Complications of an implantable venous access device (Port-a-Cath) during intermittent continuous infusion of chemotherapy.

In 149 patients, treated with intermittent continuous infusion of different chemotherapeutic agents, 169 Port-a-Caths were implanted by qualified surgeons and residents in training. The peri- and postoperative complications of implantation of the Port-a-Cath system and the complications during treatment were retrospectively analysed. The Port-a-Cath was in situ for a total of 36247 days (median 181, range 1-1332). Of the 169 catheters, major complications occurred during treatment, with infection in 4 patients (2.4%), occlusion in 3 (1.8%), thrombosis in 8 (4.7%), extravasation in 8 (4.7%) and migration in 3 (1.8%). The peri- and postoperative complication rate was low, although pneumothorax occurred in 6 patients (3.6%). In 25 patients (14.8%) the Port-a-Cath had to be explanted due to complications. It can be concluded that continuous infusion of chemotherapy via a Port-a-Cath system is a relatively safe procedure, although major complications do occur. The experience of the surgeon could not be related to the complications.

Intermittent continuous infusion of 5-fluorouracil and low dose oral leucovorin in patients with gastrointestinal cancer: relationship between plasma concentrations and clinical parameters.

Modulation of 5-fluorouracil (5-FU) by leucovorin and continuous infusion of 5-FU can both result in enhanced therapeutic efficacy. The main objective of this study was to determine the maximum tolerated dose (MTD) of oral leucovorin in combination with continuous infusion of 5-FU for 14 days every 4 weeks at a dose of 300 mg/m2/day in 30 patients with gastrointestinal cancer. The MTD of oral leucovorin was established at 10 mg/day. Dose-limiting toxicities were mucositis, diarrhoea and hand-foot syndrome. Plasma leucovorin concentrations were below the detection limit of the assay (< 0.5 microM). Plasma 5-FU concentrations varied considerably from 0.06 to 11.3 microM. A relation between toxicity, response and plasma concentration of 5-FU could not be established. Our data may indicate that even very low plasma concentrations of leucovorin are able to modulate 5-FU. In 17 patients with colorectal cancer the response rate was 24% (95% CI: 7-50%), which is comparable to other treatment schedules with leucovorin or to continuous infusion of 5-FU alone.

Continuous infusion of chemotherapy: focus on 5-fluorouracil and fluorodeoxyuridine.

Continuous infusion of chemotherapy is one of the developments to try to improve the treatment of metastatic cancer. There is a sound theoretical rationale to deliver cytotoxic drugs as a continuous infusion. Furthermore, the development of reliable venous access devices and portable infusion pumps enables patients to be treated in an ambulatory setting. This review focuses on the continuous infusion of the most frequently used drugs: 5-fluorouracil (5-FU) and fluorodeoxyuridine (FUDR). An overview is given of both preclinical studies and studies in humans. Continuous infusion of 5-FU and FUDR has proven to be feasible in all studies. However, the results (response rate and especially survival) are rather disappointing. So far, continuous infusion of cytostatic drugs can still be considered as an experimental procedure. Whether protracted, intermittent of circadian modulated continuous infusion is the optimal treatment schedule has still to be proven in future studies. Furthermore, studies are needed to demonstrate whether dose intensity for most tumours is important for treatment outcome. Also, studies are needed to investigate quality of life and economic issues.

Intermittent continuous infusion of 5-fluorouracil in combination with epirubicin and cisplatin in advanced gastric cancer: the importance of dose intensity.

BACKGROUND: Recently, high response rates have been reported in patients with advanced gastric cancer with a schedule of epirubicin, cisplatin, and protracted infusion of 5-fluorouracil (5-FU). We modified this schedule based on the assumption that shorter treatment intervals are more convenient for patients and that cytokinetically based data showed that most gastric cancers have a relatively short potential doubling time of of less than 14 days. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Fourteen patients with advanced gastric adenocarcinoma with progressive, measurable disease entered the study. Patients were treated from days 1 to 14 with 5-FU 200 mg/m2 per day as a continuous infusion using a portable infusion pump. Epirubicin 50 mg/m2 and cisplatin 60 mg/m2 were administered on day 1. Courses were repeated every 4 weeks. RESULTS: No responses were observed (response rate 0% [95% CI 0-23%]). Toxicity was mild. Grade 3 toxicity occurred in only 2 patients (14%). The median progression free survival was 3.5 months (range 2 to 17). The median survival was 6.5 months (range 2 to 31+). CONCLUSIONS: The unexpected results of this study are most likely due to a diminished dose intensity. When comparing the results of several schedules with epirubicin, cisplatin, and 5-FU, it seems that the dose intensity for all three drugs may be important, but especially for 5-FU.

Intermittent continuous infusion of ifosfamide and 5-fluorouracil in patients with advanced adenocarcinoma of the pancreas.

BACKGROUND: In advanced adenocarcinoma of the pancreas treatment with 5-fluorouracil (5-FU) or ifosfamide results in response rates of approximately 20%. Continuous infusion of these drugs is on many grounds theoretically attractive and may therefore offer advantages over bolus or short-term infusion. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Sixteen patients with advanced adenocarcinoma of the pancreas with progressive measurable disease and no previous chemotherapy entered the study. After implantation of a subcutaneous infusion chamber patients were treated on days 1-12 with ifosfamide (1.0 g/m2/day) and 5-FU (300 mg/m2/day) as a continuous intravenous infusion using a portable infusion pump. Mesna (1.0 g/m2/day) was added as uroprotective agent from day 1-14. Courses were repeated every 4 weeks. RESULTS: Fifteen of the 16 patients were evaluable for response. One partial response was observed (response rate 7% [95% CI: 0%-32%]). Toxicity occurred in 64% of the courses. Dose limiting toxic effects were grade 3 nausea/vomiting (WHO) in 3 patients, grade 2 mucositis in 1 patient and grade 4 leukopenia in 1 patient. CONCLUSION: Intermittent continuous infusion with ifosfamide, mesna and 5-FU is feasible on an outpatient basis. Although continuous infusion of ifosfamide may have a more favorable toxicity profile, the combination of 5-FU and ifosfamide in this schedule is no more effective than bolus or short-term infusion.