Lobar or Sublobar Resection for Peripheral Stage IA Non-Small-Cell Lung Cancer.

BACKGROUND: The increased detection of small-sized peripheral non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) has renewed interest in sublobar resection in lieu of lobectomy. METHODS: We conducted a multicenter, noninferiority, phase 3 trial in which patients with NSCLC clinically staged as T1aN0 (tumor size, ≤2 cm) were randomly assigned to undergo sublobar resection or lobar resection after intraoperative confirmation of node-negative disease. The primary end point was disease-free survival, defined as the time between randomization and disease recurrence or death from any cause. Secondary end points were overall survival, locoregional and systemic recurrence, and pulmonary functions. RESULTS: From June 2007 through March 2017, a total of 697 patients were assigned to undergo sublobar resection (340 patients) or lobar resection (357 patients). After a median follow-up of 7 years, sublobar resection was noninferior to lobar resection for disease-free survival (hazard ratio for disease recurrence or death, 1.01; 90% confidence interval [CI], 0.83 to 1.24). In addition, overall survival after sublobar resection was similar to that after lobar resection (hazard ratio for death, 0.95; 95% CI, 0.72 to 1.26). The 5-year disease-free survival was 63.6% (95% CI, 57.9 to 68.8) after sublobar resection and 64.1% (95% CI, 58.5 to 69.0) after lobar resection. The 5-year overall survival was 80.3% (95% CI, 75.5 to 84.3) after sublobar resection and 78.9% (95% CI, 74.1 to 82.9) after lobar resection. No substantial difference was seen between the two groups in the incidence of locoregional or distant recurrence. At 6 months postoperatively, a between-group difference of 2 percentage points was measured in the median percentage of predicted forced expiratory volume in 1 second, favoring the sublobar-resection group. CONCLUSIONS: In patients with peripheral NSCLC with a tumor size of 2 cm or less and pathologically confirmed node-negative disease in the hilar and mediastinal lymph nodes, sublobar resection was not inferior to lobectomy with respect to disease-free survival. Overall survival was similar with the two procedures. (Funded by the National Cancer Institute and others; CALGB 140503 ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT00499330.).

Extended Lymphadenectomy Improves Survival After Induction Chemoradiation for Esophageal Cancer: A Propensity-Matched Analysis of the National Cancer Database.

OBJECTIVES: The aim of this study was to explore the potential value of extended nodal-dissection following neoadjuvant chemoradiation (CRT), by analyzing data from the National Cancer Database (NCDB). BACKGROUND: A CROSS-trial post-hoc analysis showed that the number of dissected lymph nodes was associated with improved survival in patients undergoing upfront surgery but not in those treated with neoadjuvant CRT. METHODS: The NCDB was queried (2004-2014) for patients who underwent esophagectomy following induction CRT. Predictors of overall survival (OS) were assessed. The optimal number of dissected LNs associated with highest survival benefit was determined by multiple regression analyses and receiveroperating characteristic curve analysis. The whole cohort was divided into 2 groups based on the predefined cutoff number. The two groups were propensity-matched (PMs). RESULTS: Esophagectomy following induction-CRT was performed in 14,503 patients. The number of resected nodes was associated with improved OS in the multivariable analysis (hazard ratio for every 10 nodes: 0.95 (95% confidence interval: 0.93-0.98). The cutoff number of resected LNs that was associated with the highest survival benefit was 20 nodes. In the PM groups, patients in the "≥20 LNs" group had a 14% relative-increase in OS ( P = 0.002), despite having more advanced pathological stages (stage II-IV: 76% vs 72%, P < 0.001), and higher number of positive nodes (0-2 vs 0-1, P < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: The total number of resected nodes is a significant determinant of improved survival following induction CRT in patients with either node negative or node positive disease. In the matched groups, patients with higher number of resected lymph nodes had higher OS rate, despite having more advanced pathological disease and higher number of resected positive lymph nodes.

Ten-Year Survival and Recurrence Patterns After Three-Field Lymph Node Dissection for Squamous Cell and Adenocarcinoma of the Esophagus.

OBJECTIVE: The aim was to determine the prevalence of metastases to the cervical and recurrent laryngeal cervicothoracic (CT) nodes as well as survival and recurrence patterns after esophagectomy with three-field lymph node dissection (TFD) in patients with predominately adenocarcinoma (AC) of the esophagus. BACKGROUND: Although esophagectomy with TFD is commonly practiced in Japan and Southeast Asia for squamous cell cancer (SCC) of the esophagus, there are only a handful of reports about its' utilization and survival benefit in North American patients. METHODS: This is a retrospective case series of patients who had an esophagectomy with TFD. The primary outcomes of interest were the prevalence of nodal metastases to the CT nodes as well as overall survival (OS) and disease-free survival. Secondary outcomes included time to recurrence, recurrence patterns, operative morbidity as well as 30 and 90-day mortality. RESULTS: Two hundred forty-two patients with esophageal cancer (AC: 67%) underwent esophagectomy with TFD. Metastases to the CT nodes were present in 56 patients (23%: AC 20% and SCC 30%). Positive CT nodes were present in 14% of pT1/T2 tumors and 30% of pT3 tumors. For the 56 patients with CT positive nodes, 5-year OS was 25% (AC:16%; SCC:39%). Fifteen of 56 (26.7%) patients with metastases to the CT nodes were alive and disease-free at a minimum of 5 years postoperatively. Ten-year OS was 43% for all patients with SCC and 28% for patients with AC. CONCLUSIONS: Metastases to the CT nodes are common in both SCC and AC of the esophagus and may be present in at least 14% of early lesions. Five-year survival is encouraging particularly for patients with esophageal SCC cancer.

Surgical Treatment at an Academic Medical Center is Associated with Statistically Insignificant Lung Cancer Survival Outcome Differences Related to ZIP Code.

BACKGROUND: Low socioeconomic status is a well-characterized adverse prognostic factor in large lung cancer databases. However, such characterizations may be confounded as patients of lower socioeconomic status are more often treated at low-volume, non-academic centers. We evaluated whether socioeconomic status, as defined by ZIP code median income, was associated with differences in lung cancer resection outcomes within a high-volume academic medical center. METHODS: Consecutive patients undergoing resection for non-small cell lung cancer were identified from a prospectively maintained database (2011-18). Patients were assigned an income value based on the median income of their ZIP code as determined by census-based geographic data. We stratified the population into income quintiles representative of SES and compared demographics (chi-square), surgical outcomes, and survival (Kaplan-Meier). RESULTS: We identified 1,693 patients, representing 516 ZIP codes. Income quintiles were Q1: $24,421-53,151; Q2:$53,152-73,982; Q3:$73,983-99,063; Q4:$99,064-123,842; and Q5:$123,843-250,001. Compared to Q5 patients, Q1 patients were younger (median 69 vs. 73, p < 0.001), more likely male (44 vs. 36%, p = 0.035), and more likely Asian, Black, or self-identified as other than white, Asian, or Black. (67 vs. 11%, p = < 0.001). We found minor differences in surgical outcomes and no significant difference in 5-year survival between Q1 and Q5 patients (5-year: 86 vs. 85%, p = 0.886). CONCLUSIONS: Surgical care patterns at a high-volume academic medical center are similar among patients from varying ZIP codes. Surgical treatment at such a center is associated with no survival differences based upon socioeconomic status as determined by ZIP code. Centralization of lung cancer surgical care to high-volume centers may reduce socioeconomic outcome disparities.

Neoadjuvant durvalumab with or without stereotactic body radiotherapy in patients with early-stage non-small-cell lung cancer: a single-centre, randomised phase 2 trial.

BACKGROUND: Previous phase 2 trials of neoadjuvant anti-PD-1 or anti-PD-L1 monotherapy in patients with early-stage non-small-cell lung cancer have reported major pathological response rates in the range of 15-45%. Evidence suggests that stereotactic body radiotherapy might be a potent immunomodulator in advanced non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC). In this trial, we aimed to evaluate the use of stereotactic body radiotherapy in patients with early-stage NSCLC as an immunomodulator to enhance the anti-tumour immune response associated with the anti-PD-L1 antibody durvalumab. METHODS: We did a single-centre, open-label, randomised, controlled, phase 2 trial, comparing neoadjuvant durvalumab alone with neoadjuvant durvalumab plus stereotactic radiotherapy in patients with early-stage NSCLC, at NewYork-Presbyterian and Weill Cornell Medical Center (New York, NY, USA). We enrolled patients with potentially resectable early-stage NSCLC (clinical stages I-IIIA as per the 7th edition of the American Joint Committee on Cancer) who were aged 18 years or older with an Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status of 0 or 1. Eligible patients were randomly assigned (1:1) to either neoadjuvant durvalumab monotherapy or neoadjuvant durvalumab plus stereotactic body radiotherapy (8 Gy × 3 fractions), using permuted blocks with varied sizes and no stratification for clinical or molecular variables. Patients, treating physicians, and all study personnel were unmasked to treatment assignment after all patients were randomly assigned. All patients received two cycles of durvalumab 3 weeks apart at a dose of 1·12 g by intravenous infusion over 60 min. Those in the durvalumab plus radiotherapy group also received three consecutive daily fractions of 8 Gy stereotactic body radiotherapy delivered to the primary tumour immediately before the first cycle of durvalumab. Patients without systemic disease progression proceeded to surgical resection. The primary endpoint was major pathological response in the primary tumour. All analyses were done on an intention-to-treat basis. This trial is registered with ClinicalTrial.gov, NCT02904954, and is ongoing but closed to accrual. FINDINGS: Between Jan 25, 2017, and Sept 15, 2020, 96 patients were screened and 60 were enrolled and randomly assigned to either the durvalumab monotherapy group (n=30) or the durvalumab plus radiotherapy group (n=30). 26 (87%) of 30 patients in each group had their tumours surgically resected. Major pathological response was observed in two (6·7% [95% CI 0·8-22·1]) of 30 patients in the durvalumab monotherapy group and 16 (53·3% [34·3-71·7]) of 30 patients in the durvalumab plus radiotherapy group. The difference in the major pathological response rates between both groups was significant (crude odds ratio 16·0 [95% CI 3·2-79·6]; p<0·0001). In the 16 patients in the dual therapy group with a major pathological response, eight (50%) had a complete pathological response. The second cycle of durvalumab was withheld in three (10%) of 30 patients in the dual therapy group due to immune-related adverse events (grade 3 hepatitis, grade 2 pancreatitis, and grade 3 fatigue and thrombocytopaenia). Grade 3-4 adverse events occurred in five (17%) of 30 patients in the durvalumab monotherapy group and six (20%) of 30 patients in the durvalumab plus radiotherapy group. The most frequent grade 3-4 events were hyponatraemia (three [10%] patients in the durvalumab monotherapy group) and hyperlipasaemia (three [10%] patients in the durvalumab plus radiotherapy group). Two patients in each group had serious adverse events (pulmonary embolism [n=1] and stroke [n=1] in the durvalumab monotherapy group, and pancreatitis [n=1] and fatigue [n=1] in the durvalumab plus radiotherapy group). No treatment-related deaths or deaths within 30 days of surgery were reported. INTERPRETATION: Neoadjuvant durvalumab combined with stereotactic body radiotherapy is well tolerated, safe, and associated with a high major pathological response rate. This neoadjuvant strategy should be validated in a larger trial. FUNDING: AstraZeneca.

Multilobulated thymoma with an acute angle: a new predictor of lung invasion.

OBJECTIVE: Imaging features of thymomas such as lobulation, infiltration into lung, and adjacent lung abnormality have been associated with lung invasion but are unreliable. The goal of this study was to develop a more objective and reproducible method for predicting lung invasion by thymomas. SUBJECTS AND METHODS: Fifty-four thymomas resected from 2007 to 2017 were included for analysis. Pre-operative CT scans for these thymomas were reviewed, and multiple features were evaluated, including the interface of each thymoma with the adjacent lung. A multilobulated thymoma with at least one acute angle between lobulations was considered suspicious for lung invasion. Two blinded radiologists then tested this hypothesis by reviewing all 54 CT scans and using this single criterion to predict lung invasion. RESULTS: Twelve thymomas invaded the lung. All lung-invasive thymomas were multilobulated. Twenty-nine thymomas had a multilobulated interface with the lung. Multilobulated thymomas were more likely to invade the lung than thymomas with a single lobulation or no lobulation (p = 0.0008). Using the criterion of multilobulation with at least one acute angle between lobulations to predict lung invasion, the two readers achieved a sensitivity of 67-83%, specificity of 93-98%, positive predictive value of 77-89%, and negative predicted value of 91-95%. Nine lung-invasive thymomas also invaded mediastinal structures or disseminated to the pleura. CONCLUSIONS: A multilobulated thymoma with at least one acute angle between lobulations predicts lung invasion with a high degree of accuracy. When lung invasion is suspected, the findings are indicative of a locally aggressive tumor, and the pleura and mediastinal structures should also be closely inspected for invasion. KEY POINTS: • A multilobulated thymoma with at least one acute angle between lobulations is predictive of lung invasion. • Coronal and sagittal reformations and thin sections are helpful in challenging cases. • Lung invasion indicates a locally aggressive tumor, and the pleura and other mediastinal structures should also be closely inspected for invasion.

Sensitivity and specificity of fine needle aspiration for the diagnosis of mediastinal lesions.

Fine needle aspiration cytology (FNAC) of mediastinal masses allows for rapid on-site evaluation and the triaging of material for ancillary studies. However, surgical pathology is often considered to be the gold standard for diagnosis. This study examines the sensitivity and specificity of FNAC compared to a concurrent or subsequent surgical pathology specimen in 77 mediastinal lesions. The overall sensitivity for mediastinal mass FNAC was 78% and the overall specificity was 98%. For individual categories the sensitivity and specificity of FNAC was respectively as follows: inflammatory/infectious (33%, 99%), metastatic carcinoma (93%, 100%), lymphoma (84%, 97%), cysts (25%, 100%), soft tissue tumors (100%, 100%), paraganglioma (50%, 100%), germ cell tumor (100%, 99%), thymoma (87%, 94%), thymic carcinoma (60%, 100%), benign thymus (0%, 100%), and indeterminate (100%, 90%). For different locations within the mediastinum the sensitivity and specificity of FNAC was respectively as follows: anterosuperior mediastinum (80%, 98%), posterior mediastinum (33%, 95%), middle mediastinum (100%, 100%), and mediastinum, NOS (79%, 99%). Thus, mediastinal FNAC is fairly sensitive, very specific, and is a valuable technique in the diagnosis of mediastinal masses.

Oncologic considerations in the elderly.

PURPOSE OF REVIEW: Elderly patients presenting with thoracic malignancies tend to be largely undertreated because of a presumption that this group will incur a high treatment-associated morbidity and mortality. The current review highlights the current practice and recent updates in the surgical management of thoracic malignancies, mainly lung cancer, in the elderly population. RECENT FINDINGS: Lung resections appears to be relatively safe in the elderly patients presenting with lung cancer. Whenever possible, a lobectomy should be offered to patients with a good performance status who present with early stage disease. However, a limited resection may offer a valuable comparable alternative in patients with advanced comorbidities and borderline pulmonary functions. The use of minimally invasive approaches, namely video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery and robotic surgery are associated with lower morbidity and improved perioperative outcomes compared with the traditional thoracotomy approach and are ideal for the aged. In elderly patients presenting with advanced staged lung cancer, major lung resections following induction therapy, although feasible, should be discussed in a multispecialty tumor board committee. SUMMARY: There is growing evidence from the literature that surgical resection is relatively safe in the elderly population. Age by itself should not preclude patients from having curative resection. Resections can be tailored to performance status of the patient.

Predictors of Disease-free Survival and Recurrence in Patients with Resected Bronchial Carcinoid Tumors.

BACKGROUND: Bronchial carcinoids are characterized by neuroendocrine differentiation and have distinct biological behavior, recurrence patterns, and prognosis compared with adenocarcinomas or squamous cell carcinomas. Because of their often indolent nature, it has been suggested that routine postoperative imaging surveillance may not be warranted in the majority of patients. This study aims to define the factors that predict disease-free survival (DFS) and recurrence after resection of these tumors, with the goal of identifying high-risk patients for whom image surveillance may be warranted. METHODS: We conducted a retrospective review of a prospective database to identify patients with completely resected bronchial carcinoid tumors. Surgical procedure, histology, pathological stage, follow-up, tumor recurrence, and survival were assessed. RESULTS: One hundred and forty-two patients were identified. Median age was 62 years and the majority was women (106). Surgical procedures included 20 wedge resections, 10 segmentectomies, 99 lobectomies, 3 bilobectomies, 2 pneumonectomies, 6 sleeve resections, and 2 bronchectomies. Pathologic stages included I (81%), II (10%), III (8%), and IV (1%). With a median follow-up of 31 months, there were seven recurrences. The 5- and 10-year overall survival rates were 92% and 75% and DFS rates were 88% and 72%, respectively. There were 34 patients with atypical carcinoids, and 6 (18%) developed recurrence, compared with 1 recurrence (1%) in the group of 108 patients with typical carcinoids (p = 0.0008). For atypical carcinoid tumors, the 5- and 10-year DFS rates were 72% and 32% versus 92% and 85% in typical carcinoid tumors (p = 0.001). Patients with more advanced tumor stage pT2-4 and pathologic N1/N2 nodal metastases had a significantly decreased 5- and 10-year DFS compared with those with early pT1 stage (p = 0.029) or those without nodal disease (p = 0.043). Multivariate Cox regression analyses showed advancing age (p = 0.001), atypical histology (p = 0.021), and advanced tumor stage (p = 0.047) were significant negative predictors for DFS. CONCLUSION: Long-term survival after resection of bronchial carcinoids is common, especially for patients with typical carcinoid tumors. DFS can be negatively influenced by atypical histology, advanced tumor, and nodal statuses. Efforts at postoperative image surveillance should target those patients with such high-risk factors.

Perioperative Outcomes after Lung Resection in Obese Patients.

BACKGROUND: Obesity is a growing epidemic in the developed world. However, little is known about the impact of obesity on the perioperative morbidity and mortality after lung resection. PATIENTS AND METHODS: We analyzed the American College of Surgeons National Surgical Quality Improvement Program database from 2005 to 2010 to determine whether obesity is a risk factor for perioperative morbidity and mortality after pulmonary resection. Demographic, clinical, intraoperative, and morbidity and mortality data were collected. Multivariable predictors of morbidity and mortality were determined using regression analysis. RESULTS: A total of 5,216 lung resections were identified (1,372 wedges, 3,713 lobectomies, and 131 pneumonectomies). The median age was 66 years and 2,587 (49.6%) were females. The body mass index (BMI, kg/m(2)) of the patients was as follows: 192 (3.7%) < 18.5; 1,727 (33.1%) 18.5 to 24.9; 1,754 (33.6%) 25 to 29.9; and 1,488 (28.5%) > 30. In-hospital mortality and all-cause morbidity was 2.4% (n = 127) and 14.5% (n = 757) for the entire cohort of patients, respectively. BMI was not found to be a predictor of increased mortality or morbidity, even in the morbidly obese (BMI > 35). Rather, age, approach (video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery vs. open), parameters assessing performance status, operative time, and preoperative radiation therapy were the predictors of morbidity and mortality. Conversely, being overweight (BMI 25-30) approached significance as a multivariate predictor for decreased pulmonary complications (odds ratio, 0.77 [0.592-1.004]; p = 0.054) consistent with the "obesity paradox" observed after nonbariatric general surgery. CONCLUSION: Our large national study shows that obesity does not negatively impact perioperative mortality and morbidity in patients undergoing lung resection. Surgical resections should not be denied to obese (BMI > 30) patients.

Wedge resection, segmentectomy, and lobectomy: oncologic outcomes based on extent of surgical resection for ≤2 cm stage IA non-small cell lung cancer.

Background: Long-standing controversy has existed over whether sublobar resection is an adequate oncological procedure for clinical stage IA non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) ≤2 cm, despite the recent randomized trial reports of Japanese Clinical Oncology Group (JCOG) 0802 and Cancer and Leukemia Group B (CALGB) 140503 demonstrating non-inferior outcomes with sublobar resection compared to lobectomy. As practice patterns shift, we sought to compare oncologic outcomes in patients with these early-stage tumors after wedge resection, segmentectomy, or lobectomy in a contemporary, real-world, cohort. Methods: A retrospective review of a prospectively maintained database from a single institution was conducted from 2011 to 2020 to identify all patients with clinically staged IA1 or IA2 NSCLC (tumors ≤2 cm with no nodal involvement). The primary outcomes of interest were overall survival (OS) and disease-free survival (DFS), with secondary outcomes of lung cancer-specific survival (LCSS), recurrence patterns, and perioperative morbidity and mortality. Results: A total of 480 patients were identified; 93 (19.4%) patients underwent wedge resection, 90 (18.7%) received segmentectomy, and 297 (61.9%) underwent lobectomy. Patients who underwent wedge resection had worse Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) performance status (23.7% ECOG 1 or 2 vs. 5.6% among segmentectomy and 5.4% among lobectomy, P<0.05). Both wedge resection and segmentectomy patients had lower preoperative mean percentage of predicted forced expiratory volume in one second (%FEV1) compared to the lobectomy group (81.8% and 82.6% vs. 89.6%, P=0.002), a higher proportion of patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) and interstitial lung disease (ILD), and a higher Charlson Comorbidity Index. There were no statistically significant differences in 5-year OS, DFS, or LCSS between groups: 90%, 61%, 78% for wedge resections compared with 85%, 75%, 86% for segmentectomy, and 87%, 77%, 87% for lobectomy, respectively. Recurrence was observed in 17 patients who underwent wedge resection (18.3%, 8 local, 9 distant), 12 patients who received segmentectomy (13.4%, 6 local, 6 distant), and 38 patients who underwent lobectomy (12.8%, 11 local, 27 distant), which was not significantly different (P=0.36). Conclusions: Patients with inferior performance status or lower baseline pulmonary function are more likely to receive wedge resection for clinical stage IA NSCLC ≤2 cm in size. For these small tumors, lobectomy, segmentectomy, and wedge resection provide comparable oncologic outcomes.

Recurrence of Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer With Visceral Pleural Invasion: A Secondary Analysis of a Randomized Clinical Trial.

Importance: The randomized clinical trial Cancer and Leukemia Group B (CALGB) 140503 showed that for patients with clinically staged T1N0 non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC; ≤2 cm), sublobar resections were associated with similar oncological outcomes to those after lobar resection. The association of the extent of parenchymal resection with recurrence and survival in patients with tumors pathologically upstaged to T2 based on visceral pleural invasion (VPI) is controversial. Objective: To determine survival and recurrence rates in patients with small peripheral pT2 NSCLC (≤2 cm) that was treated by either lobar or sublobar resection in CALGB 140503. Design, Participants, and Setting: CALGB 140503, a randomized multicenter noninferiority trial, included 697 patients with small peripheral NSCLC that was clinically staged as T1N0. Enrollment was from June 2007 through March 2017 at 83 participating institutions, and after a median follow-up of 7 years, the primary outcome of disease-free survival after sublobar resection was noninferior to that after lobar resection. Intervention: Lobar or sublobar resection. Main Outcomes and Measures: Survival end points were estimated by the Kaplan-Meier estimator. Hazard ratios and 95% CIs were estimated using stratified Cox proportional hazard models. Results: Of 679 participants, 390 (57.4%) were female, and the median (range) age was 67.8 (37.8-89.7) years. Among 697 patients randomized, 566 (81.2%) had pT1 tumors (no VPI) and 113 (16.2%) had pT2 tumors (VPI). Five-year disease-free survival was 65.9% (95% CI, 61.9%-70.2%) in patients with pT1 compared with 53.3% (95% CI, 44.3%-64.1%) in patients with pT2 tumors (stratified log-rank: P = .02). Disease recurrence developed in 27.6% of patients with pT1 (locoregional only: 60 [10.8%]; distant only: 81 [14.6%]) and 41.6% of those with pT2 (locoregional only: 17 [15.0%]; distant only: 27 [23.9%]). Five-year recurrence-free survival was 73.1% (95% CI, 69.2%-77.1%) for pT1 tumors and 58.2% (95% CI, 49.2%-68.8%) for pT2 tumors (stratified log-rank: P = .01). There were no intergroup differences in disease-free or recurrence-free survival based on the extent of parenchymal resection. Conclusions and Relevance: The results of this secondary analysis suggest that compared with patients with tumors without VPI, patients who had tumors with VPI had worse disease-free and recurrence-free survival and a higher rate of local and distant disease recurrence. These high rates of recurrence were independent of the extent of parenchymal resection, and these data support the inclusion of these patients in adjuvant therapy trials. Trial Registration: ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT0049933.

Management and outcomes of patients on preoperative plavix (clopidogrel) undergoing general thoracic surgery.

OBJECTIVES: Plavix (clopidogrel) is a potent antiplatelet agent used to prevent thrombosis in a variety of clinical settings. The perioperative management of thoracic surgery patients who are on clopidogrel at the time of surgery is not well defined. We conducted this review to examine the perioperative management and outcomes of patients undergoing general thoracic surgical procedures. METHODS: From January 2005 to January 2010, 165 patients on clopidogrel underwent 182 operative procedures. Three management strategies were identified: Group I: clopidogrel continued through surgery (n = 17), Group II: clopidogrel discontinued with a bridging agent (n = 44) and Group III clopidogrel discontinued without a bridging agent (n = 121). Propensity score matched cohorts (17 clopidogrel continued; 34 clopidogrel discontinued) were constructed based on age, clopidogrel indication, American Society of Anesthesiology status, and procedure and used to compare the impact of clopidogrel management on postoperative bleeding and cardiovascular morbidity. RESULTS: Unmatched analysis revealed a significantly higher rate of transfusion in the group of patients who continued on clopidogrel throughout the perioperative period, compared with patients who had clopidogrel discontinued. Although there were more cardiovascular events in Groups II and III, there were no significant differences between groups in postoperative mortality, myocardial infarction, stroke, or reoperation for bleeding. In propensity matched patients only the rate of postoperative transfusions was significantly higher in patients continued on clopidogrel compared with patients whose clopidogrel was discontinued (35.3 vs. 2.9%), p < 0.004. CONCLUSIONS: In selected patients, some thoracic surgical procedures can be performed safely on clopidogrel but are associated with higher rates of postoperative transfusion.

Should sampling of three N2 stations be a quality metric for curative resection of stage I lung cancer?

OBJECTIVE: In 2022, the American College of Surgeons Commission on Cancer issued standard 5.8 quality metric for curative lung cancer resections requiring nodal resection from 3 N2 stations. In this report, we compare oncologic outcomes after resection of 3 N2 stations versus 2 N2 stations in stage I non-small cell lung cancer. METHODS: A retrospective review from a single institution database was conducted from 2011 to 2020 to identify patients with clinical stage I non-small cell lung cancer. Patients with a history of lung cancer, carcinoid tumors, and ground-glass lesions less than 50% solid component were excluded. The primary outcome was overall survival. Secondary outcomes included disease-free survival, recurrence patterns, and nodal upstaging. RESULTS: A total of 581 patients were identified and divided into 2 groups based on the number of N2 stations examined: Group A had 2 N2 stations examined (364 patients), and group B had 3 or more N2 stations examined (217 patients). Baseline demographic and clinical characteristics were similar between groups. In group A, N1 and N2 positive nodal stations were present in 8.2% (30/364) and 5.2% (19/364) of patients versus 7.4% (16/217) and 5.5% (12/217), respectively, in group B. Five-year overall survival and disease-free survival were 89% and 74% in group A versus 88% and 78% in group B, respectively. Recurrence occurred in 56 patients (15.4%) in group A (6.6% local and 8.8% distant) and 29 patients (13.4%) in group B (5.1% local and 8.3% distant; P = .73). CONCLUSIONS: There was no significant difference in oncological outcomes in stage I non-small cell lung cancer resections that included 2 N2 stations compared with at least 3 N2 stations examined.

Surgical resection after neoadjuvant durvalumab and radiation is feasible and safe in non-small cell lung cancer: Results from a randomized trial.

OBJECTIVE: Several trials have recently reported the safety of pulmonary resection after neoadjuvant immunotherapy with encouraging major pathological response rates. We report the detailed adverse events profile from a recently conducted randomized phase II trial in patients with resectable non-small cell lung cancer treated with neoadjuvant durvalumab alone or with sub-ablative radiation. METHODS: We conducted a randomized phase II trial in patients with non-small cell lung cancer clinical stages I to IIIA who were randomly assigned to receive neoadjuvant durvalumab alone or with sub-ablative radiation (8Gyx3). Secondary end points included the safety of 2 cycles of preoperative durvalumab with and without radiation followed by pulmonary resection. Postoperative adverse events within 30 days were recorded according to the National Cancer Institute Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (version 4.0). RESULTS: Sixty patients were enrolled and randomly assigned, with planned resection performed in 26 patients in each arm. Baseline demographics and clinical variables were balanced between groups. The median operative time was similar between arms: 128 minutes (97-201) versus 146 minutes (109-214) (P = .314). There was no 30- or 90-day mortality. Grade 3/4 adverse events occurred in 10 of 26 patients (38%) after monotherapy and in 10 of 26 patients (38%) after dual therapy. Anemia requiring transfusion and hypotension were the 2 most common adverse events. The median length of stay was similar between arms (5 days vs 4 days, P = .172). CONCLUSIONS: In this randomized trial, the addition of sub-ablative focal radiation to durvalumab in the neoadjuvant setting was not associated with increased mortality or morbidity compared with neoadjuvant durvalumab alone.

Volume outcome relationship in post-esophagectomy leak: A systematic review and meta-analysis.

BACKGROUND: Anastomotic leak after esophagectomy carries important short and long-term sequelae. We conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis to determine its association with surgical volume. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A systematic literature review was performed to identify all studies reporting on anastomotic leak after esophagectomy. Studies with <100 cases were excluded. The primary outcome was post-esophagectomy anastomotic leak, while secondary outcomes were operative mortality overall and after anastomotic leak. Pooled event rates (PER) were calculated and association with annual esophagectomy volume by center was investigated. RESULTS: Of the 3,932 retrieved articles, 472 were included (n=177,566 patients). The PER of anastomotic leak was 8.91% [95%CI=8.32; 9.53%]. The PER of early mortality overall and after anastomotic leak was 2.49% [95%CI=2.27; 2.74] and 11.39% [95%CI=9.66; 13.39], respectively. Centers with <37 annual esophagectomies had a higher leak rate compared to those with ≥37 annual esophagectomies (9.58% vs. 8.34%; P=0.040). On meta-regression, surgical volume was inversely associated with the PER of esophageal leak and of early mortality. CONCLUSION: The frequency of anastomotic leaks after esophagectomy, perioperative and leak associated mortality are inversely associated with esophagectomy volume.

Minimally Invasive Surgery for Lung Cancer Following Neoadjuvant Therapy in the United States.

Introduction: Pulmonary resections following neoadjuvant therapy (NT) can be technically demanding. There is a paucity of data regarding the use of minimally invasive surgery (MIS) approaches in that setting on the National level. In this study, we explored the trends of using MIS approaches following NT and its associated outcomes. Methods: The study included all adult patients with non-small cell lung cancer who underwent pulmonary resection following NT between 2010 and 2016. Propensity score (PS) matching (MIS versus open) was performed and the perioperative outcomes were compared. Results: The study included 11,287 patients who underwent pulomonary resection after NT. The percentage of patients undergoing MIS lung resection and the number of hospitals performing one or more MIS increased from 19% and 166 (2010) to 41% and 305 (2016), respectively. When compared with thoracotomy, MIS lung resections were more frequently performed in academic centers in patients with higher income (P < .001). In PS matched groups, the use of MIS was associated with shorter hospital length of stay (5 days versus 6 days; P < .001), compared with open approach. However, there were no differences between the two groups in readmission rate (P = .513), or 30-/90-day mortality (P = .145/.685). In multivariable regression analysis, MIS approach was not associated with worse long-term, all-cause, survival (confidence interval: 0.91-1.09). Conclusion: The use of MIS approaches after NT increased significantly over the study period and was associated with perioperative outcomes and long-term survival comparable to those noted with the open approach.

Sublobar resection is comparable to lobectomy for screen-detected lung cancer.

OBJECTIVE: Sublobar resection is frequently offered to patients with small, peripheral lung cancers, despite the lack of outcome data from ongoing randomized clinical trials. Sublobar resection may be a particularly attractive surgical strategy for screen-detected lung cancers, which have been suggested to be less biologically aggressive than cancers detected by other means. Using prospective data collected from patients undergoing surgery in the National Lung Screening Trial, we sought to determine whether extent of resection affected survival for patients with screen-detected lung cancer. METHODS: The National Lung Screening Trial database was queried for patients who underwent surgical resection for confirmed lung cancer. Propensity score matching analysis (lobectomy vs sublobar resection) was done (nearest neighbor, 1:1, matching with no replacement, caliper 0.2). Demographics, clinicopathologic and perioperative outcomes, and long-term survival were compared in the entire cohort and in the propensity-matched groups. Multivariable logistic regression analysis was done to identify factors associated with increased postoperative morbidity or mortality. RESULTS: We identified 1029 patients who underwent resection for lung cancer in the National Lung Screening Trial, including 821 patients (80%) who had lobectomy and 166 patients (16%) who had sublobar resection, predominantly wedge resection (n = 114, 69% of sublobar resection). Patients who underwent sublobar resection were more likely to be female (53% vs 41%, P = .004) and had smaller tumors (1.5 cm vs 2 cm, P < .001). The sublobar resection group had fewer postoperative complications (22% vs 32%, P = .010) and fewer cardiac complications (4% vs 9%, P = .033). For stage I patients undergoing sublobar resection, there was no difference in 5-year overall survival (77% for both groups, P = .89) or cancer-specific survival (83% for both groups, P = .96) compared with patients undergoing lobectomy. On multivariable logistic regression analysis, sublobar resection was the only factor associated with lower postoperative morbidity/mortality (odds ratio, 0.63; 95% confidence interval, 0.40-0.98). To compare surgical strategies in balanced patient populations, we propensity matched 127 patients from each group undergoing sublobar resection and lobectomy. There were no differences in demographics or clinical and tumor characteristics among matched groups. There was again no difference in 5-year overall survival (71% vs 65%, P = .40) or cancer-specific survival (75% vs 73%, P = .89) for patients undergoing lobectomy and sublobar resection, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: For patients with screen-detected lung cancer, sublobar resection confers survival similar to lobectomy. By decreasing perioperative complications and potentially preserving lung function, sublobar resection may provide distinct advantages in a screened patient cohort.

Outcomes After Surgical Resection of Early-stage Lung Adenocarcinomas With Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor Mutations.

BACKGROUND: Routine mutation profiling for resected lung cancers is not widespread despite an increasing array of targeted therapies. We report the incidence of epidermal growth factor receptor mutations (EGFRmu+) in resected lung adenocarcinomas and their outcomes at a large North American cancer center to characterize this population now eligible for targeted adjuvant therapy. METHODS: Among 1036 pulmonary resections performed between 2015 and 2019, 647 patients (62%) had adenocarcinomas that underwent molecular profiling by next-generation sequencing. Clinical and pathologic characteristics, along with survival, were analyzed. RESULTS: EGFRmu+ were identified in 238 patients (37%). Patients with EGFRmu+ were more likely to be Asian than those with EGFR wild-type (79/238 [33%] vs 37/409 [9%], respectively; P < .001) and more likely to be never-smokers (115/238 [48%] vs 73/409 [18%], P < .001). However, most patients with EGFRmu+ in our cohort were White (45%) and had a history of smoking (52%). A statistically nonsignificant trend was observed toward improved 3-year overall survival for pathologic stage IB to III cancers with EGFRmu+ (91% vs 77%, P = .09). Patients with pathologic stage IB lung cancers with EGFRmu+ had a 97% rate of 3-year disease-free survival, with only 1 recurrence in the first 3 years of follow-up. EGFR mutation subtype was not associated with survival differences. CONCLUSIONS: Although Asians and never-smokers comprised a disproportionately large group of patients with lung adenocarcinomas with EGFRmu+, most EGFR mutations within our cohort were found in patients who were White or with a smoking history, supporting a routine rather than selective approach to mutation profiling. Patients with surgically resected stage IA and IB lung adenocarcinomas enjoy excellent survival regardless of their mutational status.

Extent of Resection Influences Survival in Early-Stage Lung Cancer With Occult Nodal Disease.

BACKGROUND: Minimal literature exists evaluating the impact of the extent of resection on survival in patients with small, early-stage non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) found to have occult nodal disease. We hypothesized that sublobar resection has comparable overall survival to patients undergoing lobectomy for clinical stage IA NSCLC that harbors occult nodal disease. METHODS: The National Cancer Database was reviewed for identification of patients with clinical stage IA NSCLC who underwent wedge resection, segmentectomy, or lobectomy and were found to have occult nodal disease. Overall survival was compared between groups, and a multivariate Cox regression model identified factors associated with worse survival. RESULTS: Occult nodal disease occurred in 6.1% of all patients with clinical stage IA disease undergoing resection. Patients undergoing wedge resection and segmentectomy found to have occult nodal disease were older (67.6 ± 9.6 years of age vs 66.1 ± 9.3 years of age vs 65.6 ± 9.5 years of age; P = .004) and had more advanced pathologic stage (pStage III: 68.7% vs 50.5% vs 41.5%; P < .001) than those receiving lobectomy. There was no difference in the median overall survival between segmentectomy and lobectomy (68.5 months vs 57.6 months; P = .200). However, wedge resection was independently associated with worse overall survival when controlling for other preoperative variables (hazard ratio, 1.23; 95% confidence interval, 1.01-1.51; P = .042). CONCLUSIONS: Review of the National Cancer Database suggests that there is no improvement in overall survival in patients undergoing lobectomy vs segmentectomy in carefully selected patients with clinical stage IA NSCLC harboring occult nodal disease. However, those undergoing wedge resection may have worse overall survival than those undergoing both lobectomy and segmentectomy.