RESUMO
BACKGROUND: The World Health Organization (WHO) has approved the 11th Revision of the International Classification of Diseases (ICD-11). A version of the ICD-11 for Mental, Behavioural and Neurodevelopmental Disorders for use in clinical settings, called the Clinical Descriptions and Diagnostic Requirements (CDDR), has also been developed. The CDDR includes behavioural indicators (BIs) for assessing the severity of disorders of intellectual development (DID) as part of the section on neurodevelopmental disorders. Reliable and valid diagnostic assessment measures are needed to improve identification and treatment of individuals with DID. Although appropriately normed, standardised intellectual and adaptive behaviour assessments are considered the optimal assessment approach in this area, they are unavailable in many parts of the world. This field study tested the BIs internationally to assess the inter-rater reliability, concurrent validity, and clinical utility of the BIs for the assessment of DID. METHODS: This international study recruited a total of 206 children and adolescents (5-18 years old) with a suspected or established diagnosis of DID from four sites across three countries [Sri-Lanka (n = 57), Italy (n = 60) and two sites in India (n = 89)]. Two clinicians assessed each participant using the BIs with one conducting the clinical interview and the other observing. Diagnostic formulations using the BIs and clinical utility ratings were collected and entered independently after each assessment. At a follow-up appointment, standardised measures (Leiter-3, Vineland Adaptive Behaviour Scales-II) were used to assess intellectual and adaptive abilities. RESULTS: The BIs had excellent inter-rater reliability (intra-class correlations ranging from 0.91 to 0.97) and good to excellent concurrent validity (intra-class correlations ranging from 0.66 to 0.82) across sites. Compared to standardised measures, the BIs had more diagnostic overlap between intellectual and adaptive functioning. The BIs were rated as quick and easy to use and applicable across severities; clear and understandable with adequate to too much level of detail and specificity to describe DID; and useful for treatment selection, prognosis assessments, communication with other health care professionals, and education efforts. CONCLUSION: The inclusion of newly developed BIs within the CDDR for ICD-11 Neurodevelopmental Disorders must be supported by information on their reliability, validity, and clinical utility prior to their widespread adoption for international use. BIs were found to have excellent inter-rater reliability, good to excellent concurrent validity, and good clinical utility. This supports use of the BIs within the ICD-11 CDDR to assist with the accurate identification of individuals with DID, particularly in settings where specialised services are unavailable.
Assuntos
Classificação Internacional de Doenças , Transtornos do Neurodesenvolvimento , Adaptação Psicológica , Adolescente , Criança , Pré-Escolar , Humanos , Itália , Reprodutibilidade dos TestesRESUMO
BACKGROUND: Despite the high prevalence of mental disorders, mental health literacy has been comparatively neglected. People's symptom-management strategies will be influenced by their mental health literacy. This study sought to determine the feasibility of using the World Health Organization mhGAP-Intervention Guide (IG) as an educational tool for one-on-one contact in a clinical setting to increase literacy on the specified mental disorders. METHODS: This study was conducted in 20 health facilities in Makueni County, southeast Kenya which has one of the poorest economies in Kenya. It has no psychiatrist or clinical psychologist. We recruited 3267 participants from a community that had already been exposed to community mental health services. We used Mental Health Knowledge Schedule to measure the changing patterns of mental health knowledge after a period of 3 months, following a training intervention using the WHO mhGAP-IG. RESULTS: Overall, there was a significant increase in mental health related knowledge [mean range 22.4-23.5 for both post-test and pre-test scores (p < 0.001)]. This increase varied with various socio-demographic characteristics such as sex, marital status, level of education, employment status and wealth index. CONCLUSIONS: mhGAP-IG is a feasible tool to increase mental health literacy in low-resource settings where there are no mental health specialists. Our study lends evidence that the WHO Mental Health Action Plan 2013-2020 and reduction of the treatment gap may be accelerated by the use of mhGAP-IG through improving knowledge about mental illness and potentially subsequent help seeking for early diagnosis and treatment.
Assuntos
Conhecimentos, Atitudes e Prática em Saúde , Transtornos Mentais/psicologia , Saúde Mental/educação , Adulto , Serviços Comunitários de Saúde Mental , Letramento em Saúde , Humanos , Entrevista Psicológica , Quênia/epidemiologia , Masculino , Transtornos Mentais/epidemiologia , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Inquéritos e Questionários , Organização Mundial da Saúde , Adulto JovemRESUMO
AimsStigma can have a negative impact on help-seeking behaviour, treatment adherence and recovery of people with mental disorders. This study aimed to determine the feasibility of the WHO Mental Health Treatment Gap Interventions Guidelines (mhGAP-IG) to reduce stigma in face-to-face contacts during interventions for specific DSM-IV/ICD 10 diagnoses over a 6-month period. METHODS: This study was conducted in 20 health facilities across Makueni County in southeast Kenya which has one of the poorest economies in the country and has no psychiatrist or clinical psychologist. We recruited 2305 participants from the health facilities catchment areas that had already been exposed to community mental health services. We measured stigma using DISC-12 at baseline, followed by training to the health professionals on intervention using the WHO mhGAP-IG and then conducted a follow-up DISC-12 assessment after 6 months. Proper management of the patients by the trained professionals would contribute to the reduction of stigma in the patients. RESULTS: There was 59.5% follow-up at 6 months. Overall, there was a significant decline in 'reported/experienced discrimination' following the interventions. A multivariate linear mixed model regression indicated that better outcomes of 'unfair treatment' scores were associated with: being married, low education, being young, being self-employed, higher wealth index and being diagnosed with depression. For 'stopping self' domain, better outcomes were associated with being female, married, employed, young, lower wealth index and a depression diagnosis. In regards to 'overcoming stigma' domain; being male, being educated, employed, higher wealth index and being diagnosed with depression was associated with better outcomes. CONCLUSIONS: The statistically significant (p < 0.05) reduction of discrimination following the interventions by trained health professionals suggest that the mhGAP-IG may be a useful tool for reduction of discrimination in rural settings in low-income countries.
Assuntos
Serviços de Saúde Comunitária , Agentes Comunitários de Saúde , Discriminação Psicológica , Disparidades em Assistência à Saúde , Transtornos Mentais/diagnóstico , Guias de Prática Clínica como Assunto , Atenção Primária à Saúde , Estigma Social , Adulto , Manual Diagnóstico e Estatístico de Transtornos Mentais , Estudos de Viabilidade , Feminino , Humanos , Quênia , Transtornos Mentais/psicologia , Saúde Mental , Projetos Piloto , Atenção Primária à Saúde/normas , População RuralRESUMO
OBJECTIVES: (1) To determine the feasibility and effectiveness of nurses and clinical officers in using the mental health Global Action Programme Intervention Guide (mhGAP-IG) as an intervention tool in reducing disability, improving quality of life in the clinical outcomes in patients with the mhGAP-IG priority mental disorders in a Kenyan rural setting. (2) To identify any gaps that can be contributed towards future research. METHODS: This study was conducted in 20 healthcare facilities across Makueni County in the South East of Kenya. This county had a population of approximately one million people, with no psychiatrist or clinical psychologist. We recruited 2306 participants from the healthcare facilities in the catchment areas that had previously been exposed to the community mental health awareness campaigns, while being subjected to screening for the mhGAP-IG disorders. We used the Mini-International Neuropsychiatric Interview for adults (MINI-Plus) for DSM-IV confirmatory diagnosis on those who screened positive on the mhGAP-IG. We measured disability using WHO-Disability Assessment Schedule II (DAS II), Quality of Life (QoL) using the WHO QoL-BREF, depression using Patient Health Questionnaire (PHQ-9), suicidality using The Beck Suicide Scale (BSS), psychosis using the Washington Early Recognition Center Affectivity and Psychosis (WERCAP), epilepsy using a seizure questionnaire and alcohol and substance abuse using The Alcohol, Smoking and Substance Involvement Screening Test (ASSIST). These measurements were at the baseline, followed by the training for the health professionals on using the WHO mhGAP-IG as an interventional tool. The measurements were repeated at 3 and 6â¯months post-intervention. RESULTS: Of the 2306 participants enrolled in the study, we followed 1718 at 3â¯months and 1371 at 6â¯months a follow-up rate of 74.5% and 59.4% respectively. All participants received psycho-education and most depending on condition also received medication. Overall, there was significant decline in disabilities, improvement in seizure control and improvement in clinical outcomes on the identified mental disorders. CONCLUSIONS: Trained, supervised and supported nurses and clinical officers can produce good outcomes using the mhGAP-IG for mental health.