Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 9 de 9
Filtrar
1.
Teach Learn Med ; 30(1): 15-21, 2018.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28753049

RESUMO

Phenomenon: Medical students' coping abilities are important for academic success and emotional health. The authors explored differences in students' use of active, problem-solving strategies and emotional, inwardly directed approaches; the change in coping strategies used during medical school; and coping strategy impact on performance. APPROACH: One hundred eighty-three students completed the Ways of Coping Scale at matriculation and end of the 2nd and 3rd years. Frequency of each of 8 ways of coping, changes in coping strategy use over time, and relationship of coping method with preclinical and clinical scores were calculated. FINDINGS: Students varied widely in use of coping mechanisms. Over time, students shifted to using emotional strategies more frequently while decreasing their use of active strategies. Coping strategies were unrelated to preclinical academic performance (R2 = .09, adjusted R2 = .04, ns) but were related to clinical performance (R2 = .23, adjusted R2 = .18, p < .0001), with active coping associated with higher performance and emotional methods associated with lower performance. Insights: Students decreased use of active coping strategies and increased use of emotional coping strategies over time, but emotional strategies were associated with poorer clinical academic performance. These shifts in coping methods may be detrimental to student performance and learning. Improving students' ability to cope should be an educational priority.


Assuntos
Desempenho Acadêmico , Adaptação Psicológica , Educação de Graduação em Medicina , Estudantes de Medicina/psicologia , Adulto , Feminino , Humanos , Masculino , Inquéritos e Questionários , Adulto Jovem
2.
Anat Sci Educ ; 11(4): 366-376, 2018 Jul.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29178200

RESUMO

New instructional technologies have been increasingly incorporated into the medical school learning environment, including lecture video recordings as a substitute for live lecture attendance. The literature presents varying conclusions regarding how this alternative experience impacts students' academic success. Previously, a multi-year study of the first-year medical histology component at the University of Michigan found that live lecture attendance was positively correlated with learning success, while lecture video use was negatively correlated. Here, three cohorts of first-year medical students (N = 439 respondents, 86.6% response rate) were surveyed in greater detail regarding lecture attendance and video usage, focusing on study behaviors that may influence histology learning outcomes. Students who reported always attending lectures or viewing lecture videos had higher average histology scores than students who employed an inconsistent strategy (i.e., mixing live attendance and video lectures). Several behaviors were negatively associated with histology performance. Students who engaged in "non-lecture activities" (e.g., social media use), students who reported being interrupted while watching the lecture video, or feeling sleepy/losing focus had lower scores than their counterparts not engaging in these behaviors. This study suggests that interruptions and distractions during medical learning activities-whether live or recorded-can have an important impact on learning outcomes. Anat Sci Educ 11: 366-376. © 2017 American Association of Anatomists.


Assuntos
Desempenho Acadêmico , Educação de Graduação em Medicina , Histologia/educação , Aprendizagem , Estudantes de Medicina/psicologia , Atenção , Currículo , Humanos , Michigan , Estudos Retrospectivos , Faculdades de Medicina/estatística & dados numéricos , Autorrelato , Estudantes de Medicina/estatística & dados numéricos , Universidades/estatística & dados numéricos , Gravação em Vídeo/estatística & dados numéricos
3.
Med Teach ; 29(4): 335-40, 2007 May.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-17786747

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: The development of critical consciousness, anchored in principles of social justice, is an essential component of medical education. AIM: In order to assist faculty instructors in facilitating small-group discussions on potentially contentious issues involving race, gender, sexual orientation, and socioeconomic class, a faculty development workshop was created. METHODS: The workshop used 'Forum Theater' techniques in which the audience was directly involved in determining the course of a simulated classroom discussion and conflict. We assessed the workshop's impact on the instructors' attitudes regarding facilitation of small-group discussions through two surveys: one to gauge immediate impressions, and another, 9-15 months later, to assess impact over time. RESULTS: Immediately after the workshop, participants reported that the topics covered in the sketch and in the discussion were highly relevant. In the follow-up survey, the instructors agreed that the workshop had raised their awareness of the classroom experiences of minorities and women and had offered strategies for addressing destructive classroom dynamics. 72% reported that the workshop led to changes in their behavior as facilitators. Differences in responses according to gender were observed. CONCLUSIONS: A workshop using interactive theater was effective in training faculty to facilitate small-group discussions about multicultural issues. This approach emphasizes and models the need to foster critical consciousness in medical education.


Assuntos
Diversidade Cultural , Drama , Educação Médica , Educação , Docentes de Medicina , Desenvolvimento de Pessoal/métodos , Feminino , Grupos Focais , Humanos , Masculino , Avaliação de Programas e Projetos de Saúde , Fatores Sexuais
4.
Acad Med ; 81(1): 57-62, 2006 Jan.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-16377822

RESUMO

PURPOSE: To examine the effects of the new resident work-hour restrictions on medical students, as measured by their perceptions of the quality of their experiences during the required clerkships. METHOD: Evaluations of four clerkships were compared for two student cohorts at the University of Michigan Medical School. The first cohort, from the class of 2002-03, completed their clinical clerkships the year before the work-hour restrictions were implemented, and the second cohort, from the class of 2003-04, completed their clerkships the same year the restrictions were implemented. RESULTS: There were significant and notable differences in the experiences of the two cohorts. Students' perceptions of the quality of their experiences in the surgery-oriented clerkships (obstetrics-gynecology and surgery) in particular were significantly lower (i.e., more negative) in the 2003-04 cohort than in the previous cohort for the same clerkships. The nonsurgery-oriented clerkships (internal medicine and pediatrics) hired hospitalists, who offset the residents' workload (internal medicine) and assumed teaching responsibilities (pediatrics). Between 2002-03 and 2003-04, students' perceptions of the quality of their experience in the internal medicine clerkship remained mostly stable, and increased in several areas for the students in the pediatrics clerkship. CONCLUSIONS: Implementation of resident work-hour restrictions had significant effects on the education of the medical students studied. These effects need to be carefully analyzed and considered to ensure quality education for medical students. The findings also highlight that the nature of students' perceptions was related to preparations made (or not) by specific clerkships as restricted work-hour regulations were adopted.


Assuntos
Atitude , Estágio Clínico/organização & administração , Admissão e Escalonamento de Pessoal , Carga de Trabalho , Estudos de Coortes , Humanos , Medicina , Michigan , Inovação Organizacional , Avaliação de Programas e Projetos de Saúde , Especialização
5.
Acad Med ; 91(11): 1526-1529, 2016 11.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-27119333

RESUMO

PROBLEM: Most medical schools have either retained a traditional admissions interview or fully adopted an innovative, multisampling format (e.g., the multiple mini-interview) despite there being advantages and disadvantages associated with each format. APPROACH: The University of Michigan Medical School (UMMS) sought to maximize the strengths associated with both interview formats after recognizing that combining the two approaches had the potential to capture additional, unique information about an applicant. In September 2014, the UMMS implemented a hybrid interview model with six, 6-minute short-form interviews-highly structured scenario-based encounters-and two, 30-minute semistructured long-form interviews. Five core skills were assessed across both interview formats. OUTCOMES: Overall, applicants and admissions committee members reported favorable reactions to the hybrid model, supporting continued use of the model. The generalizability coefficients for the six-station short-form and the two-interview long-form formats were estimated to be 0.470 and 0.176, respectively. Different skills were more reliably assessed by different interview formats. Scores from each format seemed to be operating independently as evidenced through moderate to low correlations (r = 0.100-0.403) for the same skills measured across different interview formats; however, after correcting for attenuation, these correlations were much higher. NEXT STEPS: This hybrid model will be revised and optimized to capture the skills most reliably assessed by each format. Future analysis will examine validity by determining whether short-form and long-form interview scores accurately measure the skills intended to be assessed. Additionally, data collected from both formats will be used to establish baselines for entering students' competencies.


Assuntos
Educação de Graduação em Medicina , Entrevistas como Assunto/métodos , Critérios de Admissão Escolar , Faculdades de Medicina , Michigan
6.
Am J Surg ; 212(5): 1005-1010, 2016 Nov.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-27342635

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Surgical faculty teach medical students and residents within the same environment; however, each group may require different teaching methods. The aim of this study was to identify teaching components valued by these sets of learners. METHODS: Teaching evaluations for 43 surgical faculty members who received yearly evaluations from students and residents were analyzed. Highest and lowest ranked educators in medical student evaluations were traced to corresponding rankings in resident evaluations. Thematic analysis was conducted on written comments. RESULTS: Educators rated the highest in the medical student group were spread out among the residents' rankings, with several educators being rated the lowest. Similar patterns were observed in reverse for faculty rated highly by residents. CONCLUSIONS: Residents and medical students value faculty teaching using different criteria, with residents more focused on operative autonomy and medical students focused on approachability. Using one group to define best teaching methods is insufficient as learners value different optimal attributes.


Assuntos
Educação de Pós-Graduação em Medicina/métodos , Educação de Graduação em Medicina/métodos , Docentes de Medicina/organização & administração , Retroalimentação , Cirurgia Geral/educação , Adulto , Currículo , Avaliação Educacional , Feminino , Humanos , Masculino , Satisfação Pessoal , Estudantes de Medicina/estatística & dados numéricos , Inquéritos e Questionários , Ensino
7.
J Womens Health (Larchmt) ; 25(5): 453-6, 2016 05.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-26974476

RESUMO

PURPOSE: To investigate whether there is a difference in medical student teaching evaluations for male and female clinical physician faculty. METHODS: The authors examined all teaching evaluations completed by clinical students at one North American medical school in the surgery, obstetrics and gynecology, pediatrics, and internal medicine clinical rotations from 2008 to 2012. The authors focused on how students rated physician faculty on their "overall quality of teaching" using a 5-point response scale (1 = Poor to 5 = Excellent). Linear mixed-effects models provided estimated mean differences in evaluation outcomes by faculty gender. RESULTS: There were 14,107 teaching evaluations of 965 physician faculty. Of these evaluations, 7688 (54%) were for male physician faculty and 6419 (46%) were for female physician faculty. Female physicians received significantly lower mean evaluation scores in all four rotations. The discrepancy was largest in the surgery rotation (males = 4.23, females = 4.01, p = 0.003). Pediatrics showed the next greatest difference (males = 4.44, females = 4.29, p = 0.009), followed by obstetrics and gynecology (males = 4.38, females = 4.26, p = 0.026), and internal medicine (males = 4.35, females = 4.27, p = 0.043). CONCLUSIONS: Female physicians received lower teaching evaluations in all four core clinical rotations. This comprehensive examination adds to the medical literature by illuminating subtle differences in evaluations based on physician gender, and provides further evidence of disparities for women in academic medicine.


Assuntos
Estágio Clínico , Cirurgia Geral/educação , Ginecologia/educação , Medicina Interna/educação , Obstetrícia/educação , Médicos , Estudantes de Medicina/estatística & dados numéricos , Ensino , Adulto , Educação de Graduação em Medicina/normas , Estudos de Avaliação como Assunto , Feminino , Humanos , Masculino , Ensino/normas
9.
J Grad Med Educ ; 3(3): 360-6, 2011 Sep.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-22942963

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: The need to provide efficient, effective, and safe patient care is of paramount importance. However, most physicians receive little or no formal training to prepare them to address patient safety challenges within their clinical practice. METHODS: We describe a comprehensive Patient Safety Learning Program (PSLP) for internal medicine and medicine-pediatrics residents. The curriculum is designed to teach residents key concepts of patient safety and provided opportunities to apply these concepts in the "real" world in an effort to positively transform patient care. Residents were assigned to faculty expert-led teams and worked longitudinally to identify and address patient safety conditions and problems. The PSLP was assessed by using multiple methods. RESULTS: Resident team-based projects resulted in changes in several patient care processes, with the potential to improve clinical outcomes. However, faculty evaluations of residents were lower for the Patient Safety Improvement Project rotation than for other rotations. Comments on "unsatisfactory" evaluations noted lack of teamwork, project participation, and/or responsiveness to faculty communication. Participation in the PSLP did not change resident or faculty attitudes toward patient safety, as measured by a comprehensive survey, although there was a slight increase in comfort with discussing medical errors. CONCLUSIONS: Development of the PSLP was intended to create a supportive environment to enhance resident education and involve residents in patient safety initiatives, but it produced lower faculty evaluations of resident for communication and professionalism and did not have the intended positive effect on resident or faculty attitudes about patient safety. Further research is needed to design or refine interventions that will develop more proactive resident learners and shift the culture to a focus on patient safety.

SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA