A Risk Profile Using Simple Hematologic Parameters to Assess Benefits From Baricitinib in Patients Hospitalized With COVID-19: A Post Hoc Analysis of the Adaptive COVID-19 Treatment Trial-2.

BACKGROUND: The ACTT risk profile, which was developed from ACTT-1 (Adaptive COVID-19 Treatment Trial-1), demonstrated that hospitalized patients with COVID-19 in the high-risk quartile (characterized by low absolute lymphocyte count [ALC], high absolute neutrophil count [ANC], and low platelet count at baseline) benefited most from treatment with the antiviral remdesivir. It is unknown which patient characteristics are associated with benefit from treatment with the immunomodulator baricitinib. OBJECTIVE: To apply the ACTT risk profile to the ACTT-2 cohort to investigate potential baricitinib-related treatment effects by risk quartile. DESIGN: Post hoc analysis of ACTT-2, a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial. (ClinicalTrials.gov: NCT04401579). SETTING: Sixty-seven trial sites in 8 countries. PARTICIPANTS: Adults hospitalized with COVID-19 (n = 999; 85% U.S. participants). INTERVENTION: Baricitinib+remdesivir versus placebo+remdesivir. MEASUREMENTS: Mortality, progression to invasive mechanical ventilation (IMV) or death, and recovery, all within 28 days; ALC, ANC, and platelet count trajectories. RESULTS: In the high-risk quartile, baricitinib+remdesivir was associated with reduced risk for death (hazard ratio [HR], 0.38 [95% CI, 0.16 to 0.86]; P = 0.020), decreased progression to IMV or death (HR, 0.57 [CI, 0.35 to 0.93]; P = 0.024), and improved recovery rate (HR, 1.53 [CI, 1.16 to 2.02]; P = 0.002) compared with placebo+remdesivir. After 5 days, participants receiving baricitinib+remdesivir had significantly larger increases in ALC and significantly larger decreases in ANC compared with control participants, with the largest effects observed in the high-risk quartile. LIMITATION: Secondary analysis of data collected before circulation of current SARS-CoV-2 variants. CONCLUSION: The ACTT risk profile identifies a subgroup of hospitalized patients who benefit most from baricitinib treatment and captures a patient phenotype of treatment response to an immunomodulator and an antiviral. Changes in ALC and ANC trajectory suggest a mechanism whereby an immunomodulator limits severe COVID-19. PRIMARY FUNDING SOURCE: National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases.

SARS-CoV-2 RNA and nucleocapsid antigen are blood biomarkers associated with severe disease outcomes that improve in response to remdesivir.

BACKGROUND: Although antivirals remain important for the treatment COVID-19, methods to assess treatment efficacy are lacking. Here, we investigated the impact of remdesivir on viral dynamics and their contribution to understanding antiviral efficacy in the multicenter ACTT-1 clinical trial that randomized patients to remdesivir or placebo. METHODS: Longitudinal specimens collected during hospitalization from a substudy of 642 COVID-19 patients were measured for viral RNA (upper respiratory tract and plasma), viral nucleocapsid antigen (serum), and host immunologic markers. Associations with clinical outcomes and response to therapy were assessed. RESULTS: Higher baseline plasma viral loads were associated with poorer clinical outcomes, and decreases in viral RNA and antigen in blood but not the upper respiratory tract correlated with enhanced benefit from remdesivir. The treatment effect of remdesivir was most pronounced in patients with elevated baseline nucleocapsid antigen levels: the recovery rate ratio was 1.95 (95%CI 1.40-2.71) for levels >245 pg/ml vs 1.04 (95%CI 0.76-1.42) for levels < 245 pg/ml. Remdesivir also accelerated the rate of viral RNA and antigen clearance in blood, and patients whose blood levels decreased were more likely to recover and survive. CONCLUSIONS: Reductions in SARS-CoV-2 RNA and antigen levels in blood correlated with clinical benefit from antiviral therapy.

How do adjuvants enhance immune responses?

By altering which peptide antigens are presented to CD4+ T cells, adjuvants affect the specificity of the immune response.

Efficacy and immunogenicity following dengue virus-1 human challenge after a tetravalent prime-boost dengue vaccine regimen: an open-label, phase 1 trial.

BACKGROUND: Dengue human infection models (DHIMs) are important tools to down-select dengue vaccine candidates and establish tetravalent efficacy before advanced clinical field trials. We aimed to provide data for the safety and immunogenicity of DHIM and evaluate dengue vaccine efficacy. METHODS: We performed an open-label, phase 1 trial at the University of Maryland (Baltimore, MD, USA). Eligible participants were healthy individuals aged 18-50 years who either previously received a tetravalent dengue purified inactivated vaccine prime followed by a live-attenuated vaccine boost (ie, the vaccinee group), or were unvaccinated flavivirus-naive participants (ie, the control group). Participants in the vaccinee group with detectable pre-challenge dengue virus-1 neutralising antibody titres and flavivirus-naive participants in the control group were inoculated with dengue virus-1 strain 45AZ5 in the deltoid region, 27-65 months following booster dosing. These participants were followed-up from days 4-16 following dengue virus-1 live virus human challenge, with daily real-time quantitative PCR specific to dengue virus-1 RNA detection, and dengue virus-1 solicited local and systemic adverse events were recorded. The primary outcomes were safety (ie, solicited local and systemic adverse events) and vaccine efficacy (ie, dengue virus-1 RNAaemia) following dengue challenge. This study is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, number NCT04786457. FINDINGS: In January 2021, ten eligible participants were enrolled; of whom, six (60%) were in the vaccinee group and four (40%) were in the control group. Daily quantitative PCR detected dengue virus-1 RNA in nine (90%) of ten participants (five [83%] of six in the vaccinee group and all four [100%] in the control group). The mean onset of RNAaemia occurred on day 5 (SD 1·0) in the vaccinee group versus day 8 (1·5) in the control group (95% CI 1·1-4·9; p=0·007), with a trend towards reduced RNAaemia duration in the vaccinee group compared with the control group (8·2 days vs 10·5 days; 95% CI -0·08 to 4·68; p=0·056). Mild-to-moderate symptoms (nine [90%] of ten), leukopenia (eight [89%] of nine), and elevated aminotransferases (seven [78%] of nine) were commonly observed. Severe adverse events were detected only in the vaccinee group (fever ≥38·9°C in three [50%] of six, headache in one [17%], and transient grade 4 aspartate aminotransferase elevation in one [17%]). No deaths were reported. INTERPRETATION: Participants who had tetravalent dengue purified inactivated vaccine prime and live-attenuated vaccine boost were unprotected against dengue virus-1 infection and further showed increased clinical, immunological, and transcriptomic evidence for inflammation potentially mediated by pre-existing infection-enhancing antibodies. This study highlights the impact of small cohort, human challenge models studying dengue pathogenesis and downstream vaccine development. FUNDING: Military Infectious Disease Research Program and Medical Technology Enterprise Consortium and Advanced Technology International.