Patient and physician decision-making dynamics in overactive bladder care: A mixed methods study.

AIMS: Overactive bladder management includes multiple therapeutic options with comparable efficacy but a range of administration modalities and side effects, creating an ideal setting for shared decision-making. This study investigates patient and physician health beliefs surrounding decision-making and expectations for overactive bladder with the aim of better understanding and ultimately improving decision-making in overactive bladder care. METHODS: Patient and physician participants completed a questionnaire followed by a semi-structured interview to assess health beliefs surrounding decision making and expectations for overactive bladder treatment. The semi-structured interview guide, developed in an iterative fashion by the authors, probed qualities of overactive bladder therapies patients and physicians valued, their process of treatment selection, and their experiences with therapies. RESULTS: Patients (n = 20) frequently cited treatment invasiveness, efficacy, and safety as the most important qualities that influenced their decision when selecting overactive bladder therapy. Physicians (n = 12) frequently cited safety/contraindications, convenience, cost/insurance, and patient preference as the most important qualities. In our integration analysis, we identified four key themes associated with decision making in overactive bladder care: frustration with inaccessibility of overactive bladder treatments, discordant perception of patient education, diverging acceptability of expected outcomes, and lack of insight into other parties' decisional priorities and control preferences. CONCLUSIONS: While both patients and physicians desire to engage in a shared decision-making process when selecting therapies for overactive bladder, this process is challenged by significant divergence between patient and physician viewpoint across key domains.

A longitudinal analysis of urological chronic pelvic pain syndrome flares in the Multidisciplinary Approach to the Study of Chronic Pelvic Pain (MAPP) Research Network.

OBJECTIVE: To describe the frequency, intensity and duration of urological chronic pelvic pain syndrome symptom exacerbations ('flares'), as well as risk factors for these features, in the Multidisciplinary Approach to the Study of Chronic Pelvic Pain Epidemiology and Phenotyping longitudinal study. PARTICIPANTS AND METHODS: Current flare status ('urological or pelvic pain symptoms that are much worse than usual') was ascertained at each bi-weekly assessment. Flare characteristics, including start date, and current intensity of pelvic pain, urgency and frequency (scales of 0-10), were assessed for participants' first three flares and at three randomly selected times when they did not report a flare. Generalized linear and mixed effects models were used to investigate flare risk factors. RESULTS: Of the 385 eligible participants, 24.2% reported no flares, 22.9% reported one flare, 28.3% reported 2-3 flares, and 24.6% reported ≥4 flares, up to a maximum of 18 during the 11-month follow-up (median incidence rate = 0.13/bi-weekly assessment, range = 0.00-1.00). Pelvic pain (mean = 2.63-point increase) and urological symptoms (mean = 1.72) were both significantly worse during most flares (60.6%), with considerable within-participant variability (26.2-37.8%). Flare duration varied from 1 to 150 days (94.3% within-participant variability). In adjusted analyses, flares were more common, symptomatic, and/or longer-lasting in women and in those with worse non-flare symptoms, bladder hypersensitivity, and chronic overlapping pain conditions. CONCLUSION: In this foundational flare study, we found that pelvic pain and urological symptom flares were common, but variable in frequency and manifestation. We also identified subgroups of participants with more frequent, symptomatic, and/or longer-lasting flares for targeted flare management/prevention and further study.