Specific Birth Defects Following Antiseizure Medications Used By Pregnant Women With Epilepsy.

Background and Objectives: Previous research has been limited in the comprehensive study of associations between the use of individual antiseizure medications (ASMs) in pregnancy and specific groups of birth defects, and systematic reviews and meta-analyses on the topic are limited by pooled samples and study designs. This study investigated birth defects related to ASM use in pregnancy in children born to women with epilepsy in Sweden over 20 years. Methods: We used data from Swedish national registers to follow a cohort of 17,996 children born to women diagnosed with epilepsy any time before conception in Sweden from 1996 to 2016, following them through 2017. We examined maternal-reported use of the 4 most commonly reported ASMs: lamotrigine (n = 2,148, 11.9%), carbamazepine (n = 1,940, 10.8%), valproic acid (n = 1,043, 5.80%), and levetiracetam (n = 587, 3.26%). We identified birth defects using diagnoses recorded at the time of discharge from the hospital and inpatient and outpatient diagnoses recorded in the first year of life. Models were estimated in a stepped fashion: unadjusted, adjusted for covariates, among a subcohort born to women diagnosed 10 years before conception (n = 14,586), and restricted to monotherapy. Results: Valproic acid use in pregnancy had the strongest and most widespread associations with birth defects in children, with carbamazepine also having links to several birth defects, including respiratory system and genital organ defects. Lamotrigine use in pregnancy was associated with cleft lip/palate and chromosomal abnormalities. Levetiracetam was most often used with other ASMs and preliminarily associated with many birth defects. Discussion: Our findings support avoidance of valproic acid use in pregnancy whenever possible. Lamotrigine and carbamazepine may be safer alternatives. However, these medications were also associated with certain birth defects, including some not reported previously. We are among the first to examine the possible effects of levetiracetam use in pregnancy, though more research is needed to investigate this further.

Racial-Ethnic Differences in ADHD Diagnosis and Treatment During Adolescence and Early Adulthood.

OBJECTIVE: This study examined racial-ethnic differences in attention-deficit hyperactivity disorder (ADHD) diagnosis and treatment during adolescence and early adulthood. METHODS: A national health care claims database was used to identify a cohort of 4,216,757 commercially insured youths with at least 1 year of coverage during 2014-2019. Racial-ethnic differences in the prevalence of visits with a recorded ADHD diagnosis (identified through ICD-9-CM and ICD-10-CM codes) and of ADHD treatment (identified through medical claims for psychosocial treatments and pharmacy claims for ADHD medications) were examined. Period prevalence rates were determined within five age categories, stratified by race-ethnicity. Poisson regression with a natural log link was used within each age category to estimate prevalence ratios (PRs) comparing prevalence in each racially and ethnically minoritized group with prevalence in the White group. RESULTS: The overall prevalence of ADHD diagnosis was 9.1% at ages 12-14 and 5.3% at ages 24-25. In each age category, Asian, Black, and Hispanic youths had lower prevalence of ADHD diagnosis than did White youths (PR=0.29-0.77). Among youths with an ADHD diagnosis, relative racial-ethnic differences in treatment were small (PR=0.92-1.03). CONCLUSIONS: Throughout adolescence and early adulthood, racially and ethnically minoritized youths were less likely than White youths to have health care visits with recorded ADHD diagnoses and, among those with diagnoses, were also slightly less likely to receive treatment. More research is needed to understand the processes underlying these differences and their potential health consequences among racially and ethnically minoritized youths.

Preliminary Validation of a General Factor Model of Chronic Overlapping Pain Conditions.

Chronic overlapping pain conditions (COPCs) by definition, frequently co-occur, perhaps reflecting their shared etiologies. Their overlapping nature presents a methodological challenge, possibly masking associations between COPCs and health outcomes attributable to either general or specific processes. To address this challenge, we used population-based cohort data to evaluate the predictive validity of a bifactor model of 9 self-reported COPCs by assessing its association with incident pain-related clinical diagnoses; pain-relevant pharmacotherapy; and other health outcomes. We obtained data from a 2005 to 2006 study of Swedish adult twins linked with health data from nationwide registers through 2016 (N = 25,418). We then fit a bifactor model comprising a general COPC factor and 2 independent specific factors measuring pain-related somatic symptoms and neck and shoulder pain. Accounting for age, biological sex, and cancer, the general factor was associated with increased risk of all pain-related outcomes (eg, COPC diagnosis adjusted odds ratio [aOR], 1.71; 95% confidence interval [1.62, 1.81]), most mental health-related outcomes (eg, depression aOR, 1.72 [1.60, 1.85]), and overdose and mortality (eg, all-cause mortality aOR, 1.25 [1.09, 1.43]). The somatic symptoms specific factor was associated with pain-relevant pharmacotherapy (eg, prescribed opioids aOR, 1.25 [1.15, 1.36]), most mental health-related outcomes (eg, depression aOR, 1.95 [1.70, 2.23]), and overdose (eg, nonfatal overdose aOR, 1.66 [1.31, 2.10]). The neck and shoulder pain-specific factor was weakly and inconsistently associated with the outcomes. Findings provide initial support for the validity and utility of a general-factor model of COPCs as a tool to strengthen understanding of co-occurrence, etiology, and consequences of chronic pain. PERSPECTIVE: This article presents associations between a novel measurement model of COPCs and various health outcomes. Findings provide support for measuring pain across multiple domains rather than only measuring pain specific to one physical location in both research and clinical contexts.

Incident Benzodiazepine and Z-Drug Use and Subsequent Risk of Serious Infections.

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: Animal studies have suggested a link between benzodiazepine and related Z-drug (BZDR) use and immune dysfunction. Corresponding evidence in humans is limited and focuses mainly on pneumonia. This study aimed to assess the association of incident BZDR use with subsequent development of serious infections. METHODS: This Swedish register-based study included a population-based demographically matched cohort, a co-twin control cohort, and an active comparator cohort. Out of 7,362,979 individuals aged below 65 years who were BZDR naïve by 2007, 713,896 BZDR recipients with incident dispensation of any BZDRs between 2007 and 2019 were 1:1 matched to 713,896 nonrecipients from the general population; 9197 BZDR recipients were compared with their 9298 unexposed co-twins/co-multiples; and 434,900 BZDR recipients were compared with 428,074 incident selective serotonin reuptake inhibitor (SSRI) recipients. The outcomes were identified by the first inpatient or specialist outpatient diagnosis of serious infections in the National Patient Register, or death from any infections recorded as the underlying cause in the Cause of Death Register. Cox proportional hazards regression models were fitted and controlled for multiple confounders, including familial confounding and confounding by indication. To study a possible dose-response association, the cumulative dosage of BZDRs dispensed during the follow-up was estimated for each BZDR recipient and modeled as a time-varying exposure with dose categories in tertiles [≤ 20 defined daily doses (DDDs), > 20 DDDs ≤ 65, and > 65 DDDs). The risk of infections was assessed in BZDR recipients within each category of the cumulative BZDR dosage compared to their demographically matched nonrecipients. RESULTS: In the demographically matched cohort (average age at incident BZDR use 42.8 years, 56.9% female), the crude incidence rate of any serious infections in BZDR recipients and matched nonrecipients during 1-year follow-up was 4.18 [95% confidence intervals (CI) 4.13-4.23] and 1.86 (95% CI 1.83-1.89) per 100 person-years, respectively. After controlling for demographic, socioeconomic, clinical, and pharmacological confounders, BZDR use was associated with 83% relative increase in risk of any infections [hazard ratio (HR) 1.83, 95% CI 1.79-1.89]. The risk remained increased, although attenuated, in the co-twin cohort (HR 1.55, 95% CI 1.23-1.97) and active comparator cohort (HR 1.33, 95% CI 1.30-1.35). The observed risks were similar across different types of initial BZDRs and across individual BZDRs, and the risks increased with age at BZDR initiation. We also observed a dose-response association between cumulative BZDR dosage and risk of serious infections. CONCLUSIONS: BZDR initiation was associated with increased risks of serious infections, even when considering unmeasured familial confounding and confounding by indication. The exact pathways through which BZDRs may affect immune function, however, remain unclear. Further studies are needed to explore the neurobiological mechanisms underlying the association between BZDR use and serious infections, as it can lead to safer therapeutic strategies for patients requiring BZDR.