The effect of sunlight and UV lamp exposure on EPR signals in X-ray irradiated touch screens of mobile phones.

Electron paramagnetic resonance (EPR) signals generated by ionizing radiation in touch-screen glasses have been reported as useful for personal dosimetry in people accidently exposed to ionizing radiation. This article describes the effect of light exposure on EPR spectra of various glasses obtained from mobile phones. This effect can lead to significant inaccuracy of the radiation doses reconstructed by EPR. The EPR signals from samples unexposed and exposed to X-rays and/or to natural and artificial light were numerically separated into three model spectra: those due to background (BG), radiation-induced signal (RIS), and light-induced signal (LIS). Although prolonged exposures of mobile phones to UV light are rather implausible, the article indicates errors underestimating the actual radiation doses in dose reconstruction in glasses exposed to UV light even for low fluences equivalent to several minutes of sunshine, if one neglects the effects of light in applied dosimetric procedures. About 5 min of exposure to sunlight or to light from common UV lamps reduced the intensity of the dosimetric spectral components by 20-60% as compared to non-illuminated samples. This effect strongly limits the achievable accuracy of retrospective dosimetry using EPR in glasses from mobile phones, unless their exposure to light containing a UV component can be excluded or the light-induced reduction in intensity of the RIS can be quantitatively estimated. A method for determination of a correction factor accounting for the perturbing light effects is proposed on basis of the determined relation between the dosimetric signal and intensity of the light-induced signal.

Time evolution of radiation-induced EPR signals in different types of mobile phone screen glasses.

In this study, samples of smart phone touch screen glass sheets and tempered glass screen protectors were examined with respect to their potential application in the dosimetry of ionizing radiation. The glass samples were obtained from various phones with different types of glass. Electron paramagnetic resonance (EPR) spectra of the radiation-induced signals (RIS) are presented and their dose dependence within a dose range of 0-20 Gy. Despite the observed fading with time of the dosimetric components of the signal, the remaining RIS turned out to be strong enough for a reliable dosimetry even 18 month after irradiation. The study also shows that crushing of the glass sheets and water treatment of the samples have no effect on the background and dosimetric EPR signals.

The effect of sunlight and UV lamps on EPR signal in nails.

The effects of illumination of nail clippings by direct sunlight, UV lamps and fluorescent bulbs on native and radiation-induced electron paramagnetic resonance (EPR) signals in nails are presented. It is shown that a few minutes of exposure of the nail clippings to light including a UV component (sunlight and UV lamps) generates a strong EPR signal similar to the other EPR signals observable in nails: native background (BKG), mechanically induced (MIS) or radiation-induced (RIS). This effect was observed in clippings exposed and unexposed to ionizing radiation prior to the light illuminations. An exposure of the clippings to fluorescent light without a UV component generated, within the examined range of the light fluences (up to 240 kJ/m2), an EPR signal with considerably lower yield than UV light. The light-induced signal (LIS) decayed after 10 min of water treatment of the samples. In contrast, it was still observable 3 months after illumination in samples stored in air at room temperature, and 3 weeks in frozen samples, respectively. It is concluded that the LIS can considerably affect assessment of the dosimetric RIS components in irradiated nails, and of the background signals in unirradiated nails, thus contributing to errors in EPR dosimetry in nails.

Comparison of three methods of EPR retrospective dosimetry in watch glass.

In this article we present results of our follow-up studies of samples of watch glass obtained and examined within a framework of international intercomparison dosimetry project RENEB ILC 2021. We present three methods of dose reconstruction based on EPR measurements of these samples: calibration method (CM), added dose method (ADM) and added dose&heating method (ADHM). The study showed that the three methods of dose reconstruction gave reliable and similar results in 0.5-6.0 Gy dose range, with accuracy better than 10%. The ADHM is the only one applicable in a real scenario, when sample-specific background spectrum is not available; therefore, a positive verification of this method is important for future use of EPR dosimetry in glass in potential radiation accidents.

THE EFFECT OF BACKGROUND SIGNAL AND ITS REPRESENTATION IN DECONVOLUTION OF EPR SPECTRA ON ACCURACY OF EPR DOSIMETRY IN BONE.

This study is about the accuracy of EPR dosimetry in bones based on deconvolution of the experimental spectra into the background (BG) and the radiation-induced signal (RIS) components. The model RIS's were represented by EPR spectra from irradiated enamel or bone powder; the model BG signals by EPR spectra of unirradiated bone samples or by simulated spectra. Samples of compact and trabecular bones were irradiated in the 30-270 Gy range and the intensities of their RIS's were calculated using various combinations of those benchmark spectra. The relationships between the dose and the RIS were linear (R2 > 0.995), with practically no difference between results obtained when using signals from irradiated enamel or bone as the model RIS. Use of different experimental spectra for the model BG resulted in variations in intercepts of the dose-RIS calibration lines, leading to systematic errors in reconstructed doses, in particular for high- BG samples of trabecular bone. These errors were reduced when simulated spectra instead of the experimental ones were used as the benchmark BG signal in the applied deconvolution procedures.