Donor Action program in the Emilia-Romagna region of Italy.

CONTEXT: The high demand for organs for transplantation necessitates enhancement of organ procurement activity worldwide. OBJECTIVE: To detect critical areas in the organ donation process and to assess whether careful monitoring of deaths in each intensive care unit could improve rates of identification of brain death. DESIGN: Records of patients who died in intensive care units in the Emilia-Romagna region between July 1, 1998 and June 30, 2000 were reviewed through the Donor Action program. RESULTS: Of the 2469 patients who died during the period studied, 1010 (40.9%) had severe brain damage, as indicated by a score of 3 on the Glasgow coma scale. A total of 857 patients with severe brain damage who had spent more than 6 hours in the intensive care unit (34.7% of all deaths) were considered as potential donors. Signs of brain death were observed in 383 (44.7%) of the 857 patients who died. Rates of identification of brain death increased from 36% to 55% during the study period. CONCLUSION: Considering that the characteristics of the study population had not changed, we believe that the Donor Action program was an important factor leading to the observed improvement in identification of brain death.

Improving donor identification with the Donor Action programme.

The increasing demand for organs for transplantation entails a consensual need for enhancement of organ procurement activity. As organ donors reside mainly in hospital intensive care units (ICUs), the Donor Action programme is aimed at identifying critical areas in ICUs, in order to improve the first step of organ donation. The purpose of this paper is to analyse the problem of identification of potential donors by means of a chart revision of patients who died in 14 ICUs in the Emilia-Romagna region between 1 July 1998 and 31 December 2000. All deaths and patients with severe brain insult (score on Glasgow Coma Scale (GCS) = 3/15) were assessed by the local transplant coordinators together with a professional at the Transplant Reference Centre. Brain death diagnoses and potential donor referrals were therefore assessed in the study period, which was subdivided into five semesters. Of the 3,056 deaths reported in 30 months, 1,248 were due to severe brain damage (GCS score = 3). Brain death diagnosis (BD) was performed in 509 patients (40.8%). Although we applied the same parameters over the whole length of the study, we observed a significant increase in BDs (from 87 in the first semester to 125 in the last, 30.5% to 53.0% of the patients with GCS 3 ( P=0.003, chi(2) for trend=16.072), in spite of a slight decrease in the total number of deaths and in the total number of patients with GCS score = 3 (from 649 to 587, and from 44% to 41%, respectively). Study population characteristics could have contrasted with rather than facilitated our results: age and gender did not change significantly, whilst cause of death showed a significant reduction in trauma and an increase in cerebrovascular incidents over the whole length of the study. We can conclude that the more careful assessment of patients dying in ICUs, by the Donor Action programme, significantly contributed to the improvement of BDs observed in the study period. Therefore, Donor Action seems to be an efficient quality control programme to improve identification of potential donors, the first stage of organ procurement.