A survey of EPA/OPP and open literature on selected pesticide chemicals. II. Mutagenicity and carcinogenicity of selected chloroacetanilides and related compounds.

With this effort, we continue our examination of data on selected pesticide chemicals and their related analogues that have been presented to the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency's (USEPA's) Office of Pesticide Programs (OPP). This report focuses on a group of selected chloroacetanilides and a few related compounds. As part of the registration process for pesticidal chemicals, interested parties (registrants) must submit toxicity information to support the registration including both mutagenicity and carcinogenicity data. Although this information is available to the public via Freedom of Information (FOI) requests to the OPP, publication in the scientific literature allows greater dissemination and examination of the data. For this Special Issue, graphic profiles have been prepared of the mutagenicity and carcinogenicity data available in the submissions to OPP. Also, a discussion is presented about how toxicity data are used to help establish tolerances (limits of pesticide residues in foods). The mutagenicity results submitted by registrants are supplemented by data on these chemicals from the open literature to provide a full perspective of their genetic toxicology. The group of chloroacetanilides reviewed here display a consistent pattern of mutagenic activity, probably mediated via metabolites. This mutagenic activity is a mechanistically plausible factor in the development of tumors seen in experimental animals exposed to this class of chemicals.

[Incidence of thrombophilic factor V Leiden and prothrombin G20210A mutation in Perthes disease--a pilot study]. / Häufigkeit der thrombophilen Faktor-V-Leiden- und Prothrombin-G20210A-Mutation bei Morbus Perthes--Eine Pilotstudie.

AIM: Thrombophilic mutations may play a role in the pathogenesis of the juvenile osteonecrosis of the femoral head, Perthes' disease. We investigated whether children with Perthes' disease have an increased incidence of mutations of factor V (Leiden) and prothrombin (G2O210A), which predispose to thrombosis. METHODS: For this pilot study, we analysed the data of twenty consecutive children (16 boys, 4 girls, mean age at diagnosis 6.4 years). According to Catterall's classification of severity, 2 children were in group 1, 7 in group 2, 8 in group 3, and 3 were in the most severe group 4. Mutations of factor V and prothrombin were identified in EDTA-blood by PCR amplification, digestion with restriction enzymes, and gel electrophoresis. RESULTS: Heterozygoty for the factor V mutation was detected in two children, for the prothrombin mutation in one child. Both results did not differ significantly from the incidence in Germany, which is 0.05 for factor V mutations and 0.04 for prothrombin mutations. CONCLUSIONS: For the presented group of children with Perthes' disease, we did not find an increased rate of factor V or prothrombin mutations compared to the natural incidence. In accordance to other recent studies, our results do not support a link between inherited thrombophilic mutations and Perthes' disease.

Using dose addition to estimate cumulative risks from exposures to multiple chemicals.

The Food Quality Protection Act (FQPA) of 1996 requires the EPA to consider the cumulative risk from exposure to multiple chemicals that have a common mechanism of toxicity. Three methods, hazard index (HI), point-of-departure index (PODI), and toxicity equivalence factor (TEF), have commonly been considered to estimate the cumulative risk. These methods are based on estimates of ED(10) (point of departure) and reference doses from the dose-response functions of individual chemicals. They do not incorporate the actual dose-response function of the mixture from multiple chemical exposures. Dose addition is considered to be an appropriate approach to cumulative risk assessment because it assumes that the chemicals of interest act in accordance with a common mode of action (a similar action). This paper proposes a formal statistical procedure to estimate the cumulative risk by fitting the dose-response model of the mixture under dose addition. The relative potency between two chemicals is estimated directly from the joint dose response model of the mixture. An example data set of four drugs representing four chemicals is used to illustrate the proposed procedure and compare it to the HI, PODI, and TEF methods.