Successful Implementation of Unmanned Aircraft Use for Delivery of a Human Organ for Transplantation.

OBJECTIVE: To understand and overcome the challenges associated with moving life-urgent payloads using unmanned aircraft. BACKGROUND DATA: Organ transportation has not been substantially innovated in the last 60 years. Unmanned aircraft systems (UAS; ie, drones) have the potential to reduce system inefficiencies and improve access to transplantation. We sought to determine if UASs could successfully be integrated into the current system of organ delivery. METHODS: A multi-disciplinary team was convened to design and build an unmanned aircraft to autonomously carry a human organ. A kidney transplant recipient was enrolled to receive a drone-shipped kidney. RESULTS: A uniquely designed organ drone was built. The aircraft was flown 44 times (total of 7.38 hours). Three experimental missions were then flown in Baltimore City over 2.8 miles. For mission #1, no payload was carried. In mission #2, a payload of ice, saline, and blood tubes (3.8 kg, 8.4 lbs) was flown. In mission #3, a human kidney for transplant (4.4 kg, 9.7 lbs) was successfully flown by a UAS. The organ was transplanted into a 44-year-old female with a history of hypertensive nephrosclerosis and anuria on dialysis for 8 years. Between postoperative days (POD) 1 and 4, urine increased from 1.0 L to 3.6 L. Creatinine decreased starting on POD 3, to an inpatient nadir of 6.9 mg/dL. The patient was discharged on POD 4. CONCLUSIONS: Here, we completed the first successful delivery of a human organ using unmanned aircraft. This study brought together multidisciplinary resources to develop, build, and test the first organ drone system, through which we performed the first transplant of a drone transported kidney. These innovations could inform not just transplantation, but other areas of medicine requiring life-saving payload delivery as well.

Enhanced recovery pathway for radical prostatectomy: Implementation and evaluation in a universal healthcare system.

INTRODUCTION: Enhanced recovery pathways are standardized, multidisciplinary, consensus-based tools that provide guidelines for evidence-based decision-making. This study evaluates the impact of the implementation of a clinical care pathway on patient outcomes following radical prostatectomy in a universal healthcare system. METHODS: Medical charts of 200 patients with prostate cancer who underwent open and minimally invasive radical prostatectomy at a single academic hospital from 2009 to 2012 were reviewed. A group of 100 consecutive patients' pre-pathway implementation was compared with 99 consecutive patients' post-pathway implementation. Duration of hospital stay, complications, post-discharge emergency department visits and readmissions were compared between the 2 groups. RESULTS: Length of hospital stay decreased from a median of 3 (inter-quartile range [IQR] 4 to 3 days) days in the pre-pathway group to a median of 2 (IQR 3 to 2 days) days in the post-pathway group regardless of surgical approach (p < 0.0001). Complication rates, emergency department visits and hospital readmissions were not significantly different in the pre- and post-pathway groups (17% vs. 21%, p = 0.80; 12% vs. 12%, p = 0.95; and 3% vs. 7%, p = 0.18, respectively). These findings were consistent after stratification by surgical approach. Limitations of our study include lack of assessment of patient satisfaction, and the retrospective study design. CONCLUSIONS: The implementation of a standardized, multidisciplinary clinical care pathway for patients undergoing radical prostatectomy improved efficiency without increasing complication rates or hospital readmissions.