Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 2 de 2
Filtrar
Mais filtros

Base de dados
País/Região como assunto
Ano de publicação
Tipo de documento
Revista
País de afiliação
Intervalo de ano de publicação
1.
Elife ; 102021 11 16.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34783656

RESUMO

Background: Respiratory protective equipment recommended in the UK for healthcare workers (HCWs) caring for patients with COVID-19 comprises a fluid-resistant surgical mask (FRSM), except in the context of aerosol generating procedures (AGPs). We previously demonstrated frequent pauci- and asymptomatic severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 infection HCWs during the first wave of the COVID-19 pandemic in the UK, using a comprehensive PCR-based HCW screening programme (Rivett et al., 2020; Jones et al., 2020). Methods: Here, we use observational data and mathematical modelling to analyse infection rates amongst HCWs working on 'red' (coronavirus disease 2019, COVID-19) and 'green' (non-COVID-19) wards during the second wave of the pandemic, before and after the substitution of filtering face piece 3 (FFP3) respirators for FRSMs. Results: Whilst using FRSMs, HCWs working on red wards faced an approximately 31-fold (and at least fivefold) increased risk of direct, ward-based infection. Conversely, after changing to FFP3 respirators, this risk was significantly reduced (52-100% protection). Conclusions: FFP3 respirators may therefore provide more effective protection than FRSMs for HCWs caring for patients with COVID-19, whether or not AGPs are undertaken. Funding: Wellcome Trust, Medical Research Council, Addenbrooke's Charitable Trust, NIHR Cambridge Biomedical Research Centre, NHS Blood and Transfusion, UKRI.


Assuntos
COVID-19/prevenção & controle , Pessoal de Saúde , Máscaras , Dispositivos de Proteção Respiratória , Adulto , Aerossóis , Idoso , COVID-19/epidemiologia , Humanos , Incidência , Controle de Infecções/métodos , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Modelos Teóricos , SARS-CoV-2 , Reino Unido , Adulto Jovem
2.
Elife ; 102021 04 08.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33830018

RESUMO

The BNT162b2 mRNA COVID-19 vaccine (Pfizer-BioNTech) is being utilised internationally for mass COVID-19 vaccination. Evidence of single-dose protection against symptomatic disease has encouraged some countries to opt for delayed booster doses of BNT162b2, but the effect of this strategy on rates of asymptomatic SARS-CoV-2 infection remains unknown. We previously demonstrated frequent pauci- and asymptomatic SARS-CoV-2 infection amongst healthcare workers (HCWs) during the UK's first wave of the COVID-19 pandemic, using a comprehensive PCR-based HCW screening programme (Rivett et al., 2020; Jones et al., 2020). Here, we evaluate the effect of first-dose BNT162b2 vaccination on test positivity rates and find a fourfold reduction in asymptomatic infection amongst HCWs ≥12 days post-vaccination. These data provide real-world evidence of short-term protection against asymptomatic SARS-CoV-2 infection following a single dose of BNT162b2 vaccine, suggesting that mass first-dose vaccination will reduce SARS-CoV-2 transmission, as well as the burden of COVID-19 disease.


Assuntos
Vacinas contra COVID-19/uso terapêutico , COVID-19/prevenção & controle , Infecções Assintomáticas/terapia , Vacina BNT162 , COVID-19/diagnóstico , Vacinas contra COVID-19/administração & dosagem , Pessoal de Saúde , Humanos , Esquemas de Imunização , Imunização Secundária , SARS-CoV-2/isolamento & purificação , Vacinação
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA