Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 4 de 4
Filtrar
1.
J Gene Med ; 15(2): 93-101, 2013 Feb.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-23303531

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Almost one-third of all human genetic diseases are the result of nonsense mutations that can result in truncated proteins. Nonsense suppressor tRNAs (NSTs) were proposed as valuable tools for gene therapy of genetic diseases caused by premature termination codons (PTCs). Although various strategies have been adapted aiming to increase NST expression and efficacy, low suppression efficacies of NSTs and toxicity associated with stable expression of suppressor tRNAs have hampered the development of NST-mediated gene therapy. METHODS: We have employed the U6 promoter to enhance Gln-Amber suppressor tRNA (GlnUAG) expression and to increase PTC suppression in mammalian cells. In an attempt to study the toxic effects of NSTs, a stable 293 cell line constitutively expressing a U6 promoter-enhanced GlnUAG tRNA was established. To examine whether any proteomic changes occurred in cells that constitutively express suppressor tRNA, whole cell proteins from cells with and without any suppressor tRNA expression were analyzed. RESULTS: The data obtained suggest that U6 promoter-enhanced GlnUAG tRNAs have higher suppression efficacies than multimers of the same suppressor tRNA without a U6 promoter. Proteomic analysis of cells constitutively expressing the GlnUAG suppressor tRNA indicates that stable expression of NSTs may not lead to significant read through of normal cellular proteins. CONCLUSIONS: Because most tRNAs have cell-specific differential expression, this technique will enable the expression of different kinds of suppressor tRNAs in various cell types at high, functionally relevant levels. The techniques developed in the present study may contribute to the further development of suppressor tRNA-mediated gene therapy.


Assuntos
Genes Supressores , Regiões Promotoras Genéticas , RNA de Transferência/genética , Anticódon/química , Anticódon/genética , Western Blotting , Clonagem Molecular , Códon sem Sentido , Eletroforese em Gel Bidimensional , Expressão Gênica , Terapia Genética/métodos , Vetores Genéticos , Glutamina/química , Glutamina/genética , Células HEK293 , Humanos , Lentivirus/genética , Proteômica , RNA de Transferência/química , Reação em Cadeia da Polimerase Via Transcriptase Reversa
2.
Lancet Infect Dis ; 17(8): 854-866, 2017 08.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28606591

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: The 2014 Zaire Ebola virus outbreak highlighted the need for a safe, effective vaccine with a rapid onset of protection. We report the safety and immunogenicity of the recombinant vesicular stomatitis virus-Zaire Ebola virus envelope glycoprotein vaccine (rVSV∆G-ZEBOV-GP) across a 6 log10 dose range in two sequential cohorts. METHODS: In this phase 1b double-blind, placebo-controlled, dose-response study we enrolled and randomly assigned healthy adults (aged 18-61 years) at eight study sites in the USA to receive a single injection of vaccine or placebo, administered by intramuscular injection. In cohort 1, participants were assigned to receive 3 × 103, 3 × 104, 3 × 105, or 3 × 106 PFU doses of rVSV∆G-ZEBOV-GP or placebo. In cohort 2, participants were assigned to receive 3 × 106, 9 × 106, 2 × 107, or 1 × 108 PFU doses of rVSV∆G-ZEBOV-GP or placebo. Participants were centrally allocated by the study statistician to vaccine groups or placebo through computer-generated randomisation lists. The primary safety outcome was incidence of adverse events within 14 days in the modified intention-to-treat population (all randomly assigned participants who received vaccine or placebo), and the primary outcome for immunogenicity was IgG ELISA antibody titres at day 28 in the per-protocol population. Surveillance was enhanced for arthritis and dermatitis through to day 56. This study is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, number NCT02314923. FINDINGS: Between Dec 26, 2014, and June 8, 2015, 513 participants were enrolled and randomly assigned; one was not immunised because of unsuccessful phlebotomy. In cohort 1, 256 participants received vaccine (3 × 103 [n=64], 3 × 104 [n=64], 3 × 105 [n=64], or 3 × 106 PFU [n=64]) and 74 received placebo. In cohort 2, 162 participants received vaccine (3 × 106 [n=20], 9 × 106 [n=47], 2 × 107 [n=47], or 1 × 108 PFU [n=48]) and 20 received placebo. Most adverse events occurred in the first day after vaccination, and were mild to moderate in intensity, of a short duration, and more frequent at high vaccine doses (9 × 106 PFU and greater). At the 2 × 107 PFU dose (used in phase 3 trials), the most common local adverse events versus placebo within the first 14 days were arm pain (57·4% [27 of 47] vs 7·4% [seven of 94]) and local tenderness (59·6% [28 of 47] vs 8·5% [eight of 94]). The most common systemic adverse events at the 2 × 107 PFU dose versus placebo, occurring in the first 14 days, were headache (46·8% [22 of 47] vs 27·7% [26 of 94]), fatigue (38·3% [18 of 47] vs 19·1% [18 of 94]), myalgia (34·0% [16 of 47] vs 10·6% [10 of 94]), subjective fever (29·8% [14 of 47] vs 2·1% [two of 94]), shivering or chills (27·7% [13 of 47] vs 7·4% [seven of 94]), sweats (23·4% [11 of 47] vs 3·2% [three of 94]), joint aches and pain (19·1% [nine of 47] vs 7·4% [seven of 94]), objective fever (14·9% [seven of 47] vs 1·1% [one of 94]), and joint tenderness or swelling (14·9% [seven of 47] vs 2·1% [two of 94]). Self-limited, post-vaccination arthritis occurred in 4·5% (19 of 418) of vaccinees (median onset 12·0 days [IQR 10-14]; median duration 8·0 days [6-15]) versus 3·2% (three of 94) of controls (median onset 15·0 days [6-20]; median duration 47·0 days [37-339]), with no apparent dose relationship. Post-vaccination dermatitis occurred in 5·7% (24 of 418) of vaccinees (median onset 9·0 days [IQR 2-12]; median duration 7·0 days [4-9]) versus 3·2% (three of 94) of controls (median onset 5·0 days [3-53]; median duration 33·0 days [5-370]). A low-level, transient, dose-dependent viraemia occurred in concert with early reactogenicity. Antibody responses were observed in most participants by day 14. IgG and neutralising antibody titres were dose-related (p=0·0003 for IgG ELISA and p<0·0001 for the 60% plaque-reduction neutralisation test [PRNT60] by linear trend). On day 28 at the 2 × 107 PFU dose, the geometric mean IgG ELISA endpoint titre was 1624 (95% CI 1146-2302) and seroconversion was 95·7% (95% CI 85·5-98·8); the geometric mean neutralising antibody titre by PRNT60 was 250 (176-355) and seroconversion was 95·7% (85·5-98·8). These robust immunological responses were sustained for 1 year. INTERPRETATION: rVSV∆G-ZEBOV-GP was well tolerated and stimulated a rapid onset of binding and neutralising antibodies, which were maintained through to day 360. The immunogenicity results support selection of the 2 × 107 PFU dose. FUNDING: Biomedical Advanced Research and Development Authority, US Department of Health and Human Services.


Assuntos
Vacinas contra Ebola/efeitos adversos , Vacinas contra Ebola/imunologia , Doença pelo Vírus Ebola/prevenção & controle , Adolescente , Adulto , Anticorpos Neutralizantes/sangue , Anticorpos Antivirais/sangue , Método Duplo-Cego , Portadores de Fármacos , Efeitos Colaterais e Reações Adversas Relacionados a Medicamentos/epidemiologia , Efeitos Colaterais e Reações Adversas Relacionados a Medicamentos/patologia , Vacinas contra Ebola/administração & dosagem , Vacinas contra Ebola/genética , Ebolavirus/genética , Ebolavirus/imunologia , Ensaio de Imunoadsorção Enzimática , Feminino , Vetores Genéticos , Voluntários Saudáveis , Humanos , Imunoglobulina G/sangue , Incidência , Injeções Intramusculares , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Testes de Neutralização , Placebos/administração & dosagem , Estados Unidos , Vacinas Sintéticas/administração & dosagem , Vacinas Sintéticas/efeitos adversos , Vacinas Sintéticas/genética , Vacinas Sintéticas/imunologia , Vesiculovirus/genética , Proteínas do Envelope Viral/genética , Proteínas do Envelope Viral/imunologia , Ensaio de Placa Viral , Adulto Jovem
3.
J Immunother ; 31(6): 545-54, 2008.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-18528300

RESUMO

Owing to the absence of alphaGal epitopes in human cells and constant stimulation of the immune system by the symbiotic bacterial flora, humans develop high titers of natural antibodies against these epitopes. It has been demonstrated that syngeneic whole cell vaccines modified to express alphaGal epitopes could be used to generate a potent anticancer vaccine. In this study, we tested whether allogeneic whole cell cancer vaccines modified to express alphaGal epitopes would be effective for the treatment of murine melanoma. The alpha(1,3)galactosyltransferase (alphaGT) knockout mice (H-2) with preexisting subcutaneous and pulmonary tumors [alphaGal B16, H-2] received therapeutic vaccinations with S91M3alphaGal (H-2) whole cell allogeneic vaccines. These mice had better survival and reduced pulmonary metastasis burden compared with control mice treated with S91M3 vaccine cells. Vaccination with S91M3alphaGal-induced cytotoxic CD8 T cells recognizing the syngeneic alphaGal B16 tumors measured by adoptive transfer to recipients bearing pulmonary metastases. The presence of allo-antigens did not dominate the induction of immunity to "cryptic" tumor antigens and had helped in the generation of a more efficient vaccine to treat preexisting tumors when compared with classic autologous vaccines. Vaccination with allogeneic alphaGal vaccines did not induce signs of toxicity including changes in weight, hematology, chemistry, and histopathology of major perfused organs or autoimmunity in long-term murine models for breast, lung, and melanoma. This study established the safety and efficacy data of allogeneic alphaGal whole cell vaccines and constituted the basis for the initiation of human clinical trials to treat human malignancies.


Assuntos
Vacinas Anticâncer/imunologia , Imunoterapia Adotiva , Melanoma Experimental/imunologia , Neoplasias Experimentais/terapia , Trissacarídeos/genética , Animais , Vacinas Anticâncer/toxicidade , Linhagem Celular Tumoral , Feminino , Neoplasias Pulmonares/secundário , Masculino , Camundongos , Camundongos Endogâmicos C57BL , Camundongos Endogâmicos DBA , Neoplasias Experimentais/imunologia , Neoplasias Cutâneas/terapia
4.
Cell Immunol ; 225(2): 113-21, 2003 Oct.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-14698145

RESUMO

We have shown that vaccination of animals with two distinct commonly used glioma cell lines, 9L and RT2, generated cross-reactive cellular anti-tumor immunity. Peripheral vaccination with either cell line 9L or RT2 resulted in MHC Class I restricted effector cells capable of in vitro cytolytic activity against both target 9L and RT2 cells but not the syngeneic F98 glioma cell line. In vitro cross-reactive cytolytic activity could be measured for as long as 6 months from the time of initial vaccination. Fractionation of splenic effector cells revealed the cytolytic activity to be CD8+ T-cell mediated but required CD4+ T-cells for effective antigen presentation. Anti-tumor immunity generated after vaccination with either 9L or RT2 was completely protective against subsequent subcutaneous inoculation of animals with either 9L or RT2 cells and resulted in prolonged survival in animals inoculated intracranially with either cell line. Our results suggest that despite the different methods used in their derivation, 9L and RT2 glioma cells share a common glioma antigen recognized by the cellular arm of the immune response.


Assuntos
Linfócitos T CD8-Positivos/imunologia , Glioma/imunologia , Imunoterapia Ativa , Animais , Morte Celular/imunologia , Citotoxicidade Imunológica , Feminino , Glioma/patologia , Glioma/terapia , Ratos , Ratos Endogâmicos F344 , Baço/imunologia , Baço/patologia
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA