[Clinical characteristics and treatment for patients with low back and leg pain caused by lumbar annular tears].

OBJECTIVE: To investigate whether annular tears is a cause of low back and radiating leg pain and explore the clinical characteristics and treatment for patients with this condition. METHODS: A total of 34 patients with low back and radiating leg pain, but without lumbar disc herniation on CT (computed tomography) or MRI (magnetic resonance imaging), were examined by electrophysiological studies and discography to identify whether there were or not annular tears and nerve root injury and decipher the relations between them. The series included 15 males and 19 females with an average age of 45.6 years old and the average duration of symptoms was 25.8 months. All patients with annular tears and positive pain provocation test were treated by local windowing decompression and debridement of nucleus pulposus after failed conservative treatment. The pre- and post-operative functions and pain were evaluated by JOA (Japanese Orthopedic Association) and VAS (visual analog scale) scores respectively. The average follow-up was 17.4 months. RESULTS: The clinical manifestations included low back and radiating leg pain, intermittent claudication and nerve root injury. No significant abnormalities were discovered on X-ray and CT scan. T2W images of magnetic resonance demonstrated a low intensity or black disc in all patients and high-intensity zone (HIZ) (n = 21). Electromyography showed nerve root injury (n = 27). Abnormality of conduction velocities of common peroneal nerve (n = 7) and tibial nerve (n = 3) were found. Thirty-four patients with 38 discs displayed pain reproduction on contrast injection during discography and the sites of annular tears were confirmed on CT scan after discography. Pre- and post-operative average JOA scale score was 8.7 points and 13.5 points, the recovery ratio 76.2% and the excellent and good outcomes 88.2%. Pre- and post-operative average VAS score was 8.6 points and 2.8 points. And the recovery rate was 80.5%. CONCLUSION: The annular tears result in low back and radiating leg pain. And the typical characteristics are low back and radiating leg pain, intermittent claudication and nerve root injury. MRI and electrophysiological studies play an important role in diagnosing this condition. Lumbar discography is the decisive method and prerequisite of selecting surgery. Local windowing decompression and debridement of nucleus pulposus is a simple and effective method.

[Intraobserver and interobserver reliability of the King, Lenke, and PUMC classification systems for idiopathic scoliosis].

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the intraobserver and interobserver reliability and main influencing factors of the King, Lenke, and PUMC classification systems for idiopathic scoliosis (IS) using radiographs that had not been premeasured. METHODS: Fifty-six patients with IS, 9 male and 47 female, aged 15.4 (11 - 18), underwent preoperative X-ray photography of spine standing full-length posteroanterior and lateral films and left and right supine side-bending radiographs. The films were read by four orthopedic surgeons independently to do measurement and typing according to the King, Lenke, and PUMC classification systems respectively. Two weeks later, the sequence of the X-ray films was re-ordered and the 4 surgeons read them and did measurement and typing once more. The average percentage of intraobserver and interobserver agreement was calculated. Kappa coefficients were used to determine the intraobserver and interobserver reliability. RESULTS: King classification demonstrated fair interobserver reliability and excellent intraobserver reliability. The mean interobserver reliability was 65.8% (Kappa coefficient = 0.542), while the intraobserver reliability was 82.6% (Kappa coefficient = 0.767). The main reason of disagreement was distinguishment of the King type II and type III. Another reason was assessment of King type V. The complete Lenke classification demonstrated poor reliability. The mean interobserver reliability was 50.0% (Kappa coefficient = 0.438), and the intraobserver reliability was 47.0% (Kappa coefficient = 0.402). The 3 components of Lenke classification had fair interobserver and intraobserver reliability when they were examined separately. The main reasons for disagreement arose from judging whether there was a structural upper thoracic curve and assigning sagittal thoracic modifier. The PUMC type demonstrated excellent intraobserver and interobserver reliability with a mean interobserver reliability of 87.8% (Kappa coefficient = 0.757), and a mean intraobserver reliability of 92.9% (Kappa coefficient = 0.958). Its subtypes demonstrated fair agreement with the mean interobserver reliability of 70.2% (Kappa coefficient = 0.629), and a mean intraobserver reliability of 74.1% (Kappa coefficient = 0.674). The main reasons for disagreement were definition of a curvature and Cobb angle measurement. CONCLUSION: King and PUMC classification systems have higher interobserver and intraobserver reliability than Lenke classification. The reliability levels of the 3 classification systems are all influenced by many factors. Judgment of an upper thoracic curve, variable of Cobb angle measurement, and relationship of the central vertical sagittal line to apex of curve are the common reasons for disagreement in these 3 classifications.