Amiodarone Use Prior to Cardiac Transplant Impacts Early Post-Transplant Survival.

PURPOSE: It remains unclear if use of amiodarone pre-cardiac transplantation impacts early post-transplant survival. METHODS: We selected all patients undergoing heart transplant from 2004 to 2006 with available information using the United Network for Organ Sharing database (n = 4057). Multivariable Cox models compared the risk of death within 30 days post-transplant in patients who were taking amiodarone at the time of transplant listing (n = 1227) to those who were not (n = 2830). RESULTS: Mean age was 52 (± 12) years, and 23% were women. Patients who died within 30 days (n = 168) were older; had higher panel reactive antibody levels, higher bilirubin levels, and higher prevalence of prior cardiac surgery; were often at status 1B; and had higher use of amiodarone at listing compared to those who survived (5.3% versus 3.6%; p = 0.02). Cause of death was unknown in 49% and was reported as graft failure in 43% of cases. In multivariable Cox models, patients on amiodarone at the time of listing had 1.56-fold higher risk of post-transplant death within 30 days (95% confidence intervals 1.08-2.27) compared to patients who were not on amiodarone at listing (C-statistic 0.70). CONCLUSION: In conclusion, patients who reported taking amiodarone at the time of listing for transplant had a higher risk of death within 30 days post-transplant.

Percutaneous Vacuum-Assisted Thrombectomy Using AngioVac Aspiration System.

BACKGROUND: Surgical embolectomy and thrombolytic therapy are two common approaches for the treatment of large intra-cardiac or intravascular thrombi to prevent new or worsening pulmonary embolism (PE). Considering high operative mortality with surgical embolectomy and high bleeding risk with thrombolytic therapy, patients who are poor candidates for these treatments may benefit from percutaneous aspiration thrombectomy/Vacuum-assisted thrombectomy (VAT). AngioVac aspiration system was granted 510(k) clearance by the United States Food and Drug Administration (FDA) in April 2009. We present a case series to describe its use and outcomes in evacuating large caval thrombi or intracardiac masses. METHODS: We did a retrospective analysis of AngioVac catheter based thrombectomy in 16 consecutive patients treated between January 2016 and January 2019 to report case characteristics and in-hospital clinical outcomes. RESULTS: Sixteen patients (mean age 48) underwent 16 AngioVac procedures over 48 months. Indications included intracardiac mass (68.8%), caval thrombus (56.3%), and catheter associated thrombus (43.8%). 7 (43.8%) patients had concurrent PE. Peri-procedure mortality was 0% and in-hospital mortality was 12.5% at a mean follow-up of 14 days. There were no pulmonary hemorrhages, strokes or myocardial infarctions. 62.5% had a significant drop in hemoglobin, which required a blood transfusion but there was no episode of overt bleeding. CONCLUSION: The AngioVac aspiration system has been shown to be effective at aspirating large volumes of intravascular and intracardiac thrombus. It is a reasonable alternative to surgical thrombectomy in patients with large central thrombi or masses in-transit who are at risk of complicated PE.