Neoadjuvant chemoradiation for patients with advanced oesophageal cancer - which response grading system best impacts prognostic discrimination?

AIMS: Neoadjuvant chemoradiation reduces tumour volume and improves the R0 resection rate, followed by extended survival for patients with advanced oesophageal cancer. The degree of tumour regression has high prognostic relevance. To date, there is still no generally accepted tumour regression grading system. The aim of this study was to compare the prognostic discrimination power of different histological regression grading systems: (i) the fibrosis/tumour ratio within the primary tumour (Mandard classification), (ii) the percentage of residual vital tumour cells (VTC) compared to the original primary tumour (Cologne Regression) and (iii) the ypT category, in patients with cT3 carcinoma of the oesophagus after neoadjuvant chemoradiation. METHODS AND RESULTS: This study included 216 patients with oesophageal cancer clinically staged as cT3NxM0 and treated from 2009 to 2012 with standardised chemoradiation followed by oesophagectomy [median age 62 years, 176 (81%) male and 138 (64%) adenocarcinoma patients]. The subgroup frequencies of the three classification systems were ypT category: ypT0 = 18%, ypT1 = 14%, ypT2 = 23%, ypT3 = 44%, ypT4 = 1%; Mandard classification: TRG1 = 18%, TRG2 = 26%, TRG3 = 24%, TRG4 = 30%, TRG5 = 2%; and Cologne Regression Scale: no tumour = 18%, 1-10% VTC = 27%, 10-50% VTC = 26% and >50% VTC = 29%. The Mandard and Cologne Regression classifications showed better prognostic differentiation for the subgroups than the ypT category. The four-tiered Cologne Regression system had a good prognostic relevance. Comparing results of the re-evaluated Cologne Regression classification with the classification by routine pathological report showed very good inter-rater agreement, with kappa value 0.891. CONCLUSION: Compared to the original primary tumour, the tumour regression grading system using the percentage of residual vital tumour has prognostic relevance.

Vimentin 3, the new hope, differentiating RCC versus oncocytoma.

Vimentin is currently used to differentiate between malignant renal carcinomas and benign oncocytomas. Recent reports showing Vimentin positive oncocytomas seriously question the validity of this present diagnostic approach. Vimentin 3 is a spliced variant and ends with a unique C-terminal ending after exon 7 which differentiates it from the full length version that has 9 exons. Therefore, the protein size is different; the full length Vimentin version has a protein size of ~57 kDa and the truncated version of ~47 kDa. We designed an antibody, called Vim3, against the unique C-terminal ending of the Vimentin 3 variant. Using immune histology, immune fluorescence, Western blot, and qRT-PCR analysis, a Vim3 overexpression was detectable exclusively in oncocytoma, making the detection of Vim3 a potential specific marker for benign kidney tumors. This antibody is the first to clearly differentiate benign oncocytoma and the mimicking eosinophilic variants of the RCCs. This differentiation between malignant and benign RCCs is essential for operative planning, follow-up therapy, and patients' survival. In the future the usage of Vimentin antibodies in routine pathology has to be applied with care. Consideration must be given to Vimentin specific binding epitopes otherwise a misdiagnosis of the patients' tumor samples may result.

Potential complications of transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI)-an autopsy perspective.

OBJECTIVE: Degenerative or post-endocarditic destruction of aortic valves with secondary left ventricular hypertension and cardiac insufficiency is seen more frequently in patients of increasing age. When conventional aortic valve replacement is no longer an option, because of age and co-morbidity, patients are increasingly treated with interventional aortic valve replacement using transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI). METHODS AND RESULTS: TAVI has been performed in Cologne since 2008. We screened our autopsy registry for cases of TAVI, identifying and characterizing complications in connection with the TAVI procedure. We found 13 patients who underwent TAVI procedure. Five of these patients died of non-TAVI specific postoperative complications, whereas in 8 patients there was a direct relationship between TAVI complications and the cause of death. The Patients died within hours and few days after TAVI procedure respectively. Problems observed included predominantly complications due to calcifications of the aortic valve cusps as well as acute endocarditis in 20% of cases. In one case there was an irreversible compression of the implanted valve due to cardiac resuscitation and a malposition of the bioprosthesis. CONCLUSIONS: Future improvements of preoperative evaluation, especially concerning the degree of calcifications of the aortic valve, appear necessary to increase the chance of preventing such complications. Until then, autopsy analysis of complications may help to improve the TAVI procedure.