Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 2 de 2
Filtrar
Mais filtros

Base de dados
Ano de publicação
Tipo de documento
País de afiliação
Intervalo de ano de publicação
1.
Eur J Cancer ; 197: 113477, 2024 Jan.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38113780

RESUMO

PURPOSE: While several studies reported the influence of co-medications on immune checkpoint therapy and chemotherapy, it remains poorly studied with targeted therapy. Targeted therapies inhibiting BRAF and MEK had significantly improved management of advanced melanoma with BRAFV600 mutation over the last decade, we aimed to investigate the possible influence of co-mediations on the efficacy and toxicity of these targeted therapies (TT). METHODS: We conducted an observational study identifying patients with advanced melanoma treated with BRAF/MEK inhibitors between 2013 and 2020 in the Bordeaux University Hospital. Co-medications given within 1 month before until 3 months after the initiation of targeted therapy were recorded and classified by their mechanism or by their metabolism. Survival data were analyzed with univariable and multivariable cox regression and the combined effect of multiple factors was evaluated using a factor analysis of mixed data (FAMD). The impact of co-medications on toxicity related to TT was also assessed. RESULTS: A total of 192 patients were included. Although several co-medications were associated with significantly shorter overall survival (OS) and/or progression-free survival (PFS), PPIs was the only co-medication with a significant impact in multivariable analysis considering all co-medications and specific prognostic factors. Co-medications did not influence the risk, type, or timing of TT-related toxicity. Additional FAMD revealed the impact of each factor on the oncological outcomes. In a subgroup of patients, residual plasma TT concentration was available and did not differ between PPIs users and non-users. CONCLUSION: Co-medications, especially PPIs, must be carefully assessed at the time of TT initiation.


Assuntos
Melanoma , Inibidores de Proteínas Quinases , Inibidores da Bomba de Prótons , Inibidores da Bomba de Prótons/uso terapêutico , Melanoma/tratamento farmacológico , Inibidores de Proteínas Quinases/uso terapêutico , Terapia de Alvo Molecular , Humanos , Interações Medicamentosas , Estudos Retrospectivos , Intervalo Livre de Progressão , Masculino , Feminino , Adulto , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Idoso , Idoso de 80 Anos ou mais
2.
Cell Rep ; 43(2): 113773, 2024 Feb 27.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38350444

RESUMO

Hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) is an inflammation-associated cancer arising from viral or non-viral etiologies including steatotic liver diseases (SLDs). Expansion of immunosuppressive myeloid cells is a hallmark of inflammation and cancer, but their heterogeneity in HCC is not fully resolved and might underlie immunotherapy resistance. Here, we present a high-resolution atlas of innate immune cells from patients with HCC that unravels an SLD-associated contexture characterized by influx of inflammatory and immunosuppressive myeloid cells, including a discrete population of THBS1+ regulatory myeloid (Mreg) cells expressing monocyte- and neutrophil-affiliated genes. THBS1+ Mreg cells expand in SLD-associated HCC, populate fibrotic lesions, and are associated with poor prognosis. THBS1+ Mreg cells are CD163+ but distinguished from macrophages by high expression of triggering receptor expressed on myeloid cells 1 (TREM1), which contributes to their immunosuppressive activity and promotes HCC tumor growth in vivo. Our data support myeloid subset-targeted immunotherapies to treat HCC.


Assuntos
Carcinoma Hepatocelular , Neoplasias Hepáticas , Humanos , Receptor Gatilho 1 Expresso em Células Mieloides , Terapia de Imunossupressão , Células Mieloides , Imunossupressores , Inflamação
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA