Competitive Interactions Between Propofol and Diazepam: Studies in GABAA Receptors and Zebrafish.

Although propofol is among the most commonly administered general anesthetics, its mechanism of action is not fully understood. It has been hypothesized that propofol acts via a similar mechanism as (R)-ethyl 1-(1-phenylethyl)-1H-imidazole-5-carboxylate (etomidate) by binding within the GABAA receptor transmembrane receptor domain at the two ß +/α - subunit interfaces with resultant positive allosteric modulation. To test this hypothesis, we leveraged the ability of diazepam to bind to those sites and act as a competitive antagonist. We used oocyte-expressed α 1 ß 3 γ 2L GABAA receptors to define the actions of diazepam (± flumazenil) on currents activated or potentiated by propofol and a zebrafish activity assay to define the impact of diazepam and flumazenil on propofol-induced anesthesia. We found that diazepam increased the amplitudes of GABAA receptor-mediated currents at nanomolar concentrations but reduced them at micromolar concentrations. The current amplitude changes produced by nanomolar diazepam concentrations were inhibited by flumazenil whereas those produced by micromolar diazepam concentrations were not. Studies of agonist potentiation showed that the micromolar inhibitory action of diazepam was surmountable by high concentrations of propofol and produced a rightward shift in the propofol concentration-response curve characterized by a Schild slope not statistically significantly different from 1, consistent with competition between diazepam and propofol. Although micromolar concentrations of diazepam (plus flumazenil) similarly reduced GABAA receptor currents modulated by propofol and etomidate, it only reduced the anesthetic actions of etomidate. We conclude that while both propofol and etomidate can modulate GABAA receptors by binding to the ß +/α - subunit interfacial sites, propofol-induced anesthesia likely involves additional target sites. SIGNIFICANCE STATEMENT: Although the drug combination of diazepam and flumazenil reverses the GABAA receptor positive modulatory actions of both propofol and (R)-ethyl 1-(1-phenylethyl)-1H-imidazole-5-carboxylate (etomidate), it only reverses the in vivo anesthetic actions of etomidate. These results strongly suggest that distinct mechanisms of action account for the anesthetic actions of these two commonly administered anesthetic agents.

Competitive Antagonism of Etomidate Action by Diazepam: In Vitro GABAA Receptor and In Vivo Zebrafish Studies.

BACKGROUND: Recent cryo-electron microscopic imaging studies have shown that in addition to binding to the classical extracellular benzodiazepine binding site of the α1ß3γ2L γ-aminobutyric acid type A (GABAA) receptor, diazepam also binds to etomidate binding sites located in the transmembrane receptor domain. Because such binding is characterized by low modulatory efficacy, the authors hypothesized that diazepam would act in vitro and in vivo as a competitive etomidate antagonist. METHODS: The concentration-dependent actions of diazepam on 20 µM etomidate-activated and 6 µM GABA-activated currents were defined (in the absence and presence of flumazenil) in oocyte-expressed α1ß3γ2L GABAA receptors using voltage clamp electrophysiology. The ability of diazepam to inhibit receptor labeling of purified α1ß3γ2L GABAA receptors by [H]azietomidate was assessed in photoaffinity labeling protection studies. The impact of diazepam (in the absence and presence of flumazenil) on the anesthetic potencies of etomidate and ketamine was compared in a zebrafish model. RESULTS: At nanomolar concentrations, diazepam comparably potentiated etomidate-activated and GABA-activated GABAA receptor peak current amplitudes in a flumazenil-reversible manner. The half-maximal potentiating concentrations were 39 nM (95% CI, 27 to 55 nM) and 26 nM (95% CI, 16 to 41 nM), respectively. However, at micromolar concentrations, diazepam reduced etomidate-activated, but not GABA-activated, GABAA receptor peak current amplitudes in a concentration-dependent manner with a half-maximal inhibitory concentration of 9.6 µM (95% CI, 7.6 to 12 µM). Diazepam (12.5 to 50 µM) also right-shifted the etomidate-concentration response curve for direct activation without reducing the maximal response and inhibited receptor photoaffinity labeling by [H]azietomidate. When administered with flumazenil, 50 µM diazepam shifted the etomidate (but not the ketamine) concentration-response curve for anesthesia rightward, increasing the etomidate EC50 by 18-fold. CONCLUSIONS: At micromolar concentrations and in the presence of flumazenil to inhibit allosteric modulation via the classical benzodiazepine binding site of the GABAA receptor, diazepam acts as an in vitro and in vivo competitive etomidate antagonist.

Toxicologic and Inhibitory Receptor Actions of the Etomidate Analog ABP-700 and Its Metabolite CPM-Acid.

BACKGROUND: The etomidate analog ABP-700 produces involuntary muscle movements that could be manifestations of seizures. To define the relationship (if any) between involuntary muscle movements and seizures, electroencephalographic studies were performed in Beagle dogs receiving supra-therapeutic (~10× clinical) ABP-700 doses. γ-aminobutyric acid type A (GABAA) and glycine receptor studies were undertaken to test receptor inhibition as the potential mechanism for ABP-700 seizures. METHODS: ABP-700 was administered to 14 dogs (6 mg/kg bolus followed by a 2-h infusion at 1 mg · kg(-1) · min(-1), 1.5 mg · kg(-1) · min(-1), or 2.3 mg · kg(-1) · min(-1)). Involuntary muscle movements were documented, electroencephalograph was recorded, and plasma ABP-700 and CPM-acid concentrations were measured during and after ABP-700 administration. The concentration-dependent modulatory actions of ABP-700 and CPM-acid were defined in oocyte-expressed α1ß3γ2L GABAA and α1ß glycine receptors (n = 5 oocytes/concentration) using electrophysiologic techniques. RESULTS: ABP-700 produced both involuntary muscle movements (14 of 14 dogs) and seizures (5 of 14 dogs). However, these phenomena were temporally and electroencephalographically distinct. Mean peak plasma concentrations were (from lowest to highest dosed groups) 35 µM, 45 µM, and 102 µM (ABP-700) and 282 µM, 478 µM, and 1,110 µM (CPM-acid). ABP-700 and CPM-acid concentration-GABAA receptor response curves defined using 6 µM γ-aminobutyric acid exhibited potentiation at low and/or intermediate concentrations and inhibition at high ones. The half-maximal inhibitory concentrations of ABP-700 and CPM-acid defined using 1 mM γ-aminobutyric acid were 770 µM (95% CI, 590 to 1,010 µM) and 1,450 µM (95% CI, 1,340 to 1,560 µM), respectively. CPM-acid similarly inhibited glycine receptors activated by 1 mM glycine with a half-maximal inhibitory concentration of 1,290 µM (95% CI, 1,240 to 1,330 µM). CONCLUSIONS: High dose ABP-700 infusions produce involuntary muscle movements and seizures in Beagle dogs via distinct mechanisms. CPM-acid inhibits both GABAA and glycine receptors at the high (~100× clinical) plasma concentrations achieved during the dog studies, providing a plausible mechanism for the seizures.

Dimethoxy-etomidate: A Nonhypnotic Etomidate Analog that Potently Inhibits Steroidogenesis.

Cushing's syndrome is characterized by the overproduction of adrenocortical steroids. Steroidogenesis inhibitors are mainstays of medical therapy for Cushing's syndrome; unfortunately, adverse side effects and treatment failures are common with currently available drugs. The general anesthetic induction agent etomidate is among the most potent inhibitors of adrenocortical steroidogenesis. However, its use as a treatment of Cushing's syndrome is complicated by its sedative-hypnotic activity and ability to produce myoclonus, central nervous system actions thought to be mediated by the GABAA receptor. Here, we describe the pharmacology of the novel etomidate analog (R)-ethyl 1-(1-(3,5-dimethoxyphenyl)ethyl)-1H-imidazole-5-carboxylate (dimethoxy-etomidate). In contrast to etomidate, dimethoxy-etomidate minimally enhanced GABA-evoked GABAA receptor-mediated currents even at a near-saturating aqueous concentration. In Sprague-Dawley rats, dimethoxy-etomidate's potency for producing loss of righting reflexes-an animal model of sedation/hypnosis-was 2 orders of magnitude lower than that of etomidate, and it did not produce myoclonus. However, similar to etomidate, dimethoxy-etomidate potently suppressed adrenocortical steroid synthesis primarily by inhibiting 11ß-hydroxylase. [3H]etomidate binding to rat adrenocortical membranes was inhibited by dimethoxy-etomidate in a biphasic manner with IC50 values of 8.2 and 3970 nM, whereas that by etomidate was monophasic with an IC50 of 22 nM. Our results demonstrate that, similar to etomidate, dimethoxy-etomidate potently and dose-dependently suppresses adrenocortical steroid synthesis by inhibiting 11ß-hydroxylase. However, it is essentially devoid of etomidate's GABAA receptor positive modulatory and sedative-hypnotic activities and produces no myoclonus, providing proof of concept for the design of etomidate analogs without important central nervous system actions for the pharmacologic treatment of Cushing's syndrome.

Etomidate and Etomidate Analog Binding and Positive Modulation of γ-Aminobutyric Acid Type A Receptors: Evidence for a State-dependent Cutoff Effect.

WHAT WE ALREADY KNOW ABOUT THIS TOPIC: WHAT THIS ARTICLE TELLS US THAT IS NEW: BACKGROUND:: Naphthalene-etomidate, an etomidate analog containing a bulky phenyl ring substituent group, possesses very low γ-aminobutyric acid type A (GABAA) receptor efficacy and acts as an anesthetic-selective competitive antagonist. Using etomidate analogs containing phenyl ring substituents groups that range in volume, we tested the hypothesis that this unusual pharmacology is caused by steric hindrance that reduces binding to the receptor's open state. METHODS: The positive modulatory potencies and efficacies of etomidate and phenyl ring-substituted etomidate analogs were electrophysiology defined in oocyte-expressed α1ß3γ2L GABAA receptors. Their binding affinities to the GABAA receptor's two classes of transmembrane anesthetic binding sites were assessed from their abilities to inhibit receptor labeling by the site-selective photolabels [H]azi-etomidate and tritiated R-5-allyl-1-methyl-5-(m-trifluoromethyl-diazirynylphenyl) barbituric acid. RESULTS: The positive modulatory activities of etomidate and phenyl ring-substituted etomidate analogs progressively decreased with substituent group volume, reflecting significant decreases in both potency (P = 0.005) and efficacy (P < 0.0001). Affinity for the GABAA receptor's two ß - α anesthetic binding sites similarly decreased with substituent group volume (P = 0.003), whereas affinity for the receptor's α - ß/γ - ß sites did not (P = 0.804). Introduction of the N265M mutation, which is located at the ß - α binding sites and renders GABAA receptors etomidate-insensitive, completely abolished positive modulation by naphthalene-etomidate. CONCLUSIONS: Steric hindrance selectively reduces phenyl ring-substituted etomidate analog binding affinity to the two ß - α anesthetic binding sites on the GABAA receptor's open state, suggesting that the binding pocket where etomidate's phenyl ring lies becomes smaller as the receptor isomerizes from closed to open.

Sources of Variation in Anesthetic Drug Costs.

BACKGROUND: Increasing attention has been focused on health care expenditures, which include anesthetic-related drug costs. Using data from 2 large academic medical centers, we sought to identify significant contributors to anesthetic drug cost variation. METHODS: Using anesthesia information management systems, we calculated volatile and intravenous drug costs for 8 types of inpatient surgical procedures performed from July 1, 2009, to December 31, 2011. For each case, we determined patient age, American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) physical status, gender, institution, case duration, in-room provider, and attending anesthesiologist. These variables were then entered into 2 fixed-effects linear regression models, both with logarithmically transformed case cost as the outcome variable. The first model included duration, attending anesthesiologist, patient age, ASA physical status, and patient gender as independent variables. The second model included case type, institution, patient age, ASA physical status, and patient gender as independent variables. When all variables were entered into 1 model, redundancy analyses showed that case type was highly correlated (R = 0.92) with the other variables in the model. More specifically, a model that included case type was no better at predicting cost than a model without the variable, as long as that model contained the combination of attending anesthesiologist and case duration. Therefore, because we were interested in determining the effect both variables had on cost, 2 models were created instead of 1. The average change in cost resulting from each variable compared to the average cost of the reference category was calculated by first exponentiating the ß coefficient and subtracting 1 to get the percent difference in cost. We then multiplied that value by the mean cost of the associated reference group. RESULTS: A total of 5504 records were identified, of which 4856 were analyzed. The median anesthetic drug cost was $38.45 (25th percentile = $23.23, 75th percentile = $63.82). The majority of the variation was not described by our models-35.2% was explained in the model containing case duration, and 32.3% was explained in the model containing case type. However, the largest sources of variation our models identified were attending anesthesiologist, case type, and procedure duration. With all else held constant, the average change in cost between attending anesthesiologists ranged from a cost decrease of $41.25 to a cost increase of $95.67 (10th percentile = -$19.96, 90th percentile = +$20.20) when compared to the provider with the median value for mean cost per case. The average change in cost between institutions was significant but minor ($5.73). CONCLUSIONS: The majority of the variation was not described by the models, possibly indicating high per-case random variation. The largest sources of variation identified by our models included attending anesthesiologist, procedure type, and case duration. The difference in cost between institutions was statistically significant but was minor. While many prior studies have found significant savings resulting from cost-reducing interventions, our findings suggest that because the overall cost of anesthetic drugs was small, the savings resulting from interventions focused on the clinical practice of attending anesthesiologists may be negligible, especially in institutions where access to more expensive drugs is already limited. Thus, cost-saving efforts may be better focused elsewhere.

Competitive Antagonism of Anesthetic Action at the γ-Aminobutyric Acid Type A Receptor by a Novel Etomidate Analog with Low Intrinsic Efficacy.

BACKGROUND: The authors characterized the γ-aminobutyric acid type A receptor pharmacology of the novel etomidate analog naphthalene-etomidate, a potential lead compound for the development of anesthetic-selective competitive antagonists. METHODS: The positive modulatory potencies and efficacies of etomidate and naphthalene-etomidate were defined in oocyte-expressed α1ß3γ2L γ-aminobutyric acid type A receptors using voltage clamp electrophysiology. Using the same technique, the ability of naphthalene-etomidate to reduce currents evoked by γ-aminobutyric acid alone or γ-aminobutyric acid potentiated by etomidate, propofol, pentobarbital, and diazepam was quantified. The binding affinity of naphthalene-etomidate to the transmembrane anesthetic binding sites of the γ-aminobutyric acid type A receptor was determined from its ability to inhibit receptor photoaffinity labeling by the site-selective photolabels [H]azi-etomidate and R-[H]5-allyl-1-methyl-5-(m-trifluoromethyl-diazirynylphenyl) barbituric acid. RESULTS: In contrast to etomidate, naphthalene-etomidate only weakly potentiated γ-aminobutyric acid-evoked currents and induced little direct activation even at a near-saturating aqueous concentration. It inhibited labeling of γ-aminobutyric acid type A receptors by [H]azi-etomidate and R-[H]5-allyl-1-methyl-5-(m-trifluoromethyl-diazirynylphenyl) barbituric acid with similar half-maximal inhibitory concentrations of 48 µM (95% CI, 28 to 81 µM) and 33 µM (95% CI, 20 to 54 µM). It also reduced the positive modulatory actions of anesthetics (propofol > etomidate ~ pentobarbital) but not those of γ-aminobutyric acid or diazepam. At 300 µM, naphthalene-etomidate increased the half-maximal potentiating propofol concentration from 6.0 µM (95% CI, 4.4 to 8.0 µM) to 36 µM (95% CI, 17 to 78 µM) without affecting the maximal response obtained at high propofol concentrations. CONCLUSIONS: Naphthalene-etomidate is a very low-efficacy etomidate analog that exhibits the pharmacology of an anesthetic competitive antagonist at the γ-aminobutyric acid type A receptor.

Sedative-hypnotic Binding to 11ß-hydroxylase.

BACKGROUND: Etomidate potently suppresses adrenocortical steroid synthesis with potentially deleterious consequences by binding to 11ß-hydroxylase and inhibiting its function. The authors hypothesized that other sedative-hypnotics currently in clinical use or under development (or their metabolites) might bind to the same site at clinically relevant concentrations. The authors tested this hypothesis by defining etomidate's affinity for this site and the potencies with which other sedative-hypnotics (and their metabolites) inhibit etomidate binding. METHODS: H-etomidate's binding to adrenal membranes from Sprague-Dawley rats was characterized with a filtration assay, and its dissociation constant was defined using saturation and homologous ligand competition approaches. Half-inhibitory concentrations of sedative-hypnotics and metabolites were determined from the reduction in specific H-etomidate binding measured in the presence of ranging sedative-hypnotic and metabolite concentrations. RESULTS: Saturation and homologous competition studies yielded H-etomidate dissociation constants of 40 and 21 nM, respectively. Half-inhibitory concentrations of etomidate and cyclopropyl methoxycarbonyl metomidate (CPMM) differed significantly (26 vs. 143 nM, respectively; P < 0.001), and those of the carboxylic acid (CA) metabolites etomidate-CA and CPMM-CA were greater than or equal to 1,000× higher than their respective parent hypnotics. The half-inhibitory concentration of dexmedetomidine was 2.2 µM, whereas those of carboetomidate, ketamine, and propofol were greater than or equal to 50 µM. CONCLUSION: Etomidate's in vitro dissociation constant for 11ß-hydroxylase closely approximates its in vivo adrenocortical half-inhibitory concentration. CPMM produces less adrenocortical suppression than etomidate not only because it is metabolized faster but also because it binds to 11ß-hydroxylase with lower affinity. Other sedative-hypnotics and metabolites bind to 11ß-hydroxylase and inhibit etomidate binding only at suprahypnotic concentrations.

γ-Aminobutyric Acid Type A Receptor Modulation by Etomidate Analogs.

BACKGROUND: Etomidate is a highly potent anesthetic agent that is believed to produce hypnosis by enhancing γ-aminobutyric acid type A (GABAA) receptor function. The authors characterized the GABAA receptor and hypnotic potencies of etomidate analogs. The authors then used computational techniques to build statistical and graphical models that relate the potencies of these etomidate analogs to their structures to identify the specific molecular determinants of potency. METHODS: GABAA receptor potencies were defined with voltage clamp electrophysiology using α1ß3γ2 receptors harboring a channel mutation (α1[L264T]) that enhances anesthetic sensitivity (n = 36 to 60 measurements per concentration-response curve). The hypnotic potencies of etomidate analogs were defined using a loss of righting reflexes assay in Sprague Dawley rats (n = 9 to 21 measurements per dose-response curve). Three-dimensional quantitative structure-activity relationships were determined in silico using comparative molecular field analysis. RESULTS: The GABAA receptor and hypnotic potencies of etomidate and the etomidate analogs ranged by 91- and 53-fold, respectively. These potency measurements were significantly correlated (r = 0.72), but neither measurement correlated with drug hydrophobicity (r = 0.019 and 0.005, respectively). Statistically significant and predictive comparative molecular field analysis models were generated, and a pharmacophore model was built that revealed both the structural elements in etomidate analogs associated with high potency and the interactions that these elements make with the etomidate-binding site. CONCLUSIONS: There are multiple specific structural elements in etomidate and etomidate analogs that mediate GABAA receptor modulation. Modifying any one element can alter receptor potency by an order of magnitude or more.

Distinct Hypnotic Recoveries After Infusions of Methoxycarbonyl Etomidate and Cyclopropyl Methoxycarbonyl Metomidate: The Role of the Metabolite.

BACKGROUND: Methoxycarbonyl etomidate (MOC-etomidate) and cyclopropyl methoxycarbonyl metomidate (CPMM) are rapidly metabolized "soft" etomidate analogs. CPMM's duration of hypnotic effect is context insensitive, whereas MOC-etomidate's is not. In this study, we tested the hypothesis that CPMM's effect is context insensitive because, unlike MOC-etomidate, its metabolite fails to reach physiologically important concentrations in vivo even with prolonged continuous infusion. METHODS: We compared the potencies with which MOC-etomidate and CPMM activate α1(L264T)ß3γ2 γ-aminobutyric acid type A receptors and induce loss-of-righting reflexes (i.e., produce hypnosis) in tadpoles with those of their metabolites (MOC-etomidate's carboxylic acid metabolite [MOC-ECA] and CPMM's carboxylic acid metabolite [CPMM-CA], respectively). We measured metabolite concentrations in the blood and cerebrospinal fluid of Sprague-Dawley rats on CPMM infusion and compared them with those achieved with MOC-etomidate infusion. We measured the rates with which brain tissue from Sprague-Dawley rats metabolize MOC-etomidate and CPMM. RESULTS: Both analogs and their metabolites enhanced γ-aminobutyric acid type A receptor function and induced loss-of-righting reflexes in a concentration-dependent manner. However, in these 2 assays, CPMM-CA's potency relative to its parent hypnotic was approximately 1:4900 and 1:1900, respectively, whereas MOC-ECA's was only approximately 1:415 and 1:390, respectively. With 2-hour CPMM infusions, CPMM-CA reached respective concentrations in the blood and cerebrospinal fluid that were 2 and >3 orders of magnitude lower than that which produced hypnosis. CPMM was metabolized by the brain tissue at a rate that is approximately 1/15th that of MOC-etomidate. CONCLUSIONS: Hypnotic recovery after CPMM administration is context insensitive because its metabolite does not accumulate to hypnotic levels in the central nervous system. This reflects the very large potency ratio between CPMM and CPMM-CA and the resistance of CPMM to metabolism by esterases present in the brain.

Contrasting actions of a convulsant barbiturate and its anticonvulsant enantiomer on the α1 ß3 γ2L GABAA receptor account for their in vivo effects.

KEY POINTS: Most barbiturates are anaesthetics but unexpectedly a few are convulsants whose mechanism of action is poorly understood. We synthesized and characterized a novel pair of chiral barbiturates that are capable of photolabelling their binding sites on GABAA receptors. In mice the S-enantiomer is a convulsant, but the R-enantiomer is an anticonvulsant. The convulsant S-enantiomer binds solely at an inhibitory site. It is both an open state inhibitor and a resting state inhibitor. Its action is pH independent, suggesting the pyrimidine ring plays little part in binding. The inhibitory site is not enantioselective because the R-enantiomer inhibits with equal affinity. In contrast, only the anticonvulsant R-enantiomer binds to the enhancing site on open channels, causing them to stay open longer. The enhancing site is enantioselective. The in vivo actions of the convulsant S-enantiomer are accounted for by its interactions with GABAA receptors. ABSTRACT: Most barbiturates are anaesthetics but a few unexpectedly are convulsants. We recently located the anaesthetic sites on GABAA receptors (GABAA Rs) by photolabelling with an anaesthetic barbiturate. To apply the same strategy to locate the convulsant sites requires the creation and mechanistic characterization of a suitable agent. We synthesized enantiomers of a novel, photoactivable barbiturate, 1-methyl-5-propyly-5-(m-trifluoromethyldiazirinyl) phenyl barbituric acid (mTFD-MPPB). In mice, S-mTFD-MPPB acted as a convulsant, whereas R-mTFD-MPPB acted as an anticonvulsant. Using patch clamp electrophysiology and fast solution exchange on recombinant human α1 ß3 γ2L GABAA Rs expressed in HEK cells, we found that S-mTFD-MPPB inhibited GABA-induced currents, whereas R-mTFD-MPPB enhanced them. S-mTFD-MPPB caused inhibition by binding to either of two inhibitory sites on open channels with bimolecular kinetics. It also inhibited closed, resting state receptors at similar concentrations, decreasing the channel opening rate and shifting the GABA concentration-response curve to the right. R-mTFD-MPPB, like most anaesthetics, enhanced receptor gating by rapidly binding to allosteric sites on open channels, initiating a rate-limiting conformation change to stabilized open channel states. These states had slower closing rates, thus shifting the GABA concentration-response curve to the left. Under conditions when most GABAA Rs were open, an inhibitory action of R-mTFD-MPPB was revealed that had a similar IC50 to that of S-mTFD-MPPB. Thus, the inhibitory sites are not enantioselective, and the convulsant action of S-mTFD-MPPB results from its negligible affinity for the enhancing, anaesthetic sites. Interactions with these two classes of barbiturate binding sites on GABAA Rs underlie the enantiomers' different pharmacological activities in mice.

Cyclopropyl-methoxycarbonyl Metomidate: Studies in a Lipopolysaccharide Inflammatory Model of Sepsis.

BACKGROUND: Cyclopropyl-methoxycarbonyl metomidate (CPMM) is a rapidly metabolized etomidate analog that is currently in clinical trials. The goal of this study is to assess CPMM's potential value as an anesthetic agent for use in patients with sepsis by defining its actions in an acute inflammatory model of sepsis. METHODS: Escherichia coli lipopolysaccharide (1 mg/kg) was injected intravenously into Sprague-Dawley rats. Thirty minutes later, CPMM, etomidate, or vehicle (n = 8 per group) was infused for 1 h. Plasma adrenocorticotropic hormone, corticosterone, and cytokine (interleukin-1ß, interleukin-6, interleukin-10, and tumor necrosis factor-α) concentrations were measured before, during, and after infusion. RESULTS: After lipopolysaccharide injection, adrenocorticotropic hormone concentrations changed similarly over time in all three groups. Compared with vehicle group rats, CPMM group rats had significantly lower corticosterone concentrations at only a single study time point during infusion and no significant differences in cytokine concentrations at any time during the study period. Compared with etomidate group rats, CPMM group rats had significantly higher corticosterone concentrations (up to nine-fold) during and after hypnotic infusion. Cytokine concentrations in CPMM group rats and vehicle group rats were not significantly different, but they were significantly lower than those in etomidate group rats. Postinfusion mortality was 40% in etomidate group rats and 0% in CPMM and vehicle group rats. CONCLUSION: Compared with etomidate, CPMM produces less adrenocortical suppression, lower plasma cytokine concentrations, and improved survival in a lipopolysaccharide inflammatory model of sepsis. These results suggest that CPMM may be a safer alternative to etomidate in patients with sepsis.

Advancing novel anesthetics: pharmacodynamic and pharmacokinetic studies of cyclopropyl-methoxycarbonyl metomidate in dogs.

BACKGROUND: Cyclopropyl-methoxycarbonyl metomidate (CPMM, also known as ABP-700) is a second-generation "soft" (i.e., metabolically labile) etomidate analogue. The purpose of this study was to characterize CPMM's pharmacology in beagle dogs in preparation for potential first in human phase 1 clinical trials. METHODS: CPMM's and etomidate's hypnotic activity and duration of action were assessed using loss of righting reflex and anesthesia score assays in three or four dogs. Their pharmacokinetics were defined after single bolus administration and single bolus followed by 2-h infusion. Adrenocortical recovery times after single bolus followed by 2-h infusion of CPMM, propofol, etomidate, and vehicle were measured using an adrenocorticotropic hormone stimulation test. RESULTS: Compared with etomidate, CPMM was half as potent as a hypnotic (ED50 approximately 0.8 mg/kg), was more rapidly metabolized, and had a shorter duration of sedative-hypnotic action. Recovery times after CPMM administration were also independent of infusion duration. After hypnotic infusion, adrenocorticotropic hormone-stimulated plasma cortisol concentrations were 4- to 27-fold higher in dogs that received CPMM versus etomidate. Adrenocortical recovery was faster in dogs after CPMM infusion versus etomidate infusion (half-time: 215 vs. 1,623 min, respectively). Adrenocortical responsiveness assessed 90 min after CPMM infusion was not significantly different from that after propofol infusion. CONCLUSION: The studies in dogs confirm that CPMM has hypnotic and adrenocortical recovery profiles that are superior than those of etomidate, supporting the continued development of CPMM as a clinical sedative-hypnotic to be used as a single bolus and by continuous infusion to induce and maintain general anesthesia or procedural sedation.

Analogues of etomidate: modifications around etomidate's chiral carbon and the impact on in vitro and in vivo pharmacology.

BACKGROUND: R-etomidate possesses unique desirable properties but potently suppresses adrenocortical function. Consequently, efforts are being made to define structure-activity relationships with the goal of designing analogues with reduced adrenocortical toxicity. The authors explored the pharmacological impact of modifying etomidate's chiral center using R-etomidate, S-etomidate, and two achiral etomidate analogues (cyclopropyl etomidate and dihydrogen etomidate). METHODS: The γ-aminobutyric acid type A receptor modulatory potencies of drugs were assessed in oocyte-expressed α1(L264T)ß3γ2L and α1(L264T)ß1γ2L γ-aminobutyric acid type A receptors (for each drug, n = 6 oocytes per subtype). In rats, hypnotic potencies and durations of action were measured using a righting reflex assay (n = 26 to 30 doses per drug), and adrenocortical potencies were quantified by using an adrenocorticotropic hormone stimulation test (n = 20 experiments per drug). RESULTS: All four drugs activated both γ-aminobutyric acid type A receptor subtypes in vitro and produced hypnosis and suppressed adrenocortical function in rats. However, drug potencies in each model ranged by 1 to 2 orders of magnitude. R-etomidate had the highest γ-aminobutyric acid type A receptor modulatory, hypnotic, and adrenocortical inhibitory potencies. Respectively, R-etomidate, S-etomidate, and cyclopropyl etomidate were 27.4-, 18.9-, and 23.5-fold more potent activators of receptors containing ß3 subunits than ß1 subunits; however, dihydrogen etomidate's subunit selectivity was only 2.48-fold and similar to that of propofol (2.08-fold). S-etomidate was 1/23rd as potent an adrenocortical inhibitor as R-etomidate. CONCLUSION: The linkage between the structure of etomidate's chiral center and its pharmacology suggests that altering etomidate's chiral center may be used as part of a strategy to design analogues with more desirable adrenocortical activities and/or subunit selectivities.

The pharmacology of cyclopropyl-methoxycarbonyl metomidate: a comparison with propofol.

BACKGROUND: Cyclopropyl-methoxycarbonyl metomidate (CPMM) is a "soft" etomidate analogue currently being developed as a propofol alternative for anesthetic induction and maintenance. METHODS: We compared the potencies of CPMM and propofol by assessing their abilities to directly activate α1(L264T)ß3γ2 gamma-aminobutyric acid type A (GABAA) receptors and induce loss of righting reflexes in tadpoles. We also measured the rates of encephalographic recovery in rats after CPMM and propofol infusions ranging in duration from 5 to 120 minutes. RESULTS: CPMM and propofol activate GABAA receptors and induce loss of righting reflexes in tadpoles with respective 50% effective concentrations (EC50s) of 3.8 ± 0.4 and 3.9 ± 0.2 µM (GABAA receptor) and 2.6 ± 0.19 and 1.3 ± 0.04 µM (tadpole). Encephalographic recovery after prolonged infusion was faster with CPMM and lacked propofol's context sensitivity. CONCLUSION: CPMM and propofol have similar potencies in GABAA receptors and tadpoles; however, CPMM provides more rapid and predictable recovery than propofol, particularly after prolonged infusion.

Adrenocortical suppression and recovery after continuous hypnotic infusion: etomidate versus its soft analogue cyclopropyl-methoxycarbonyl metomidate.

INTRODUCTION: Etomidate is no longer administered as a continuous infusion for anesthetic maintenance or sedation, because it results in profound and persistent suppression of adrenocortical steroid synthesis with potentially lethal consequences in critically ill patients. We hypothesized that rapidly metabolized soft analogues of etomidate could be developed that do not produce persistent adrenocortical dysfunction even after prolonged continuous infusion. We hope that such agents might also provide more rapid and predictable anesthetic emergence. We have developed the soft etomidate analogue cyclopropyl-methoxycarbonyl etomidate (CPMM). Upon termination of 120-minute continuous infusions, hypnotic and encephalographic recoveries occur in four minutes. The aims of this study were to assess adrenocortical function during and following 120-minute continuous infusion of CPMM and to compare the results with those obtained using etomidate. METHODS: Dexamethasone-suppressed rats were randomized into an etomidate group, CPMM group, or control group. Rats in the etomidate and CPMM groups received 120-minute continuous infusions of etomidate and CPMM, respectively. Rats in the control group received neither hypnotic. In the first study, adrenocortical function during hypnotic infusion was assessed by administering adrenocorticotropic hormone (ACTH) 90 minutes after the start of the hypnotic infusion and measuring plasma corticosterone concentrations at the end of the infusion 30 minutes later. In the second study, adrenocortical recovery following hypnotic infusion was assessed by administering ACTH every 30 minutes after infusion termination and measuring plasma corticosterone concentrations 30 minutes after each ACTH dose. RESULTS: During hypnotic infusion, ACTH-stimulated serum corticosterone concentrations were significantly lower in the CPMM and etomidate groups than in the control group (100 ± 64 ng/ml and 33 ± 32 ng/ml versus 615 ± 265 ng/ml, respectively). After hypnotic infusion, ACTH-stimulated serum corticosterone concentrations recovered to control values within 30 minutes in the CPMM group but remained suppressed relative to those in the control group for more than 3 hours in the etomidate group. CONCLUSIONS: Both CPMM and etomidate suppress adrenocortical function during continuous infusion. However, recovery occurs significantly more rapidly following infusion of CPMM.

The pyrrole etomidate analog carboetomidate potently inhibits human 5-HT3A receptor function: comparisons with etomidate and potential implications for emetogenesis.

BACKGROUND: 5-Hydroxytryptamine type 3 (5-HT(3)) receptors are excitatory ion channels belonging to the cys-loop family of ligand-gated ion channels. They are involved in nausea and vomiting and their antagonists are used clinically as antiemetic drugs. We previously reported the development of a novel pyrrole analog of etomidate, (R)-ethyl 1-(1-phenylethyl)-1H-pyrrole-2-carboxylate (carboetomidate), which retains etomidate's desirable anesthetic and hemodynamic properties, but lacks its potent inhibitory effect on adrenocorticotropic hormone-stimulated steroid synthesis. Also in contrast to etomidate, carboetomidate potently inhibits nicotinic acetylcholine receptors. Because nicotinic acetylcholine and 5-HT(3) receptors are highly homologous, we hypothesized that carboetomidate might also potently inhibit 5-HT(3) receptors with potentially important implications for the drug's emetogenic activity. In the current studies, we investigated and compared modulation of 5-HT(3A) receptors by carboetomidate and etomidate. METHODS: 5-HT(3) receptors were heterologously expressed in human embryonic kidney cells. Drugs were applied with a multichannel superfusion pipette coupled to piezoelectric elements, and currents were recorded from cells in either the whole-cell or excised outside-out patch configuration of patch-clamp recordings. RESULTS: Carboetomidate and etomidate inhibited integrated 5-HT(3A) receptor-mediated currents with respective half-inhibitory concentrations of 1.9 µM (95% confidence interval [CI] = 1.4-2.7 µM) and 25 µM (95% CI = 17-37 µM). These values may be compared with respective hypnotic concentrations of 5.4 and 2.3 µM. This inhibition reflected hypnotic effects on peak current amplitudes and desensitization rates. Half-inhibitory concentrations for reducing peak current amplitudes were 34 µM (95% CI = 24-48 µM) for carboetomidate and 171 µM (95% CI = 128-228 µM) for etomidate. Half-inhibitory concentrations for reducing the desensitization time constant were 3.5 µM (95% CI = 2.4-5.1 µM) for carboetomidate and 36 µM (95% CI = 21-59 µM) for etomidate. CONCLUSIONS: In contrast to etomidate, carboetomidate inhibits 5-HT(3A) receptor-mediated currents at hypnotic concentrations. This inhibition is primarily the result of enhancing the rate of desensitization. Because carboetomidate potently inhibits 5-HT(3A) receptors, it may be less emetogenic than etomidate.

Carboetomidate: an analog of etomidate that interacts weakly with 11ß-hydroxylase.

BACKGROUND: Carboetomidate is a pyrrole etomidate analog that is 3 orders of magnitude less potent an inhibitor of in vitro cortisol synthesis than etomidate (an imidazole) and does not inhibit in vivo steroid production. Although carboetomidate's reduced functional effect on steroid synthesis is thought to reflect lower binding affinity to 11ß-hydroxylase, differential binding to this enzyme has never been experimentally demonstrated. In the current study, we tested the hypothesis that carboetomidate and etomidate bind with differential affinity to 11ß-hydroxylase by comparing their abilities to inhibit photoaffinity labeling of purified enzyme by a photoactivatable etomidate analog and to modify the enzyme's absorption spectrum in a way that is indicative of ligand binding. In addition, we made a preliminary exploration of the manner in which etomidate and carboetomidate might differentially interact with this site using spectroscopic methods as well as molecular modeling techniques to better understand the structural basis for their selectivity. METHODS: The ability of azi-etomidate to inhibit cortisol synthesis was tested by assessing its ability to inhibit cortisol synthesis by H295R cells. The binding affinities of etomidate and carboetomidate to 11ß-hydroxylase were compared by assessing their abilities to (1) inhibit photoincorporation of the photolabile etomidate analog [(3)H]azi-etomidate into the enzyme and (2) modify the absorption spectrum of the enzyme's heme group. In silico docking studies of etomidate, carboetomidate, and azi-etomidate binding to 11ß-hydroxylase were performed using the computer software GOLD. RESULTS: Similar to etomidate, azi-etomidate potently inhibits in vitro cortisol synthesis. Etomidate inhibited [(3)H]azi-etomidate photolabeling of 11ß-hydroxylase in a concentration-dependent manner. At a concentration of 40 µM, etomidate reduced photoincorporation of [(3)H]azi-etomidate by 96% ± 1% whereas carboetomidate had no experimentally detectable effect. On addition of etomidate to 11ß-hydroxylase, a type 2 difference spectrum was produced indicative of etomidate complexation with the enzyme's heme iron; carboetomidate had no effect whereas azi-etomidate produced a reverse type 1 spectrum. Computer modeling studies predicted that etomidate, carboetomidate, and azi-etomidate can fit into the heme-containing pocket that forms 11ß-hydroxylase's active site and pose with their carbonyl oxygens interacting with the heme iron and their phenyl rings stacking with phenylalanine-80. However, additional unique poses were identified for etomidate and azi-etomidate that likely account for their higher affinities. CONCLUSIONS: Carboetomidate's reduced ability to suppress in vitro and in vivo steroid synthesis as compared with etomidate reflects its lower binding affinity to 11ß-hydroxylase and may be attributed to carboetomidate's inability to form a coordination bond with the heme iron located at the enzyme's active site.

Differential effects of etomidate and its pyrrole analogue carboetomidate on the adrenocortical and cytokine responses to endotoxemia.

OBJECTIVE: We developed a novel pyrrole analog of etomidate, (R)-ethyl 1-(1-phenylethyl)-1H-pyrrole-2-carboxylate (carboetomidate), which retains etomidate's desirable anesthetic and hemodynamic properties but lacks its potent inhibitory affect on adrenocorticotropic hormone-stimulated steroid synthesis. The objective of this study was to test the hypothesis that in contrast to etomidate, carboetomidate neither suppresses the adrenocortical response to endotoxemia nor enhances the accompanying production of proinflammatory cytokines. DESIGN: Animal study. SETTING: University research laboratory. SUBJECTS: Male Sprague-Dawley rats. INTERVENTIONS: For both single and multiple anesthetic dose studies, rats were injected with Escherichia coli lipopolysaccharide immediately followed by a hypnotic dose of etomidate, carboetomidate, or vehicle alone (dimethyl sulfoxide) as a control. For single-dose studies, no additional anesthetic (or vehicle) was administered. For multiple anesthetic dose studies, additional doses of anesthetic (or vehicle) were administered every 15 mins for a total of eight anesthetic (or vehicle) doses. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: Plasma adrenocorticotropic hormone, corticosterone, and cytokine concentrations were measured before lipopolysaccharide administration and intermittently throughout the 5-hr experiment. In single anesthetic dose studies, plasma adrenocorticotropic hormone and cytokine concentrations were not different at any time point among the etomidate, carboetomidate, and vehicle groups, whereas plasma corticosterone concentrations were briefly (60-120 mins) reduced in the etomidate group. In multiple anesthetic dose studies, plasma corticosterone concentrations were persistently lower and peak plasma interleukin-1ß and interleukin-6 concentrations were higher in the etomidate group vs. the carboetomidate and control groups. Peak plasma interleukin-10 concentrations were similarly elevated in the etomidate and carboetomidate groups vs. the control group. CONCLUSIONS: Compared with etomidate, carboetomidate produces less suppression of adrenocortical function and smaller increases in proinflammatory cytokine production in an endotoxemia model of sepsis. These findings suggest that carboetomidate could be a useful alternative to etomidate for maintaining anesthesia for a prolonged period of time in patients with sepsis.