Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 20 de 109
Filtrar
Mais filtros

Tipo de documento
Intervalo de ano de publicação
1.
Breast Cancer Res Treat ; 193(2): 455-465, 2022 Jun.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35290544

RESUMO

PURPOSE: To identify adherence to follow-up recommendations in long-term breast cancer survivors (LTBCS) of the SURBCAN cohort and to identify its determinants, using real-world data. METHODS: We conducted a retrospective study using electronic health records from 2012 to 2016 of women diagnosed with incident breast cancer in Spain between 2000 and 2006 and surviving at least 5 years. Adherence to basic follow-up recommendations, adherence according to risk of recurrence, and overall adherence were calculated based on attendance at medical appointments and imaging surveillance, by year of survivorship. Logistic regression models were fitted to depict the association between adherence and its determinants. RESULTS: A total of 2079 LTBCS were followed up for a median of 4.97 years. Of them, 23.6% had survived ≥ 10 years at baseline. We estimated that 79.5% of LTBCS were overall adherent to at least one visit and one imaging test. Adherence to recommendations decreased over time and no differences were found according to recurrence risk. Determinants of better overall adherence were diagnosis in middle age (50-69 years old), living in a more-deprived area, having fewer years of survival, receiving primary treatment, and being alive at the end of follow-up. CONCLUSION: We identified women apparently not complying with surveillance visits and tests. Special attention should be paid to the youngest and eldest women at diagnosis and to those with longer survival.


Assuntos
Neoplasias da Mama , Sobreviventes de Câncer , Assistência ao Convalescente , Idoso , Neoplasias da Mama/diagnóstico , Neoplasias da Mama/epidemiologia , Neoplasias da Mama/terapia , Feminino , Humanos , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Estudos Retrospectivos , Sobrevivência
2.
Int J Cancer ; 149(10): 1755-1767, 2021 11 15.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34255861

RESUMO

The disease management of long-term breast cancer survivors (BCS) is hampered by the scarce knowledge of multimorbidity patterns. The aim of our study was to identify multimorbidity clusters among long-term BCS and assess their impact on mortality and health services use. We conducted a retrospective study using electronic health records of 6512 BCS from Spain surviving at least 5 years. Hierarchical cluster analysis was used to identify groups of similar patients based on their chronic diagnoses, which were assessed using the Clinical Classifications Software. As a result, multimorbidity clusters were obtained, clinically defined and named according to the comorbidities with higher observed/expected prevalence ratios. Multivariable Cox and negative binomial regression models were fitted to estimate overall mortality risk and probability of contacting health services according to the clusters identified. 83.7% of BCS presented multimorbidity, essential hypertension (34.5%) and obesity and other metabolic disorders (27.4%) being the most prevalent chronic diseases at the beginning of follow-up. Five multimorbidity clusters were identified: C1-unspecific (29.9%), C2-metabolic and neurodegenerative (28.3%), C3-anxiety and fractures (9.7%), C4-musculoskeletal and cardiovascular (9.6%) and C5-thyroid disorders (5.3%). All clusters except C5-thyroid disorders were associated with higher mortality compared to BCS without comorbidities. The risk of mortality in C4 was increased by 64% (adjusted hazard ratio 1.64, 95% confidence interval 1.52-2.07). Stratified analysis showed an increased risk of death among BCS with 5 to 10 years of survival in all clusters. These results help to identify subgroups of long-term BCS with specific needs and mortality risks and to guide BCS clinical practice regarding multimorbidity.


Assuntos
Neoplasias da Mama/terapia , Sobreviventes de Câncer/estatística & dados numéricos , Registros Eletrônicos de Saúde/estatística & dados numéricos , Atenção Primária à Saúde/estatística & dados numéricos , Adulto , Idoso , Ansiedade/diagnóstico , Ansiedade/epidemiologia , Ansiedade/terapia , Neoplasias da Mama/diagnóstico , Neoplasias da Mama/epidemiologia , Sobreviventes de Câncer/classificação , Doenças Cardiovasculares/diagnóstico , Doenças Cardiovasculares/epidemiologia , Doenças Cardiovasculares/terapia , Análise por Conglomerados , Humanos , Doenças Metabólicas/diagnóstico , Doenças Metabólicas/epidemiologia , Doenças Metabólicas/terapia , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Multimorbidade , Doenças Neurodegenerativas/diagnóstico , Doenças Neurodegenerativas/epidemiologia , Doenças Neurodegenerativas/terapia , Prevalência , Estudos Retrospectivos , Espanha/epidemiologia , Análise de Sobrevida , Doenças da Glândula Tireoide/diagnóstico , Doenças da Glândula Tireoide/epidemiologia , Doenças da Glândula Tireoide/terapia
3.
Int J Equity Health ; 20(1): 41, 2021 01 20.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33472644

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: There is little verified information on global healthcare utilization by irregular migrants. Understanding how immigrants use healthcare services based on their needs is crucial to establish effective health policy. We compared healthcare utilization between irregular migrants, documented migrants, and Spanish nationals in a Spanish autonomous community. METHODS: This retrospective, observational study included the total adult population of Aragon, Spain: 930,131 Spanish nationals; 123,432 documented migrants; and 17,152 irregular migrants. Healthcare utilization data were compared between irregular migrants, documented migrants and Spanish nationals for the year 2011. Multivariable standard or zero-inflated negative binomial regression models were generated, adjusting for age, sex, length of stay, and morbidity burden. RESULTS: The average annual use of healthcare services was lower for irregular migrants than for documented migrants and Spanish nationals at all levels of care analyzed: primary care (0.5 vs 4 vs 6.7 visits); specialized care (0.2 vs 1.8 vs 2.9 visits); planned hospital admissions (0.3 vs 2 vs 4.23 per 100 individuals), unplanned hospital admissions (0.5 vs 3.5 vs 5.2 per 100 individuals), and emergency room visits (0.4 vs 2.8 vs 2.8 per 10 individuals). The average annual prescription drug expenditure was also lower for irregular migrants (€9) than for documented migrants (€77) and Spanish nationals (€367). These differences were only partially attenuated after adjusting for age, sex, and morbidity burden. CONCLUSIONS: Under conditions of equal access, healthcare utilization is much lower among irregular migrants than Spanish nationals (and lower than that of documented migrants), regardless of country of origin or length of stay in Spain.


Assuntos
Utilização de Instalações e Serviços , Serviços de Saúde , Migrantes , Adolescente , Adulto , Idoso , Utilização de Instalações e Serviços/estatística & dados numéricos , Feminino , Serviços de Saúde/estatística & dados numéricos , Humanos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Estudos Retrospectivos , Espanha , Migrantes/estatística & dados numéricos , Adulto Jovem
4.
Int J Equity Health ; 19(1): 113, 2020 07 06.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32631325

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: There is little verified information on the global health status of undocumented migrants (UMs). Our aim is to compare the prevalence of the main chronic diseases and of multimorbidity in undocumented migrants, documented migrants, and Spanish nationals in a Spanish autonomous community. METHODS: Retrospective observational study of all users of the public health system of the region of Aragon over 1 year (2011): 930,131 Spanish nationals; 123,432 documented migrants (DMs); and 17,152 UMs. Binary logistic regression was performed to examine the association between migrant status (Spanish nationals versus DMs and UMs) and both multimorbidity and individual chronic diseases, adjusting for age and sex. RESULTS: The prevalence of individual chronic diseases in UMs was lower than in DMs and much lower than in Spanish nationals. Comparison with the corresponding group of Spanish nationals revealed odds ratios (OR) of 0.1-0.3 and 0.3-0.5 for male and female UMs, respectively (p < 0.05 in all cases). The risk of multimorbidity was lower for UMs than DMs, both for men (OR, 0.12; 95%CI 0.11-0.13 versus OR, 0.53; 95%CI 0.51-0.54) and women (OR, 0.18; 95%CI 0.16-0.20 versus OR, 0.74; 95%CI 0.72-0.75). CONCLUSIONS: Analysis of data from a health system that offers universal coverage to all immigrants, irrespective of legal status, reveals that the prevalence of chronic disease and multimorbidity is lower in UMs as compared with both DMs and Spanish nationals. These findings refute previous claims that the morbidity burden in UM populations is higher than that of the native population of the host country.


Assuntos
Doença Crônica/epidemiologia , Emigrantes e Imigrantes , Nível de Saúde , Multimorbidade , Migrantes , Adolescente , Adulto , Idoso , Idoso de 80 Anos ou mais , Estudos Transversais , Atenção à Saúde , Documentação , Feminino , Humanos , Jurisprudência , Modelos Logísticos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Programas Nacionais de Saúde , Razão de Chances , Prevalência , Estudos Retrospectivos , Espanha/epidemiologia , Adulto Jovem
5.
Pharmacoepidemiol Drug Saf ; 28(7): 965-975, 2019 07.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31172633

RESUMO

PURPOSE: Validating cases of acute liver injury (ALI) in health care data sources is challenging. Previous validation studies reported low positive predictive values (PPVs). METHODS: Case validation was undertaken in a study conducted from 2009 to 2014 assessing the risk of ALI in antidepressants users in databases in Spain (EpiChron and SIDIAP) and the Danish National Health Registers. Three ALI definitions were evaluated: primary (specific hospital discharge codes), secondary (specific and nonspecific hospital discharge codes), and tertiary (specific and nonspecific hospital and outpatient codes). The validation included review of patient profiles (EpiChron and SIDIAP) and of clinical data from medical records (EpiChron and Denmark). ALI cases were confirmed when liver enzyme values met a definition by an international working group. RESULTS: Overall PPVs (95% CIs) for the study ALI definitions were, for the primary ALI definition, 84% (60%-97%) (EpiChron), 60% (26%-88%) (SIDIAP), and 74% (60%-85%) (Denmark); for the secondary ALI definition, 65% (45%-81%) (EpiChron), 40% (19%-64%) (SIDIAP), and 70% (64%-77%) (Denmark); and for the tertiary ALI definition, 25% (18%-34%) (EpiChron), 8% (7%-9%) (SIDIAP), and 47% (42%-52%) (Denmark). The overall PPVs were higher for specific than for nonspecific codes and for hospital discharge than for outpatient codes. The nonspecific code "unspecified jaundice" had high PPVs in Denmark. CONCLUSIONS: PPVs obtained apply to patients using antidepressants without preexisting liver disease or ALI risk factors. To maximize validity, studies on ALI should prioritize hospital specific discharge codes and should include hospital codes for unspecified jaundice. Case validation is required when ALI outpatient cases are considered.


Assuntos
Doença Hepática Induzida por Substâncias e Drogas/epidemiologia , Bases de Dados Factuais , Grupos Diagnósticos Relacionados/normas , Adolescente , Adulto , Idoso , Idoso de 80 Anos ou mais , Doença Hepática Induzida por Substâncias e Drogas/diagnóstico , Dinamarca/epidemiologia , Feminino , Humanos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Farmacoepidemiologia , Reprodutibilidade dos Testes , Espanha/epidemiologia , Adulto Jovem
6.
BMC Geriatr ; 19(1): 226, 2019 08 19.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31426764

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: With the number of centenarians increasing exponentially in Spain, a deeper knowledge of their socio-demographic, clinical, and healthcare use characteristics is important to better understand the health profile of the very elderly. METHODS: We conducted a retrospective, cross-sectional observational study in the EpiChron Cohort (Aragón, Spain) aimed at analyzing the socio-demographic, clinical, drug use and healthcare use characteristics of 1680 centenarians during 2011-2015, using data from electronic health records and clinical-administrative databases. RESULTS: Spanish centenarians (79.1% women) had 101.6 years on average. Approximately 80% of centenarians suffered from multimorbidity, with an average of 4.0 chronic conditions; 50% were exposed to polypharmacy, with an average of 4.8 medications; only 6% of centenarians were free of chronic diseases and only 7% were not on medication. Centenarians presented a cardio-cerebrovascular pattern in which hypertension, heart failure, cerebrovascular disease and dementia were the most frequent conditions. Primary care was the most frequently visited healthcare level (79% of them), followed by medical specialist consultations (23%), hospitalizations (13%), and emergency service use (9%). CONCLUSIONS: Multimorbidity is the rule rather than the exception in Spanish centenarians. Addressing medical care in the very elderly from a holistic geriatric view is critical in order to preserve their health, and avoid the negative effects of polypharmacy.


Assuntos
Doenças Cardiovasculares/epidemiologia , Demência/epidemiologia , Registros Eletrônicos de Saúde/tendências , Nível de Saúde , Atenção Primária à Saúde/tendências , Idoso de 80 Anos ou mais , Doenças Cardiovasculares/diagnóstico , Doenças Cardiovasculares/terapia , Doença Crônica , Estudos de Coortes , Estudos Transversais , Bases de Dados Factuais/tendências , Demência/diagnóstico , Demência/terapia , Serviço Hospitalar de Emergência/tendências , Feminino , Hospitalização/tendências , Humanos , Masculino , Multimorbidade/tendências , Polimedicação , Atenção Primária à Saúde/métodos , Estudos Retrospectivos , Espanha/epidemiologia
7.
BMC Public Health ; 19(1): 247, 2019 Feb 28.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30819146

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Mortality is a robust indicator of health and offers valuable insight into the health of immigrants. However, mortality estimates can vary significantly depending on the manner in which immigrant status is defined. Here, we assess the impact of nationality, country of origin, and length of stay in the host country on mortality estimates in an immigrant population in Aragón, Spain. METHODS: Cross-sectional retrospective study of all adult subjects from the EpiChron Cohort in 2011 (n = 1,102,544), of whom 146,100 were foreign-born (i.e., according to place of birth) and 127,213 were non-nationals (i.e., according to nationality). Directly standardized death proportions between years 2012-2015 were calculated, taking into account the age distribution of the European population in 2013. Binary logistic regression was used to compare the four-year probability of death. RESULTS: The age- and sex-standardized number of deaths per 1000 subjects were 45.1 (95%CI 44.7-45.2) for the Spanish-born population, 29.3 (95%CI 26.7-32.1) for the foreign-born population, and 18.4 (95%CI 15.6-21.6) for non-Spanish nationals. Compared with the Spanish-born population, the age- and sex-adjusted likelihood of dying was equally reduced in the foreign-born and non-national populations (OR 0.6; 95%CI 0.5-0.7) when the length of stay was less than 10 years. No significant differences in mortality estimates were detected when the length of stay was over 10 years. CONCLUSIONS: Mortality estimates in immigrant populations were lower than those of the native Spanish population, regardless of the criteria applied. However, the proportion of deaths was lower when immigrant status was defined using nationality instead of country of birth. Age- and sex-standardized death proportions tended to increase with increased length of stay in the host country.


Assuntos
Emigrantes e Imigrantes/estatística & dados numéricos , Etnicidade/estatística & dados numéricos , Equidade em Saúde/estatística & dados numéricos , Tempo de Internação/estatística & dados numéricos , Mortalidade , Adolescente , Adulto , África , Idoso , Idoso de 80 Anos ou mais , Ásia , Estudos de Coortes , Estudos Transversais , Europa Oriental , Feminino , Humanos , América Latina , Modelos Logísticos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Estudos Retrospectivos , Espanha , Adulto Jovem
8.
Pharmacoepidemiol Drug Saf ; 27(9): 953-961, 2018 09.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30043552

RESUMO

PURPOSE: The purpose of the study is to evaluate the effectiveness of risk minimization measures-labeling changes and communication to health care professionals-recommended by the European Medicines Agency for use of cilostazol for the treatment of intermittent claudication in Europe. METHODS: Observational study of cilostazol in The Health Improvement Network (United Kingdom), EpiChron Cohort (Spain), SIDIAP (Spain), Swedish National Databases, and GePaRD (Germany). Among new users of cilostazol, we compared the prevalence of conditions targeted by the risk minimization measures in the periods before (2002-2012) and after (2014) implementation. Conditions evaluated were prevalence of smoking, cardiovascular conditions, concurrent use of ≥2 antiplatelet agents, concurrent use of potent CYP3A4/CYP2C19 inhibitors and high-dose cilostazol, early monitoring of all users, and continuous monitoring of users at high cardiovascular risk. RESULTS: We included 22 593 and 1821 new users of cilostazol before and after implementation of risk minimization measures, respectively. After implementation, the frequency of several conditions related to the labeling changes improved in all the study populations: prevalence of use decreased between 13% (EpiChron) and 57% (SIDIAP), frequency of cardiovascular contraindications decreased between 8% (GePaRD) and 84% (EpiChron), and concurrent use of high-dose cilostazol and potent CYP3A4/CYP2C19 inhibitors decreased between 6% (Sweden) and 100% (EpiChron). The frequency of other conditions improved in most study populations, except smoking, which decreased only in EpiChron (48% reduction). CONCLUSIONS: This study indicates that the risk minimization measures implemented by the EMA for the use of cilostazol have been effective in all European countries studied, except for smoking cessation before initiating cilostazol, which remains an area of improvement.


Assuntos
Doenças Cardiovasculares/epidemiologia , Cilostazol/efeitos adversos , Inibidores da Agregação Plaquetária/efeitos adversos , Serviços Preventivos de Saúde/organização & administração , Fumar/epidemiologia , Idoso , Doenças Cardiovasculares/induzido quimicamente , Doenças Cardiovasculares/prevenção & controle , Cilostazol/administração & dosagem , Bases de Dados Factuais/estatística & dados numéricos , Relação Dose-Resposta a Droga , Rotulagem de Medicamentos , Feminino , Alemanha/epidemiologia , Implementação de Plano de Saúde/estatística & dados numéricos , Humanos , Claudicação Intermitente/tratamento farmacológico , Claudicação Intermitente/etiologia , Claudicação Intermitente/prevenção & controle , Masculino , Inibidores da Agregação Plaquetária/administração & dosagem , Prevalência , Serviços Preventivos de Saúde/métodos , Avaliação de Programas e Projetos de Saúde/estatística & dados numéricos , Fumar/efeitos adversos , Prevenção do Hábito de Fumar/métodos , Prevenção do Hábito de Fumar/organização & administração , Espanha/epidemiologia , Suécia/epidemiologia , Reino Unido/epidemiologia
9.
Pharmacoepidemiol Drug Saf ; 26(6): 615-624, 2017 Jun.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28133890

RESUMO

PURPOSE: To describe the characteristics of new users of cilostazol in Europe with the aim to support the evaluation of its benefit/risk as used in regular clinical practice before the implementation of labeling changes recommended by the European Medicines Agency. METHODS: New users of cilostazol were identified in populations enrolled in five European health automated databases in the UK (The Health Improvement Network [THIN]), Spain (EpiChron cohort and Information System for the Improvement of Research in Primary Care [SIDIAP]), Sweden (National Registers), and Germany (German Pharmacoepidemiological Research Database [GePaRD]) between 2002 and 2012. New users were characterized according to the prevalence of cardiovascular disease and other comorbidities, concurrent use of interacting medications, new contraindications, duration of use, and potential off-label prescribing. RESULTS: We identified 22 593 new users of cilostazol. The median age was between 68.0 (THIN) and 73.7 (Sweden) years. More than 78% of users had concomitant cardiovascular disease, and between 78.8% (GePaRD) and 91.6% (THIN) were treated with interacting medications. Prevalence of new cardiovascular contraindications ranged from 1.5% (THIN) to 11.6% (GePaRD), and concurrent use of two or more antiplatelet drugs ranged from 6.3% (SIDIAP) to 13.5% (EpiChron cohort). Between 39.4% (Sweden) and 52.9% (THIN) of users discontinued cilostazol in the first 3 months. Between 41.0% (SIDIAP) and 93.4% (THIN) were considered to have received cilostazol according to the European Medicines Agency labeling. CONCLUSIONS: In this collaborative European study, most cilostazol users were elderly patients with a high prevalence of cardiovascular diseases and other comorbidity and concurrent use of interacting drugs, indicating that this is a vulnerable population at high risk of complications, especially cardiovascular events. © 2017 The Authors. Pharmacoepidemiology and Drug Safety Published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd.


Assuntos
Bases de Dados Factuais/tendências , Rotulagem de Medicamentos/tendências , Uso de Medicamentos/tendências , Uso Off-Label , Inibidores da Agregação Plaquetária/uso terapêutico , Tetrazóis/uso terapêutico , Idoso , Doenças Cardiovasculares/tratamento farmacológico , Doenças Cardiovasculares/epidemiologia , Cilostazol , Bases de Dados Factuais/estatística & dados numéricos , Uso de Medicamentos/estatística & dados numéricos , Feminino , Alemanha/epidemiologia , Humanos , Masculino , Uso Off-Label/estatística & dados numéricos , Espanha/epidemiologia , Suécia/epidemiologia , Reino Unido/epidemiologia
10.
Fam Pract ; 34(6): 662-666, 2017 11 16.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29106530

RESUMO

Aim: Multimorbidity is a growing phenomenon in primary care, and knowledge of the influence of social determinants on its evolution is vital. The aim of this study was to understand the relationship between multimorbidity and immigration, taking into account length of residence in the host country and area of origin of the immigrant population. Methods: Cross-sectional retrospective study of all adult patients registered within the public health service of Aragon, Spain (N = 1092279; 144238 were foreign-born), based on data from the EpiChron Cohort. Age-standardized prevalence rates of multimorbidity were calculated. Different models of binary logistic regressions were conducted to study the association between multimorbidity, immigrant status and length of residence in the host country. Results: The risk of multimorbidity in foreign-borns was lower than that of native-borns [odds ratio (OR): 0.54, 95% confidence interval (CI): 0.53-0.55]. The probability of experiencing multimorbidity was lowest for Asians (OR: 0.34, 95% CI: 0.31-0.37) and Eastern Europeans (OR: 0.42, 95% CI: 0.40-0.43), and highest for Latin Americans (OR: 0.70, 95% CI: 0.68-0.72). Foreign-born immigrants residing in Aragon for ≥5 years had a higher multimorbidity risk than those residing for <5 years (OR: 2.3, 95% CI: 2.2-2.4). Conclusion: Prevalence of multimorbidity is lower among foreign-borns as compared with native-borns, but increases rapidly with length of residence in the host country. However, the progressive development of multimorbidity among immigrants varies widely depending on area of origin. These findings provide important insight into the health care needs of specific population groups and may help minimize the negative impact of multimorbidity among the most vulnerable groups.


Assuntos
Emigrantes e Imigrantes/estatística & dados numéricos , Multimorbidade/tendências , Adulto , África/etnologia , Estudos Transversais , Europa Oriental/etnologia , Feminino , Clínicos Gerais/estatística & dados numéricos , Humanos , América Latina/etnologia , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Prevalência , Atenção Primária à Saúde , Estudos Retrospectivos , Espanha , Fatores de Tempo
11.
Aten Primaria ; 49(5): 300-307, 2017 May.
Artigo em Espanhol | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28427915

RESUMO

Multimorbidity, defined as the coexistence of two or more chronic conditions in one same individual, has negative consequences for people suffering from it and it poses a real challenge for health systems. In primary care, where most of these patients are attended, the clinical management of multimorbidity can be a complex task due, among others, to the high volume of clinical information that needs to be handled, the scarce scientific evidence available to approach multimorbidity, and the need for coordination among multiple health providers to guarantee continuity of care. Moreover, the adequate implementation of the care plan in these patients requires a process of shared decision making between patient and physician. One of the available tools to support this process, which is specifically directed to patients with multimorbidity in primary care, is described in the present article: the Ariadne principles.


Assuntos
Medicina Geral , Multimorbidade , Assistência Centrada no Paciente , Medicina de Família e Comunidade , Humanos , Guias de Prática Clínica como Assunto , Atenção Primária à Saúde
13.
Int J Equity Health ; 15: 32, 2016 Feb 24.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-26912255

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Although equity in health care is theoretically a cornerstone in Western societies, several studies show that services do not always provide equitable care for immigrants. Differences in pharmaceutical consumption between immigrants and natives are explained by variances in predisposing factors, enabling factors and needs across populations, and can be used as a proxy of disparities in health care use. By comparing the relative differences in pharmacological use between natives and immigrants from the same four countries of origin living in Spain and Norway respectively, this article presents a new approach to the study of inequity in health care. METHODS: All purchased drug prescriptions classified according to the Anatomical Therapeutic Chemical (ATC) system in Aragon (Spain) and Norway for a total of 5 million natives and nearly 100,000 immigrants for one calendar year were included in this cross-sectional study. Age and gender adjusted relative purchase rates for immigrants from Poland, China, Colombia and Morocco compared to native populations in each of the host countries were calculated. Direct standardisation was performed based on the 2009 population structure of the OECD countries. RESULTS: Overall, a significantly lower proportion of immigrants in Aragon (Spain) and Norway purchased pharmacological drugs compared to natives. Patterns of use across the different immigrant groups were consistent in both host countries, despite potential disparities between the Spanish and Norwegian health care systems. Immigrants from Morocco showed the highest drug use rates in relation to natives, especially for antidepressants, "pain killers" and drugs for peptic ulcer. Immigrants from China and Poland showed the lowest use rates, while Colombians where more similar to host countries. CONCLUSIONS: The similarities found between the two European countries in relation to immigrants' pharmaceutical use disregarding their host country emphasises the need to consider specific immigrant-related features when planning and providing healthcare services to this part of the population. These results somehow remove the focus on inequity as the main reason to explain differences in purchase between immigrants and natives.


Assuntos
Prescrições de Medicamentos/estatística & dados numéricos , Emigrantes e Imigrantes/estatística & dados numéricos , Disparidades em Assistência à Saúde , Atenção Primária à Saúde/estatística & dados numéricos , Adolescente , Adulto , Idoso , Idoso de 80 Anos ou mais , Criança , Pré-Escolar , Estudos Transversais , Feminino , Humanos , Lactente , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Noruega/etnologia , Atenção Primária à Saúde/métodos , Fatores Socioeconômicos , Espanha/etnologia
14.
Fam Pract ; 33(5): 471-5, 2016 10.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-27221732

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Although acute bronchitis is frequently viral in nature, antibiotics are usually inappropriately prescribed in Primary Care to treat this condition, with serious public health consequences. OBJECTIVE: To determine the prevalence and predictors of appropriate management of antibiotic use in acute bronchitis processes diagnosed in outpatients in the Spanish region of Aragón. METHODS: Four different electronic health databases provided demographic and clinical information pertaining to patients diagnosed with acute bronchitis in Primary Care in Aragón during 2011, as well as data for corresponding antibiotic prescriptions dispensed at pharmacies. We evaluated adherence to recommendations for antibiotic use in acute bronchitis episodes in adults collected in both international and national guidelines. Finally, regression analyses were used to identify factors associated with appropriate antibiotic management. RESULTS: A total of 54701 episodes of acute bronchitis were registered, 9.5% of which corresponded to patients with an underlying chronic respiratory disease. In adults, antibiotics were prescribed in 64.9% of episodes, 17.9% of which involved prescription of a first-choice agent. Overall, 48.5% of episodes were appropriately managed according to guidelines. The likelihood of appropriate treatment was higher for female patients, and lower for patients who were older, presented chronic co-morbidities or were using corticoids. CONCLUSIONS: We observed poor levels of adherence to recommendations for antibiotic prescribing in adults with acute bronchitis, in terms of both the decision to prescribe and the choice of antibiotic agent. Older acute bronchitis patients and those with co-morbidities were at greater risk of being inappropriately treated.


Assuntos
Antibacterianos/uso terapêutico , Bronquite/tratamento farmacológico , Uso de Medicamentos/estatística & dados numéricos , Fidelidade a Diretrizes/normas , Prescrição Inadequada/estatística & dados numéricos , Doença Aguda , Adolescente , Adulto , Idoso , Idoso de 80 Anos ou mais , Comorbidade , Bases de Dados Factuais , Registros Eletrônicos de Saúde , Feminino , Humanos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Padrões de Prática Médica/organização & administração , Atenção Primária à Saúde , Análise de Regressão , Espanha , Adulto Jovem
15.
BMC Public Health ; 16: 450, 2016 05 27.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-27230885

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: The healthcare of immigrants is an important aspect of equity of care provision. Understanding how immigrants use the healthcare services based on their needs is crucial to establish effective health policy. METHODS: This retrospective, observational study included the total population of Aragon, Spain (1,251,540 individuals, of whom 11.9 % were immigrants). Patient-level data on the use of primary, specialised, hospital, and emergency care as well as prescription drug use in 2011 were extracted from the EpiChron Cohort and compared between immigrants and nationals. Multivariable standard or zero-inflated negative binomial regression models were generated, adjusting for age, sex, length of stay, and morbidity burden. RESULTS: The annual visit rates of immigrants were lower than those of nationals for primary care (3.3 vs 6.4), specialised care (1.3 vs 2.7), planned hospital admissions/100 individuals (1.6 vs 3.8), unplanned hospital admissions/100 individuals (2.7 vs 4.7), and emergency room visits/10 individuals (2.3 vs 2.8). Annual prescription drug costs were also lower for immigrants (€47 vs €318). These differences were only partially attenuated after adjusting for age, sex and morbidity burden. CONCLUSION: In a universal coverage health system offering broad legal access to immigrants, the global use of healthcare services was lower for immigrants than for nationals. These differences may be explained in part by the healthy migration effect, but also reveal possible inequalities in healthcare provision that warrant further investigation.


Assuntos
Emigrantes e Imigrantes , Disparidades em Assistência à Saúde , Aceitação pelo Paciente de Cuidados de Saúde , Atenção Primária à Saúde/estatística & dados numéricos , Adolescente , Adulto , África/etnologia , Idoso , Ásia/etnologia , Criança , Pré-Escolar , Estudos Transversais , Feminino , Humanos , Lactente , Recém-Nascido , Tempo de Internação/estatística & dados numéricos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Morbidade , Estudos Retrospectivos , Espanha , Adulto Jovem
16.
Aten Primaria ; 48(4): 244-50, 2016 Apr.
Artigo em Espanhol | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-26300324

RESUMO

OBJECTIVES: To measure the diagnostic agreement between Primary Care (PC) and hospital information systems, in order to assess the usefulness of health care records for research purposes. SETTING: Cross-sectional retrospective study integrating PC and hospital diagnostic information for the Aragon population admitted to hospital in 2010. PARTICIPANTS: 75.176 patients were analysed. INTERVENTIONS: Similarities, differences and the kappa index were calculated for each of the diagnoses recorded in both information systems. MAIN MEASUREMENTS: The studied diseases included COPD, diabetes, hypertension, cerebrovascular disease, ischaemic heart disease, asthma, epilepsy, and heart failure. RESULTS: Diagnostic concordance was higher in men and between 45 and 64 years. Diabetes was the condition showing the highest concordance (kappa index: 0.75), while asthma had the lowest values (kappa index: 0.34). CONCLUSIONS: The low concordance between the diagnostic information recorded in PC and in the hospital setting calls for urgent measures to ensure that healthcare professionals have a comprehensive picture of patient's health problems.


Assuntos
Doença Crônica , Diagnóstico , Sistemas de Informação Hospitalar , Prontuários Médicos/normas , Idoso , Estudos Transversais , Diabetes Mellitus , Feminino , Hospitalização , Humanos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Estudos Retrospectivos
17.
Trop Med Int Health ; 20(12): 1805-14, 2015 Dec.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-26426974

RESUMO

OBJECTIVES: International migration is rapidly increasing worldwide. However, the health status of migrants differs across groups. Information regarding health at arrival and subsequent periodic follow-up in the host country is necessary to develop equitable health care to immigrants. The objective of this study was to determine the impact of the length of stay in Norway and other sociodemographic variables on the prevalence of multimorbidity across immigrant groups (refugees, labour immigrants, family reunification immigrants and education immigrants). METHODS: This is a register-based study merging data from the National Population Register and the Norwegian Health Economics Administration database. Sociodemographic variables and multimorbidity across the immigrant groups were compared using Persons' chi-square test and anova as appropriate. Several binary logistic regression models were conducted. RESULTS: Multimorbidity was significantly lower among labour immigrants (OR (95% CI) 0.23 (0.21-0.26) and 0.45 (0.40-0.50) for men and women, respectively) and education immigrants (OR (95% CI) 0.40 (0.32-0.50) and 0.38 (0.33-0.43)) and higher among refugees (OR (95% CI) 1.67 (1.57-1.78) and 1.83 (1.75-1.92)), compared to family reunification immigrants. For all groups, multimorbidity doubled after a five-year stay in Norway. Effect modifications between multimorbidity and sociodemographic characteristics across the different reasons for migration were observed. CONCLUSIONS: Multimorbidity was highest among refugees at arrival but increased rapidly among labour immigrants, especially females. Health providers need to ensure tailor-made preventive and management strategies that take into account pre-migration and post-migration experiences for immigrants in order to address their needs.


Assuntos
Comorbidade , Emigrantes e Imigrantes , Emigração e Imigração , Nível de Saúde , Refugiados , Migrantes , Adolescente , Adulto , Idoso , Etnicidade , Feminino , Humanos , Modelos Logísticos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Motivação , Noruega , Razão de Chances , Atenção Primária à Saúde , Sistema de Registros , Fatores Sexuais , Fatores Socioeconômicos , Adulto Jovem
18.
BMC Med ; 12: 223, 2014 Dec 08.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-25484244

RESUMO

Multimorbidity is a health issue mostly dealt with in primary care practice. As a result of their generalist and patient-centered approach, long-lasting relationships with patients, and responsibility for continuity and coordination of care, family physicians are particularly well placed to manage patients with multimorbidity. However, conflicts arising from the application of multiple disease oriented guidelines and the burden of diseases and treatments often make consultations challenging. To provide orientation in decision making in multimorbidity during primary care consultations, we developed guiding principles and named them after the Greek mythological figure Ariadne. For this purpose, we convened a two-day expert workshop accompanied by an international symposium in October 2012 in Frankfurt, Germany. Against the background of the current state of knowledge presented and discussed at the symposium, 19 experts from North America, Europe, and Australia identified the key issues of concern in the management of multimorbidity in primary care in panel and small group sessions and agreed upon making use of formal and informal consensus methods. The proposed preliminary principles were refined during a multistage feedback process and discussed using a case example. The sharing of realistic treatment goals by physicians and patients is at the core of the Ariadne principles. These result from i) a thorough interaction assessment of the patient's conditions, treatments, constitution, and context; ii) the prioritization of health problems that take into account the patient's preferences - his or her most and least desired outcomes; and iii) individualized management realizes the best options of care in diagnostics, treatment, and prevention to achieve the goals. Goal attainment is followed-up in accordance with a re-assessment in planned visits. The occurrence of new or changed conditions, such as an increase in severity, or a changed context may trigger the (re-)start of the process. Further work is needed on the implementation of the formulated principles, but they were recognized and appreciated as important by family physicians and primary care researchers.Please see related article: http://www.biomedcentral.com/1741-7015/12/222.


Assuntos
Doença Crônica/terapia , Gerenciamento Clínico , Atenção Primária à Saúde/métodos , Idoso , Tomada de Decisões , Feminino , Humanos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Encaminhamento e Consulta
19.
BMC Psychiatry ; 14: 84, 2014 Mar 20.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-24645776

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: The epidemiologic study of comorbidities of an index health problem represents a methodological challenge. This study cross-sectionally describes and analyzes the comorbidities associated with dementia in older patients and reviews the existing similarities and differences between identified comorbid diseases using the statistical methods most frequently applied in current research. METHODS: Cross-sectional study of 72,815 patients over 64 seen in 19 Spanish primary care centers during 2008. Chronic diseases were extracted from electronic health records and grouped into Expanded Diagnostic Clusters®. Three different statistical methods were applied (i.e., analysis of prevalence data, multiple regression and factor analysis), stratifying by sex. RESULTS: The two most frequent comorbidities both for men and women with dementia were hypertension and diabetes. Yet, logistic regression and factor analysis demonstrated that the comorbidities significantly associated with dementia were Parkinson's disease, congestive heart failure, cerebrovascular disease, anemia, cardiac arrhythmia, chronic skin ulcers, osteoporosis, thyroid disease, retinal disorders, prostatic hypertrophy, insomnia and anxiety and neurosis. CONCLUSIONS: The analysis of the comorbidities associated with an index disease (e.g., dementia) must not be exclusively based on prevalence rates, but rather on methodologies that allow the discovery of non-random associations between diseases. A deep and reliable knowledge about how different diseases are grouped and associated around an index disease such as dementia may orient future longitudinal studies aimed at unraveling causal associations.


Assuntos
Demência/diagnóstico , Demência/epidemiologia , Atenção Primária à Saúde/estatística & dados numéricos , Índice de Gravidade de Doença , Idoso , Idoso de 80 Anos ou mais , Transtornos de Ansiedade/epidemiologia , Transtornos Cerebrovasculares/epidemiologia , Doença Crônica , Comorbidade , Estudos Transversais , Diabetes Mellitus/epidemiologia , Registros Eletrônicos de Saúde/estatística & dados numéricos , Feminino , Humanos , Hipertensão/epidemiologia , Modelos Logísticos , Estudos Longitudinais , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Prevalência , Distúrbios do Início e da Manutenção do Sono/epidemiologia , Espanha/epidemiologia
20.
BMC Womens Health ; 14: 145, 2014 Nov 30.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-25433402

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Sex and gender can interact to contribute to differences in morbidity and mortality between men and women. To detect such differences is an important issue for health policy planners when designing programmes for the provision of healthcare services for the whole population. Our aim was to study differences between men and women in the use of Primary Health Care (PHC) resources, taking into account age and morbidity burden. METHODS: An observational retrospective study was carried out using the information gathered in electronic medical records from 79,809 adult patients who attended a PHC centre at least once in 2008. The ACG® System was used to quantify the morbidity burden of patients. Poisson regression models were applied to analyse differences in the number of visits to the PHC centre by men and women. RESULTS: Morbidity burden was significantly higher in women of all age groups. The gross number of visits to the PHC centre was also higher for women in all age groups. However, when adjusting by age and morbidity burden, we did not find a higher utilization by women compared to men. For high levels of morbidity burden, the attendance by men was even significantly higher. CONCLUSIONS: The overall higher use of PHC by women seems to be associated with their higher morbidity burden. The interaction between biology and socially constructed roles could also underlie this higher use by women, and is therefore an area that deserves further in-depth research.


Assuntos
Visita a Consultório Médico/estatística & dados numéricos , Atenção Primária à Saúde/estatística & dados numéricos , Fatores Sexuais , Adolescente , Adulto , Fatores Etários , Idoso , Registros Eletrônicos de Saúde , Feminino , Planejamento em Saúde , Humanos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Morbidade , Estudos Retrospectivos , Espanha , Adulto Jovem
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA