Right sided colorectal cancer increases with age and screening should be tailored to reflect this: a national cancer database study.

BACKGROUND: In the United States, colorectal cancer (CRC) screening and surveillance is recommended until age 75. However, rates of surgery for CRC are greatest in the elderly, questioning current guidelines. Tumor sidedness is an emerging prognostic marker that may help guide screening and treatment decisions, with specific benefit evaluating CRC anatomic distribution in the elderly. Our objective was to investigate the anatomical distribution of CRC in the elderly and factors associated with right-sidedness. METHODS: The National Cancer Database (2004-2016) was used to identify elderly patients with CRC. Cases were stratified by tumor sidedness and elderly subgroups: 65-74, 75-84, and ≥ 85 years of age, and further categorized by primary site. Multivariate analysis identified factors associated with CRC right-sidedness. The outcomes were CRC sidedness in the elderly, the anatomic distribution by age group, and factors associated with right-sidedness. RESULTS: There were 508,219 colorectal cancer patients aged over 65 years identified, 54% of whom had a right-sided cancer. The right-sided incidence rates by age group were 49% (65-74 years), 58.2% (75-84 years), and 65.9% (≥ 85 years) (p < 0.001). Variables associated with right-sidedness were age (OR 1.032; 95% CI 1.031-1.033; p < 0.001), female sex (OR 1.541; 95% CI 1.522-1.561; p < 0.001), Medicare (OR 1.023, 95% CI 1.003-1.043; p = 0.027), year of diagnosis ≥ 2010 (OR 1.133; 95% CI 1.119-1.147; p < 0.001), tumor size > 5 cm (OR 1.474; 95% CI 1.453-1.495; p < 0.001), pathologic stage IV (OR 1.036; 95% CI 1.012-1.060; p = 0.003). CONCLUSIONS: We found higher rates of right-sided colon cancer in the 75 and above age group. This is a population who would benefit greatly from a high-quality and complete colonoscopy for early diagnosis. As screening and surveillance for this age group are not currently recommended, our findings question the lack of universal recommendation of colonoscopy in patients over 75 years old. Guidelines for CRC screening and surveillance should consider the colon cancer right-shift in the elderly population. Based on these results, we recommend thorough assessment of the proximal colon in the elderly.

Frailty in older patients undergoing emergency colorectal surgery: USA National Surgical Quality Improvement Program analysis.

BACKGROUND: Frailty is associated with advancing age and may result in adverse postoperative outcomes. A suspected growing elderly population needing emergency colorectal surgery stimulated this study of the prevalence and impact of frailty. METHODS: Elderly patients (defined as aged at least 65 years by Medicare and the United States Census Bureau) who underwent emergency colorectal resection between 2012 and 2016 were identified from the American College of Surgeons National Surgical Quality Improvement Program population database. The five-item modified frailty index (mFI-5) score was calculated, and patients stratified into groups 0, 1 or 2 + . Main outcome measures were the prevalence of frailty, and its impact on 30-day postoperative morbidity, mortality, reoperation, duration of hospital stay (LOS), discharge destination and readmission. RESULTS: A total of 10 025 patients were identified with a median age 75 years, of whom 41·8 per cent were men. The majority (87·7 per cent) had an ASA fitness grade of III or greater and 3129 (31·2 per cent) were frail (mFI-5 group 2+). Major morbidity occurred in one-third of patients and the postoperative mortality rate was 15·9 per cent. Some 52·0 per cent of patients had a prolonged hospital stay and 11·0 per cent were readmitted. Although most patients (88·0 per cent) lived independently before surgery, only 45·4 per cent were discharged home directly. Frailty (mFI-5 2+) predicted mortality, overall and major morbidity, reoperation, prolonged LOS, discharge to an institution and readmission, but frailty was independent of sex. CONCLUSION: Frailty is associated with morbidity, mortality and loss of independence in elderly patients needing emergency colorectal surgery.

ANTECEDENTES: la fragilidad se asocia con la edad avanzada y puede ocasionar resultados adversos postoperatorios. Un presunto aumento de la población mayor que necesita cirugía colorrectal urgente fue el motivo de efectuar este estudio sobre la prevalencia e impacto de la fragilidad. MÉTODOS: Pacientes mayores (definidos como ≥ 65 años por Medicare y la Oficina del Censo de los Estados Unidos) sometidos a resección colorrectal de urgencia fueron identificados a partir de la base de datos poblacional del ACS-NSQIP desde 2012 a 2016. Se calculó el índice de fragilidad modificado de 5 factores (5-factor modified frailty index, mFI-5), y los pacientes se estratificaron en grupos de 0, 1, y 2+. Las medidas de los resultados principales fueron la prevalencia y el impacto de la fragilidad en la morbilidad postoperatoria a los 30 días, mortalidad, reoperación, duración de la estancia hospitalaria (length of stay, LOS), destino al alta y reingreso. RESULTADOS: De 10.131 pacientes, 31,2% (n = 3.129) eran frágiles/mFI-5 de 2+ con una mediana de edad de 75 años y 41,8% eran varones. La mayoría tenían una puntuación ASA 3 o mayor (n = 87,7%), aparecieron complicaciones mayores en un tercio de los pacientes y la mortalidad postoperatoria fue del 15,9%. Se observó una LOS prolongada en 52,0% y 11,0% fueron reingresados. Aunque la gran mayoría (88%) vivían de forma independiente antes de la cirugía, solo el 45,4% fueron dados de alta directamente a su domicilio. Un mFI-5 of 2+ predijo mortalidad, morbilidad global y mayor, reoperación, LOS prolongada, alta a una institución, y reingreso, pero la fragilidad fue independiente del género. CONCLUSIÓN: La fragilidad se asoció con morbilidad, mortalidad y pérdida de independencia en pacientes mayores que necesitan cirugía colorrectal de urgencia.

Evaluating the association of the new National Surgical Quality Improvement Program modified 5-factor frailty index with outcomes in elective colorectal surgery.

BACKGROUND: The 5-factor modified frailty index (mFI-5) is a new, NSQIP-based, predictive tool for mortality and postoperative complications. The mFI-5's predictive ability has been validated within the large-scale NSQIP database but applicability in institutional databases has not been investigated. We sought to assess the association between the mFI-5 and morbidity/mortality at the institutional level. METHODS: A divisional database was queried for 2017 elective colorectal resections and an mFI-5 calculated. The main outcome measure was the association and predictive value of the mFI-5 with major morbidity/mortality and minor complications. Univariable analyses were performed via the Cochran-Armitage Test and Cramer's V. Logistic regression evaluated the relationship between the mFI-5 and morbidity/mortality while accounting for demographics and pre-operative risk factors. Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves were plotted to visualize the predictive strength for outcomes. RESULTS: Four hundred and twelve patients were analyzed. 8.7% had major morbidity/mortality and 31.6% minor complications. The mFI-5 categorized patients into 0 (n = 335), 1 (n = 58), and 2+ (n = 19) groups. Univariable analysis showed a higher mFI-5 was associated significantly with major morbidity/mortality (P = 0.004), but not minor (P = 0.281). Multivariable logistic regression showed a strong association between an mFI-5 score of 2+ with major complications (Major: OR = 4.616, CI [1.442-14.776], P = 0.010). ROC curves showed the mFI-5 was poor for predicting outcomes and performed better when other risk factors were added to the model. CONCLUSION: The mFI-5 tool has an independent association with major morbidity/mortality in an institutional dataset for elective colorectal surgery, but is not predictive. Its predictive ability is enhanced when other patient-specific risk factors are incorporated.

Restorative surgery for ulcerative colitis in the elderly: an analysis of ileal pouch-anal anastomosis procedures from the American College of Surgeons National Surgical Quality Improvement Program.

BACKGROUND: Ileal pouch-anal anastomosis (IPAA) for ulcerative colitis (UC) can be performed as either 2- or 3-stage procedure. IPAA in the elderly has been reported as safe and feasible, but little work to date has assessed outcomes by procedure. The aim of our study was to assess use and short-term outcomes of 2- and 3-stage IPAA in older adults. METHODS: The American College of Surgeons National Surgical Quality Improvement Program (ACS-NSQIP) Database was searched for ≥ 65-year-old patients who underwent IPAA for UC in 2- or 3-stage from 2012 to 2016. The primary endpoint was the rate and trends of the two approaches over time. Secondary endpoints included 30-day adverse events and complication-associated costs. RESULTS: Overall, 123 patients were included: 77.5% (n = 83) 2-stage and 40 (32.5%) 3-stage IPAA. Mean age was 68.7 ± 3.9 years, with 43 (34.9%) women. The use of the 3-stage IPAA increased over time (18.8% in 2012 vs. 33.3% in 2016), with decreasing use of 2-stage IPAA (81.3% vs. 66.7%, p < 0.001). The morbidity associated with the procedures decreased over time, overall (81.3% in 2012 and 51.5% in 2016, p < 0.001) and in each group individually. No differences were observed in postoperative complications across groups (45.8% 2-stage, 32.5% 3-stage). The overall mean costs of care when no postoperative complications occurred was $25,910, vs. $38,577 when any complication occurred (p < 0.001), but no differences were observed between groups. CONCLUSION: In a national analysis, there was a trend of increasing 3-stage vs. 2-stage IPAA for UC in older Americans. Complications and complication-associated costs were comparable across approaches, suggesting that the choice of procedure type should be based on the specific patient comorbidities and surgeon preferences.

Restorative surgery for ulcerative colitis in the elderly: an analysis of ileal pouch-anal anastomosis procedures from the American College of Surgeons National Surgical Quality Improvement Program.

BACKGROUND: Ileal pouch-anal anastomosis (IPAA) for ulcerative colitis(UC) can be performed as either 2- or 3-stage procedure. IPAA in the elderly has been reported as safe and feasible, but little work to date has assessed outcomes by procedure. The aim of our study was to assess use and short-term outcomes of 2- and 3-stage IPAA in older adults. METHODS: The American College of Surgeons National Surgical Quality Improvement Program (ACS-NSQIP) database was searched for ≥ 65-year-old patients who underwent IPAA for UC in 2- or 3-stage from 2012 to 2016. The primary endpoint was the rate and trends of the two approaches over time. Secondary endpoints included 30-day adverse events and complication-associated costs. RESULTS: Overall, 123 patients were included: 77.5% (n = 83) 2-stage and 40 (32.5%) 3-stage IPAA. Mean age was 68.7 ± 3.9 years, with 43 (34.9%) women. The use of the 3-stage IPAA increased over time (18.8% in 2012 vs. 33.3% in 2016), with decreasing use of 2-stage IPAA(81.3% vs. 66.7%, p < 0.001). The morbidity associated with the procedures decreased over time, overall (81.3% in 2012 and 51.5% in 2016, p < 0.001) and in each group individually. No differences were observed in postoperative complications across groups (45.8% 2-stage, 32.5% 3-stage). The overall mean costs of care when no postoperative complications occurred was $25,910, vs. $38,577 when any complication occurred (p < 0.001), but no differences were observed between groups. CONCLUSIONS: In a national analysis, there was a trend of increasing 3-stage vs. 2-stage IPAA for UC in older Americans. Complications and complication-associated costs were comparable across approaches, suggesting that the choice of procedure type should be based on the specific patient comorbidities and surgeon preferences.

Analysis of the impact of EEA stapler size on risk of anastomotic complications in colorectal anastomosis: does size matter?

BACKGROUND: Colorectal anastomotic complications are dreaded and dramatically affect outcomes. Causes are multifactorial, with the size of the end-to-end anastomosis (EEA) stapler a modifiable factor and potential target for risk reduction. Our goal was to examine the impact of the EEA stapler size on the risk of anastomotic complications in left-sided colorectal resections. METHODS: A prospective divisional database was reviewed for consecutive elective left-sided resections with a colorectal anastomosis using an EEA stapler from January 2013 May 2018 inclusive. Patients were stratified into 25-29 mm or 30-33 mm cohorts. Patient and disease demographics, operative variables, and postoperative outcomes were evaluated. The main outcome measures were the rate and factors associated with anastomotic complications. RESULTS: Four hundred seventy-three cases were evaluated, 185 ( 39.1%) were in the 25-29 mm group and 288 (60.9%) in the 30-33 mm group. Patients were comparable in demographics and operative variables. More males were anastomosed with the 30-33 mm than with the 25-29 mm stapler (57.6% vs 28.6%, p < 0.01). Significantly more patients developed an anastomotic stricture with the 25-29 mm than with the 30-33 mm staplers (7.1% vs. 2.1%; p = 0.007). There was no significant difference in leak rates or reoperation/interventions between groups. On logistic regression, neither gender, operative indication nor approach were associated with anastomotic leak, readmission, or reoperation/intervention. Stapler size remained significantly associated with stricture (p = 0.032). CONCLUSIONS: The 25-29 mm EEA staplers were associated with an increased rate of anastomotic stricture compared to 30-33 mm staplers in left-sided colorectal anastomoses. As stapler size is a simple process measure that is easily modifyable, this is a potential target for improving anastomotic complication rates. Further controlled trials may help assess the impact of stapler size on improving patient and quality outcomes.