Immunology of Diabetes Society T-Cell Workshop: HLA class II tetramer-directed epitope validation initiative.

BACKGROUND: Islet-antigen-specific CD4+ T cells are known to promote auto-immune destruction in T1D. Measuring T-cell number and function provides an important biomarker. In response to this need, we evaluated responses to proinsulin and GAD epitopes in a multicentre study. METHODS: A tetramer-based assay was used in five participating centres to measure T-cell reactivities to DR0401-restricted epitopes. Three participating centres concurrently performed ELISPOT or immunoblot assays. Each centre used blind-coded, centrally distributed peptide and tetramer reagents. RESULTS: All participating centres detected responses to auto-antigens and the positive control antigen, and in some cases cloned the corresponding T cells. However, response rates varied among centres. In total, 74% of patients were positive for at least one islet epitope. The most commonly recognized epitope was GAD270-285. Only a minority of the patients tested by tetramer and ELISPOT were concordant for both assays. CONCLUSIONS: This study successfully detected GAD and proinsulin responses using centrally distributed blind-coded reagents. Centres with little previous experience using class II tetramer reagents implemented the assay. The variability in response rates observed for different centres suggests technical difficulties and/or heterogeneity within the local patient populations tested. Dual analysis by tetramer and ELISPOT or immunoblot assays was frequently discordant, suggesting that these assays detect distinct cell populations. Future efforts should investigate shared blood samples to evaluate assay reproducibility and longitudinal samples to identify changes in T-cell phenotype that correlate with changes in disease course.

Comparison of cryopreservation methods on T-cell responses to islet and control antigens from type 1 diabetic patients and controls.

BACKGROUND: Type 1 diabetes (T1D) is a cell-mediated autoimmune disease characterized by destruction of the pancreatic islet cells. The use of cryopreserved cells is preferable to the use of freshly isolated cells to monitor clinical trials to decrease assay and laboratory variability. METHODS: The T-Cell Workshop Committee of the Immunology of Diabetes Society compared two widely accepted T-cell freezing protocols (warm and cold) to freshly isolated peripheral blood mononuclear cells from patients with T1D and controls in terms of recovery, viability, cell subset composition, and performance in functional assays currently in use in T1D-related research. Nine laboratories participated in the study with four different functional assays included. RESULTS: The cold freezing method yielded higher recovery and viability compared with the warm freezing method. Irrespective of freezing protocol, B cells and CD8+ T cells were enriched, monocyte fraction decreased, and islet antigen-reactive responses were lower in frozen versus fresh cells. However, these results need to take in to account that the overall response to islet autoantigens was low in some assays. CONCLUSIONS: In the current study, none of the tested T-cell functional assays performed well using frozen samples. More research is required to identify a freezing method and a T-cell functional assay that will produce responses in patients with T1D comparable to responses using fresh peripheral blood mononuclear cells.

Changes in GAD65Ab-specific antiidiotypic antibody levels correlate with changes in C-peptide levels and progression to islet cell autoimmunity.

CONTEXT: The previously reported absence of 65-kDa glutamate decarboxylase antibody (GAD65Ab)-specific antiidiotypic antibodies (anti-Id) in type 1 diabetes (T1D) patients at clinical onset could be due to an inability to mount an antibody response to GAD65Ab or a longitudinal decline in anti-Id levels. OBJECTIVE AND DESIGN: We investigated anti-Id levels in longitudinal samples obtained from T1D patients (n = 41) (clinical diagnosis - 12 months), and latent autoimmune diabetes in adults (LADA) patients (n = 32) who received alum-formulated human recombinant GAD65 (baseline - 12 months). We also determined anti-Id levels in a small cohort of Type 2 diabetes patients during their development of autoimmune T cell responses. RESULTS: At clinical onset T1D patients presented no or low anti-Id levels. However, 22/41 T1D patients showed ≥50% increase in GAD65Ab-specific anti-Id levels during follow-up; peaking at 3 (n = 1), 6 (n = 10), 9 (n = 10), or 12 (n = 1) months. Increasing anti-Id levels marked patients who experienced a temporary increase in C-peptide levels. Anti-Id levels correlated significantly with glycated hemoglobin and C-peptide levels at 6 and 9 months (P values ranged from <0.001 to <0.05). In LADA patients receiving placebo, anti-Id levels declined in seven of nine patients, whereas four of five patients receiving 20 µg alum-formulated human recombinant GAD65 showed increasing anti-Id levels. Changes in anti-Id and C-peptide levels closely correlated (P < 0.0001). The significant decline in anti-Id levels (P = 0.03) in T2D patients developing T cell autoimmune responses supports our hypothesis that declining anti-Id levels are associated with developing islet autoimmunity. CONCLUSIONS: The close association between GAD65Ab-specific anti-Id levels and ß-cell function may provide a novel marker for the progression of autoimmune diabetes.