Comparison of Rotational with Orbital Atherectomy During Percutaneous Coronary Intervention for Coronary Artery Calcification: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

BACKGROUND: Percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) outcomes for patients with significant calcification have been consistently inferior compared to patients without significant calcification. Procedural success and long-term outcomes after PCI have been worse in patients with severe coronary calcium. OBJECTIVE: A Bayesian meta-analysis of outcomes comparing rotational atherectomy (RA) with orbital atherectomy (OA) was performed. METHODS: PubMed, Embase, and Cochrane Library databases were searched through 30th November 2018 and identified 4 observational studies. RESULTS: The primary end-point, Major Adverse Cardiac Event (MACE) composing of death, MI and stroke at 1 year was more likely with RA (OR = 1.61; 95% CI: 1.11-2.33; p = 0.01) as compared to OA. The driver of the difference in MACE between the two groups was a statistically significant difference in mortality favoring OA (OR = 4.65; 95% CI: 1.36-15.87; p = 0.01). Peri-procedural MI, the other component of the primary end-point was 1.3 times more likely in the RA arm (OR = 1.35; 95% CI 0.95-1.92; p-0.09) and was not statistically different between the groups. The odds of a vascular complication were not different in the two groups (OR = 1.26; 95% CI: 0.73-2.17; p = 0.41). In an adjusted Bayesian analysis, mortality (OR = 3.69; 95% CI: 0.30-38.51), MACE (OR = 1.68; 95% CI: 0.55-5.49), MI (OR = 1.42; 95% CI: 0.50-4.29) and dissections/perforations (OR = 0.38; 95% CI: 0.10-1.38) were not different in RA and OA groups. CONCLUSION: Our study is the first published Bayesian meta-analysis comparing MACE and peri-procedural outcomes in RA compared to OA. These findings lay the foundation for a randomized comparison between the two competing technologies.

Operator Experience and Outcomes after Transcatheter Left Atrial Appendage Occlusion with the Watchman Device.

BACKGROUND: Transcatheter left atrial appendage occlusion (LAAO) has become a suitable alternative to anticoagulation in patients with atrial fibrillation (AF). However, volume-outcome relationships at the individual operator level have not been studied. METHODS: Study population included 425 consecutive patients with AF undergoing LAAO from August 2015 to November 2018 by seven operators at BUMC-Phoenix. Operator volume was divided in tertiles by those with <40 cases/year (2 operators), 41-80 cases/year (3 operators) and >80 cases/year (2 operators). Patient data including comorbidities, labs, medications, procedural characteristics and outcomes were collected. The primary composite outcome was major adverse cardiac events (MACE) including mortality, stroke, bleeding and vascular complications. RESULTS: Mean age was 75 ±â€¯8 years and 251 (59%) were males. Mean CHA2DS2-VASc score was 4.5 ±â€¯1.3 points and mean HASBLED score was 3.9 ±â€¯1.0 points. MACE outcome was similar in the three operator groups in both unadjusted (p = 0.83) and adjusted (OR = 0.59: 95% Confidence Interval [CI]: 0.15-2.29, p = 0.45) analysis. The occurrence MACE was also similar between Interventional Cardiologist (IC) and Electrophysiologist (EP) operators in an unadjusted (p = 0.24) and adjusted (OR = 0.60: 95% CI: 0.21-1.68, p = 0.33) analysis. The secondary outcome of technical success did not differ among the three tertiles (p = 0.37) and among IC & EP operators respectively (p = 0.24) as well. CONCLUSION: Operator experience does not affect MACE and technical success even after adjusting for comorbidities. These results suggest a lower learning curve for LAAO with high technical success achievable even by low volume operators.

Prognostic value of frontal QRS-T angle in predicting survival after primary percutaneous coronary revascularization/coronary artery bypass grafting for ST-elevation myocardial infarction.

BACKGROUND: Frontal QRS-T angle (FQRST) has previously been correlated with mortality in patients with stable coronary artery disease, but its role as survival predictor after ST-elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) remains unknown. METHODS: We evaluated 267 consecutive patients with STEMI undergoing reperfusion or coronary artery bypass grafting. Data assessed included demographics, clinical presentation, electrocardiograms, medical therapy, and one-year mortality. RESULTS: Of 267 patients, 187 (70%) were males and most (49.4%) patients were Caucasian. All-cause mortality was significantly higher among patients with the highest (101-180°) FQRST [28% vs. 15%, p = 0.02]. Patients with FQRST 1-50° had higher survival (85.6%) compared with FQRST = 51-100° (72.3%) and FQRST = 101-180° (67.9%), [log rank, p = 0.01]. Adjusting for significant variables identified during univariate analysis, FQRST (OR = 2.04 [95% CI: 1.31-13.50]) remained an independent predictor of one-year mortality. FQRST-based risk score (1-50° = 0 points, 51-100° = 2 points, 101-180° = 5 points) had excellent discriminatory ability for one-year mortality when combined with Mayo Clinic Risk Score (C statistic = 0.875 [95%CI: 0.813-0.937]. A high (>4 points) FQRST risk score was associated with greater mortality (32% vs. 19%, p = 0.02) and longer length of stay (6 vs. 2 days, p < 0.001). CONCLUSION: FQRST represents a novel independent predictor of one-year mortality in patients with STEMI undergoing reperfusion. A high FQRST-based risk score was associated with greater mortality and longer length of stay and, after combining with Mayo Clinic Risk Score, improved discriminatory ability for one-year mortality.

Superior safety of direct oral anticoagulants compared to Warfarin in patients with atrial fibrillation and underlying cancer: a national veterans affairs database study.

BACKGROUND: Studies evaluating safety of warfarin and direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) for prevention of stroke in patients with atrial fibrillation (AF) are lacking. METHODS & RESULTS: All patients (n = 196,521) receiving care at veteran's affairs with active cancer and AF from 2010-2015 were included. One-year mortality was significantly higher in unadjusted analysis with warfarin (44.9%) compared to dabigatran (25%, P < 0.001), rivaroxaban (24.4%, P < 0.001) and apixaban (30%, P < 0.001) and after adjusting for age, sex and type of cancer mortality (OR = 2.66, 95% CI: 2.52-2.82, P < 0.001). Risk of ischemic stroke (13.5% vs. 11.1%, 12.0%, 14.0%) was similar, however risk of hemorrhagic stroke was significantly higher among patients receiving warfarin (1.2%) compared to patients receiving dabigatran (0.5%), rivaroxaban (0.7%) and apixaban (0.8%) respectively, P = 0.04. CONCLUSIONS: We demonstrated the superior safety profile of DOACs compared to warfarin among patients with underlying cancer and AF. Warfarin was associated with higher mortality, similar ischemic stroke risk but higher risk of hemorrhagic stroke.