Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 2 de 2
Filtrar
Mais filtros

Base de dados
País/Região como assunto
Ano de publicação
Tipo de documento
Intervalo de ano de publicação
1.
Zentralbl Bakteriol Mikrobiol Hyg A ; 259(4): 564-71, 1985 Jul.
Artigo em Alemão | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-4050201

RESUMO

During 1982-83 the frequency of single chemoresistant Salmonella isolates declined compared with the period of 1980-81. This decrease is evident regardless of whether the material is grouped according to serovars or to regions. However, the degree of resistance in multiresistant isolates increased. The frequency of S. saint-paul decreased, but continued to have the highest degree of resistance. In the D1 group there were almost exclusively mono-resistant isolates. 59% of all resistant isolates were resistant to tetracyclin, 47% to streptomycine and 25% to sulfonamides. Sensitive isolates predominate in outbreaks, except for one outbreak of S. enteritidis, which showed a marked percentage of bacteria with reduced sensibility against cephalosporine. The resistance patterns showed considerable variance over the time of observation. All types of resistance appeared much more frequently than expected from calculation of possible gene-bound properties; the only exception was the double resistance to cephalosporine and tetracycline which corresponds with genetic laws.


Assuntos
Antibacterianos/farmacologia , Portador Sadio/microbiologia , Infecções por Salmonella/microbiologia , Salmonella/efeitos dos fármacos , Áustria , Resistência Microbiana a Medicamentos , Humanos , Testes de Sensibilidade Microbiana , Especificidade da Espécie
2.
Zentralbl Bakteriol Mikrobiol Hyg A ; 270(4): 487-91, 1989 Mar.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-2496537

RESUMO

A method developed in the USA (2, 6, 8) for the culturing, identification and differentiation of mycobacteria by means of a radiometric method (Bactec) was compared with a conventional method by examining 802 specimens received. Obviously better results were obtained with the new method: The number of positive cultures was 102 (12.7%) for Bactec against 87 (10.8%) for the conventional method. When using the radiometric method, the contamination rate (5.1%) was higher than for the conventional method (3.1%). It would, however, seem that this disadvantage can be offset by an increase in the alkali concentration during pretreatment of the specimens. After elimination of all paired samples one or both specimens were found to be contaminated, 743 specimens remained for direct comparison. Of these, 101 (13.6%) were positive when the Bactec method, and 84 (11.3%), when the conventional method was used. The superiority of the new method was most obvious with sputum specimens: 14.5% were positive when Bactec, and 12.2%, when the conventional method was used. For the Bactec method, the mean period until positive results could be recognized by daily readings was 15 days against 28 days for the conventional method with weekly readings. Sensitivity testing can be completed within 8 days. Owing to the costs of the radiometric method, it is recommended to limit its use of defined situations.


Assuntos
Mycobacterium tuberculosis/isolamento & purificação , Tuberculose/diagnóstico , Técnicas Bacteriológicas , Meios de Cultura , Humanos , Testes de Sensibilidade Microbiana , Mycobacterium tuberculosis/efeitos dos fármacos , Valor Preditivo dos Testes , Radiometria , Fatores de Tempo , Tuberculose/microbiologia
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA