Assessment of endpoint definitions in curative-intent trials for mucosal head and neck squamous cell carcinomas: Head and Neck Cancer International Group consensus recommendations.

Robust time-to-event endpoint definitions are crucial for the assessment of treatment effect and the clinical value of trial interventions. Here, the Head and Neck Cancer International Group investigated endpoint use in phase 3 trials and trials considered potentially practice-changing published between 2008 and 2021 in the curative-intent setting for patients with mucosal head and neck squamous cell carcinoma. Of the 92 trials reviewed, we show that all core components of endpoint reporting were heterogeneous, including definitions of common terms, such as overall survival and progression-free survival. Our report highlights the urgent need for harmonisation of fundamental components of clinical trial endpoints and the engagement of all stakeholders to ensure the transparent reporting of endpoint details.

Outcomes in biomarker-selected subgroups from the KESTREL study of durvalumab and tremelimumab in recurrent or metastatic head and neck squamous cell carcinoma.

BACKGROUND: Selective biomarkers may improve outcomes in patients with recurrent or metastatic head and neck squamous cell carcinoma (R/M HNSCC) treated with immune checkpoint inhibitor therapy. We investigated three independent biomarkers for association with efficacy in the randomized, phase III KESTREL study (NCT02551159) of first-line durvalumab monotherapy or durvalumab plus tremelimumab versus the EXTREME regimen: programmed cell death ligand-1 (PD-L1) immunohistochemistry, blood tumor mutational burden (bTMB) via circulating tumor DNA, and neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio (NLR). METHODS: Tumor or blood samples from patients enrolled in the KESTREL study were analyzed for PD-L1, bTMB, and NLR. Associations with overall survival (OS) or objective response rates (ORRs) were evaluated based on prespecified cut-offs for PD-L1 (tumor cell [TC] ≥ 50%/immune cell ≥ 25% or TC ≥ 25%), bTMB (≥ 16 mutations [mut] per megabase [Mb]), and NLR (≤ 7). Ad hoc analyses of exploratory cut-offs were performed. RESULTS: Prespecified or exploratory cut-offs for PD-L1 did not enrich for ORR or OS for durvalumab monotherapy or durvalumab plus tremelimumab versus EXTREME. In the bTMB ≥ 16 mut/Mb subgroup, OS hazard ratios (95% confidence interval) for durvalumab monotherapy and durvalumab plus tremelimumab versus EXTREME were 0.90 (0.48-1.72) and 0.69 (0.39-1.25), respectively. Complete response rates were 8.6% with durvalumab plus tremelimumab and 4.3% with EXTREME (≥ 16 mut/Mb subgroup). No improvement in OS was observed for durvalumab monotherapy or durvalumab plus tremelimumab versus EXTREME at prespecified or exploratory NLR cut-offs. CONCLUSIONS: bTMB demonstrated potential utility for selecting patients with R/M HNSCC who benefited from durvalumab with or without tremelimumab versus EXTREME. Trial registration ClinicalTrials.gov identifier NCT02551159.

Implementing geriatric assessment for dose optimization of CDK4/6 inhibitors in older breast cancer patients.

Current evidence from both randomized trials and real-world studies suggests that older patients with advanced hormone receptor-positive/HER2-negative (HR+/HER2) breast cancer derive clinical benefit from the addition of CDK4/6 inhibitors to endocrine therapy. However, a higher risk for adverse events due to CDK4/6 inhibitors among older patients is evident, leading to a trend of initiating CDK4/6 inhibitors at lower dose in clinical practice, though without evidence. The aim of the IMPORTANT-trial, a pragmatic, multinational, open-label, partly decentralized randomized trial is to investigate whether lower starting dose of CDK4/6 inhibitors combined with endocrine therapy is comparable to full dose in older (≥70 years old) patients with advanced HR+/HER2- breast cancer who are assessed as vulnerable or frail based on comprehensive geriatric assessment.Clinical Trial Registration: NCT06044623 (ClinicalTrials.gov); Registration date: 13 September 2023.

[Box: see text].

Spatial characterization and quantification of CD40 expression across cancer types.

BACKGROUND: CD40, a TNF receptor family member, is expressed by a variety of immune cells and is involved in the activation of both adaptive and innate immune responses. Here, we used quantitative immunofluorescence (QIF) to evaluate CD40 expression on the tumor epithelium of solid tumors in large patient cohorts of lung, ovarian, and pancreatic cancers. METHODS: Tissue samples from nine different solid tumors (bladder, breast, colon, gastric, head and neck, non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC), ovarian, pancreatic and renal cell carcinoma), constructed in tissue microarray format, were initially assessed for CD40 expression by QIF. CD40 expression was then evaluated on the large available patient cohorts for three of the tumor types demonstrating high CD40 positivity rate; NSCLC, ovarian and pancreatic cancer. The prognostic impact of CD40 expression on tumor cells was also investigated. RESULTS: CD40 expression on tumor cells was found to be common, with 80% of the NSCLC population, 40% of the ovarian cancer population, and 68% of the pancreatic adenocarcinoma population displaying some degree of CD40 expression on cancer cells. All of three of these cancer types displayed considerable intra-tumoral heterogeneity of CD40 expression, as well as partial correlation between expression of CD40 on tumor cells and on surrounding stromal cells. CD40 was not found to be prognostic for overall survival in NSCLC, ovarian cancer, or pancreatic adenocarcinoma. CONCLUSIONS: The high percentage of tumor cells expressing CD40 in each of these solid tumors should be considered in the development of therapeutic agents designed to target CD40.

Human Papillomavirus 16 DNA Methylation Patterns and Investigation of Integration Status in Head and Neck Cancer Cases.

Persistent high-risk human papillomavirus (HPV) infection is a pivotal factor in the progression of cervical cancer. In recent years, an increasing interest has emerged in comprehending the influence of HPV on head and neck squamous cell carcinoma (HNSCC). Notably, it is well established that HPV-associated HNSCC show cases with distinct molecular and clinical attributes compared to HPV-negative cases. The present study delves into the epigenetic landscape of HPV16, specifically its L1 gene and untranslated region (UTR), through pyrosequencing, while the HPV16 DNA physical status was evaluated using E2/E6 ratio analysis in HPV16-positive HNSCC FFPE biopsies. Our findings reveal substantial methylation across six sites within the HPV16 L1 gene and seven sites in the UTR. Specifically, methylation percentages of two L1 CpG sites (7136, 7145) exhibit significant associations with tumor histological grade (p < 0.01), while proving concurrent methylation across multiple sites. The HPV16 DNA physical status was not correlated with the methylation of viral genome or tumor characteristics. This is the first study that examines epigenetic modifications and the HPV16 DNA physical status in Greek HNSCC patients. Our findings suggest an orchestrated epigenetic modulation among specific sites, impacting viral gene expression and intricate virus-host interactions.

Investigation of Clinically Significant Molecular Aberrations in Patients with Prostate Cancer: Implications for Personalized Treatment, Prognosis and Genetic Testing.

The data on tumor molecular profiling of European patients with prostate cancer is limited. Our aim was to evaluate the prevalence and prognostic and predictive values of gene alterations in unselected patients with prostate cancer. The presence of gene alterations was assessed in patients with histologically confirmed prostate cancer using the ForeSENTIA® Prostate panel (Medicover Genetics), targeting 36 clinically relevant genes and microsatellite instability testing. The primary endpoint was the prevalence of gene alterations in homologous recombination repair (HRR) genes. Overall, 196 patients with prostate cancer were evaluated (median age 72.2 years, metastatic disease in 141 (71.9%) patients). Gene alterations were identified in 120 (61%) patients, while alteration in HRR genes were identified in 34 (17.3%) patients. The most commonly mutated HRR genes were ATM (17, 8.7%), BRCA2 (9, 4.6%) and BRCA1 (4, 2%). The presence of HRR gene alterations was not associated with advanced stage (p = 0.21), age at diagnosis (p = 0.28), Gleason score (p = 0.17) or overall survival (HR 0.72; 95% CI: 0.41-1.26; p = 0.251). We identified clinically relevant somatic gene alterations in European patients with prostate cancer. These molecular alterations have prognostic significance and therapeutic implications and/or may trigger genetic testing in selected patients. In the era of precision medicine, prospective research on the predictive role of these alterations for innovative treatments or their combinations is warranted.

Dose-dense sequential adjuvant chemotherapy in the trastuzumab era: final long-term results of the Hellenic Cooperative Oncology Group Phase III HE10/05 Trial.

BACKGROUND: Dose-dense sequential chemotherapy with anthracyclines and taxanes achieved an 18% reduction of recurrence risk in early breast cancer (BC). The optimal chemotherapy schedule and interval between cycles remain under investigation. METHODS: Overall, 990 patients were randomised to receive either three cycles of epirubicin (E, 110 mg/m2) every 2 weeks followed by 3 cycles of paclitaxel (T, 200 mg/m2) every 2 weeks followed by three cycles of intensified CMF (Control Arm A, E-T-CMF) that was previously used in BC or three cycles of epirubicin followed by three cycles of CMF followed by nine consecutive weekly cycles of docetaxel (wD) 35 mg/m2 (Arm B, E-CMF-wD) or nine consecutive weekly cycles of paclitaxel (wT) 80 mg/m2 (Arm C, E-CMF-wT). Trastuzumab was administered for HER2-positive disease. RESULTS: At a median follow-up of 13.3 years, 330 disease-free survival (DFS) events (33.3%) were reported. DFS and overall survival (OS) did not differ between patients in the combined B and C arms versus arm A either in the entire cohort (HR = 0.90, P = 0.38 and HR = 0.85, P = 0.20) or among trastuzumab-treated patients (HR = 0.69, P = 0.13 and HR = 0.67, P = 0.13). Thirty-four patients (3.4%) developed secondary neoplasms. CONCLUSIONS: Overall, no significant differences in survival were found amongst the studied regimens after a long-term observational period. TRIAL REGISTRATION: Australian New Zealand Clinical Trials Registry ACTRN12610000151033.

Real-world safety and efficacy data of immunotherapy in patients with cancer and autoimmune disease: the experience of the Hellenic Cooperative Oncology Group.

BACKGROUND: Data on the safety and efficacy of immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICI) in patients with concurrent autoimmune diseases (AID) are limited. METHODS: We performed a retrospective multicenter review of medical records of patients with cancer and underlying AID who received ICI. The primary endpoint was progression-free survival (PFS). RESULTS: Among 123 patients with pre-existing AID who received ICI, the majority had been diagnosed with non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC, 68.3%) and melanoma (14.6%). Most patients had a rheumatologic (43.9%), or an endocrine disorder (21.1%). Overall, 74 (60.2%) patients experienced an immune-related adverse event (irAE) after ICI initiation, AID flare (25.2%), or new irAE (35%). Frequent irAEs included thyroiditis, dermatitis and colitis. ICI was permanently discontinued due to unacceptable (8.1%) or fatal (0.8%) toxicity. In patients with NSCLC, corticosteroid treatment at the initiation of immunotherapy was associated with poor PFS (HR = 2.78, 95% CI 1.40-5.50, p = 0.003). The occurrence of irAE was associated with increased PFS (HR = 0.48, 95% CI 0.25-0.92, p = 0.026). Both parameters maintained their independent prognostic significance. CONCLUSIONS: ICI in patients with cancer and pre-existing AID is associated with manageable toxicity that infrequently requires treatment discontinuation. However, since severe AID flare might occur, expected ICI efficacy and toxicity must be balanced. CLINICAL TRIAL IDENTIFIER: NCT04805099.

The addition of the immunomodulator mifamurtide to adjuvant chemotherapy for early osteosarcoma: a retrospective analysis.

BACKGROUND: Current treatment recommendations for high grade non-metastatic osteosarcoma include perioperative chemotherapy and surgery. Despite this intensive protocol, approximately 40% of patients will relapse. The addition of the immunomodulator mifamurtide to adjuvant cytotoxic chemotherapy was associated with a significant improvement in 6-year overall survival (OS) in young patients with resectable osteosarcoma, leading to its approval in Europe and other countries. Very limited real-world data are reported on its use. METHODS: We retrospectively evaluated data from osteosarcoma patients who received mifamurtide in the adjuvant setting. Data were obtained from medical records in 2 high-volume bone sarcoma centers. The aim of this study was to collect real-world data on mifamurtide safety and efficacy in Greece. RESULTS: We identified 15 patients with completely resected osteosarcoma who received mifamurtide from September 2015 to January 2020. Median age at diagnosis was 24 years old (16-76). Osteosarcoma arose in the lower extremities (n = 12), in the upper extremities (n = 2) or in the ilium (n = 1). The majority of patients (n = 13) received cisplatin/doxorubicin/methotrexate as perioperative chemotherapy and the remaining patients cisplatin/doxorubicin. After a median follow-up of 46.9 months (range, 32.8-61.1), the median recurrence-free survival was 58.7 months (range, 18.5-98.8) and the median OS 64.1 months (range, 25.6-102.6). Except for fever and chills, the only adverse event probably related to mifamurtide was pericarditis (n = 1). CONCLUSIONS: Mifamurtide was well tolerated in a Greek osteosarcoma population, including patients older than 30 years. The small sample size and the non-comparative design do not allow drawing conclusions on the drug benefit in terms of survival.

Avelumab plus standard-of-care chemoradiotherapy versus chemoradiotherapy alone in patients with locally advanced squamous cell carcinoma of the head and neck: a randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled, multicentre, phase 3 trial.

BACKGROUND: Chemoradiotherapy is the standard of care for unresected locally advanced squamous cell carcinoma of the head and neck. We aimed to assess if addition of avelumab (anti-PD-L1) to chemoradiotherapy could improve treatment outcomes for this patient population. METHODS: In this randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled, phase 3 study, patients were recruited from 196 hospitals and cancer treatment centres in 22 countries. Patients aged 18 years or older, with histologically confirmed, previously untreated, locally advanced squamous cell carcinoma of the oropharynx, hypopharynx, larynx, or oral cavity (unselected for PD-L1 status), an Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status score of 0 or 1, and who could receive chemoradiotherapy were eligible. Patients were randomly assigned (1:1) centrally by means of stratified block randomisation with block size four (stratified by human papillomavirus status, tumour stage, and nodal stage, and done by an interactive response technology system) to receive 10 mg/kg avelumab intravenously every 2 weeks plus chemoradiotherapy (100 mg/m2 cisplatin every 3 weeks plus intensity-modulated radiotherapy with standard fractionation of 70 Gy [35 fractions during 7 weeks]; avelumab group) or placebo plus chemoradiotherapy (placebo group). This was preceded by a single 10 mg/kg avelumab or placebo lead-in dose given 7 days previously and followed by 10 mg/kg avelumab or placebo every 2 weeks maintenance therapy for up to 12 months. The primary endpoint was progression-free survival by investigator assessment per modified Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors, version 1.1, in all randomly assigned patients. Adverse events were assessed in patients who received at least one dose of avelumab or placebo. This trial is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT02952586. Enrolment is no longer ongoing, and the trial has been discontinued. FINDINGS: Between Dec 12, 2016, and Jan 29, 2019, from 907 patients screened, 697 patients were randomly assigned to the avelumab group (n=350) or the placebo group (n=347). Median follow-up for progression-free survival was 14·6 months (IQR 8·5-19·6) in the avelumab group and 14·8 months (11·6-18·8) in the placebo group. Median progression-free survival was not reached (95% CI 16·9 months-not estimable) in the avelumab group and not reached (23·0 months-not estimable) in the placebo group (stratified hazard ratio 1·21 [95% CI 0·93-1·57] favouring the placebo group; one-sided p=0·92). The most common grade 3 or worse treatment-related adverse events were neutropenia (57 [16%] of 348 patients in the avelumab group vs 52 [15%] of 344 patients in the placebo group), mucosal inflammation (50 [14%] vs 45 [13%]), dysphagia (49 [14%] vs 47 [14%]), and anaemia (41 [12%] vs 44 [13%]). Serious treatment-related adverse events occurred in 124 (36%) patients in the avelumab group and in 109 (32%) patients in the placebo group. Treatment-related deaths occurred in two (1%) patients in the avelumab group (due to general disorders and site conditions, and vascular rupture) and one (<1%) in the placebo group (due to acute respiratory failure). INTERPRETATION: The primary objective of prolonging progression-free survival with avelumab plus chemoradiotherapy followed by avelumab maintenance in patients with locally advanced squamous cell carcinoma of the head and neck was not met. These findings may help inform the design of future trials investigating the combination of immune checkpoint inhibitors plus CRT. FUNDING: Pfizer and Merck KGaA, Darmstadt, Germany.

The hidden curve behind COVID-19 outbreak: the impact of delay in treatment initiation in cancer patients and how to mitigate the additional risk of dying-the head and neck cancer model.

PURPOSE: The rapid spread of the SARS-CoV-2 pandemic around the world caused most healthcare services to turn substantial attention to treatment of these patients and also to alter the structure of healthcare systems to address an infectious disease. As a result, many cancer patients had their treatment deferred during the pandemic, increasing the time-to-treatment initiation, the number of untreated patients (which will alter the dynamics of healthcare delivery in the post-pandemic era) and increasing their risk of death. Hence, we analyzed the impact on global cancer mortality considering the decline in oncology care during the COVID-19 outbreak using head and neck cancer, a known time-dependent disease, as a model. METHODS: An online practical tool capable of predicting the risk of cancer patients dying due to the COVID-19 outbreak and also useful for mitigation strategies after the peak of the pandemic has been developed, based on a mathematical model. The scenarios were estimated by information of 15 oncological services worldwide, given a perspective from the five continents and also some simulations were conducted at world demographic data. RESULTS: The model demonstrates that the more that cancer care was maintained during the outbreak and also the more it is increased during the mitigation period, the shorter will be the recovery, lessening the additional risk of dying due to time-to-treatment initiation. CONCLUSIONS: This impact of COVID-19 pandemic on cancer patients is inevitable, but it is possible to minimize it with an effort measured by the proposed model.

Development and Analytical Validation of a Reverse Transcription Droplet Digital PCR (RT-ddPCR) Assay for PD-L1 Transcripts in Circulating Tumor Cells.

BACKGROUND: PD-L1, an immune checkpoint protein, is an important biomarker for monitoring cancer patients during the administration of cancer immunotherapy. Droplet digital PCR (ddPCR), is a highly sensitive and accurate tool for the quantification of cancer biomarkers in liquid biopsy. We report the development and analytical validation of a novel duplex RT-ddPCR assay for the simultaneous quantification of PD-L1 and hypoxanthine phosphoribosyltransferase (HPRT) (used as reference gene) transcripts in circulating tumor cells (CTCs). METHODS: RT-ddPCR experimental conditions were first optimized and the assay was analytically validated using synthetic standards and the BB49 and SCC47 cancer cell lines. The developed assay was further applied in 71 peripheral blood (PB) samples from head and neck squamous cell carcinoma (HNSCC) patients and 20 PB samples from healthy donors. PD-L1 and HPRT transcripts were quantified in cDNAs derived from CTCs isolated by a size-dependent microfluidic device. The developed RT-ddPCR assay was directly compared to RT-qPCR using 71 identical patient cDNA samples. RESULTS: Analytical sensitivity was 0.64 copies/µL, while estimation of intra- and interassay variation revealed a high reproducibility (within-run CV%:4.7-23%; between-run CV%:13%). Using the developed RT-ddPCR assay 33/71(46.5%) HNSCC patients' samples were found positive for PD-L1 expression in CTCs, while by using RT-qPCR fewer samples (23/71, 32.4%) were positive (concordance: 55/71, 77.5%). CONCLUSIONS: The developed RT-ddPCR assay for PD-L1 in CTCs is highly sensitive, specific, and reproducible; additionally, it offers improved diagnostic sensitivity over RT-qPCR. The clinical utility of the assay should be prospectively evaluated for the real-time monitoring of CTCs of cancer patients under immunotherapy.

A Comprehensive Molecular Analysis of in Vivo Isolated EpCAM-Positive Circulating Tumor Cells in Breast Cancer.

BACKGROUND: Circulating tumor cell (CTC) analysis is highly promising for liquid biopsy-based molecular diagnostics. We undertook a comprehensive molecular analysis of in vivo isolated CTCs in breast cancer (BrCa). METHODS: In vivo isolated CTCs from 42 patients with early and 23 patients with metastatic breast cancer (MBC) were prospectively collected and analyzed for gene expression, DNA mutations, and DNA methylation before and after treatment. 19 healthy donor (HD) samples were analyzed as a control group. In identical blood draws, CTCs were enumerated using CellSearch® and characterized by direct IF staining. RESULTS: All 19 HD samples were negative for CK8, CK18, CK19, ERBB2, TWIST1, VEGF, ESR1, PR, and EGFR expression, while CD44, CD24, ALDH1, VIM, and CDH2 expression was normalized to B2M (reference gene). At least one gene was expressed in 23/42 (54.8%) and 8/13 (61.5%) CTCs in early BrCa before and after therapy, and in 20/23 (87.0%) and 5/7 (71.4%) MBC before and after the first cycle of therapy. PIK3CA mutations were detected in 11/42 (26.2%) and 3/13 (23.1%) in vivo isolated CTCs in early BrCa before and after therapy, and in 11/23 (47.8%) and 2/7 (28.6%) MBC, respectively. ESR1 methylation was detected in 5/32 (15.7%) and 1/10 (10.0%) CTCs in early BrCa before and after therapy, and in 3/15(20.0%) MBC before the first line of therapy. The comprehensive molecular analysis of CTC revealed a higher sensitivity in relation to CellSearch or IF staining when based on creatine kinase selection. CONCLUSIONS: In vivo-CTC isolation in combination with a comprehensive molecular analysis at the gene expression, DNA mutation, and DNA methylation level comprises a highly powerful approach for molecular diagnostic applications using CTCs.

AGAPP: efficacy of first-line cisplatin, 5-fluorouracil with afatinib in inoperable gastric and gastroesophageal junction carcinomas. A Hellenic Cooperative Oncology Group study.

PURPOSE: Gastric cancer is the fifth most common neoplasm worldwide with high rates of mortality. Afatinib, a low molecular, irreversible potent inhibitor of ErbB trans-membrane receptor family, has shown promising results according to preclinical and phase I clinical trial data when combined with chemotherapy. We aimed at evaluating the safety and efficacy of the combination of cisplatin, 5FU with afatinib in molecularly unselected patients with advanced gastric cancer. METHODS: Patients with locally advanced or metastatic gastric/gastroesophageal junction adenocarcinoma received first line combination therapy of cisplatin, 5FU and afatinib every 21 days, followed by afatinib maintenance monotherapy. The primary endpoint was the Objective Response Rate (ORR); secondary endpoints included Overall Survival (OS), Progression Free Survival (PFS) and the safety profile. Unplanned exploratory analysis of HER2 and tumor mutational profile was performed. RESULTS: Among 55 patients (ITT population) enrolled, 19 (34.5%) achieved an objective tumor response; stable disease was observed in 16 patients (29.1%) and progressive disease in 10 patients (18.2%). The ORR in the per protocol population (PP) was 42.9%. Within a median follow-up of 56 months, the median PFS and OS in the ITT population was 5.0 and 8.7 months, respectively. Seven of the 47 HER2 informative cases carried HER2 positive tumors while TP53, BRCA2 and SMAD4 were the most frequently mutated genes. The most common toxicities were neutrophil count and white blood cell decrease occurring in 56.4% of patients, followed by anemia (50.9%), hyperglycemia (40%), and diarrhea (38.2%). CONCLUSIONS: The combination of cisplatin/5FU with afatinib did not surpass the benchmarks of efficacy of the contemporary therapeutic regimens that are being applied for the treatment of patients with advanced gastric cancer. However, the observed efficacy and the improved safety profile support that our administration schedule may be further investigated to overcome toxicity problems when integrating afatinib to cytotoxic chemotherapy. CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION: NCT01743365.

Phase 2 study of cabazitaxel as second-line treatment in patients with HER2-negative metastatic breast cancer previously treated with taxanes-a Hellenic Cooperative Oncology Group (HeCOG) Trial.

BACKGROUND: Cabazitaxel is a novel taxane that might be active in breast cancer resistant to first-generation taxanes. METHODS: The purpose of the current multicentre phase II trial was to evaluate the activity and safety of cabazitaxel, as second-line treatment, in patients with human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2)-negative metastatic breast cancer (MBC) previously treated with taxanes. The primary endpoint was objective response rate (ORR). RESULTS: Eighty-four patients were enrolled between October 2012 and November 2016. Taxane resistance to previous treatment was detected in 43 cases. The ORR was 22.6% in the intent-to-treat population, 23.3% in taxane-resistant and 20.5% in taxane-non-resistant cases. At a median follow-up of 39.6 months, the median progression-free survival and overall survival were 3.7 months (95% CI 2.2-4.4) and 15.2 months (95% CI 11.3-19.4), respectively. Regarding toxicity, grade 3-4 neutropenia was reported in 22.6% and febrile neutropenia in 6% of the patients, respectively. Two fatal events (one febrile neutropenia and one sepsis) were reported as being related to study treatment. CONCLUSIONS: This phase II trial suggests that cabazitaxel is active as second-line treatment in taxane-pretreated patients with HER2-negative MBC, with manageable toxicity.

Pembrolizumab alone or with chemotherapy versus cetuximab with chemotherapy for recurrent or metastatic squamous cell carcinoma of the head and neck (KEYNOTE-048): a randomised, open-label, phase 3 study.

BACKGROUND: Pembrolizumab is active in head and neck squamous cell carcinoma (HNSCC), with programmed cell death ligand 1 (PD-L1) expression associated with improved response. METHODS: KEYNOTE-048 was a randomised, phase 3 study of participants with untreated locally incurable recurrent or metastatic HNSCC done at 200 sites in 37 countries. Participants were stratified by PD-L1 expression, p16 status, and performance status and randomly allocated (1:1:1) to pembrolizumab alone, pembrolizumab plus a platinum and 5-fluorouracil (pembrolizumab with chemotherapy), or cetuximab plus a platinum and 5-fluorouracil (cetuximab with chemotherapy). Investigators and participants were aware of treatment assignment. Investigators, participants, and representatives of the sponsor were masked to the PD-L1 combined positive score (CPS) results; PD-L1 positivity was not required for study entry. The primary endpoints were overall survival (time from randomisation to death from any cause) and progression-free survival (time from randomisation to radiographically confirmed disease progression or death from any cause, whichever came first) in the intention-to-treat population (all participants randomly allocated to a treatment group). There were 14 primary hypotheses: superiority of pembrolizumab alone and of pembrolizumab with chemotherapy versus cetuximab with chemotherapy for overall survival and progression-free survival in the PD-L1 CPS of 20 or more, CPS of 1 or more, and total populations and non-inferiority (non-inferiority margin: 1·2) of pembrolizumab alone and pembrolizumab with chemotherapy versus cetuximab with chemotherapy for overall survival in the total population. The definitive findings for each hypothesis were obtained when statistical testing was completed for that hypothesis; this occurred at the second interim analysis for 11 hypotheses and at final analysis for three hypotheses. Safety was assessed in the as-treated population (all participants who received at least one dose of allocated treatment). This study is registered at ClinicalTrials.gov, number NCT02358031. FINDINGS: Between April 20, 2015, and Jan 17, 2017, 882 participants were allocated to receive pembrolizumab alone (n=301), pembrolizumab with chemotherapy (n=281), or cetuximab with chemotherapy (n=300); of these, 754 (85%) had CPS of 1 or more and 381 (43%) had CPS of 20 or more. At the second interim analysis, pembrolizumab alone improved overall survival versus cetuximab with chemotherapy in the CPS of 20 or more population (median 14·9 months vs 10·7 months, hazard ratio [HR] 0·61 [95% CI 0·45-0·83], p=0·0007) and CPS of 1 or more population (12·3 vs 10·3, 0·78 [0·64-0·96], p=0·0086) and was non-inferior in the total population (11·6 vs 10·7, 0·85 [0·71-1·03]). Pembrolizumab with chemotherapy improved overall survival versus cetuximab with chemotherapy in the total population (13·0 months vs 10·7 months, HR 0·77 [95% CI 0·63-0·93], p=0·0034) at the second interim analysis and in the CPS of 20 or more population (14·7 vs 11·0, 0·60 [0·45-0·82], p=0·0004) and CPS of 1 or more population (13·6 vs 10·4, 0·65 [0·53-0·80], p<0·0001) at final analysis. Neither pembrolizumab alone nor pembrolizumab with chemotherapy improved progression-free survival at the second interim analysis. At final analysis, grade 3 or worse all-cause adverse events occurred in 164 (55%) of 300 treated participants in the pembrolizumab alone group, 235 (85%) of 276 in the pembrolizumab with chemotherapy group, and 239 (83%) of 287 in the cetuximab with chemotherapy group. Adverse events led to death in 25 (8%) participants in the pembrolizumab alone group, 32 (12%) in the pembrolizumab with chemotherapy group, and 28 (10%) in the cetuximab with chemotherapy group. INTERPRETATION: Based on the observed efficacy and safety, pembrolizumab plus platinum and 5-fluorouracil is an appropriate first-line treatment for recurrent or metastatic HNSCC and pembrolizumab monotherapy is an appropriate first-line treatment for PD-L1-positive recurrent or metastatic HNSCC. FUNDING: Merck Sharp & Dohme.

Tolvaptan Response Improves Overall Survival in Patients with Refractory Ascites: A Meta-Analysis.

BACKGROUND AND AIMS: Refractory ascites represents a significant complication of decompensated cirrhosis, associated with increased mortality rates. The aim of this meta-analysis was to evaluate whether response to treatment with tolvaptan is associated with improved overall survival in cirrhotic patients with refractory ascites. METHODS: Medline, Scopus, Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, Clinicaltrials.gov, and Google Scholar databases were systematically searched from inception to April 11, 2019. All studies that assessed the overall survival of patients with ascites depending on their response to tolvaptan were held eligible. RESULTS: Nine studies were included, with a total of 736 patients with cirrhosis and ascites. Response to tolvaptan was estimated to be linked to significantly improved overall survival (hazard ratio [HR] 0.42, 95% CI [0.31-0.58]). Subgroup analysis indicated that the same outcome was present when tolvaptan responsiveness was defined either as effective body weight loss (HR 0.44, 95% CI [0.30-0.63] or as effective sodium restoration (HR 0.35, 95% CI [0.20-0.61]. Sensitivity analysis suggested that the presence of hepatocellular carcinoma, the sample size, and the quality of the studies did not significantly affect the overall result of the meta-analysis. CONCLUSIONS: The outcomes of the meta-analysis support the prognostic role of tolvaptan response in patients with cirrhosis and refractory ascites, as it was shown to lead to significantly improved overall survival. These findings should be confirmed by future large-scale studies, while efficient biomarkers should be identified in order to accurately predict response to tolvaptan and discriminate patients that would benefit from its administration.

Alveolar bone histological necrosis observed prior to extractions in patients, who received bone-targeting agents.

OBJECTIVE: We reported the alveolar bone histology prior to dental extractions in cancer patients, who received bone-targeting agents (BTA). SUBJECTS AND METHODS: Fifty-four patients were included. Patients underwent extractions, and bone biopsies were taken. RESULTS: Extractions were performed due to pain, swelling, purulence, fistula, and numbness, not responding to treatment, in 40 patients (group A); extractions due to asymptomatic, non-restorable teeth, were performed in 14 patients (group B). Complete alveolar jaw bone histological necrosis was observed in 28 of 40 (70%) patients of group A and none of group B (p < .001). The development of clinical osteonecrosis (MRON) was assessed in 44 patients; 10 patients, who were also treated with Low Level Laser Treatments-LLLT, were excluded from this analysis, as the alternative therapies were a confounding factor. Twelve patients, with alveolar bone histological necrosis prior to extraction, developed medication-related osteonecrosis of the jaw (MRONJ) compared with two patients with vital or mixed vital/non-vital bone (p < .0007). BTAs >1 year and concurrent targeted therapy were also significantly associated with MRONJ (p = .016 and p = .050). CONCLUSION: Pain, swelling, purulence, fistula, and numbness were significantly associated with complete bone histological necrosis prior to extractions and increased MRONJ development. Research is justified to explore whether histological necrosis represents an early stage of osteonecrosis.

Special Issue about Head and Neck Cancers: HPV Positive Cancers.

The oropharynx has become the leading primary site for Human Papilloma Virus (HPV)-associated head and neck cancer. HPV positive oropharyngeal squamous cell carcinoma (HPV+ OSCC) has emerged as an epidemic not easily recognized by many physicians, resulting in delays in diagnosis and management. HPV+ OSCC traditionally refers to younger, healthier patients with high economic status and high-risk sexual behavior and is related to improved prognosis. De-intensification strategies are being evaluated in ongoing clinical trials and if validated, might help spare severe morbidity associated with current cisplatin-based chemoradiotherapy, which is the standard of care for all patients with locally advanced head and neck cancer. On the other hand, whether HPV status represents an important prognostic factor for non-oropharyngeal sites remains to be elucidated.

PALB2 c.2257C>T truncating variant is a Greek founder and is associated with high breast cancer risk.

PALB2 loss-of-function variants play an important role in breast, pancreatic and possibly, ovarian and gastric cancer susceptibility. Their frequency can be influenced by founder effects, already described in some populations. Herein, we have assessed the possible founder effect of PALB2 c.2257C>T (p.Arg753*) truncating variant among Greek breast cancer patients, while investigating possible correlations with cancer diagnoses. Following a lead deriving from a background study of highly selected Greek breast cancer patients, a total of 2496 breast and 697 ovarian cancer patients were directly genotyped for the PALB2 c.2257C>T truncating variant. Consequently, haplotype analysis was conducted on identified carriers, using seven microsatellite markers. The prevalence of the PALB2 variant was 0.24% (6/2496) and 0.14% (1/697) among breast and ovarian cases, respectively. Family history seems to be an important factor for the variant identification, although not reaching statistical significance. Microsatellite analysis on 12 carriers revealed a common shared haplotype, spanning a chromosomal region of ~1.2 Mb; the variant was possibly introduced in the Greek population ~1600 years ago. The variant confers high breast cancer risk, as illustrated by comparison with publicly available control groups. Genetic testing for PALB2, especially for the Greek founder c.2257C>T truncating variant, should be seriously considered in Greek breast cancer cases, since such findings could assist appropriate clinical management for the patients and their families.