Case of disseminated histoplasmosis in a HIV-infected patient revealed by nasal involvement with maxillary osteolysis.

BACKGROUND: Disseminated Histoplasmosis (DH) is a rare manifestation of Acquired Immune Deficiency Syndrome (AIDS) in European countries. Naso-maxillar osteolysis due to Histoplasma capsulatum var. capsulatum (Hcc) is unusual in endemic countries and has never been reported in European countries. Differential diagnoses such as malignant tumors, cocaine use, granulomatosis, vasculitis and infections are more frequently observed and could delay and/or bias the final diagnosis. CASE PRESENTATION: We report the case of an immunocompromised patient infected by Human Immunodeficiency Virus (HIV) with naso-maxillar histoplasmosis in a non-endemic country. Our aim is to describe the clinical presentation, the diagnostic and therapeutic issues. A 53-year-old woman, originated from Haiti, was admitted in 2016 for nasal deformation with alteration of general condition evolving for at least 6 months. HIV infection was diagnosed in 2006 and classified at AIDS stage in 2008 due to cytomegalovirus infection associated with pulmonary histoplasmosis. At admission, CD4 cell count was 9/mm3. Surgical biopsies were performed and ruled out differential or associated diagnoses. Mycological cultures identified Hcc and Blood Polymerase Chain Reaction (PCR) for Hcc was positive. The patient was given daily Amphothericin B liposomal infusion during 1 month. Hcc PCR became negative in the blood under treatment, and then oral switch by itraconazole was introduced. Antiretroviral treatment was reintroduced after a 3-week histoplasmosis treatment. Normalization of naso-maxillar mucosa enabled a palatal prosthesis. CONCLUSION: Naso-maxillar histoplasmosis is extremely rare; this is the first case ever reported in a non-endemic country. Differential diagnoses must be ruled out by conducting microbiologic tools and histological examinations on surgical biopsies. Early antifungal treatment should be initiated in order to prevent DH severe outcomes.

Stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT) as salvage treatment for early stage lung cancer with interstitial lung disease (ILD): An observational and exploratory case series of non-asian patients.

Interstitial lung disease (ILD) can coexist with early-stage lung cancer (LC) and may compromise surgery and worsen patients' outcomes. Stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT) is the gold standard treatment for medically inoperable early-stage lung cancer, but radiation therapy is contra-indicated for patients with ILD because of the higher risk of severe radiation-induced pneumonitis. SBRT may spare healthy lung tissue, but data are scarce in this rare population. Our exploratory case series aimed to retrospectively identify patients treated with SBRT in this setting: 19 patients were diagnosed with early-stage LC-ILD over the past 6 years and 9 received SBRT. Most of them were smokers with a median age of 71, 4 had no pathological documentation. After SBRT, 5 patients had grade I-II respiratory adverse events (AEs), but none had treatment-related grade III-IV respiratory AEs. Two patients died within 6 months of SBRT, and for both, death was related to metastatic relapse. In this case series, the radiological evolution of ILD before radiotherapy and the evolution of the radiotherapy scar on CT-Scan were also explored with different evolutionary models. This exploratory study shows available data that could be studied in a larger retrospective cohort to identify risk factors for SBRT in the LC-ILD population. The use of dosimetric data as a risk factor for SBRT should be done with cautiousness due to heterogeneous and complex dose delivery and different fractionation schedule.

Patients avec cancers thoraciques et COVID-19 : au cœur de la tempête: Patients with chest cancer and COVID-19: at the heart of the storm.

A meta-analysis of the Chinese studies in April 2020, including 3600 patients with cancer and COVID-19, first reported an increase of the COVID-19 risk and the case-fatality in these patients. Then, North-American and European series confirmed the increased COVID-19 risk for patients with cancer, as the increased risk of severe COVID-19 and death, when compared with general population, adjusting for age. Patients with lung cancer have the highest risk of severe respiratory forms, and the highest risk of SARS-CoV2-induced death (25 to 30%), after patients with hematological cancers. Metastatic patients, with poor PS, and those having received a cytotoxic chemotherapy within the weeks preceding SARSCoV2 infection, are those with the highest risk of death. Conversely, being treated with immune checkpoint inhibitors would not favor the cytokine storm, which makes the severity of COVID-19. SARS-CoV2 pandemic, beyond having needed the generalization of drastic social distancing measures in hospitals, also needed organizational changes, to allow healthcare continuity for cancer patients. Adaptation of therapeutic protocols was needed, with increased intervals between cycles, the choice of less toxic protocols, the systematic use of hematological growth factors, and teleconsultations follow-up. Lastly, mRNA-based SARS-CoV2 vaccines are efficient in patients with thoracic cancer, provided the interval of 21/28 days between the two injections is maintained, since protective immunization seems delayed, especially after cytotoxic chemotherapy. Only 13% of patients with very low protective antibodies titers would need a third booster injection, with a clear rise in protective antibodies titers induced by such a third injection.© 2021 SPLF. Published by Elsevier Masson SAS. All rights reserved.

Definitions, outcomes, and management of hyperprogression in patients with non-small-cell lung cancer treated with immune checkpoint inhibitors.

BACKGROUND: The advent of immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICI) has been a breakthrough in the care of patients with non-small-cell lung cancers (NSCLC). However, physicians are now facing a previously unidentified clinical situation called hyperprogression (HP), which presents as a fast and unexpected increase in tumor burden. HP's existence and specificity to ICIs remains controversial because a widely acknowledged definition is currently lacking. Meanwhile, management remains elusive. METHODS: Medical records from all consecutive NSCLC patients who were treated with ICI from 2015 to 2018 were retrospectively analyzed. The HP incidence rate was calculated according to five definitions (tumor growth rate [TGR]ratio, ΔTGR, tumor growth kinetic [TGK], RECIST, and time to treatment failure [TTF]), and the agreement between such definitions was determined. The HP impact on overall survival (OS) was then assessed. The association between HP (defined using the TGRratio definition) and clinical and biological variables was also assessed. Clinical HP management and its impact on outcomes were described. RESULTS: We identified 169 consecutive ICI-treated patients, with potential HP accounting for 11.3 %, 5.7 %, 17.0 %, 9.6 %, and 31.7 % patients, according to TGRratio, ΔTGR, TGK, RECIST, and TTF definitions. Agreement between the different HP definitions was highly heterogeneous (range 29 %-77 %) and globally poor. HP was associated with shorter OS, compared to standard RECIST progressive disease, but this difference only reached statistical significance when using the TTF definition. TGRratio-based HP was significantly associated with hepatic metastases. In TGRratio-based HP patients, neither resuming chemotherapy nor corticosteroids use was associated with statistically significant impact on overall survival. CONCLUSION: We found fairly heterogeneous HP rates using different definitions. TTF was the only definition leading to significantly worsened OS. Further studies are needed to provide consensus recommendations for the assessment, definition, and management of HP, whose existence is likely real.