The capability set for work - correlates of sustainable employability in workers with multiple sclerosis.

BACKGROUND: The aim of this study was to examine whether work capabilities differ between workers with Multiple Sclerosis (MS) and workers from the general population. The second aim was to investigate whether the capability set was related to work and health outcomes. METHODS: A total of 163 workers with MS from the MS@Work study and 163 workers from the general population were matched for gender, age, educational level and working hours. All participants completed online questionnaires on demographics, health and work functioning. The Capability Set for Work Questionnaire was used to explore whether a set of seven work values is considered valuable (A), is enabled in the work context (B), and can be achieved by the individual (C). When all three criteria are met a work value can be considered part of the individual's 'capability set'. RESULTS: Group differences and relationships with work and health outcomes were examined. Despite lower physical work functioning (U = 4250, p = 0.001), lower work ability (U = 10591, p = 0.006) and worse self-reported health (U = 9091, p ≤ 0.001) workers with MS had a larger capability set (U = 9649, p ≤ 0.001) than the general population. In workers with MS, a larger capability set was associated with better flexible work functioning (r = 0.30), work ability (r = 0.25), self-rated health (r = 0.25); and with less absenteeism (r = - 0.26), presenteeism (r = - 0.31), cognitive/neuropsychiatric impairment (r = - 0.35), depression (r = - 0.43), anxiety (r = - 0.31) and fatigue (r = - 0.34). CONCLUSIONS: Workers with MS have a larger capability set than workers from the general population. In workers with MS a larger capability set was associated with better work and health outcomes. TRIAL REGISTRATION: This observational study is registered under NL43098.008.12: 'Voorspellers van arbeidsparticipatie bij mensen met relapsing-remitting Multiple Sclerose'. The study is registered at the Dutch CCMO register ( https://www.toetsingonline.nl ). This study is approved by the METC Brabant, 12 February 2014. First participants are enrolled 1st of March 2014.

Hepatic trauma management in polytraumatised patients.

UNLABELLED: The specialty literature of the last decade presents the nonoperative management of the closed abdominal trauma as the treatment of choice. The purpose of this study is to highlight the importance of the optimal management of hepatic lesions considering the clinical, paraclinical and therapeutic approach. Our study is based on the analysis of the clinical and paraclinical data and also on the evaluation of the treatment results in 1671 patients with abdominal trauma affecting multiple organs who were treated at the Clinic of Surgery, County Hospital of Oradea from 2008 to 2011. The non-operative approach of the hepatic trauma, applied in 52% of the patients, was indicated in stable hemodynamic status, non-bleeding hepatic lesions on the abdominal CT, and the absence of other significant abdominal lesions. The remaining 48% were treated surgically. The postoperative evolution was free of complications in 72% of the patients while the rest of 28% presented one or more postoperative complications. ABBREVIATIONS: CT = Computer Tomography; ISS= Injury Severity Score; AIS = Abbreviated Index of Severity; AAST = American Association for the Surgery of Trauma; ARDS = Adult Respiratory Distress Syndrome.

Maxillary odontogenic sinusitis, complicated with cerebral abscess--case report.

Maxillary sinus inflammation, when untreated or incorrectly treated, may extend locoregionally, the remaining paranasal sinuses being the first affected anatomical structures. This is why the understanding of the inflammatory pathology of the maxillary sinus, and particularly of the complications it can generate, is extremely important. The purpose of this presentation is to point out that inflammations of the paranasal sinuses are susceptible to develop complications in certain conditions and threaten the patient's life due to the proximity of vital structures. This is the case of a 16 years old male patient who developed a left maxillary and frontal sinusitis, complicated with cerebral abscess. Early detection, multidisciplinary approach and proper indication of surgical treatment, as well as early suspicion of complication, especially in young male adolescents, are extremely important.

Fitting a routine health-care activity into a randomized trial: an experiment possible without informed consent?

Due to possible methodological and practical problems, many researchers refrain from using a randomized controlled trial design to evaluate procedures already embedded in routine health care. We performed a randomized controlled trial on the effects of routine individual feedback on test ordering behavior of family physicians. The trial started after 4 years of feedback and lasted for 2.5 years. With some adaptations a randomized trial proved to be possible. In evaluating health-care procedures that cannot be blinded in a traditional way, asking full and study-specific informed consent may conflict with the validity of the design. In such studies, an alternative procedure is to be considered. Our trial, with doctors as study subjects, was held on an already accepted routine procedure (feedback). This made it possible to refrain from obtaining study-specific informed consent. Consequently, a Hawthorne effect and contamination of the trial arms through information leakage could be avoided. Justification and general criteria for not obtaining full and study-specific informed consent are worked out. In health-care research on the performance of doctors or on interventions into the quality of care, obtaining a general informed consent in advance is an acceptable alternative approach.

Efficacy of naratriptan tablets in the acute treatment of migraine: a dose-ranging study. Naratriptan S2WB2004 Study Group.

OBJECTIVE: This study sought to compare the efficacy of several doses of naratriptan tablets with that of sumatriptan tablets and placebo in the acute treatment of a single migraine attack. METHODS: This was a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, parallel-group, dose-ranging study. Patients received either naratriptan tablets (1, 2.5, 5, 7.5, or 10 mg), sumatriptan tablets (100 mg), or placebo. RESULTS: A total of 643 patients took part in the study. Two hours after dosing, headache relief was reported by significantly more patients treated with any dose of naratriptan (52%-69%) or sumatriptan (60%) than with placebo (31%) (P < 0.05). Four hours after dosing, headache relief was reported by significantly more patients treated with any dose of naratriptan (63%-80%) or sumatriptan (80%) than with placebo (39%) and by significantly more patients treated with sumatriptan 100 mg (80%) than with naratriptan 1 mg (64%), 2.5 mg (63%), or 5 mg (65%) (P < 0.05). Twenty-four-hour overall efficacy (headache relief maintained through 24 hours postdose with no worsening, no use of rescue medication, and no recurrence) was reported by more patients treated with any dose of naratriptan (39%-58%) or sumatriptan (44%) than with placebo (22%). Headache recurrence was reported in 17% to 32% of naratriptan-treated patients, 44% of sumatriptan-treated patients, and 36% of placebo recipients. The overall incidence of adverse events was similar in patients treated with naratriptan 1 mg (20%), naratriptan 2.5 mg (21%), and placebo (23%). For naratriptan 5, 7.5, and 10 mg, the incidence of adverse events was 32%, 37%, and 35%, respectively, and for sumatriptan 100 mg it was 26%. CONCLUSIONS: Our results suggest that the 2.5-mg dose of naratriptan tablets offers the optimal efficacy-to-tolerability ratio at the dose range between 1 and 10 mg. Although naratriptan 2.5 mg was less effective than sumatriptan 100 mg at 4 hours after dosing, the 2 medications showed similar efficacy at 24 hours.

To test or not to test, that is the question.

This paper describes a system that is used in Maastricht, the Netherlands, to provide general practitioners with feedback about the adequateness of their test requesting behaviour. The system has proven to be effective. Since the screening of test requests and additional patient data is work-intensive a project was started in the framework of the AIM programme OPENLABS to design a computer-based feedback system. In this system the general practitioner sends test requests to the laboratory decision support system by means of electronic data interchange (EDI). The authors were involved in the development of the EDI messages, which are now accepted standards in the Netherlands. The requests are stored in a database that is part of the laboratory decision support system. The other part of the decision support system, an expert system, obtains the request data (including patient data) from the database, screens the requests for adequateness and provides feedback when necessary.

The diagnostic value of scoring models for organic and non-organic gastrointestinal disease, including the irritable-bowel syndrome.

Scoring models based on history and physical examination have been developed to discriminate patients with non-organic gastrointestinal disease from those who have organic disease. The application of these models may lead to more efficient diagnosis and prevent somatization. Although the models have high diagnostic accuracy in the population in which they have been developed, their value in other populations has not been established. In this study previously developed models were tested in validation populations defined by the original selection criteria from the studies in which the models were developed and in unselected general practice and outpatient populations. The diagnostic performance of the models are expressed in terms of odds ratio and sensitivity and specificity for the classification of patients as having organic and non-organic disease. The diagnostic performance of all the models were rather low in the validation populations. Relatively few elements of the models had independent diagnostic value. In addition, the correlation between the scoring models, expressed in Cohen's kappa, was extremely low. The diagnostic values of the scoring models were not reproduced in comparable and unselected populations. Therefore, it is concluded that the diagnostic value of such a model has little external validity.

Routine individual feedback on requests for diagnostic tests: an economic evaluation.

The authors assessed the economic cor sequences of routine individual feedback on test requests provided to 85 family physicians in a region with 187,000 inhabitants. In a retrospective study as part of a quasi-experiment, cost trends in a region where feedback was provided over a seven-year period were compared with cost trends elsewhere in The Netherlands without feedback. Data on variable costs were obtained for 400 individual tests that accounted for 90% of all requests. Differences in request trends thus were transformed to savings in costs of diagnostic testing, taking account of the extra costs of providing the feedback. Expenditures for diagnostic testing declined after the start of the feedback, despite the costs of providing the feedback. The savings increased as the feedback continued. Compared with the trend elsewhere without feedback, over seven years a total net sum of 1.4 million U.S. dollars was saved. Routine individual feedback is therefore economically worthwhile.

Malposition of a total parenteral nutrition catheter in the accessory hemiazygos vein.

A total parenteral nutrition catheter was surgically introduced into the left cephalic vein of a 31-yr-old man with regional enteritis. After placement, a frontal radiograph indicated malplacement of the catheter. Its left vertical paramedian position indicated a left internal thoracic vein, a persistent left superior cava, or a left superior intercostal-accessory hemiazygos vein position. The left internal thoracic vein is very anterior within the thorax, a persistent left superior vena cava is centrally located, and the left superior intercostal-accessory hemiazygos vein is quite posterior. A lateral radiograph revealed a markedly posterior catheter course, with its tip at the level of the vertebral bodies. A venogram confirmed its location within the left superior intercostal-hemiazygos vein. The catheter was removed and replaced. After placement of all total parenteral nutrition catheters, a chest radiograph should be obtained. A single frontal film is usually adequate; if not, a supplemental lateral view may be taken. If uncertainty still exists, a venogram through the catheter may be obtained for precise localization.

Does a reduction in general practitioners' use of diagnostic tests lead to more hospital referrals?

BACKGROUND: Individual feedback on general practitioners' requests for tests can improve the quality of their test ordering behaviour. Little is known of the side effects on hospital referral behaviour when the use of tests is reduced through feedback. AIM: A study was undertaken to explore changes in general practitioners' hospital referral rates in a region where their use of diagnostic tests is reduced through feedback. METHOD: Trends in test requests and of first referrals to specialists were compared among 64 general practitioners in the Maastricht region of the Netherlands where routine feedback on test ordering behaviour is provided by the diagnostic coordinating centre. RESULTS: Reduction in diagnostic test use was not accompanied by a higher hospital referral rate, not even for specialties related to tests discussed in feedback. Good responders to feedback had decreased hospital referral rates in contrast to increased rates for poor responders (P < 0.01). CONCLUSION: Reducing the volume of general practitioners' diagnostic tests through feedback does not lead to more specialist referrals. Together with lower test use, fewer hospital referrals were seen.

A rational request behavior: the development of prediction instruments regarding thyroid function tests in primary care.

A prospective study was performed to encourage a rational thyroid-stimulating hormone (TSH) test request behavior of physicians, using prediction instruments. The latter give direct feedback about request adequacy on the basis of pretest probabilities of hyperthyroidism using patients' signs and symptoms. For instrument design, stepwise logistic regression was used on diagnostic data acquired through questionnaires, answered by 80 physicians and 668 patients for whom physicians requested a TSH test. Instruments were designed for clinical and subclinical hyperthyroidism and for clinical hyperthyroidism alone. Use of the instrument for clinical or subclinical hyperthyroidism on the selected group, at a 5% probability threshold, can result in a 37% reduction of unnecessary TSH test requests. With the instrument for clinical hyperthyroidism at a 5% probability threshold, the number of unnecessary test requests can be reduced by 57%. Therefore, it can be concluded that the instruments can determine TSH test request adequacy and encourage a rational TSH test request behavior of physicians at low pretest probability thresholds.

Validation of a knowledge based reminder system for diagnostic test ordering in general practice.

We describe the validation of a real-time automated reminder system that assists General Practitioners (GP) in appropriate test ordering. We compared the comments of human experts with the comments of the reminder system using a retrospective random selection of 253 request forms. A panel of three expert physicians judged the requested tests independently based on their interpretations of the practice guidelines. The majority assessment of the physicians was compared with the assessment of the reminder system. In case the system's output differed from the majority assessment the written practice guidelines were consulted. On average 1.75 reminders were produced per form. In total 32 of the 442 given reminders (7%) were given incorrectly. The amount of information and the level of detail (the specificity of the terms) in which the GP describes the patients' medical status are crucial for the reminder system to react correctly.

Computer-based assistance in family medicine.

In this paper, the fully integrated General Practitioner (GP) Information and Research System HIOS and Decision Support System HIOS+ are described. Both systems were developed with the Phased Development Methodology (PDM), which is also presented. HIOS consists of an administrative module, medical modules, and a research module to support GPs in daily practice activities and research. It was implemented at a general practice and a health centre, and was evaluated positively. HIOS+ was developed by extending HIOS with modules which offer several types of decision support to assist GPs in (diagnostic) decision making. The modules offer passive and active decision support. HIOS+ can present textbook information, generate advice and warnings, support the creation of models, generate reports, and can be used in education. Some HIOS+ modules were evaluated by GPs in evaluation studies, all with positive results.

OpenLabs services for ordering laboratory investigations.

An automated system is described that screens requests for laboratory investigations from GPs and delivers feedback with respect to the adequacy of the requests. The system has to replace and extend the current system in which feedback is provided on a manual basis each half year, based on the tests requested during a period of one month, randomly selected from the previous half year. It has been reported elsewhere that the manual system reduced the number of tests requested considerably. The criteria used by the automated system and the manual system are based on guidelines and work agreements that GPs have agreed to follow when requesting investigations. It is concluded that the automated system is very user-friendly and that in the order of 4-17% of the requested tests could be identified as unnecessary, with a false negative rate in between 4% (for hyperthyroidism) and 23% (for hypothyroidism). The achieved reduction in the number of tests is in addition to the reduction obtained in the manual system.

Effect of feedback on test ordering behaviour of general practitioners.

OBJECTIVE: To assess the effect of feedback on the test ordering behaviour of general practitioners. DESIGN: Comparison of requests at two diagnostic centres, and internal comparison between tests which were discussed in feedback and tests which were not. SETTING: A diagnostic centre in Maastricht giving feedback and another elsewhere in the Netherlands (laboratory A) not giving feedback. SUBJECTS: All 85 general practitioners in the region of Maastricht, and all general practitioners in the region of laboratory A. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Numbers of tests requested by general practitioners. RESULTS: Requests at the Maastricht diagnostic centre decreased soon after the onset of feedback whereas there was a persistent increase in requests at laboratory A. Tests that were discussed showed the strongest decrease (maximum 40%), though tests that were not discussed decreased as well (maximum 27%). CONCLUSIONS: Feedback on diagnostic requests may exert a strong influence on request behaviour. Four years after the onset of feedback the effects were still noticeable.

Discriminant value of symptoms in patients with dyspepsia.

BACKGROUND: Family physicians encounter many pitfalls in managing and treating dyspeptic patients, most of whom are treated in family practice based solely on their signs and symptoms. METHODS: A computer literature search followed by a systematic methodological appraisal was performed to identify studies that evaluated clinical symptomatology in dyspeptic patients. RESULTS: Ten studies, none of which took place in a family practice, fulfilled our inclusion criteria. The main conclusion drawn from outpatient populations and patients referred for open-access endoscopy was that certain clusters of symptoms have a negative predictive value for organic causes of dyspepsia. Higher age, male sex, pain at night, relief by antacids or food, and previous history of peptic ulcer disease were identified as predictors of organic causes for abdominal symptoms. CONCLUSIONS: These findings can be helpful to family physicians in determining the need for endoscopy referral. However, since the diagnostic values of tests in family practice may differ from those in referred populations, there is a need for prospective studies in primary care.

Comparing assessment of appropriateness of diagnostic tests between a human expert and an automated reminder system.

This paper describes the validation of the GRIF automated reminder system. The reminder system has been developed to influence diagnostic test ordering of General Practitioners (GPs). It generates critical comments on the basis of accepted guidelines. A retrospective random selection of 253 request forms has been taken. We compared the comments of a human expert to the comments of the reminder system. A panel of two independent reviewers judged the requested tests based on the strict interpretation of the guidelines. The sensitivity, specificity and 'predictive values' of the comments of the reminder system and the human expert were calculated using the judgement of the two reviewers as 'gold standard'.

Reliability of the assessment of appropriateness of diagnostic test request behavior.

We describe the reliability of the assessment of the appropriateness of requested diagnostic tests. We used a retrospective random selection of 253 request forms with in total 1217 requested tests. Three experts made an independent assessment of each requested test. Interrater kappa values ranged from 0.33 to 0.44. The kappa values of intrarater agreement ranged from 0.65 to 0.68. The reliability coefficient for all three reviewers was 0.66. This reliability is not sufficient to make case-by-case decisions, for example to give individual feedback on the appropriateness of requested tests. Sixteen reviewers are necessary to obtain a reference with a reliability of 0.95.

Comparison of sucralfate and cimetidine in the treatment of duodenal and gastric ulcers. A multicenter study.

Sixty-three outpatients with endoscopically proven duodenal ulcer and 58 with gastric ulcer were treated under single-blind conditions with either sucralfate, 4 g daily, or with cimetidine, 1 g daily. Endoscopy was performed after 4 weeks and again after 6 weeks if the ulcer had not healed. Among the duodenal ulcer patients, 22 of 31 (71.0%) who received sucralfate and 24 of 32 (75.0%) who received cimetidine were healed after 4 weeks. After 6 weeks, the overall healing rate was 96.8% in the sucralfate group and 96.9% in the cimetidine group. Of 28 gastric ulcer patients who received sucralfate, 10 (35.7%) were healed after 4 weeks, compared with 18 of 30 (60.0%) who received cimetidine. The overall healing rates after 6 weeks were 71.4% in the sucralfate group and 83.3% in the cimetidine group. None of the differences between treatment groups was statistically significant. No serious side effects occurred with either drug. The results suggest that sucralfate and cimetidine are equally effective in the short-term treatment of peptic ulcer.