Identification of epigenetic modifiers essential for growth and survival of AML1/ETO-positive leukemia.

Aberrant gene expression patterns in acute myeloid leukemia (AML) with balanced chromosomal translocations are often associated with dysregulation of epigenetic modifiers. The AML1/ETO (RUNX1/MTG8) fusion protein, caused by the translocation (8;21)(q22;q22), leads to the epigenetic repression of its target genes. We aimed in this work to identify critical epigenetic modifiers, on which AML1/ETO-positive AML cells depend on for proliferation and survival using shRNA library screens and global transcriptomics approaches. Using shRNA library screens, we identified 41 commonly depleted genes in two AML1/ETO-positive cell lines Kasumi-1 and SKNO-1. We validated, genetically and pharmacologically, DNMT1 and ATR using several AML1/ETO-positive and negative cell lines. We also demonstrated in vivo differentiation of myeloblasts after treatment with the DNMT1 inhibitor decitabine in a patient with an AML1/ETO-positive AML. Bioinformatic analysis of global transcriptomics after AML1/ETO induction in 9/14/18-U937 cells identified 973 differentially expressed genes (DEGs). Three genes (PARP2, PRKCD, and SMARCA4) were both downregulated after AML1/ETO induction, and identified in shRNA screens. In conclusion, using unbiased shRNA library screens and global transcriptomics, we have identified several driver epigenetic regulators for proliferation in AML1/ETO-positive AML. DNMT1 and ATR were validated and are susceptible to pharmacological inhibition by small molecules showing promising preclinical and clinical efficacy.

In vivo kinetics of early, non-random methylome and transcriptome changes induced by DNA-hypomethylating treatment in primary AML blasts.

Despite routine use of DNA-hypomethylating agents (HMAs) in AML/MDS therapy, their mechanisms of action are not yet unraveled. Pleiotropic effects of HMAs include global methylome and transcriptome changes. We asked whether in blasts and T-cells from AML patients HMA-induced in vivo demethylation and remethylation occur randomly or non-randomly, and whether gene demethylation is associated with gene induction. Peripheral blood AML blasts from patients receiving decitabine (20 mg/m2 day 1-5) were serially isolated for methylome analyses (days 0, 8 and 15, n = 28) and methylome-plus-transcriptome analyses (days 0 and 8, n = 23), respectively. T-cells were isolated for methylome analyses (days 0 and 8; n = 16). We noted massive, non-random demethylation at day 8, which was variable between patients. In contrast, T-cells disclosed a thousand-fold lesser, random demethylation, indicating selectivity of the demethylation for the malignant blasts. The integrative analysis of DNA demethylation and transcript induction revealed 87 genes displaying a significant inverse correlation, e.g. the tumor suppressor gene IFI27, whose derepression was validated in two AML cell lines. These results support HMA-induced, non-random early in vivo demethylation events in AML blasts associated with gene induction. Larger patient cohorts are needed to determine whether a demethylation signature may be predictive for response to this treatment.