 interferon production or signaling, attenuated or skewed adaptative immune response, sometimes due to viral immune escape properties. These defects induce an hyperinflammatory state featuring hypersecretion of pro-inflammatory cytokines, excessive recruitment of immune cells in the lungs and parenchymal lesions, responsible for COVID-19 acute respiratory distress syndrome. Thus, COVID-19 is successively a viral and an inflammatory disease. Clarifying the chronology of these viral and immunological mechanisms allows us to identify a therapeutic logic, which sometimes involves contradictory treatments.

PATHOGENÈSE DE L'INFECTION PAR LE SARS-COV-2 L'infection par le SARS-CoV-2 suit une évolution relativement reproductible qu'il est possible de séparer en plusieurs étapes. Si les premières phases de la maladie sont le siège de cytotoxicité virale, les phases évolutives les plus tardives sont essentiellement la conséquence d'une réponse inflammatoire disproportionnée. Toxicité virale et hyperinflammation sont toutefois intimement liées. Les mécanismes d'évasion virale, l'affaiblissement de la réponse interféron et de la réponse immunitaire adaptative concourent à l'hypersécrétion des cytokines inflammatoires. L'infiltration exagérée des poumons par les macrophages, les neutrophiles et les lymphocytes surpasse les mécanismes de réparation tissulaire et conduit au syndrome de détresse respiratoire aiguë. L'infection par le SARS-CoV-2 est donc successivement une maladie virale puis une maladie inflammatoire. Préciser la chronologie de ces mécanismes viraux et immunologiques permet d'en dégager une logique thérapeutique, qui fait intervenir des traitements parfois contradictoires.

Immune interventions in COVID-19: a matter of time?

As the COVID-19 pandemic is still ongoing, and considering the lack of efficacy of antiviral strategies to this date, and the reactive hyperinflammation leading to tissue lesions and pneumonia, effective treatments targeting the dysregulated immune response are more than ever required. Immunomodulatory and immunosuppressive drugs have been repurposed in severe COVID-19 with contrasting results. The heterogeneity in the timing of treatments administrations could be accountable for these discrepancies. Indeed, many studies included patients at different timepoints of infection, potentially hiding the beneficial effects of a time-adapted intervention. We aim to review the available data on the kinetics of the immune response in beta-coronaviruses infections, from animal models and longitudinal human studies, and propose a four-step model of severe COVID-19 timeline. Then, we discuss the results of the clinical trials of immune interventions with regards to the timing of administration, and finally suggest a time frame in order to delineate the best timepoint for each treatment.

Antiretroviral therapy for HIV controllers: Reasons for initiation and outcomes in the French ANRS-CO21 CODEX cohort.

BACKGROUND: Less than 1% of Human Immunodeficiency Virus (HIV)-infected individuals are able to achieve spontaneous viral control without requiring antiretroviral therapy (ART). Whether these HIV controllers (HIC) are at risk of HIV-associated comorbidities and could benefit from ART is debated, but recent studies reported decreased T-cell activation upon ART initiation. We report the frequency of ART initiation, reasons to treat, treatment outcome on immunovirological parameters, and rate of side-effects and treatment discontinuation in the French cohort of HIC. METHODS: Participants included in the French multicenter Agence Nationale de Recherche sur le SIDA et les Hépatites (ANRS) Cohorte des extremes (CODEX) cohort of HIC between July 6, 2007 and January 3, 2018 were prospectively followed. ART initiation, indication, discontinuation, non-Acquired ImmunoDeficiency Syndrome (AIDS)-defining events, side-effects, and immunovirological parameters were recorded. Undetectable HIC (u-HIC) were defined as participants with strictly undetectable viral loads based on routinely used assays throughout the follow-up and blipper HIC (b-HIC) as participants with possible detectable viral loads above the detection threshold during follow-up. FINDINGS: Among 302 HIC followed for a median of 14.8 years [10.3-20.2], 90 (30%) received ART (7 u-HIC and 83 b-HIC). The main reasons for ART initiation were decreased CD4 T-cell counts (n = 36, 40%), loss of virological control (n = 13, 14%), and non-AIDS-defining events (n = 12, 13%). Sixteen (18%) participants experienced 17 grade 1-2 adverse events. In b-HIC, ART slightly increased the CD4/CD8 ratio (median +0.19, p < 0.0001) and decreased the frequency of circulating CD38+ HLA-DR.+ CD4 and CD8 lymphocytes (median -0.75%, p = 0.003, and -2%, p < 0.0001, respectively), but these changes were not observed for treated u-HIC. Thirteen (14%) participants discontinued ART (5 (38%) because of side-effects, and 10 remained HIC after treatment cessation (median follow-up: 305 days [235-728]). INTERPRETATION: Only 30% of participants in this large cohort of HIC required ART during a median follow-up of 14.8 years. These results show that HIC status is very stable and vouch for a patient-centered treatment decision based on the individual benefit/risk balance.

Unexplained recurrent implantation failures: Predictive factors of pregnancy and therapeutic management from a French multicentre study.

INTRODUCTION: Recurrent implantation failure is defined as the absence of pregnancy after at least three transfers of good-quality embryos after in vitro fecundation/intracytoplasic sperm injection. AIM: The aim of this study was to describe a multicentre cohort of women with unexplained RIF, to analyse the factors associated with clinical pregnancy and to evaluate the immunomodulatory therapies efficacy. METHODS: Women were consecutively recruited from university departments with unexplained RIF. RESULTS: Sixty-four women were enrolled with mean age 36 ± 3 years. The rates of clinical pregnancy in 64 women were compared in untreated and treated cycles and according to therapies used during the last prospectively followed embryo transfer. A clinical pregnancy after the transfer was noted in 56 % pregnancies on intralipids and in 50 % on prednisone, versus 5 % in untreated ones (p < 0.001). The 340 embryo transfers of these 64 women resulted in 68 clinical pregnancies and 18 live births. Clinical pregnancies were significantly more frequent in treated versus untreated embryo transfers (44 % vs 9 %; p < 0.001) with odds ratio at 8.13 (95 % CI 4.49-14.72, p < 0.0001). Cumulative pregnancy rates were higher for steroid-treated transfers than for untreated transfers when considering overall transfers before and after using steroids and also only those under steroids. Cumulative pregnancy rates were not different from steroid- and intralipid-treated embryo transfers CONCLUSIONS: In this multicentre study of women with unexplained RIF, use of immunomodulatory treatments before embryo transfer resulted in higher clinical pregnancy. Randomised, well-designed studies in well-defined population of RIF women are necessary to confirm our preliminary data.