Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 1 de 1
Filtrar
Mais filtros

Base de dados
Ano de publicação
Tipo de documento
Intervalo de ano de publicação
1.
J Am Vet Med Assoc ; : 1-6, 2024 Aug 30.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-39214141

RESUMO

OBJECTIVE: The objective of this study was to compare Doppler blood pressure (DBP) measurements between blood pressure cuffs (BPCs) with and without a secondary fastener (tape) in healthy nonanesthetized large-breed dogs. ANIMALS: 28 healthy dogs. METHODS: Superficial palmar venous arch DBP measurements with and without tape on the BPC were performed in lateral recumbency with Doppler ultrasound. Each method was performed 6 consecutive times, with the final 5 values averaged. Bland-Altman plots were made and limits of agreement calculated. RESULTS: The limits of agreement were -40.8 (95% CI, -55.6 to -26.0) to 45.6 (95% CI, 30.8 to 60.4), indicating that the DBP measured with tape would be expected to be between 40.8 mm Hg below and 45.6 mm Hg above that measured without tape 95% of the time. The mean bias estimate was 2.4 mm Hg (SD, 22.0; 95% CI, -6.1 to 11.0; P = .724), indicating that DBP measurements with tape averaged 2.4 mm Hg higher than without tape. CLINICAL RELEVANCE: Doppler blood pressure measurements obtained with secondary fasteners on the BPCs differed by > 10 mm Hg compared to the BPCs' standard hook-and-loop fasteners 54% (30 of 56) of the time. Blood pressure cuffs with dysfunctional hook-and-loop fasteners should be replaced due to poor clinical reliability of DBP measurements. However, it is unclear whether Doppler sphygmomanometry is more accurate with the use of traditional Velcro BPC fasteners or with tape BPC fasteners.

SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA