Diagnostic criteria for apathy in neurocognitive disorders.

INTRODUCTION: Apathy is common in neurocognitive disorders (NCD) but NCD-specific diagnostic criteria are needed. METHODS: The International Society for CNS Clinical Trials Methodology Apathy Work Group convened an expert group and sought input from academia, health-care, industry, and regulatory bodies. A modified Delphi methodology was followed, and included an extensive literature review, two surveys, and two meetings at international conferences, culminating in a consensus meeting in 2019. RESULTS: The final criteria reached consensus with more than 80% agreement on all parts and included: limited to people with NCD; symptoms persistent or frequently recurrent over at least 4 weeks, a change from the patient's usual behavior, and including one of the following: diminished initiative, diminished interest, or diminished emotional expression/responsiveness; causing significant functional impairment and not exclusively explained by other etiologies. DISCUSSION: These criteria provide a framework for defining apathy as a unique clinical construct in NCD for diagnosis and further research.

A randomized Phase II trial evaluating efficacy, safety, and tolerability of oral BI 409306 in attenuated psychosis syndrome: Design and rationale.

AIM: Attenuated psychosis syndrome (APS), a condition for further study in the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders-5, comprises psychotic symptoms that are qualitatively similar to those observed in schizophrenia but are less severe. Patients with APS are at high risk of converting to first-episode psychosis (FEP). As evidence for effective pharmacological interventions in APS is limited, novel treatments may provide symptomatic relief and delay/prevent psychotic conversion. This trial aims to investigate the efficacy, safety, and tolerability of BI 409306, a potent and selective phosphodiesterase-9 inhibitor, versus placebo in APS. Novel biomarkers of psychosis are being investigated. METHODS: In this Phase II, multinational, double-blind, parallel-group trial, randomized (1:1) patients will receive BI 409306 50 mg or placebo twice daily for 52 weeks. Patients (n = 300) will be enrolled to determine time to remission of APS, time to FEP, change in everyday functional capacity (Schizophrenia Cognition Rating Scale), and change from baseline in Brief Assessment of Cognition composite score and Positive and Negative Syndrome Scale scores. Potential biomarkers of psychosis under investigation include functional measures of brain activity and automated speech analyses. Safety is being assessed throughout. CONCLUSIONS: This trial will determine whether BI 409306 is superior to placebo in achieving sustainable remission of APS and improvements in cognition and functional capacity. These advances may provide evidence-based treatment options for symptomatic relief in APS. Furthermore, the study will assess the effect of BI 409306 on psychotic conversion and explore the identification of patients at risk for conversion using novel biomarkers.

Efficacy and safety of the novel glycine transporter inhibitor BI 425809 once daily in patients with schizophrenia: a double-blind, randomised, placebo-controlled phase 2 study.

BACKGROUND: Cognitive impairment associated with schizophrenia predicts poor functional outcomes, but currently no approved pharmacotherapy is available. This study investigated whether the glycine transporter-1 inhibitor BI 425809 improves cognition in patients with schizophrenia. METHODS: This phase 2, randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled, parallel-group trial (81 centres, 11 countries), randomly assigned outpatients (aged 18-50 years) with schizophrenia on stable treatment to add-on once-daily oral BI 425809 2 mg, 5 mg, 10 mg, or 25 mg or placebo (1:1:1:1:2) for 12 weeks. Treatment was assigned in blocks using interactive response technology; patients, investigators, and all trial personnel were masked to group assignment. The primary endpoint was change from baseline in MATRICS Consensus Cognitive Battery (MCCB) overall composite T-score at week 12. Six predefined dose-response models were evaluated using a multiple comparison procedure and modelling approach with mixed model repeated measures to assess evidence for a non-flat dose-response relationship for cognitive improvements with BI 425809. Adverse events were monitored. Safety analyses included all randomly allocated patients who received one or more doses of trial medication; efficacy analyses included patients from this set who also had available baseline data and at least one post-baseline on-treatment measurement for the primary or secondary endpoint. This study is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, number NCT02832037. FINDINGS: 509 patients were randomly assigned between April 25, 2018, and Oct 4, 2019 (BI 425809 2 mg, n=85; 5 mg, n=84; 10 mg, n=85; 25 mg, n=85; placebo, n=170 444 (87%) completed the 12-week treatment. Five of six dose-response models showed a statistically significant benefit of BI 425809 over placebo (linear [t=2·55, p=0·015], linear in log [t=2·56, p=0·015]; Emax [t=2·75, p=0·0089], sigmoid Emax [t=2·98, p=0·0038], logistic [t=2·77, p=0·0085]). Pairwise comparisons showed greater mean improvement from baseline in MCCB overall composite T-score at week 12 with BI 425809 10 mg and 25 mg versus placebo (adjusted mean difference 1·98 [95% CI 0·43-3·53] for 10 mg and 1·73 [0·18-3·28] for 25 mg; standardised effect size 0·34 for 10 mg and 0·30 for 25 mg). Adverse events were balanced across groups, reported in 50 (59%) of 85 patients on BI 425809 2 mg, 44 (52%) of 84 on 5 mg, 35 (41%) of 85 on 10 mg, 36 (42%) of 85 on 25 mg, and 74 (44%) of 170 on placebo. INTERPRETATION: BI 425809 improved cognition after 12 weeks in patients with schizophrenia; doses of 10 mg and 25 mg showed the largest separation from placebo. If these encouraging results are confirmed in phase 3 trials, BI 425809 could provide an effective treatment for cognitive impairment associated with schizophrenia. FUNDING: Boehringer Ingelheim.

Social dysfunction in mood disorders and schizophrenia: Clinical modulators in four independent samples.

INTRODUCTION: Social dysfunction is a common symptom of several neuropsychiatric disorders. However, only in the last few years research began to systematically investigate clinical aspects of this relevant outcome. Interestingly, its distribution and link with other clinical variables is still unclear. This study investigated social dysfunction in 4 different cohorts of patients affected by mood disorders and schizophrenia to evaluate 1) the degree of social dysfunction in these populations; 2) the associations among social dysfunction and socio-demographic and psychopathological features. METHODS: Data from 4 independent studies (CATIE, GSRD ES1, ES2 and ES3, STAR*D, STEP-BD) were investigated. Behavioural and affective indicators of social dysfunction were derived and operationalized from scales or questionnaire items related to the interaction with relatives, friends and significant people in patients affected by schizophrenia (N = 765) and mood disorders (N = 2278 + 1954 + 1829). In particular the social dysfunction indicator was derived from Sheehan Disability Scale (SDS) for GSRD sample, from the Work and Social Adjustment Scale (WSAS) for STAR*D sample, from the Life-Range of Impaired Functioning Tool (LRIFT) for STEP-BD sample, and from the Quality of Life Scale (QOLS) for CATIE sample. The distribution of social dysfunction was described and association with socio-demographic and psychopathological characteristics were analysed. RESULTS: Social dysfunction indicators showed a broad distribution in all samples investigated. Consistently across studies, social dysfunction was associated with higher psychopathological severity (all samples except CATIE) and suicide risk (GSRD ES1 and ES2, STAR*D, and STEP-BD) that explain up to 47% of the variance, but also to lower education level (GSRD ES2, STAR*D, CATIE, and STEP-BD), poorer professional/work status (GSRD ES2 and ES3, STAR*D, CATIE, and STEP-BD), marital status (STAR*D and CATIE), age (younger age in GSRD ES1 and STAR*D, older age in CATIE), higher BMI (GSRD ES2 and ES3, and STEP-BD), and smoking (GSRD ES2 and ES3). CONCLUSION: Our results demonstrated that a significant percentage of patients affected by both mood disorders and schizophrenia shows relevant social dysfunction. Social dysfunction is related, but not completely explained by psychopathological severity. In several patients, it tends to persist also during remission state. Socio-demographic and lifestyle factors were also found to play a role and should therefore be taken into consideration in further studies investigating social dysfunction.

Optimizing Behavioral Paradigms to Facilitate Development of New Treatments for Anhedonia and Reward Processing Deficits in Schizophrenia and Major Depressive Disorder: Study Protocol.

Background: Behavioral tasks focusing on different subdomains of reward processing may provide more objective and quantifiable measures of anhedonia and impaired motivation compared with clinical scales. Typically, single tasks are used in relatively small studies to compare cases and controls in one indication, but they are rarely included in larger multisite trials. This is due to limited systematic standardization as well as the challenges of deployment in international studies and stringent adherence to the high regulatory requirements for data integrity. The Reward Task Optimization Consortium (RTOC) was formed to facilitate operational implementation of reward processing tasks, making them suitable for use in future large-scale, international, multisite drug development studies across multiple indications. The RTOC clinical study aims to conduct initial optimization of a set of tasks in patients with major depressive disorder (MDD) or schizophrenia (SZ). Methods: We will conduct a multicenter study across four EU countries. Participants (MDD = 37, SZ = 37, with ≤80 age- and gender-matched healthy volunteers) will attend a study visit comprising screening, self-report and clinically rated assessments of anhedonia and symptom severity, and three reward processing tasks; specifically, the Grip Strength Effort task, the Doors task, and the Reinforcement Learning Working Memory task. The Grip Strength Effort and Doors tasks include simultaneous electroencephalography/event-related potential recordings. Outcomes will be compared using a two-way group design of MDD and SZ with matched controls, respectively. Further analyses will include anhedonia assessment scores as covariates. Planned analyses will assess whether our findings replicate previously published data, and multisite deployment will be evaluated through assessments of quality and conduct. A subset of participants will complete a second visit, to assess test-retest reliability of the task battery. Discussion: This study will evaluate the operational deployment of three reward processing tasks to the regulatory standards required for use in drug development trials. We will explore the potential of these tasks to differentiate patients from controls and to provide a quantitative marker of anhedonia and/or impaired motivation, establishing their usefulness as endpoints in multisite clinical trials. This study should demonstrate where multifaceted reward deficits are similar or divergent across patient populations. Registration: ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT04024371).

Calcitonin gene-related peptide receptor antagonist BIBN 4096 BS for the acute treatment of migraine.

BACKGROUND: Calcitonin gene-related peptide (CGRP) may have a causative role in migraine. We therefore hypothesized that a CGRP-receptor antagonist might be effective in the treatment of migraine attacks. METHODS: In an international, multicenter, double-blind, randomized clinical trial of BIBN 4096 BS, a highly specific and potent nonpeptide CGRP-receptor antagonist, 126 patients with migraine received one of the following: placebo or 0.25, 0.5, 1, 2.5, 5, or 10 mg of BIBN 4096 BS intravenously over a period of 10 minutes. A group-sequential adaptive treatment-assignment design was used to minimize the number of patients exposed. RESULTS: The 2.5-mg dose was selected, with a response rate of 66 percent, as compared with 27 percent for placebo (P=0.001). The BIBN 4096 BS group as a whole had a response rate of 60 percent. Significant superiority over placebo was also observed with respect to most secondary end points: the pain-free rate at 2 hours; the rate of sustained response over a period of 24 hours; the rate of recurrence of headache; improvement in nausea, photophobia, phonophobia, and functional capacity; and the time to meaningful relief. An effect was apparent after 30 minutes and increased over the next few hours. The overall rate of adverse events was 25 percent after the 2.5-mg dose of the drug and 20 percent for the BIBN 4096 BS group as a whole, as compared with 12 percent for placebo. The most frequent side effect was paresthesia. There were no serious adverse events. CONCLUSIONS: The CGRP antagonist BIBN 4096 BS was effective in treating acute attacks of migraine.

An item response analysis of the international restless legs syndrome study group rating scale for restless legs syndrome.

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: Restless legs syndrome (RLS) is a common central nervous system disorder; however, there is currently a lack of well-validated and easily-administered measures of RLS severity available. The International Restless Legs Syndrome Study Group has recently developed a 10-item scale to meet this need. The International Restless Legs Severity Scale (IRLS) has been shown to have a high degree of reliability, validity, and internal consistency. In order to further demonstrate the validity of the IRLS, the present study examined the relationship between scores on individual IRLS items and overall RLS severity. PATIENTS AND METHODS: The 10-item IRLS was administered to 196 RLS patients. Option characteristic curves (the probability of scoring different options for a given item as a function of overall IRLS score) were generated in order to illustrate the scoring patterns for each item across the range of total RLS severity. Item characteristic curves (the expected score on an item as a function of overall IRLS score) were also generated to illustrate the relationship between scores on the individual items and total RLS severity. RESULTS: The IRLS items demonstrated excellent item response properties, with option and item characteristic curves closely approximating those of an ideal item. Item 3 (relief of arm or leg discomfort from moving around) was the most problematic item in that a 'floor' effect was evident; however, the item response characteristics for this item were still acceptable. CONCLUSIONS: Each IRLS item showed a good relationship between responses on that item and overall RLS severity, providing further evidence for the validity of the IRLS as a measure of RLS severity in RLS patients.