Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 2 de 2
Filtrar
Mais filtros

Base de dados
Ano de publicação
Tipo de documento
País de afiliação
Intervalo de ano de publicação
1.
Curr Med Sci ; 42(2): 439-446, 2022 Apr.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35292874

RESUMO

OBJECTIVE: Contrast-enhanced ultrasound (CEUS) is advantageous for evaluating microcirculation, and has been applied to assess arthritis in previous studies. However, CEUS examinations have not been studied for hemophilia arthritis. Hemophilia arthritis is different from other arthritis, because it is induced by spontaneous joint bleeding. Hence, CEUS may have special value in evaluating hemophilia arthritis. The present study assessed the value of CEUS in evaluating synovial hypertrophy and predicting recurrent joint bleeding in severe hemophilia A patients. METHODS: From August 2016 to January 2017, 81 severe hemophilia A patients, who were referred to our hospital for ultrasound joint assessment with conventional ultrasound, were enrolled. Among these 81 patients, 46 patients consented for CEUS examinations on the same day. RESULTS: Compared to color Doppler flow imaging (CDFI), four more joints presented with a blood flow signal under CEUS mode. In addition, the synovial hypertrophy measured by CEUS was thicker than that measured by conventional ultrasound. The ultrasound scores (including the total grey-scale ultrasound score, joint effusion/hemarthrosis, synovial hypertrophy, CDFI semi-quantitative score, and CEUS semi-quantitative score) were significantly higher in the joint bleeding group than in the no joint bleeding group (P<0.05). Furthermore, these ultrasound scores were positively correlated with the joint bleeding frequency, and had the highest correlation with the CEUS score (r=0.620, P<0.05). CONCLUSION: CEUS can more accurately assess the degree of synovial hypertrophy and vascularization, and diagnose synovitis, when compared to conventional ultrasound. In addition, CEUS appears to be essential for evaluating the possibility of recurrent joint bleeding, and providing more reliable evidence for individualized treatment.


Assuntos
Artrite , Hemofilia A , Sinovite , Artrite/complicações , Artrite/diagnóstico por imagem , Hemartrose/diagnóstico por imagem , Hemartrose/etiologia , Hemofilia A/complicações , Hemofilia A/diagnóstico por imagem , Hemorragia/etiologia , Humanos , Sinovite/complicações , Sinovite/diagnóstico por imagem , Ultrassonografia/métodos
2.
Nan Fang Yi Ke Da Xue Xue Bao ; 37(10): 1391-1395, 2017 Oct 20.
Artigo em Zh | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29070472

RESUMO

OBJECTIVE: To investigate the characteristics of breakthrough bleeding in adult patients with severe hemophilia A (SHA) receiving low- and intermediate-dose FVIII for tertiary prophylaxis and explore the factors affecting the outcomes of the treatment. METHODS: Forty-nine patients (mean age 31.53∓7.33 years) with SHA receiving tertiary prophylaxis FVIII treatment were divided into low-dose group (n=15) and intermediate-dose group (n=34). The data including clinical bleeding phenotype (Pre?AJBR), 72 h FVIII trough activity, and Functional Independence Score in Hemophilia (FISH) were recorded in all the patients, and Hemophilia Steward APP was used to record the bleeding episode and the treatment data. All the patients were followed up for at least 6 months. RESULTS: In the low-dose and intermediate-dose groups, the number of joint bleeding (AJBR) episodes were 18.79∓13.03 and 9.28∓7.02 per year (P=0.016), and the proportions of spontaneous bleeding were 75.0% and 47.7%, respectively. The proportions of patients with target joint were 80% and 44%, target joint bleeding occurred in 59% and 41%, and cataract bleeding after 0-12 h of prophylactic injection occurred in 4.86% and 5.18% of the patients with a median breakthrough bleeding time of 40.08 h and 46.08 h (P=0.008), respectively. The proportions of patients with 72 h FVIII trough activity <1% were 44.4% and 34.8% in the two groups, respectively. AJBR was negatively correlated with the preventive dose consumed (r=-0.57, P=0.000, n=49) and FISH, but positively correlated with Pre-AJBR in the two groups (P<0.05). CONCLUSION: Tertiary prophylaxis with low- and intermediate-dose FVIII is not sufficient to achieve the goal of preventing progression of joint disease in Chinese adult patients with SHA. Although the prophylactic dose is the most important factor to affect the treatment efficacy, other non-factor approaches may also help to improve the efficacy of the treatment.


Assuntos
Fator VIII/uso terapêutico , Hemartrose/epidemiologia , Hemofilia A/tratamento farmacológico , Adulto , Humanos
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA