Dorsal root ganglion stimulation (DRG-s) for potential resolution of restless leg syndrome symptoms and increased cost savings for patients: A case study.

INTRODUCTION: We report successful use of dorsal root ganglion stimulation (DRG-s) to treat a patient with persistent symptoms of restless leg syndrome (RLS). METHODS: The treatment involved the placement of a small device millimeters away from the patient's DRG, which are nerves near the spinal cord that carry sensory information from the periphery of the body to the brain. The device automatically delivers electrical impulse to the DRG to alter and decrease pain perception in the brain. RESULTS: Our case report elucidates the use of this procedure as a targeted therapy for RLS, with a nearly 90% reduction in reported symptoms in our patient, thus potentially reducing morbidity associated with this condition. Furthermore, we report a 10-year cost savings of nearly $90,000 following DRG-s for our patient. CONCLUSION: This case study aims to demonstrate the effectiveness of DRG-s neuromodulation in managing RLS, a condition that is often difficult and costly to treat.

Advances in radiofrequency ablation for thoracic spine pain.

Radiofrequency ablation (RFA) is a neuromodulation technique that uses electrocautery to damage nerves with thermal energy and interrupt nociception and has primarily been used to treat patients with chronic back pain. While the use of RFA to modulate neuronal innervation of cervical and lumbar facet joints is well studied, research on the applications of RFA to target the thoracic spine is limited despite these facet joints accounting for pain in over 25% of patients with chronic mid-back and upper-back pain. The purpose of this paper is thus to describe RFA and its utilization in the thoracic spine for chronic back pain. A review of the literature on PubMed was conducted to identify primary evidence for RFA with a focus on only the thoracic spine. Nine papers were identified and reviewed in this article. Primary literature published on RFA-naive patients with thoracic facet joint pain has provided evidence in support of RFA for short-term and long-term pain relief in this spinal region. However, all but two of these studies utilized a cohort study design. Future studies with larger patient cohorts or that utilize a randomized control trial study design are crucial to better establish the effectiveness and long-term utility of this neuromodulation technique.

A scoping review of bacterial resistance among inpatients amidst the COVID-19 pandemic.

OBJECTIVES: The COVID-19 pandemic disrupted antimicrobial stewardship and infection prevention operations worldwide, raising concerns for an acceleration of antimicrobial resistance (AMR). Therefore, we aimed to define the scope of peer reviewed research comparing AMR in inpatient bacterial clinical cultures before and after the start of the COVID-19 pandemic. METHODS: We conducted a scoping review and searched PubMed, Scopus, and Web of Science through 15 June 2023. Our inclusion criteria were: (1) English language, (2) primary evidence, (3) peer-reviewed, (4) clinical culture data from humans, (5) AMR data for at least one bacterial order/species, (6) inpatient setting, (7) use of statistical testing to evaluate AMR data before and during the COVID-19 pandemic. Reviewers extracted country, study design, type of analysis, study period, setting and population, number of positive cultures or isolates, culture type(s), method of AMR analysis, organisms, and AMR results. Study results were organised by organism and antibiotic class or resistance mechanism. AMR results are also summarised by individual study and across all studies. RESULTS: In total, 4805 articles were identified with 55 papers meeting inclusion criteria. Acinetobacter baumannii, Escherichia coli, Klebsiella pneumoniae, Pseudomonas aeruginosa, and Staphylococcus aureus were the most commonly studied organisms. There were 464 bacterial AMR results across all studies with 82 (18%) increase, 71 (15%) decrease, and 311 (67%) no change results. CONCLUSIONS: The literature examining the impact of COVID-19 on AMR among inpatients is diverse with most results reflecting no change pre/post pandemic. Ongoing inquiry is needed into evolving patterns in AMR post COVID-19.

Neuromodulation Techniques for Headache Management.

This narrative review aims to summarize evidence regarding the current utilization and future applications of neuromodulation in patients with headaches, with special attention paid to migraine and chronic cluster headache. A search was conducted in PubMed in August of 2023 to survey the current literature on neuromodulation for the treatment of headache. In total, the search yielded 1989 results, which were further filtered to include only systematic reviews published between 2022 to 2023 to capture the most up-to-date and comprehensive research on this topic. The citation lists of these articles were reviewed to find additional research on neuromodulation and supplement the results presented in this paper with primary literature. Research on the use of neuromodulation for the treatment of headache has predominantly focused on four neuromodulation techniques: peripheral nerve stimulation (PNS), transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS), deep brain stimulation (DBS), and spinal cord stimulation (SCS). Outcome measures reported in this article include impact on migraine and headache frequency and/or pain intensity, adverse effects of the neuromodulation technique, and associated costs, when available. We found that neuromodulation has developed utility as an alternative treatment for both chronic cluster headaches and migraines, with a reduction in frequency and intensity of headache most elucidated from the articles mentioned in this review.

Refining Patient-Centered Measures of End-of-Life Care Quality for Children With Cancer.

PURPOSE: There are no existing quality measures (QMs) to optimize end-of-life care for children with cancer. Previously, we developed a set of 26 candidate QMs. Our primary objective in this study was to achieve stakeholder consensus on priority measures. METHODS: We conducted an iterative, cross-sectional electronic survey, using a modified Delphi method to build consensus among clinician and family stakeholders. In each of the two rounds of surveys, stakeholders were asked to rate QMs on a 9-point Likert scale, on the basis of perceived importance. Health care professionals were additionally asked to rate measures on perceived feasibility. After each round, we computed median scores on importance and feasibility of measurement, retaining QMs with median importance scores ≥ 8. RESULTS: Twenty-five participants completed both rounds of the survey. In round 1, participants were asked to rate 26 QMs; nine QMs, including QMs pertaining to health care use, were removed because of median importance scores < 8. Two new measures were proposed for consideration in round 2, on the basis of participant feedback. Following round 2, 17 QMs were ultimately retained. QMs related to symptom screening and palliative care consultation were rated highly in importance and feasibility. QMs related to communication were rated highly important, yet less feasible. Measuring whether a patient's needs were heard by their health care team was rated among the least feasible. CONCLUSION: Childhood cancer stakeholders prioritized QMs pertaining to patient-reported outcomes, deeming measures of health care resource use less important. Future research should seek to develop novel tools for quality assessment to enhance feasibility of implementing priority measures.

A Stakeholder-Driven Qualitative Study to Define High Quality End-of-Life Care for Children With Cancer.

CONTEXT: Among adults with cancer, measures for high quality end-of-life care (EOLC) include avoidance of hospitalizations near end of life. For children with cancer, no measures exist to evaluate or improve EOLC, and adult quality measures may not apply. OBJECTIVE: We engaged key stakeholders to explore EOLC priorities for children with cancer and their families, and to examine relevance of existing adult EOLC quality measures for children with cancer. METHODS: In a multicenter qualitative study, we conducted interviews and focus groups with: adolescents and young adults (AYAs) with advanced cancer, parents of children with advanced cancer, bereaved parents, and interdisciplinary healthcare professionals. We transcribed, coded, and employed thematic analysis to summarize findings. RESULTS: We enrolled 54 stakeholders (25 parents [including 12 bereaved parents], 10 AYAs, and 19 healthcare professionals). Participants uniformly prioritized direct communication with children about preferences and prognosis, interdisciplinary care, symptom management, and honoring family preference for location of death. Many participants valued access to the emergency department or hospital for symptom management or supportive care, which diverges from measures for high quality EOLC in adults. Most wished to avoid mechanical ventilation and cardiopulmonary resuscitation. Notably, participants generally valued hospice; however, few understood hospice care or had utilized its services. CONCLUSION: Childhood cancer stakeholders define high quality EOLC primarily through person-centered measures, characterizing half of existing adult-focused measures as limited in relevance to children. Future research should focus on developing techniques for person-centered quality measurement to capture attributes of greatest importance to children with cancer and their families.